Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon

Frontier development in the Brazilian Amazon has created vast areas of largely deforested landscapes. Conservation efforts in these post‐frontier zones seek to protect the remaining forest fragments and promote sustainable agricultural practices that absorb labor, meet market demand, and generate ec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural economics 2015-11, Vol.46 (S1), p.83-102
Hauptverfasser: Sills, Erin O, Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue S1
container_start_page 83
container_title Agricultural economics
container_volume 46
creator Sills, Erin O
Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L
description Frontier development in the Brazilian Amazon has created vast areas of largely deforested landscapes. Conservation efforts in these post‐frontier zones seek to protect the remaining forest fragments and promote sustainable agricultural practices that absorb labor, meet market demand, and generate ecosystem services. Assessments of these efforts often find that rates of sustained uptake are disappointingly low and that impacts are difficult to discern, but this could be due to the short‐time frames of both the efforts themselves and their evaluation. We investigate the impacts of participation in an internationally sponsored farmer association that for 15 years promoted sustainable agricultural practices in the heavily deforested state of Rondônia, Brazil. Using data from a georeferenced four‐period panel survey of farmers in combination with remote sensing data on land use spanning the life of the association, we apply matching methods to estimate the impacts of participation. We find that membership resulted in more diversified production systems, including more land allocated to agroforestry. Members also deforested less of their farms, but this difference is not statistically significant after we control for selection bias in membership.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/agec.12200
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776670817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1776670817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5300-94fd7107f2012c4368be15b09104f1aa1f529140eba5fe2a82655d2cac0f23703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFu0zAcBnBrAmllcOEFFonLhJTx_zuxnRxLKQU0MWms4mi5nh0ykrizE2Cc-gg8ALxcnwS32TjsgCXLl99nffoIeY5wivG8UpXRp0gpwAGZIBN5CgWnj8gEkJcpQwaH5EkI1wCYA80mZDn_pppB9XVXJf0XkzSuq7abX73xbVK3a6X7kDibrL1r3R5tN78rb0y33fxJVOVrPTT94E1Sd_v8tFU_XfeUPLaqCebZ3XtElm_nl7N36dn54v1sepZqlgGkZW6vBIKwFJDqPOPFyiBbQYmQW1QKLaNlLGpWillDVUE5Y1dUKw2WZgKyI3Iy_hv73Qwm9LKtgzZNozrjhiBRCM4FFCgiffGAXrvBd7FdVEyAKErYqZej0t6F4I2Va1-3yt9KBLlbWO4WlvuFI8YRf68bc_sfKaeL-ew-k46ZOvTmx7-M8l8lF5lg8vPHhfxw8VrQi8WlfBP98eitcnK3d5DLT3EuDgBlvDz7C9Qpl1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757078907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Sills, Erin O ; Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</creator><creatorcontrib>Sills, Erin O ; Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</creatorcontrib><description>Frontier development in the Brazilian Amazon has created vast areas of largely deforested landscapes. Conservation efforts in these post‐frontier zones seek to protect the remaining forest fragments and promote sustainable agricultural practices that absorb labor, meet market demand, and generate ecosystem services. Assessments of these efforts often find that rates of sustained uptake are disappointingly low and that impacts are difficult to discern, but this could be due to the short‐time frames of both the efforts themselves and their evaluation. We investigate the impacts of participation in an internationally sponsored farmer association that for 15 years promoted sustainable agricultural practices in the heavily deforested state of Rondônia, Brazil. Using data from a georeferenced four‐period panel survey of farmers in combination with remote sensing data on land use spanning the life of the association, we apply matching methods to estimate the impacts of participation. We find that membership resulted in more diversified production systems, including more land allocated to agroforestry. Members also deforested less of their farms, but this difference is not statistically significant after we control for selection bias in membership.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-0862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/agec.12200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Agroforestry ; Brazilian Amazon ; Diversification ; ecosystem services ; farmers ; farms ; Genetic matching ; georeferencing ; habitat fragmentation ; Impact evaluation ; labor ; land use ; landscapes ; markets ; production technology ; Productive conservation ; Q12 ; Q23 ; spatial data ; surveys ; Tropical deforestation</subject><ispartof>Agricultural economics, 2015-11, Vol.46 (S1), p.83-102</ispartof><rights>2015 International Association of Agricultural Economists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5300-94fd7107f2012c4368be15b09104f1aa1f529140eba5fe2a82655d2cac0f23703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5300-94fd7107f2012c4368be15b09104f1aa1f529140eba5fe2a82655d2cac0f23703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fagec.12200$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fagec.12200$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sills, Erin O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon</title><title>Agricultural economics</title><addtitle>Agricultural Economics</addtitle><description>Frontier development in the Brazilian Amazon has created vast areas of largely deforested landscapes. Conservation efforts in these post‐frontier zones seek to protect the remaining forest fragments and promote sustainable agricultural practices that absorb labor, meet market demand, and generate ecosystem services. Assessments of these efforts often find that rates of sustained uptake are disappointingly low and that impacts are difficult to discern, but this could be due to the short‐time frames of both the efforts themselves and their evaluation. We investigate the impacts of participation in an internationally sponsored farmer association that for 15 years promoted sustainable agricultural practices in the heavily deforested state of Rondônia, Brazil. Using data from a georeferenced four‐period panel survey of farmers in combination with remote sensing data on land use spanning the life of the association, we apply matching methods to estimate the impacts of participation. We find that membership resulted in more diversified production systems, including more land allocated to agroforestry. Members also deforested less of their farms, but this difference is not statistically significant after we control for selection bias in membership.</description><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Brazilian Amazon</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>farmers</subject><subject>farms</subject><subject>Genetic matching</subject><subject>georeferencing</subject><subject>habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Impact evaluation</subject><subject>labor</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>markets</subject><subject>production technology</subject><subject>Productive conservation</subject><subject>Q12</subject><subject>Q23</subject><subject>spatial data</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Tropical deforestation</subject><issn>0169-5150</issn><issn>1574-0862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MFu0zAcBnBrAmllcOEFFonLhJTx_zuxnRxLKQU0MWms4mi5nh0ykrizE2Cc-gg8ALxcnwS32TjsgCXLl99nffoIeY5wivG8UpXRp0gpwAGZIBN5CgWnj8gEkJcpQwaH5EkI1wCYA80mZDn_pppB9XVXJf0XkzSuq7abX73xbVK3a6X7kDibrL1r3R5tN78rb0y33fxJVOVrPTT94E1Sd_v8tFU_XfeUPLaqCebZ3XtElm_nl7N36dn54v1sepZqlgGkZW6vBIKwFJDqPOPFyiBbQYmQW1QKLaNlLGpWillDVUE5Y1dUKw2WZgKyI3Iy_hv73Qwm9LKtgzZNozrjhiBRCM4FFCgiffGAXrvBd7FdVEyAKErYqZej0t6F4I2Va1-3yt9KBLlbWO4WlvuFI8YRf68bc_sfKaeL-ew-k46ZOvTmx7-M8l8lF5lg8vPHhfxw8VrQi8WlfBP98eitcnK3d5DLT3EuDgBlvDz7C9Qpl1g</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Sills, Erin O</creator><creator>Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</creator><general>Elsevier</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon</title><author>Sills, Erin O ; Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5300-94fd7107f2012c4368be15b09104f1aa1f529140eba5fe2a82655d2cac0f23703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Brazilian Amazon</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>farmers</topic><topic>farms</topic><topic>Genetic matching</topic><topic>georeferencing</topic><topic>habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Impact evaluation</topic><topic>labor</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>markets</topic><topic>production technology</topic><topic>Productive conservation</topic><topic>Q12</topic><topic>Q23</topic><topic>spatial data</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Tropical deforestation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sills, Erin O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sills, Erin O</au><au>Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle><addtitle>Agricultural Economics</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>83-102</pages><issn>0169-5150</issn><eissn>1574-0862</eissn><abstract>Frontier development in the Brazilian Amazon has created vast areas of largely deforested landscapes. Conservation efforts in these post‐frontier zones seek to protect the remaining forest fragments and promote sustainable agricultural practices that absorb labor, meet market demand, and generate ecosystem services. Assessments of these efforts often find that rates of sustained uptake are disappointingly low and that impacts are difficult to discern, but this could be due to the short‐time frames of both the efforts themselves and their evaluation. We investigate the impacts of participation in an internationally sponsored farmer association that for 15 years promoted sustainable agricultural practices in the heavily deforested state of Rondônia, Brazil. Using data from a georeferenced four‐period panel survey of farmers in combination with remote sensing data on land use spanning the life of the association, we apply matching methods to estimate the impacts of participation. We find that membership resulted in more diversified production systems, including more land allocated to agroforestry. Members also deforested less of their farms, but this difference is not statistically significant after we control for selection bias in membership.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1111/agec.12200</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-5150
ispartof Agricultural economics, 2015-11, Vol.46 (S1), p.83-102
issn 0169-5150
1574-0862
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776670817
source Wiley Online Library Journals
subjects Agroforestry
Brazilian Amazon
Diversification
ecosystem services
farmers
farms
Genetic matching
georeferencing
habitat fragmentation
Impact evaluation
labor
land use
landscapes
markets
production technology
Productive conservation
Q12
Q23
spatial data
surveys
Tropical deforestation
title Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A34%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20long%E2%80%90term%20impacts%20of%20promoting%20%E2%80%9Cgreen%E2%80%9D%20agriculture%20in%20the%20Amazon&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Sills,%20Erin%20O&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=83-102&rft.issn=0169-5150&rft.eissn=1574-0862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/agec.12200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1776670817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757078907&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true