Nitrogen sources and net growth efficiency of zooplankton in three Amazon River plume food webs

The plasticity of nitrogen specific net growth efficiency (NGE) in marine mesozooplankton is currently unresolved, with discordant lines of evidence suggesting that NGE is constant, or that it varies with nitrogen source, food availability, and food quality in marine ecosystems. Specifically, the fa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Limnology and oceanography 2016-03, Vol.61 (2), p.460-481
Hauptverfasser: Loick-Wilde, Natalie, Weber, Sarah C., Conroy, Brandon J., Capone, Douglas G., Coles, Victoria J., Medeiros, Patricia M., Steinberg, Deborah K., Montoya, Joseph P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 481
container_issue 2
container_start_page 460
container_title Limnology and oceanography
container_volume 61
creator Loick-Wilde, Natalie
Weber, Sarah C.
Conroy, Brandon J.
Capone, Douglas G.
Coles, Victoria J.
Medeiros, Patricia M.
Steinberg, Deborah K.
Montoya, Joseph P.
description The plasticity of nitrogen specific net growth efficiency (NGE) in marine mesozooplankton is currently unresolved, with discordant lines of evidence suggesting that NGE is constant, or that it varies with nitrogen source, food availability, and food quality in marine ecosystems. Specifically, the fate of nitrogen from nitrogen fixation is poorly known. We use 15N : 14N ratios in plankton in combination with hydrological data, nutrient profiles, and nitrogen fixation rate measurements to investigate the relationship between new nitrogen sources and the nitrogen specific NGE in three plankton communities along the outer Amazon River plume. The NGE of small (200–500 μm) mesozooplankton was estimated from the δ 15N differences between particulate nitrogen and zooplankton using an open system Rayleigh fractionation model. The transfer efficiency of nitrogen among larger (> 500 μm) mesozooplankton was estimated from the change in δ 15N as a function of zooplankton size. The Amazon River was not a significant source of bioavailable nitrogen anywhere in our study region, and subsurface nitrate was the primary new nitrogen source for the outer shelf community, which was dominated by diatoms. N₂ fixation was the principal new nitrogen source at sites of high diatom diazotroph association abundance and at oceanic sites dominated by Trichodesmium spp. and Synechococcus spp. Although we found clear spatial differences in food quantity, food quality, and diazotroph inputs into mesozooplankton, our data show no significant differences in mesozooplankton nitrogen transfer efficiency and NGE (for latter, mean ± SD: 59 ± 10%) among sites.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lno.10227
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776661620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26628426</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26628426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3587-8b52698bfa4ae7bea9140b86afa22893f78e44abd7de7bebfd43d0a0ca657c973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4AGQfOQScJzYjo-AaEGqyo9AHC0nWYMhjYudUtqnx21QTzurb2a1GoROU3KREkIvm9ZFQanYQ4NUZjJhTJJ9NIgsT7KoD9FRCJ-EEMkYGyA1tZ1379Di4Ba-goB1W-MWOvzu3bL7wGCMrSy01Qo7g9fOzRvdfnWuxbbF3YcHwFczvY77s_0Bj-fNYgbYOFfjJZThGB0Y3QQ4-Z9D9Dq6fbm5SyYP4_ubq0liM1aIpCgZ5bIojc41iBK0THNSFlwbTWkhMyMKyHNd1qLe4NLUeVYTTSrNmaikyIbovL879-57AaFTMxsqaOKz4BZBpUJwzlNOSbRe9talbWCl5t7OtF-plKhNgyo2qLYNqsn0YSti4qxPfIbO-V2Cck6LnPLIk57b0MHvjmv_pbjIBFNv07F6Gl1LcVeM1GP2B5NjgDU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776661620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrogen sources and net growth efficiency of zooplankton in three Amazon River plume food webs</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><creator>Loick-Wilde, Natalie ; Weber, Sarah C. ; Conroy, Brandon J. ; Capone, Douglas G. ; Coles, Victoria J. ; Medeiros, Patricia M. ; Steinberg, Deborah K. ; Montoya, Joseph P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Loick-Wilde, Natalie ; Weber, Sarah C. ; Conroy, Brandon J. ; Capone, Douglas G. ; Coles, Victoria J. ; Medeiros, Patricia M. ; Steinberg, Deborah K. ; Montoya, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><description>The plasticity of nitrogen specific net growth efficiency (NGE) in marine mesozooplankton is currently unresolved, with discordant lines of evidence suggesting that NGE is constant, or that it varies with nitrogen source, food availability, and food quality in marine ecosystems. Specifically, the fate of nitrogen from nitrogen fixation is poorly known. We use 15N : 14N ratios in plankton in combination with hydrological data, nutrient profiles, and nitrogen fixation rate measurements to investigate the relationship between new nitrogen sources and the nitrogen specific NGE in three plankton communities along the outer Amazon River plume. The NGE of small (200–500 μm) mesozooplankton was estimated from the δ 15N differences between particulate nitrogen and zooplankton using an open system Rayleigh fractionation model. The transfer efficiency of nitrogen among larger (&gt; 500 μm) mesozooplankton was estimated from the change in δ 15N as a function of zooplankton size. The Amazon River was not a significant source of bioavailable nitrogen anywhere in our study region, and subsurface nitrate was the primary new nitrogen source for the outer shelf community, which was dominated by diatoms. N₂ fixation was the principal new nitrogen source at sites of high diatom diazotroph association abundance and at oceanic sites dominated by Trichodesmium spp. and Synechococcus spp. Although we found clear spatial differences in food quantity, food quality, and diazotroph inputs into mesozooplankton, our data show no significant differences in mesozooplankton nitrogen transfer efficiency and NGE (for latter, mean ± SD: 59 ± 10%) among sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5590</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lno.10227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacillariophyceae ; Freshwater ; Marine ; Synechococcus</subject><ispartof>Limnology and oceanography, 2016-03, Vol.61 (2), p.460-481</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26628426$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26628426$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,1433,25354,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833,54524,54530,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26628426$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loick-Wilde, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Brandon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capone, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coles, Victoria J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Deborah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montoya, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrogen sources and net growth efficiency of zooplankton in three Amazon River plume food webs</title><title>Limnology and oceanography</title><addtitle>Limnol. Oceanogr</addtitle><description>The plasticity of nitrogen specific net growth efficiency (NGE) in marine mesozooplankton is currently unresolved, with discordant lines of evidence suggesting that NGE is constant, or that it varies with nitrogen source, food availability, and food quality in marine ecosystems. Specifically, the fate of nitrogen from nitrogen fixation is poorly known. We use 15N : 14N ratios in plankton in combination with hydrological data, nutrient profiles, and nitrogen fixation rate measurements to investigate the relationship between new nitrogen sources and the nitrogen specific NGE in three plankton communities along the outer Amazon River plume. The NGE of small (200–500 μm) mesozooplankton was estimated from the δ 15N differences between particulate nitrogen and zooplankton using an open system Rayleigh fractionation model. The transfer efficiency of nitrogen among larger (&gt; 500 μm) mesozooplankton was estimated from the change in δ 15N as a function of zooplankton size. The Amazon River was not a significant source of bioavailable nitrogen anywhere in our study region, and subsurface nitrate was the primary new nitrogen source for the outer shelf community, which was dominated by diatoms. N₂ fixation was the principal new nitrogen source at sites of high diatom diazotroph association abundance and at oceanic sites dominated by Trichodesmium spp. and Synechococcus spp. Although we found clear spatial differences in food quantity, food quality, and diazotroph inputs into mesozooplankton, our data show no significant differences in mesozooplankton nitrogen transfer efficiency and NGE (for latter, mean ± SD: 59 ± 10%) among sites.</description><subject>Bacillariophyceae</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Synechococcus</subject><issn>0024-3590</issn><issn>1939-5590</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4AGQfOQScJzYjo-AaEGqyo9AHC0nWYMhjYudUtqnx21QTzurb2a1GoROU3KREkIvm9ZFQanYQ4NUZjJhTJJ9NIgsT7KoD9FRCJ-EEMkYGyA1tZ1379Di4Ba-goB1W-MWOvzu3bL7wGCMrSy01Qo7g9fOzRvdfnWuxbbF3YcHwFczvY77s_0Bj-fNYgbYOFfjJZThGB0Y3QQ4-Z9D9Dq6fbm5SyYP4_ubq0liM1aIpCgZ5bIojc41iBK0THNSFlwbTWkhMyMKyHNd1qLe4NLUeVYTTSrNmaikyIbovL879-57AaFTMxsqaOKz4BZBpUJwzlNOSbRe9talbWCl5t7OtF-plKhNgyo2qLYNqsn0YSti4qxPfIbO-V2Cck6LnPLIk57b0MHvjmv_pbjIBFNv07F6Gl1LcVeM1GP2B5NjgDU</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Loick-Wilde, Natalie</creator><creator>Weber, Sarah C.</creator><creator>Conroy, Brandon J.</creator><creator>Capone, Douglas G.</creator><creator>Coles, Victoria J.</creator><creator>Medeiros, Patricia M.</creator><creator>Steinberg, Deborah K.</creator><creator>Montoya, Joseph P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Nitrogen sources and net growth efficiency of zooplankton in three Amazon River plume food webs</title><author>Loick-Wilde, Natalie ; Weber, Sarah C. ; Conroy, Brandon J. ; Capone, Douglas G. ; Coles, Victoria J. ; Medeiros, Patricia M. ; Steinberg, Deborah K. ; Montoya, Joseph P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3587-8b52698bfa4ae7bea9140b86afa22893f78e44abd7de7bebfd43d0a0ca657c973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bacillariophyceae</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Synechococcus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loick-Wilde, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Brandon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capone, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coles, Victoria J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Deborah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montoya, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loick-Wilde, Natalie</au><au>Weber, Sarah C.</au><au>Conroy, Brandon J.</au><au>Capone, Douglas G.</au><au>Coles, Victoria J.</au><au>Medeiros, Patricia M.</au><au>Steinberg, Deborah K.</au><au>Montoya, Joseph P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrogen sources and net growth efficiency of zooplankton in three Amazon River plume food webs</atitle><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle><addtitle>Limnol. Oceanogr</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>460-481</pages><issn>0024-3590</issn><eissn>1939-5590</eissn><abstract>The plasticity of nitrogen specific net growth efficiency (NGE) in marine mesozooplankton is currently unresolved, with discordant lines of evidence suggesting that NGE is constant, or that it varies with nitrogen source, food availability, and food quality in marine ecosystems. Specifically, the fate of nitrogen from nitrogen fixation is poorly known. We use 15N : 14N ratios in plankton in combination with hydrological data, nutrient profiles, and nitrogen fixation rate measurements to investigate the relationship between new nitrogen sources and the nitrogen specific NGE in three plankton communities along the outer Amazon River plume. The NGE of small (200–500 μm) mesozooplankton was estimated from the δ 15N differences between particulate nitrogen and zooplankton using an open system Rayleigh fractionation model. The transfer efficiency of nitrogen among larger (&gt; 500 μm) mesozooplankton was estimated from the change in δ 15N as a function of zooplankton size. The Amazon River was not a significant source of bioavailable nitrogen anywhere in our study region, and subsurface nitrate was the primary new nitrogen source for the outer shelf community, which was dominated by diatoms. N₂ fixation was the principal new nitrogen source at sites of high diatom diazotroph association abundance and at oceanic sites dominated by Trichodesmium spp. and Synechococcus spp. Although we found clear spatial differences in food quantity, food quality, and diazotroph inputs into mesozooplankton, our data show no significant differences in mesozooplankton nitrogen transfer efficiency and NGE (for latter, mean ± SD: 59 ± 10%) among sites.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/lno.10227</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0024-3590
ispartof Limnology and oceanography, 2016-03, Vol.61 (2), p.460-481
issn 0024-3590
1939-5590
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776661620
source JSTOR Open Access Journals
subjects Bacillariophyceae
Freshwater
Marine
Synechococcus
title Nitrogen sources and net growth efficiency of zooplankton in three Amazon River plume food webs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A23%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrogen%20sources%20and%20net%20growth%20efficiency%20of%20zooplankton%20in%20three%20Amazon%20River%20plume%20food%20webs&rft.jtitle=Limnology%20and%20oceanography&rft.au=Loick-Wilde,%20Natalie&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=460-481&rft.issn=0024-3590&rft.eissn=1939-5590&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lno.10227&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_JFNAL%3E26628426%3C/jstor_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776661620&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26628426&rfr_iscdi=true