Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context

Vegetation growing on white‐sand soils is patchily distributed across the Amazon and is characterized by scrublands or open vegetation types (white‐sand campinas) and by forests (white‐sand forests) surrounded by contrasting habitat types. We studied birds in patches of white‐sand campinas in contra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotropica 2016, Vol.48 (1), p.121-131
Hauptverfasser: Borges, Sergio H, Cornelius, Cintia, Moreira, Marcelo, Ribas, Camila C, Conh‐Haft, Mario, Capurucho, João M, Vargas, Claudeir, Almeida, Ricardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 131
container_issue 1
container_start_page 121
container_title Biotropica
container_volume 48
creator Borges, Sergio H
Cornelius, Cintia
Moreira, Marcelo
Ribas, Camila C
Conh‐Haft, Mario
Capurucho, João M
Vargas, Claudeir
Almeida, Ricardo
description Vegetation growing on white‐sand soils is patchily distributed across the Amazon and is characterized by scrublands or open vegetation types (white‐sand campinas) and by forests (white‐sand forests) surrounded by contrasting habitat types. We studied birds in patches of white‐sand campinas in contrasting landscapes in four regions located in distinct biogeographic units delimited by major rivers. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of landscape configuration and biogeographic context to patterns of species diversity and distribution. Aracá and Viruá landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Branco) are composed by large and continuous patches of white‐sand campinas, while Jaú, Novo Airão and Uatumã landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Negro) are composed by small patches of white‐sand campinas isolated by continuous terra firme forests. Birds were sampled using mist‐nets and qualitative censuses, and were classified as white‐sand vegetation specialists or non‐specialists. Bird species diversity was significantly different among studied regions, and composition was significantly different for both, specialists and non‐specialists birds. Local variability in species diversity and composition was best explained by white‐sand campina area, patch proximity, and distance to major rivers. We conclude that landscape configuration and biogeographical context influence patterns of bird diversity, abundance, and composition in Amazonian white‐sand campinas.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/btp.12296
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776657228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48574864</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48574864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4146-66913b25ff642b7a7537c03afa36951a72378679764b1785f4983caf309e2d5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10s9v0zAUB_AIgUQZHPgDEJG4jEM2_3xOuK3VGGgVVOrGJC6Wm9qpSxMH2xHbuPAn8Dfyl8wlsAMSvljW9_OeLD9n2XOMjnBax6vYH2FCKniQTbBgrBCMVA-zCUIICgoIHmdPQtimY8URm2Tfp9av85lr26Gz0eqQ2y4_adWt66zq8quNjfrXj59L1a3zT7rRUUXrunyhYr3R4U1-aoyuY8idyefJhFr1OrXrjG0GP9p96dS6RrvGq35j630e9XV8mj0yahf0sz_7QXb59vRi9q6Yfzx7PzuZFzXDDAqACtMV4cYAIyuhBKeiRlQZRaHiWAlCRQmiEsBWWJTcsKqktTIUVZqs-ZoeZIdj3967r4MOUbY21Hq3U512Q5BYCAAuCCkTffUP3brBd-l2SXHBKyAASb0eVe1dCF4b2XvbKn8jMZL7Mcg0Bvl7DMkej_ab3emb_0M5vVj8rXgxVmxDdP6-gpVcsBJYyosxtyG94n2u_BcJggourz6cSZh_XpJleS4Xyb8cvVFOqsbbIC-XBGHYfwJMCaF38xCrnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757596266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Borges, Sergio H ; Cornelius, Cintia ; Moreira, Marcelo ; Ribas, Camila C ; Conh‐Haft, Mario ; Capurucho, João M ; Vargas, Claudeir ; Almeida, Ricardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Borges, Sergio H ; Cornelius, Cintia ; Moreira, Marcelo ; Ribas, Camila C ; Conh‐Haft, Mario ; Capurucho, João M ; Vargas, Claudeir ; Almeida, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><description>Vegetation growing on white‐sand soils is patchily distributed across the Amazon and is characterized by scrublands or open vegetation types (white‐sand campinas) and by forests (white‐sand forests) surrounded by contrasting habitat types. We studied birds in patches of white‐sand campinas in contrasting landscapes in four regions located in distinct biogeographic units delimited by major rivers. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of landscape configuration and biogeographic context to patterns of species diversity and distribution. Aracá and Viruá landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Branco) are composed by large and continuous patches of white‐sand campinas, while Jaú, Novo Airão and Uatumã landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Negro) are composed by small patches of white‐sand campinas isolated by continuous terra firme forests. Birds were sampled using mist‐nets and qualitative censuses, and were classified as white‐sand vegetation specialists or non‐specialists. Bird species diversity was significantly different among studied regions, and composition was significantly different for both, specialists and non‐specialists birds. Local variability in species diversity and composition was best explained by white‐sand campina area, patch proximity, and distance to major rivers. We conclude that landscape configuration and biogeographical context influence patterns of bird diversity, abundance, and composition in Amazonian white‐sand campinas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/btp.12296</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BTROAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Association for Tropical Biology</publisher><subject>Amazon biodiversity ; biogeography ; Birds ; connectivity ; forests ; habitats ; insular habitats ; island biogeography ; Landscape ; landscape ecology ; landscapes ; Mist ; Neotropical birds ; open vegetation ; Rivers ; Sand ; shrublands ; soil ; Species diversity ; species-area relationship ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Biotropica, 2016, Vol.48 (1), p.121-131</ispartof><rights>2016 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4146-66913b25ff642b7a7537c03afa36951a72378679764b1785f4983caf309e2d5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4146-66913b25ff642b7a7537c03afa36951a72378679764b1785f4983caf309e2d5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48574864$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48574864$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borges, Sergio H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelius, Cintia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribas, Camila C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conh‐Haft, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capurucho, João M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Claudeir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><title>Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context</title><title>Biotropica</title><addtitle>Biotropica</addtitle><description>Vegetation growing on white‐sand soils is patchily distributed across the Amazon and is characterized by scrublands or open vegetation types (white‐sand campinas) and by forests (white‐sand forests) surrounded by contrasting habitat types. We studied birds in patches of white‐sand campinas in contrasting landscapes in four regions located in distinct biogeographic units delimited by major rivers. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of landscape configuration and biogeographic context to patterns of species diversity and distribution. Aracá and Viruá landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Branco) are composed by large and continuous patches of white‐sand campinas, while Jaú, Novo Airão and Uatumã landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Negro) are composed by small patches of white‐sand campinas isolated by continuous terra firme forests. Birds were sampled using mist‐nets and qualitative censuses, and were classified as white‐sand vegetation specialists or non‐specialists. Bird species diversity was significantly different among studied regions, and composition was significantly different for both, specialists and non‐specialists birds. Local variability in species diversity and composition was best explained by white‐sand campina area, patch proximity, and distance to major rivers. We conclude that landscape configuration and biogeographical context influence patterns of bird diversity, abundance, and composition in Amazonian white‐sand campinas.</description><subject>Amazon biodiversity</subject><subject>biogeography</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>connectivity</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>insular habitats</subject><subject>island biogeography</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>landscape ecology</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>Mist</subject><subject>Neotropical birds</subject><subject>open vegetation</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>shrublands</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>species-area relationship</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0006-3606</issn><issn>1744-7429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10s9v0zAUB_AIgUQZHPgDEJG4jEM2_3xOuK3VGGgVVOrGJC6Wm9qpSxMH2xHbuPAn8Dfyl8wlsAMSvljW9_OeLD9n2XOMjnBax6vYH2FCKniQTbBgrBCMVA-zCUIICgoIHmdPQtimY8URm2Tfp9av85lr26Gz0eqQ2y4_adWt66zq8quNjfrXj59L1a3zT7rRUUXrunyhYr3R4U1-aoyuY8idyefJhFr1OrXrjG0GP9p96dS6RrvGq35j630e9XV8mj0yahf0sz_7QXb59vRi9q6Yfzx7PzuZFzXDDAqACtMV4cYAIyuhBKeiRlQZRaHiWAlCRQmiEsBWWJTcsKqktTIUVZqs-ZoeZIdj3967r4MOUbY21Hq3U512Q5BYCAAuCCkTffUP3brBd-l2SXHBKyAASb0eVe1dCF4b2XvbKn8jMZL7Mcg0Bvl7DMkej_ab3emb_0M5vVj8rXgxVmxDdP6-gpVcsBJYyosxtyG94n2u_BcJggourz6cSZh_XpJleS4Xyb8cvVFOqsbbIC-XBGHYfwJMCaF38xCrnA</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Borges, Sergio H</creator><creator>Cornelius, Cintia</creator><creator>Moreira, Marcelo</creator><creator>Ribas, Camila C</creator><creator>Conh‐Haft, Mario</creator><creator>Capurucho, João M</creator><creator>Vargas, Claudeir</creator><creator>Almeida, Ricardo</creator><general>Association for Tropical Biology</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context</title><author>Borges, Sergio H ; Cornelius, Cintia ; Moreira, Marcelo ; Ribas, Camila C ; Conh‐Haft, Mario ; Capurucho, João M ; Vargas, Claudeir ; Almeida, Ricardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4146-66913b25ff642b7a7537c03afa36951a72378679764b1785f4983caf309e2d5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Amazon biodiversity</topic><topic>biogeography</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>connectivity</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>insular habitats</topic><topic>island biogeography</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>landscape ecology</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>Mist</topic><topic>Neotropical birds</topic><topic>open vegetation</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>shrublands</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>species-area relationship</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borges, Sergio H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelius, Cintia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribas, Camila C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conh‐Haft, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capurucho, João M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Claudeir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borges, Sergio H</au><au>Cornelius, Cintia</au><au>Moreira, Marcelo</au><au>Ribas, Camila C</au><au>Conh‐Haft, Mario</au><au>Capurucho, João M</au><au>Vargas, Claudeir</au><au>Almeida, Ricardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context</atitle><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle><addtitle>Biotropica</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>121-131</pages><issn>0006-3606</issn><eissn>1744-7429</eissn><coden>BTROAZ</coden><abstract>Vegetation growing on white‐sand soils is patchily distributed across the Amazon and is characterized by scrublands or open vegetation types (white‐sand campinas) and by forests (white‐sand forests) surrounded by contrasting habitat types. We studied birds in patches of white‐sand campinas in contrasting landscapes in four regions located in distinct biogeographic units delimited by major rivers. Our aim was to investigate the contribution of landscape configuration and biogeographic context to patterns of species diversity and distribution. Aracá and Viruá landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Branco) are composed by large and continuous patches of white‐sand campinas, while Jaú, Novo Airão and Uatumã landscapes (on opposite sides of Rio Negro) are composed by small patches of white‐sand campinas isolated by continuous terra firme forests. Birds were sampled using mist‐nets and qualitative censuses, and were classified as white‐sand vegetation specialists or non‐specialists. Bird species diversity was significantly different among studied regions, and composition was significantly different for both, specialists and non‐specialists birds. Local variability in species diversity and composition was best explained by white‐sand campina area, patch proximity, and distance to major rivers. We conclude that landscape configuration and biogeographical context influence patterns of bird diversity, abundance, and composition in Amazonian white‐sand campinas.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Association for Tropical Biology</pub><doi>10.1111/btp.12296</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3606
ispartof Biotropica, 2016, Vol.48 (1), p.121-131
issn 0006-3606
1744-7429
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776657228
source Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Amazon biodiversity
biogeography
Birds
connectivity
forests
habitats
insular habitats
island biogeography
Landscape
landscape ecology
landscapes
Mist
Neotropical birds
open vegetation
Rivers
Sand
shrublands
soil
Species diversity
species-area relationship
Vegetation
title Bird Communities in Amazonian White‐Sand Vegetation Patches: Effects of Landscape Configuration and Biogeographic Context
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A07%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bird%20Communities%20in%20Amazonian%20White%E2%80%90Sand%20Vegetation%20Patches:%20Effects%20of%20Landscape%20Configuration%20and%20Biogeographic%20Context&rft.jtitle=Biotropica&rft.au=Borges,%20Sergio%20H&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=121-131&rft.issn=0006-3606&rft.eissn=1744-7429&rft.coden=BTROAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/btp.12296&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48574864%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757596266&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48574864&rfr_iscdi=true