Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?
Humans are faster to grasp an object such as a tool if they have previewed the same object beforehand. This priming effect is strongest when actors gesture the use of the tool rather than simply move it, possibly because the previewed tool activates action-specific routines in dorsal-stream motor ne...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2016-04, Vol.234 (4), p.963-976 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 976 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 963 |
container_title | Experimental brain research |
container_volume | 234 |
creator | Squires, Scott D. Macdonald, Scott N. Culham, Jody C. Snow, Jacqueline C. |
description | Humans are faster to grasp an object such as a tool if they have previewed the same object beforehand. This priming effect is strongest when actors gesture the use of the tool rather than simply move it, possibly because the previewed tool activates action-specific routines in dorsal-stream motor networks. Here, we examined whether real tools, which observers could physically act upon, serve as more potent primes than two-dimensional images of tools, which do not afford physical action. Participants were presented with a prime stimulus that could be either a real tool or a visually matched photograph of a tool. After a brief delay, participants interacted with a real tool target, either by ‘grasping to move,’ or ‘grasping to use’ it. The identities of the prime and target tools were either the same (congruent trials; e.g., spatula–spatula) or different (incongruent trials; e.g., whisk–spatula). As expected, participants were faster to initiate grasps during trials when they had to move the tool rather than gesture its use. Priming effects were observed for grasp-to-use, but not grasp-to-move, responses. Surprisingly, however, both pictures of tools and real tools primed action responses equally. Our results indicate that tool priming effects are driven by pictorial cues and their implied actions, even in the absence of volumetric cues that reflect the tangibility and affordances of the prime. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00221-015-4518-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776657331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1776657331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d459513886923f4e3aec5dbabb4c25759bcc8be3ec967dfbb157c9528094a32c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LHTEUhkOx1KvtD-hGAm7cjM3JxyTjRkT8KBXsol2HJPeMzmXu5DaZKeivN8NVKYJQCISTPO-bc_IS8hXYMTCmv2XGOIeKgaqkAlM9fiALkIJXAKzeIQvGQFbSQLNL9nJezaXQ7BPZ5XVtaqHNgvz4mbp1N9zRMcaeujB2ccgn9CwhTeh6Gv0Kw5jpOpYTbNtSdH-RbooKMx3v3UA3XRinhPn0M_nYuj7jl-d9n_y-vPh1fl3d3F59Pz-7qYKSMFZLqRoFwpi64aKVKBwGtfTOexm40qrxIRiPAkNT62XrPSgdGsUNa6QTPIh9crT13aT4Z8I82nWXA_a9GzBO2YLWda20EPA_KDfCSNkU9PANuopTGsogM1VWaUEVCrZUSDHnhK2dv8KlBwvMzqHYbSi2hGLnUOxj0Rw8O09-jctXxUsKBeBbIJer4Q7TP0-_6_oEsKKWew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771779525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Squires, Scott D. ; Macdonald, Scott N. ; Culham, Jody C. ; Snow, Jacqueline C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Squires, Scott D. ; Macdonald, Scott N. ; Culham, Jody C. ; Snow, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><description>Humans are faster to grasp an object such as a tool if they have previewed the same object beforehand. This priming effect is strongest when actors gesture the use of the tool rather than simply move it, possibly because the previewed tool activates action-specific routines in dorsal-stream motor networks. Here, we examined whether real tools, which observers could physically act upon, serve as more potent primes than two-dimensional images of tools, which do not afford physical action. Participants were presented with a prime stimulus that could be either a real tool or a visually matched photograph of a tool. After a brief delay, participants interacted with a real tool target, either by ‘grasping to move,’ or ‘grasping to use’ it. The identities of the prime and target tools were either the same (congruent trials; e.g., spatula–spatula) or different (incongruent trials; e.g., whisk–spatula). As expected, participants were faster to initiate grasps during trials when they had to move the tool rather than gesture its use. Priming effects were observed for grasp-to-use, but not grasp-to-move, responses. Surprisingly, however, both pictures of tools and real tools primed action responses equally. Our results indicate that tool priming effects are driven by pictorial cues and their implied actions, even in the absence of volumetric cues that reflect the tangibility and affordances of the prime.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4518-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26686378</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain research ; Female ; Hand Strength - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Planning ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Research Article ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2016-04, Vol.234 (4), p.963-976</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d459513886923f4e3aec5dbabb4c25759bcc8be3ec967dfbb157c9528094a32c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d459513886923f4e3aec5dbabb4c25759bcc8be3ec967dfbb157c9528094a32c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-015-4518-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-015-4518-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26686378$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Squires, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, Scott N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culham, Jody C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snow, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><title>Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>Humans are faster to grasp an object such as a tool if they have previewed the same object beforehand. This priming effect is strongest when actors gesture the use of the tool rather than simply move it, possibly because the previewed tool activates action-specific routines in dorsal-stream motor networks. Here, we examined whether real tools, which observers could physically act upon, serve as more potent primes than two-dimensional images of tools, which do not afford physical action. Participants were presented with a prime stimulus that could be either a real tool or a visually matched photograph of a tool. After a brief delay, participants interacted with a real tool target, either by ‘grasping to move,’ or ‘grasping to use’ it. The identities of the prime and target tools were either the same (congruent trials; e.g., spatula–spatula) or different (incongruent trials; e.g., whisk–spatula). As expected, participants were faster to initiate grasps during trials when they had to move the tool rather than gesture its use. Priming effects were observed for grasp-to-use, but not grasp-to-move, responses. Surprisingly, however, both pictures of tools and real tools primed action responses equally. Our results indicate that tool priming effects are driven by pictorial cues and their implied actions, even in the absence of volumetric cues that reflect the tangibility and affordances of the prime.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hand Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LHTEUhkOx1KvtD-hGAm7cjM3JxyTjRkT8KBXsol2HJPeMzmXu5DaZKeivN8NVKYJQCISTPO-bc_IS8hXYMTCmv2XGOIeKgaqkAlM9fiALkIJXAKzeIQvGQFbSQLNL9nJezaXQ7BPZ5XVtaqHNgvz4mbp1N9zRMcaeujB2ccgn9CwhTeh6Gv0Kw5jpOpYTbNtSdH-RbooKMx3v3UA3XRinhPn0M_nYuj7jl-d9n_y-vPh1fl3d3F59Pz-7qYKSMFZLqRoFwpi64aKVKBwGtfTOexm40qrxIRiPAkNT62XrPSgdGsUNa6QTPIh9crT13aT4Z8I82nWXA_a9GzBO2YLWda20EPA_KDfCSNkU9PANuopTGsogM1VWaUEVCrZUSDHnhK2dv8KlBwvMzqHYbSi2hGLnUOxj0Rw8O09-jctXxUsKBeBbIJer4Q7TP0-_6_oEsKKWew</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Squires, Scott D.</creator><creator>Macdonald, Scott N.</creator><creator>Culham, Jody C.</creator><creator>Snow, Jacqueline C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?</title><author>Squires, Scott D. ; Macdonald, Scott N. ; Culham, Jody C. ; Snow, Jacqueline C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d459513886923f4e3aec5dbabb4c25759bcc8be3ec967dfbb157c9528094a32c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hand Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Squires, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, Scott N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culham, Jody C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snow, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Squires, Scott D.</au><au>Macdonald, Scott N.</au><au>Culham, Jody C.</au><au>Snow, Jacqueline C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>234</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>976</epage><pages>963-976</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>Humans are faster to grasp an object such as a tool if they have previewed the same object beforehand. This priming effect is strongest when actors gesture the use of the tool rather than simply move it, possibly because the previewed tool activates action-specific routines in dorsal-stream motor networks. Here, we examined whether real tools, which observers could physically act upon, serve as more potent primes than two-dimensional images of tools, which do not afford physical action. Participants were presented with a prime stimulus that could be either a real tool or a visually matched photograph of a tool. After a brief delay, participants interacted with a real tool target, either by ‘grasping to move,’ or ‘grasping to use’ it. The identities of the prime and target tools were either the same (congruent trials; e.g., spatula–spatula) or different (incongruent trials; e.g., whisk–spatula). As expected, participants were faster to initiate grasps during trials when they had to move the tool rather than gesture its use. Priming effects were observed for grasp-to-use, but not grasp-to-move, responses. Surprisingly, however, both pictures of tools and real tools primed action responses equally. Our results indicate that tool priming effects are driven by pictorial cues and their implied actions, even in the absence of volumetric cues that reflect the tangibility and affordances of the prime.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26686378</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-015-4518-z</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
ispartof | Experimental brain research, 2016-04, Vol.234 (4), p.963-976 |
issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776657331 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Brain research Female Hand Strength - physiology Humans Male Neurology Neurosciences Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Photic Stimulation - methods Planning Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reaction Time - physiology Research Article Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
title | Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T23%3A07%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Priming%20tool%20actions:%20Are%20real%20objects%20more%20effective%20primes%20than%20pictures?&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Squires,%20Scott%20D.&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=234&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=976&rft.pages=963-976&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-015-4518-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1776657331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771779525&rft_id=info:pmid/26686378&rfr_iscdi=true |