Age moderates response to acceptance and commitment therapy vs. cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine age differences in response to different forms of psychotherapy for chronic pain. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of 114 adults (ages 18–89 years) with a variety of chronic, nonmalignant pain conditions randomly assigned to 8 weeks of grou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of geriatric psychiatry 2016-03, Vol.31 (3), p.302-308
Hauptverfasser: Wetherell, Julie Loebach, Petkus, Andrew J., Alonso-Fernandez, Miriam, Bower, Emily S., Steiner, Amanda R. W., Afari, Niloofar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The purpose of this study was to examine age differences in response to different forms of psychotherapy for chronic pain. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of 114 adults (ages 18–89 years) with a variety of chronic, nonmalignant pain conditions randomly assigned to 8 weeks of group‐administered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Treatment response was defined as a drop of at least three points on the Brief Pain Inventory‐interference subscale. Results Older adults were more likely to respond to ACT, and younger adults to CBT, both immediately following treatment and at 6‐month follow‐up. There were no significant differences in credibility, expectations of positive outcome, attrition, or satisfaction, although there was a trend for the youngest adults (ages 18–45 years) to complete fewer sessions. Conclusions These data suggest that ACT may be an effective and acceptable treatment for chronic pain in older adults. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:0885-6230
1099-1166
DOI:10.1002/gps.4330