Patterns of parasite community dissimilarity: the significant role of land use and lack of distance‐decay in a bat–helminth system

Increasing community dissimilarity across geographic distance has been described for a wide variety of organisms and understanding its underlying causes is key to understanding mechanisms driving patterns of biodiversity. Both niche‐based and neutral processes may produce a distance decay relationsh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oikos 2016-03, Vol.125 (3), p.374-385
Hauptverfasser: Warburton, Elizabeth M, Kohler, Steven L, Vonhof, Maarten J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 385
container_issue 3
container_start_page 374
container_title Oikos
container_volume 125
creator Warburton, Elizabeth M
Kohler, Steven L
Vonhof, Maarten J
description Increasing community dissimilarity across geographic distance has been described for a wide variety of organisms and understanding its underlying causes is key to understanding mechanisms driving patterns of biodiversity. Both niche‐based and neutral processes may produce a distance decay relationship; however, disentangling their relative influence requires simultaneous examination of multiple potential drivers. Parasites represent a unique opportunity in which to study distance decay because community dissimilarity may depend on environmental requirements and dispersal capability of parasites as well also those of their hosts. We used big brown bats Eptesicus fuscus and their intestinal helminths to investigate: 1) independent contributions of geographic and environmental distances on dissimilarity of intestinal helminth component communities between populations of big brown bats; 2) which environmental variables best explained variation in community dissimilarity; and 3) whether similar patterns of decay with geographic or environmental distance were observed for within‐host population and within‐individual host parasite communities. We used compositional measures of community dissimilarity to examine how parasite communities may change with geographic distance and varying environmental conditions. Non‐spatial variables strongly influenced compositional parasite community dissimilarity over multiple community scales, and we observed little evidence for spatial processes such as distance decay. Environment surrounding roost sites better predicted helminth community dissimilarity than any other class of variables and landcover classes representing anthropogenic modification consistently explained variation in community structure. Our results indicate that human disturbance drives significant patterns of parasite community dissimilarity, most likely by changing the presence or abundance of intermediate hosts in an area.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/oik.02313
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776658468</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>oikos.125.3.374</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>oikos.125.3.374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4903-c45209ab5016238f0d1096c56715f719918dd2814ba7319a2b474f464a8f893d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10kGL1DAUB_AiCo6rBz-BAT3ooeNL0yaNt3XQcZnFFXTxGN606U5m2mZMUrS3PXkW_Ib7SUztsgfBHBISfv_wyEuSPKWwpHG8tuawhIxRdi9ZUA6QggB-P1kAMEhpJuXD5JH3ewAQQuSL5OcnDEG73hPbkCM69CZoUtmuG3oTRlIb701nWnRx94aEnSbeXPWmMRX2gTjb6inZYl-TwWsyrS1Wh-kwZgP2lb65_lXrCkdieoJki-Hm-vdOt53pw4740QfdPU4eNNh6_eR2PUku37_7svqQnl-sz1an52mVS2BxLjKQuC2A8oyVDdQUJK8KLmjRCColLes6K2m-RcGoxGybi7zJeY5lU0pWs5Pk5Xzv0dlvg_ZBdcZXuo31azt4RYXgvChzXkb6_B-6t4PrY3VR8VKIMr5zVK9mVTnrvdONOjrToRsVBTV1RMWOqL8diXY52--m1eP_obo429wGXsyBvQ_W3QUitLGIrFBMMZFHls4svrf-ccfQHRQXTBTq68e12rxdy_WGrlQW_bPZN2gVXjnj1eXnDKbvApLKEtgfHBGzOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768778023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of parasite community dissimilarity: the significant role of land use and lack of distance‐decay in a bat–helminth system</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Warburton, Elizabeth M ; Kohler, Steven L ; Vonhof, Maarten J</creator><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Elizabeth M ; Kohler, Steven L ; Vonhof, Maarten J</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing community dissimilarity across geographic distance has been described for a wide variety of organisms and understanding its underlying causes is key to understanding mechanisms driving patterns of biodiversity. Both niche‐based and neutral processes may produce a distance decay relationship; however, disentangling their relative influence requires simultaneous examination of multiple potential drivers. Parasites represent a unique opportunity in which to study distance decay because community dissimilarity may depend on environmental requirements and dispersal capability of parasites as well also those of their hosts. We used big brown bats Eptesicus fuscus and their intestinal helminths to investigate: 1) independent contributions of geographic and environmental distances on dissimilarity of intestinal helminth component communities between populations of big brown bats; 2) which environmental variables best explained variation in community dissimilarity; and 3) whether similar patterns of decay with geographic or environmental distance were observed for within‐host population and within‐individual host parasite communities. We used compositional measures of community dissimilarity to examine how parasite communities may change with geographic distance and varying environmental conditions. Non‐spatial variables strongly influenced compositional parasite community dissimilarity over multiple community scales, and we observed little evidence for spatial processes such as distance decay. Environment surrounding roost sites better predicted helminth community dissimilarity than any other class of variables and landcover classes representing anthropogenic modification consistently explained variation in community structure. Our results indicate that human disturbance drives significant patterns of parasite community dissimilarity, most likely by changing the presence or abundance of intermediate hosts in an area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/oik.02313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bats ; Biodiversity ; Community ecology ; community structure ; environmental factors ; Eptesicus fuscus ; helminths ; humans ; intermediate hosts ; land cover ; land use ; Parasites</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 2016-03, Vol.125 (3), p.374-385</ispartof><rights>2015 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>2015 The Authors</rights><rights>Oikos © 2016 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4903-c45209ab5016238f0d1096c56715f719918dd2814ba7319a2b474f464a8f893d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4903-c45209ab5016238f0d1096c56715f719918dd2814ba7319a2b474f464a8f893d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/oikos.125.3.374$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/oikos.125.3.374$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Elizabeth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohler, Steven L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonhof, Maarten J</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of parasite community dissimilarity: the significant role of land use and lack of distance‐decay in a bat–helminth system</title><title>Oikos</title><addtitle>Oikos</addtitle><description>Increasing community dissimilarity across geographic distance has been described for a wide variety of organisms and understanding its underlying causes is key to understanding mechanisms driving patterns of biodiversity. Both niche‐based and neutral processes may produce a distance decay relationship; however, disentangling their relative influence requires simultaneous examination of multiple potential drivers. Parasites represent a unique opportunity in which to study distance decay because community dissimilarity may depend on environmental requirements and dispersal capability of parasites as well also those of their hosts. We used big brown bats Eptesicus fuscus and their intestinal helminths to investigate: 1) independent contributions of geographic and environmental distances on dissimilarity of intestinal helminth component communities between populations of big brown bats; 2) which environmental variables best explained variation in community dissimilarity; and 3) whether similar patterns of decay with geographic or environmental distance were observed for within‐host population and within‐individual host parasite communities. We used compositional measures of community dissimilarity to examine how parasite communities may change with geographic distance and varying environmental conditions. Non‐spatial variables strongly influenced compositional parasite community dissimilarity over multiple community scales, and we observed little evidence for spatial processes such as distance decay. Environment surrounding roost sites better predicted helminth community dissimilarity than any other class of variables and landcover classes representing anthropogenic modification consistently explained variation in community structure. Our results indicate that human disturbance drives significant patterns of parasite community dissimilarity, most likely by changing the presence or abundance of intermediate hosts in an area.</description><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>community structure</subject><subject>environmental factors</subject><subject>Eptesicus fuscus</subject><subject>helminths</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>intermediate hosts</subject><subject>land cover</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10kGL1DAUB_AiCo6rBz-BAT3ooeNL0yaNt3XQcZnFFXTxGN606U5m2mZMUrS3PXkW_Ib7SUztsgfBHBISfv_wyEuSPKWwpHG8tuawhIxRdi9ZUA6QggB-P1kAMEhpJuXD5JH3ewAQQuSL5OcnDEG73hPbkCM69CZoUtmuG3oTRlIb701nWnRx94aEnSbeXPWmMRX2gTjb6inZYl-TwWsyrS1Wh-kwZgP2lb65_lXrCkdieoJki-Hm-vdOt53pw4740QfdPU4eNNh6_eR2PUku37_7svqQnl-sz1an52mVS2BxLjKQuC2A8oyVDdQUJK8KLmjRCColLes6K2m-RcGoxGybi7zJeY5lU0pWs5Pk5Xzv0dlvg_ZBdcZXuo31azt4RYXgvChzXkb6_B-6t4PrY3VR8VKIMr5zVK9mVTnrvdONOjrToRsVBTV1RMWOqL8diXY52--m1eP_obo429wGXsyBvQ_W3QUitLGIrFBMMZFHls4svrf-ccfQHRQXTBTq68e12rxdy_WGrlQW_bPZN2gVXjnj1eXnDKbvApLKEtgfHBGzOg</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Warburton, Elizabeth M</creator><creator>Kohler, Steven L</creator><creator>Vonhof, Maarten J</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Nordic Society Oikos</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Patterns of parasite community dissimilarity: the significant role of land use and lack of distance‐decay in a bat–helminth system</title><author>Warburton, Elizabeth M ; Kohler, Steven L ; Vonhof, Maarten J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4903-c45209ab5016238f0d1096c56715f719918dd2814ba7319a2b474f464a8f893d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>community structure</topic><topic>environmental factors</topic><topic>Eptesicus fuscus</topic><topic>helminths</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>intermediate hosts</topic><topic>land cover</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Elizabeth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohler, Steven L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonhof, Maarten J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warburton, Elizabeth M</au><au>Kohler, Steven L</au><au>Vonhof, Maarten J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of parasite community dissimilarity: the significant role of land use and lack of distance‐decay in a bat–helminth system</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><addtitle>Oikos</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>374-385</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><abstract>Increasing community dissimilarity across geographic distance has been described for a wide variety of organisms and understanding its underlying causes is key to understanding mechanisms driving patterns of biodiversity. Both niche‐based and neutral processes may produce a distance decay relationship; however, disentangling their relative influence requires simultaneous examination of multiple potential drivers. Parasites represent a unique opportunity in which to study distance decay because community dissimilarity may depend on environmental requirements and dispersal capability of parasites as well also those of their hosts. We used big brown bats Eptesicus fuscus and their intestinal helminths to investigate: 1) independent contributions of geographic and environmental distances on dissimilarity of intestinal helminth component communities between populations of big brown bats; 2) which environmental variables best explained variation in community dissimilarity; and 3) whether similar patterns of decay with geographic or environmental distance were observed for within‐host population and within‐individual host parasite communities. We used compositional measures of community dissimilarity to examine how parasite communities may change with geographic distance and varying environmental conditions. Non‐spatial variables strongly influenced compositional parasite community dissimilarity over multiple community scales, and we observed little evidence for spatial processes such as distance decay. Environment surrounding roost sites better predicted helminth community dissimilarity than any other class of variables and landcover classes representing anthropogenic modification consistently explained variation in community structure. Our results indicate that human disturbance drives significant patterns of parasite community dissimilarity, most likely by changing the presence or abundance of intermediate hosts in an area.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/oik.02313</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-1299
ispartof Oikos, 2016-03, Vol.125 (3), p.374-385
issn 0030-1299
1600-0706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776658468
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Bats
Biodiversity
Community ecology
community structure
environmental factors
Eptesicus fuscus
helminths
humans
intermediate hosts
land cover
land use
Parasites
title Patterns of parasite community dissimilarity: the significant role of land use and lack of distance‐decay in a bat–helminth system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A18%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20parasite%20community%20dissimilarity:%20the%20significant%20role%20of%20land%20use%20and%20lack%20of%20distance%E2%80%90decay%20in%20a%20bat%E2%80%93helminth%20system&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Warburton,%20Elizabeth%20M&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=374-385&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/oik.02313&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3Eoikos.125.3.374%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768778023&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=oikos.125.3.374&rfr_iscdi=true