Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context
Vegetation growing on white‐sand soils is patchily distributed across the Amazon and is characterized by scrublands or open vegetation types (white‐sand campinas) and by forests (white‐sand forests) surrounded by contrasting habitat types. We studied birds in patches of white‐sand campinas in contra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biotropica 2016, Vol.48 (1), p.121-131 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 131 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | Biotropica |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Borges, Sergio H Cornelius, Cintia Moreira, Marcelo Ribas, Camila C Conh‐Haft, Mario Capurucho, João M Vargas, Claudeir Almeida, Ricardo |
description | Vegetation growing on white‐sand soils is patchily distributed across the Amazon and is characterized by scrublands or open vegetation types (white‐sand campinas) and by forests (white‐sand forests) surrounded by contrasting habitat types. We studied birds in patches of white‐sand campinas in contrasting landscapes in four regions located in distinct biogeographic units delimited by major rivers. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of landscape configuration and biogeographic context to patterns of species diversity and distribution. Aracá and Viruá landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Branco) are composed by large and continuous patches of white‐sand campinas, while Jaú, Novo Airão and Uatumã landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Negro) are composed by small patches of white‐sand campinas isolated by continuous terra firme forests. Birds were sampled using mist‐nets and qualitative censuses, and were classified as white‐sand vegetation specialists or non‐specialists. Bird species diversity was significantly different among studied regions, and composition was significantly different for both, specialists and non‐specialists birds. Local variability in species diversity and composition was best explained by white‐sand campina area, patch proximity, and distance to major rivers. We conclude that landscape configuration and biogeographical context influence patterns of bird diversity, abundance, and composition in Amazonian white‐sand campinas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/btp.12296 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776657228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48574864</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48574864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4146-66913b25ff642b7a7537c03afa36951a72378679764b1785f4983caf309e2d5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10s9v0zAUB_AIgUQZHPgDEJG4jEM2_3xOuK3VGGgVVOrGJC6Wm9qpSxMH2xHbuPAn8Dfyl8wlsAMSvljW9_OeLD9n2XOMjnBax6vYH2FCKniQTbBgrBCMVA-zCUIICgoIHmdPQtimY8URm2Tfp9av85lr26Gz0eqQ2y4_adWt66zq8quNjfrXj59L1a3zT7rRUUXrunyhYr3R4U1-aoyuY8idyefJhFr1OrXrjG0GP9p96dS6RrvGq35j630e9XV8mj0yahf0sz_7QXb59vRi9q6Yfzx7PzuZFzXDDAqACtMV4cYAIyuhBKeiRlQZRaHiWAlCRQmiEsBWWJTcsKqktTIUVZqs-ZoeZIdj3967r4MOUbY21Hq3U512Q5BYCAAuCCkTffUP3brBd-l2SXHBKyAASb0eVe1dCF4b2XvbKn8jMZL7Mcg0Bvl7DMkej_ab3emb_0M5vVj8rXgxVmxDdP6-gpVcsBJYyosxtyG94n2u_BcJggourz6cSZh_XpJleS4Xyb8cvVFOqsbbIC-XBGHYfwJMCaF38xCrnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757596266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Borges, Sergio H ; Cornelius, Cintia ; Moreira, Marcelo ; Ribas, Camila C ; Conh‐Haft, Mario ; Capurucho, João M ; Vargas, Claudeir ; Almeida, Ricardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Borges, Sergio H ; Cornelius, Cintia ; Moreira, Marcelo ; Ribas, Camila C ; Conh‐Haft, Mario ; Capurucho, João M ; Vargas, Claudeir ; Almeida, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><description>Vegetation growing on white‐sand soils is patchily distributed across the Amazon and is characterized by scrublands or open vegetation types (white‐sand campinas) and by forests (white‐sand forests) surrounded by contrasting habitat types. We studied birds in patches of white‐sand campinas in contrasting landscapes in four regions located in distinct biogeographic units delimited by major rivers. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of landscape configuration and biogeographic context to patterns of species diversity and distribution. Aracá and Viruá landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Branco) are composed by large and continuous patches of white‐sand campinas, while Jaú, Novo Airão and Uatumã landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Negro) are composed by small patches of white‐sand campinas isolated by continuous terra firme forests. Birds were sampled using mist‐nets and qualitative censuses, and were classified as white‐sand vegetation specialists or non‐specialists. Bird species diversity was significantly different among studied regions, and composition was significantly different for both, specialists and non‐specialists birds. Local variability in species diversity and composition was best explained by white‐sand campina area, patch proximity, and distance to major rivers. We conclude that landscape configuration and biogeographical context influence patterns of bird diversity, abundance, and composition in Amazonian white‐sand campinas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/btp.12296</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BTROAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Association for Tropical Biology</publisher><subject>Amazon biodiversity ; biogeography ; Birds ; connectivity ; forests ; habitats ; insular habitats ; island biogeography ; Landscape ; landscape ecology ; landscapes ; Mist ; Neotropical birds ; open vegetation ; Rivers ; Sand ; shrublands ; soil ; Species diversity ; species-area relationship ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Biotropica, 2016, Vol.48 (1), p.121-131</ispartof><rights>2016 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4146-66913b25ff642b7a7537c03afa36951a72378679764b1785f4983caf309e2d5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4146-66913b25ff642b7a7537c03afa36951a72378679764b1785f4983caf309e2d5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48574864$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48574864$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borges, Sergio H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelius, Cintia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribas, Camila C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conh‐Haft, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capurucho, João M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Claudeir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><title>Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context</title><title>Biotropica</title><addtitle>Biotropica</addtitle><description>Vegetation growing on white‐sand soils is patchily distributed across the Amazon and is characterized by scrublands or open vegetation types (white‐sand campinas) and by forests (white‐sand forests) surrounded by contrasting habitat types. We studied birds in patches of white‐sand campinas in contrasting landscapes in four regions located in distinct biogeographic units delimited by major rivers. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of landscape configuration and biogeographic context to patterns of species diversity and distribution. Aracá and Viruá landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Branco) are composed by large and continuous patches of white‐sand campinas, while Jaú, Novo Airão and Uatumã landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Negro) are composed by small patches of white‐sand campinas isolated by continuous terra firme forests. Birds were sampled using mist‐nets and qualitative censuses, and were classified as white‐sand vegetation specialists or non‐specialists. Bird species diversity was significantly different among studied regions, and composition was significantly different for both, specialists and non‐specialists birds. Local variability in species diversity and composition was best explained by white‐sand campina area, patch proximity, and distance to major rivers. We conclude that landscape configuration and biogeographical context influence patterns of bird diversity, abundance, and composition in Amazonian white‐sand campinas.</description><subject>Amazon biodiversity</subject><subject>biogeography</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>connectivity</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>insular habitats</subject><subject>island biogeography</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>landscape ecology</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>Mist</subject><subject>Neotropical birds</subject><subject>open vegetation</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>shrublands</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>species-area relationship</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0006-3606</issn><issn>1744-7429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10s9v0zAUB_AIgUQZHPgDEJG4jEM2_3xOuK3VGGgVVOrGJC6Wm9qpSxMH2xHbuPAn8Dfyl8wlsAMSvljW9_OeLD9n2XOMjnBax6vYH2FCKniQTbBgrBCMVA-zCUIICgoIHmdPQtimY8URm2Tfp9av85lr26Gz0eqQ2y4_adWt66zq8quNjfrXj59L1a3zT7rRUUXrunyhYr3R4U1-aoyuY8idyefJhFr1OrXrjG0GP9p96dS6RrvGq35j630e9XV8mj0yahf0sz_7QXb59vRi9q6Yfzx7PzuZFzXDDAqACtMV4cYAIyuhBKeiRlQZRaHiWAlCRQmiEsBWWJTcsKqktTIUVZqs-ZoeZIdj3967r4MOUbY21Hq3U512Q5BYCAAuCCkTffUP3brBd-l2SXHBKyAASb0eVe1dCF4b2XvbKn8jMZL7Mcg0Bvl7DMkej_ab3emb_0M5vVj8rXgxVmxDdP6-gpVcsBJYyosxtyG94n2u_BcJggourz6cSZh_XpJleS4Xyb8cvVFOqsbbIC-XBGHYfwJMCaF38xCrnA</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Borges, Sergio H</creator><creator>Cornelius, Cintia</creator><creator>Moreira, Marcelo</creator><creator>Ribas, Camila C</creator><creator>Conh‐Haft, Mario</creator><creator>Capurucho, João M</creator><creator>Vargas, Claudeir</creator><creator>Almeida, Ricardo</creator><general>Association for Tropical Biology</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context</title><author>Borges, Sergio H ; Cornelius, Cintia ; Moreira, Marcelo ; Ribas, Camila C ; Conh‐Haft, Mario ; Capurucho, João M ; Vargas, Claudeir ; Almeida, Ricardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4146-66913b25ff642b7a7537c03afa36951a72378679764b1785f4983caf309e2d5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Amazon biodiversity</topic><topic>biogeography</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>connectivity</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>insular habitats</topic><topic>island biogeography</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>landscape ecology</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>Mist</topic><topic>Neotropical birds</topic><topic>open vegetation</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>shrublands</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>species-area relationship</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borges, Sergio H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelius, Cintia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribas, Camila C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conh‐Haft, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capurucho, João M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Claudeir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borges, Sergio H</au><au>Cornelius, Cintia</au><au>Moreira, Marcelo</au><au>Ribas, Camila C</au><au>Conh‐Haft, Mario</au><au>Capurucho, João M</au><au>Vargas, Claudeir</au><au>Almeida, Ricardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context</atitle><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle><addtitle>Biotropica</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>121-131</pages><issn>0006-3606</issn><eissn>1744-7429</eissn><coden>BTROAZ</coden><abstract>Vegetation growing on white‐sand soils is patchily distributed across the Amazon and is characterized by scrublands or open vegetation types (white‐sand campinas) and by forests (white‐sand forests) surrounded by contrasting habitat types. We studied birds in patches of white‐sand campinas in contrasting landscapes in four regions located in distinct biogeographic units delimited by major rivers. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of landscape configuration and biogeographic context to patterns of species diversity and distribution. Aracá and Viruá landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Branco) are composed by large and continuous patches of white‐sand campinas, while Jaú, Novo Airão and Uatumã landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Negro) are composed by small patches of white‐sand campinas isolated by continuous terra firme forests. Birds were sampled using mist‐nets and qualitative censuses, and were classified as white‐sand vegetation specialists or non‐specialists. Bird species diversity was significantly different among studied regions, and composition was significantly different for both, specialists and non‐specialists birds. Local variability in species diversity and composition was best explained by white‐sand campina area, patch proximity, and distance to major rivers. We conclude that landscape configuration and biogeographical context influence patterns of bird diversity, abundance, and composition in Amazonian white‐sand campinas.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Association for Tropical Biology</pub><doi>10.1111/btp.12296</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3606 |
ispartof | Biotropica, 2016, Vol.48 (1), p.121-131 |
issn | 0006-3606 1744-7429 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776657228 |
source | Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Amazon biodiversity biogeography Birds connectivity forests habitats insular habitats island biogeography Landscape landscape ecology landscapes Mist Neotropical birds open vegetation Rivers Sand shrublands soil Species diversity species-area relationship Vegetation |
title | Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A07%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bird%20Communities%20in%20Amazonian%20White%E2%80%90Sand%20Vegetation%20Patches:%20Effects%20of%20Landscape%20Configuration%20and%20Biogeographic%20Context&rft.jtitle=Biotropica&rft.au=Borges,%20Sergio%20H&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=121-131&rft.issn=0006-3606&rft.eissn=1744-7429&rft.coden=BTROAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/btp.12296&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48574864%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757596266&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48574864&rfr_iscdi=true |