Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon
Frontier development in the Brazilian Amazon has created vast areas of largely deforested landscapes. Conservation efforts in these post‐frontier zones seek to protect the remaining forest fragments and promote sustainable agricultural practices that absorb labor, meet market demand, and generate ec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agricultural economics 2015-11, Vol.46 (S1), p.83-102 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 102 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | 83 |
container_title | Agricultural economics |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Sills, Erin O Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L |
description | Frontier development in the Brazilian Amazon has created vast areas of largely deforested landscapes. Conservation efforts in these post‐frontier zones seek to protect the remaining forest fragments and promote sustainable agricultural practices that absorb labor, meet market demand, and generate ecosystem services. Assessments of these efforts often find that rates of sustained uptake are disappointingly low and that impacts are difficult to discern, but this could be due to the short‐time frames of both the efforts themselves and their evaluation. We investigate the impacts of participation in an internationally sponsored farmer association that for 15 years promoted sustainable agricultural practices in the heavily deforested state of Rondônia, Brazil. Using data from a georeferenced four‐period panel survey of farmers in combination with remote sensing data on land use spanning the life of the association, we apply matching methods to estimate the impacts of participation. We find that membership resulted in more diversified production systems, including more land allocated to agroforestry. Members also deforested less of their farms, but this difference is not statistically significant after we control for selection bias in membership. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/agec.12200 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776670817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1776670817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5300-94fd7107f2012c4368be15b09104f1aa1f529140eba5fe2a82655d2cac0f23703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFu0zAcBnBrAmllcOEFFonLhJTx_zuxnRxLKQU0MWms4mi5nh0ykrizE2Cc-gg8ALxcnwS32TjsgCXLl99nffoIeY5wivG8UpXRp0gpwAGZIBN5CgWnj8gEkJcpQwaH5EkI1wCYA80mZDn_pppB9XVXJf0XkzSuq7abX73xbVK3a6X7kDibrL1r3R5tN78rb0y33fxJVOVrPTT94E1Sd_v8tFU_XfeUPLaqCebZ3XtElm_nl7N36dn54v1sepZqlgGkZW6vBIKwFJDqPOPFyiBbQYmQW1QKLaNlLGpWillDVUE5Y1dUKw2WZgKyI3Iy_hv73Qwm9LKtgzZNozrjhiBRCM4FFCgiffGAXrvBd7FdVEyAKErYqZej0t6F4I2Va1-3yt9KBLlbWO4WlvuFI8YRf68bc_sfKaeL-ew-k46ZOvTmx7-M8l8lF5lg8vPHhfxw8VrQi8WlfBP98eitcnK3d5DLT3EuDgBlvDz7C9Qpl1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757078907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Sills, Erin O ; Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</creator><creatorcontrib>Sills, Erin O ; Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</creatorcontrib><description>Frontier development in the Brazilian Amazon has created vast areas of largely deforested landscapes. Conservation efforts in these post‐frontier zones seek to protect the remaining forest fragments and promote sustainable agricultural practices that absorb labor, meet market demand, and generate ecosystem services. Assessments of these efforts often find that rates of sustained uptake are disappointingly low and that impacts are difficult to discern, but this could be due to the short‐time frames of both the efforts themselves and their evaluation. We investigate the impacts of participation in an internationally sponsored farmer association that for 15 years promoted sustainable agricultural practices in the heavily deforested state of Rondônia, Brazil. Using data from a georeferenced four‐period panel survey of farmers in combination with remote sensing data on land use spanning the life of the association, we apply matching methods to estimate the impacts of participation. We find that membership resulted in more diversified production systems, including more land allocated to agroforestry. Members also deforested less of their farms, but this difference is not statistically significant after we control for selection bias in membership.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-0862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/agec.12200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Agroforestry ; Brazilian Amazon ; Diversification ; ecosystem services ; farmers ; farms ; Genetic matching ; georeferencing ; habitat fragmentation ; Impact evaluation ; labor ; land use ; landscapes ; markets ; production technology ; Productive conservation ; Q12 ; Q23 ; spatial data ; surveys ; Tropical deforestation</subject><ispartof>Agricultural economics, 2015-11, Vol.46 (S1), p.83-102</ispartof><rights>2015 International Association of Agricultural Economists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5300-94fd7107f2012c4368be15b09104f1aa1f529140eba5fe2a82655d2cac0f23703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5300-94fd7107f2012c4368be15b09104f1aa1f529140eba5fe2a82655d2cac0f23703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fagec.12200$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fagec.12200$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sills, Erin O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon</title><title>Agricultural economics</title><addtitle>Agricultural Economics</addtitle><description>Frontier development in the Brazilian Amazon has created vast areas of largely deforested landscapes. Conservation efforts in these post‐frontier zones seek to protect the remaining forest fragments and promote sustainable agricultural practices that absorb labor, meet market demand, and generate ecosystem services. Assessments of these efforts often find that rates of sustained uptake are disappointingly low and that impacts are difficult to discern, but this could be due to the short‐time frames of both the efforts themselves and their evaluation. We investigate the impacts of participation in an internationally sponsored farmer association that for 15 years promoted sustainable agricultural practices in the heavily deforested state of Rondônia, Brazil. Using data from a georeferenced four‐period panel survey of farmers in combination with remote sensing data on land use spanning the life of the association, we apply matching methods to estimate the impacts of participation. We find that membership resulted in more diversified production systems, including more land allocated to agroforestry. Members also deforested less of their farms, but this difference is not statistically significant after we control for selection bias in membership.</description><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Brazilian Amazon</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>farmers</subject><subject>farms</subject><subject>Genetic matching</subject><subject>georeferencing</subject><subject>habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Impact evaluation</subject><subject>labor</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>markets</subject><subject>production technology</subject><subject>Productive conservation</subject><subject>Q12</subject><subject>Q23</subject><subject>spatial data</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Tropical deforestation</subject><issn>0169-5150</issn><issn>1574-0862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MFu0zAcBnBrAmllcOEFFonLhJTx_zuxnRxLKQU0MWms4mi5nh0ykrizE2Cc-gg8ALxcnwS32TjsgCXLl99nffoIeY5wivG8UpXRp0gpwAGZIBN5CgWnj8gEkJcpQwaH5EkI1wCYA80mZDn_pppB9XVXJf0XkzSuq7abX73xbVK3a6X7kDibrL1r3R5tN78rb0y33fxJVOVrPTT94E1Sd_v8tFU_XfeUPLaqCebZ3XtElm_nl7N36dn54v1sepZqlgGkZW6vBIKwFJDqPOPFyiBbQYmQW1QKLaNlLGpWillDVUE5Y1dUKw2WZgKyI3Iy_hv73Qwm9LKtgzZNozrjhiBRCM4FFCgiffGAXrvBd7FdVEyAKErYqZej0t6F4I2Va1-3yt9KBLlbWO4WlvuFI8YRf68bc_sfKaeL-ew-k46ZOvTmx7-M8l8lF5lg8vPHhfxw8VrQi8WlfBP98eitcnK3d5DLT3EuDgBlvDz7C9Qpl1g</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Sills, Erin O</creator><creator>Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</creator><general>Elsevier</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon</title><author>Sills, Erin O ; Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5300-94fd7107f2012c4368be15b09104f1aa1f529140eba5fe2a82655d2cac0f23703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Brazilian Amazon</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>farmers</topic><topic>farms</topic><topic>Genetic matching</topic><topic>georeferencing</topic><topic>habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Impact evaluation</topic><topic>labor</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>markets</topic><topic>production technology</topic><topic>Productive conservation</topic><topic>Q12</topic><topic>Q23</topic><topic>spatial data</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Tropical deforestation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sills, Erin O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sills, Erin O</au><au>Caviglia‐Harris, Jill L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle><addtitle>Agricultural Economics</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>83-102</pages><issn>0169-5150</issn><eissn>1574-0862</eissn><abstract>Frontier development in the Brazilian Amazon has created vast areas of largely deforested landscapes. Conservation efforts in these post‐frontier zones seek to protect the remaining forest fragments and promote sustainable agricultural practices that absorb labor, meet market demand, and generate ecosystem services. Assessments of these efforts often find that rates of sustained uptake are disappointingly low and that impacts are difficult to discern, but this could be due to the short‐time frames of both the efforts themselves and their evaluation. We investigate the impacts of participation in an internationally sponsored farmer association that for 15 years promoted sustainable agricultural practices in the heavily deforested state of Rondônia, Brazil. Using data from a georeferenced four‐period panel survey of farmers in combination with remote sensing data on land use spanning the life of the association, we apply matching methods to estimate the impacts of participation. We find that membership resulted in more diversified production systems, including more land allocated to agroforestry. Members also deforested less of their farms, but this difference is not statistically significant after we control for selection bias in membership.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1111/agec.12200</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-5150 |
ispartof | Agricultural economics, 2015-11, Vol.46 (S1), p.83-102 |
issn | 0169-5150 1574-0862 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776670817 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals |
subjects | Agroforestry Brazilian Amazon Diversification ecosystem services farmers farms Genetic matching georeferencing habitat fragmentation Impact evaluation labor land use landscapes markets production technology Productive conservation Q12 Q23 spatial data surveys Tropical deforestation |
title | Evaluating the long‐term impacts of promoting “green” agriculture in the Amazon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A34%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20long%E2%80%90term%20impacts%20of%20promoting%20%E2%80%9Cgreen%E2%80%9D%20agriculture%20in%20the%20Amazon&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Sills,%20Erin%20O&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=83-102&rft.issn=0169-5150&rft.eissn=1574-0862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/agec.12200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1776670817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757078907&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |