Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination
Summary Stigma and discrimination in relation to mental illnesses have been described as having worse consequences than the conditions themselves. Most medical literature in this area of research has been descriptive and has focused on attitudes towards people with mental illness rather than on inte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2016-03, Vol.387 (10023), p.1123-1132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1132 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10023 |
container_start_page | 1123 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 387 |
creator | Thornicroft, Graham, Prof Mehta, Nisha, MBBS Clement, Sarah, PhD Evans-Lacko, Sara, PhD Doherty, Mary, MBBS Rose, Diana, Prof Koschorke, Mirja, PhD Shidhaye, Rahul, PhD O'Reilly, Claire, PhD Henderson, Claire, PhD |
description | Summary Stigma and discrimination in relation to mental illnesses have been described as having worse consequences than the conditions themselves. Most medical literature in this area of research has been descriptive and has focused on attitudes towards people with mental illness rather than on interventions to reduce stigma. In this narrative Review, we summarise what is known globally from published systematic reviews and primary data on effective interventions intended to reduce mental-illness-related stigma or discrimination. The main findings emerging from this narrative overview are that: (1) at the population level there is a fairly consistent pattern of short-term benefits for positive attitude change, and some lesser evidence for knowledge improvement; (2) for people with mental illness, some group-level anti-stigma inventions show promise and merit further assessment; (3) for specific target groups, such as students, social-contact-based interventions usually achieve short-term (but less clearly long-term) attitudinal improvements, and less often produce knowledge gains; (4) this is a heterogeneous field of study with few strong study designs with large sample sizes; (5) research from low-income and middle-income countries is conspicuous by its relative absence; (6) caution needs to be exercised in not overgeneralising lessons from one target group to another; (7) there is a clear need for studies with longer-term follow-up to assess whether initial gains are sustained or attenuated, and whether booster doses of the intervention are needed to maintain progress; (8) few studies in any part of the world have focused on either the service user's perspective of stigma and discrimination or on the behaviour domain of behavioural change, either by people with or without mental illness in the complex processes of stigmatisation. We found that social contact is the most effective type of intervention to improve stigma-related knowledge and attitudes in the short term. However, the evidence for longer-term benefit of such social contact to reduce stigma is weak. In view of the magnitude of challenges that result from mental health stigma and discrimination, a concerted effort is needed to fund methodologically strong research that will provide robust evidence to support decisions on investment in interventions to reduce stigma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00298-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777489667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0140673615002986</els_id><sourcerecordid>1777489667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-7c68ac0ec53430ec7cd6d971fe2a92e29434067cb3091e758a5986ff3247a2fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1rFTEUxYMo9vn0T1AG3NTF6M3ka2ajSKkfUHChgitDmtzY1JlMm2Qe9L83816t0I2rC-F3Tu49h5DnFF5ToPLNV6AcWqmYPKbiFUA39K18QDaUK94Krn48JJs75Ig8yfkSALgE8ZgcdZJTYJxuyM_TXXAYLTZ-Tg16j7aEHTYhFkw7jCXMMTdlbhK6pVJTfTJje4FmLBdtwtEUdE0u4ddkGhNd40K2KUwhmlX6lDzyZsz47HZuyfcPp99OPrVnXz5-Pnl_1lrJZGmVlb2xgFYwzupQ1kk3KOqxM0OH3cAZB6nsOYOBohK9EUMvvWcdV6bzyLbk-OB7lebrBXPRU90Dx9FEnJesqVKK94OsYWzJy3vo5bykWLdbKQacMd5XShwom-acE3p9Va8y6UZT0GsBel-AXtPVVOh9AVpW3Ytb9-V8Qnen-pt4Bd4dAKxx7AImnW1YC3Ah1ey1m8N_v3h7z8GOIQZrxt94g_nfNTp3Gg4mqwcVewfJ_gDSzqov</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773043348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Thornicroft, Graham, Prof ; Mehta, Nisha, MBBS ; Clement, Sarah, PhD ; Evans-Lacko, Sara, PhD ; Doherty, Mary, MBBS ; Rose, Diana, Prof ; Koschorke, Mirja, PhD ; Shidhaye, Rahul, PhD ; O'Reilly, Claire, PhD ; Henderson, Claire, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham, Prof ; Mehta, Nisha, MBBS ; Clement, Sarah, PhD ; Evans-Lacko, Sara, PhD ; Doherty, Mary, MBBS ; Rose, Diana, Prof ; Koschorke, Mirja, PhD ; Shidhaye, Rahul, PhD ; O'Reilly, Claire, PhD ; Henderson, Claire, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Stigma and discrimination in relation to mental illnesses have been described as having worse consequences than the conditions themselves. Most medical literature in this area of research has been descriptive and has focused on attitudes towards people with mental illness rather than on interventions to reduce stigma. In this narrative Review, we summarise what is known globally from published systematic reviews and primary data on effective interventions intended to reduce mental-illness-related stigma or discrimination. The main findings emerging from this narrative overview are that: (1) at the population level there is a fairly consistent pattern of short-term benefits for positive attitude change, and some lesser evidence for knowledge improvement; (2) for people with mental illness, some group-level anti-stigma inventions show promise and merit further assessment; (3) for specific target groups, such as students, social-contact-based interventions usually achieve short-term (but less clearly long-term) attitudinal improvements, and less often produce knowledge gains; (4) this is a heterogeneous field of study with few strong study designs with large sample sizes; (5) research from low-income and middle-income countries is conspicuous by its relative absence; (6) caution needs to be exercised in not overgeneralising lessons from one target group to another; (7) there is a clear need for studies with longer-term follow-up to assess whether initial gains are sustained or attenuated, and whether booster doses of the intervention are needed to maintain progress; (8) few studies in any part of the world have focused on either the service user's perspective of stigma and discrimination or on the behaviour domain of behavioural change, either by people with or without mental illness in the complex processes of stigmatisation. We found that social contact is the most effective type of intervention to improve stigma-related knowledge and attitudes in the short term. However, the evidence for longer-term benefit of such social contact to reduce stigma is weak. In view of the magnitude of challenges that result from mental health stigma and discrimination, a concerted effort is needed to fund methodologically strong research that will provide robust evidence to support decisions on investment in interventions to reduce stigma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00298-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26410341</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude change ; Developed Countries ; Developing Countries ; Discrimination ; Health Education ; Health Personnel - education ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Intervention ; Inventions ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Prejudice ; Prejudice - prevention & control ; Prejudice - psychology ; Self Concept ; Social Stigma ; Sociology ; Stereotypes ; Stigma ; Students - psychology ; Studies ; Target groups</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2016-03, Vol.387 (10023), p.1123-1132</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 12, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-7c68ac0ec53430ec7cd6d971fe2a92e29434067cb3091e758a5986ff3247a2fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-7c68ac0ec53430ec7cd6d971fe2a92e29434067cb3091e758a5986ff3247a2fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1773043348?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26410341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Nisha, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clement, Sarah, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans-Lacko, Sara, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Mary, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Diana, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koschorke, Mirja, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shidhaye, Rahul, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Claire, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Claire, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Summary Stigma and discrimination in relation to mental illnesses have been described as having worse consequences than the conditions themselves. Most medical literature in this area of research has been descriptive and has focused on attitudes towards people with mental illness rather than on interventions to reduce stigma. In this narrative Review, we summarise what is known globally from published systematic reviews and primary data on effective interventions intended to reduce mental-illness-related stigma or discrimination. The main findings emerging from this narrative overview are that: (1) at the population level there is a fairly consistent pattern of short-term benefits for positive attitude change, and some lesser evidence for knowledge improvement; (2) for people with mental illness, some group-level anti-stigma inventions show promise and merit further assessment; (3) for specific target groups, such as students, social-contact-based interventions usually achieve short-term (but less clearly long-term) attitudinal improvements, and less often produce knowledge gains; (4) this is a heterogeneous field of study with few strong study designs with large sample sizes; (5) research from low-income and middle-income countries is conspicuous by its relative absence; (6) caution needs to be exercised in not overgeneralising lessons from one target group to another; (7) there is a clear need for studies with longer-term follow-up to assess whether initial gains are sustained or attenuated, and whether booster doses of the intervention are needed to maintain progress; (8) few studies in any part of the world have focused on either the service user's perspective of stigma and discrimination or on the behaviour domain of behavioural change, either by people with or without mental illness in the complex processes of stigmatisation. We found that social contact is the most effective type of intervention to improve stigma-related knowledge and attitudes in the short term. However, the evidence for longer-term benefit of such social contact to reduce stigma is weak. In view of the magnitude of challenges that result from mental health stigma and discrimination, a concerted effort is needed to fund methodologically strong research that will provide robust evidence to support decisions on investment in interventions to reduce stigma.</description><subject>Attitude change</subject><subject>Developed Countries</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Health Education</subject><subject>Health Personnel - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Inventions</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Prejudice - prevention & control</subject><subject>Prejudice - psychology</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Social Stigma</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Target groups</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1rFTEUxYMo9vn0T1AG3NTF6M3ka2ajSKkfUHChgitDmtzY1JlMm2Qe9L83816t0I2rC-F3Tu49h5DnFF5ToPLNV6AcWqmYPKbiFUA39K18QDaUK94Krn48JJs75Ig8yfkSALgE8ZgcdZJTYJxuyM_TXXAYLTZ-Tg16j7aEHTYhFkw7jCXMMTdlbhK6pVJTfTJje4FmLBdtwtEUdE0u4ddkGhNd40K2KUwhmlX6lDzyZsz47HZuyfcPp99OPrVnXz5-Pnl_1lrJZGmVlb2xgFYwzupQ1kk3KOqxM0OH3cAZB6nsOYOBohK9EUMvvWcdV6bzyLbk-OB7lebrBXPRU90Dx9FEnJesqVKK94OsYWzJy3vo5bykWLdbKQacMd5XShwom-acE3p9Va8y6UZT0GsBel-AXtPVVOh9AVpW3Ytb9-V8Qnen-pt4Bd4dAKxx7AImnW1YC3Ah1ey1m8N_v3h7z8GOIQZrxt94g_nfNTp3Gg4mqwcVewfJ_gDSzqov</recordid><startdate>20160312</startdate><enddate>20160312</enddate><creator>Thornicroft, Graham, Prof</creator><creator>Mehta, Nisha, MBBS</creator><creator>Clement, Sarah, PhD</creator><creator>Evans-Lacko, Sara, PhD</creator><creator>Doherty, Mary, MBBS</creator><creator>Rose, Diana, Prof</creator><creator>Koschorke, Mirja, PhD</creator><creator>Shidhaye, Rahul, PhD</creator><creator>O'Reilly, Claire, PhD</creator><creator>Henderson, Claire, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160312</creationdate><title>Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination</title><author>Thornicroft, Graham, Prof ; Mehta, Nisha, MBBS ; Clement, Sarah, PhD ; Evans-Lacko, Sara, PhD ; Doherty, Mary, MBBS ; Rose, Diana, Prof ; Koschorke, Mirja, PhD ; Shidhaye, Rahul, PhD ; O'Reilly, Claire, PhD ; Henderson, Claire, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-7c68ac0ec53430ec7cd6d971fe2a92e29434067cb3091e758a5986ff3247a2fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Attitude change</topic><topic>Developed Countries</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Health Education</topic><topic>Health Personnel - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Inventions</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Prejudice - prevention & control</topic><topic>Prejudice - psychology</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Social Stigma</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Target groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Nisha, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clement, Sarah, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans-Lacko, Sara, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Mary, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Diana, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koschorke, Mirja, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shidhaye, Rahul, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Claire, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Claire, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thornicroft, Graham, Prof</au><au>Mehta, Nisha, MBBS</au><au>Clement, Sarah, PhD</au><au>Evans-Lacko, Sara, PhD</au><au>Doherty, Mary, MBBS</au><au>Rose, Diana, Prof</au><au>Koschorke, Mirja, PhD</au><au>Shidhaye, Rahul, PhD</au><au>O'Reilly, Claire, PhD</au><au>Henderson, Claire, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2016-03-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>387</volume><issue>10023</issue><spage>1123</spage><epage>1132</epage><pages>1123-1132</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Stigma and discrimination in relation to mental illnesses have been described as having worse consequences than the conditions themselves. Most medical literature in this area of research has been descriptive and has focused on attitudes towards people with mental illness rather than on interventions to reduce stigma. In this narrative Review, we summarise what is known globally from published systematic reviews and primary data on effective interventions intended to reduce mental-illness-related stigma or discrimination. The main findings emerging from this narrative overview are that: (1) at the population level there is a fairly consistent pattern of short-term benefits for positive attitude change, and some lesser evidence for knowledge improvement; (2) for people with mental illness, some group-level anti-stigma inventions show promise and merit further assessment; (3) for specific target groups, such as students, social-contact-based interventions usually achieve short-term (but less clearly long-term) attitudinal improvements, and less often produce knowledge gains; (4) this is a heterogeneous field of study with few strong study designs with large sample sizes; (5) research from low-income and middle-income countries is conspicuous by its relative absence; (6) caution needs to be exercised in not overgeneralising lessons from one target group to another; (7) there is a clear need for studies with longer-term follow-up to assess whether initial gains are sustained or attenuated, and whether booster doses of the intervention are needed to maintain progress; (8) few studies in any part of the world have focused on either the service user's perspective of stigma and discrimination or on the behaviour domain of behavioural change, either by people with or without mental illness in the complex processes of stigmatisation. We found that social contact is the most effective type of intervention to improve stigma-related knowledge and attitudes in the short term. However, the evidence for longer-term benefit of such social contact to reduce stigma is weak. In view of the magnitude of challenges that result from mental health stigma and discrimination, a concerted effort is needed to fund methodologically strong research that will provide robust evidence to support decisions on investment in interventions to reduce stigma.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26410341</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00298-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2016-03, Vol.387 (10023), p.1123-1132 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777489667 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Attitude change Developed Countries Developing Countries Discrimination Health Education Health Personnel - education Humans Internal Medicine Intervention Inventions Mental disorders Mental Disorders - psychology Prejudice Prejudice - prevention & control Prejudice - psychology Self Concept Social Stigma Sociology Stereotypes Stigma Students - psychology Studies Target groups |
title | Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A50%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20for%20effective%20interventions%20to%20reduce%20mental-health-related%20stigma%20and%20discrimination&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Thornicroft,%20Graham,%20Prof&rft.date=2016-03-12&rft.volume=387&rft.issue=10023&rft.spage=1123&rft.epage=1132&rft.pages=1123-1132&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00298-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1777489667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773043348&rft_id=info:pmid/26410341&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0140673615002986&rfr_iscdi=true |