Higher seed number compensates for lower fruit set in deceptive orchids

Floral deception is widespread in orchids, with more than one‐third of the species being pollinated this way. The evolutionary success of deceptive orchids is puzzling, as species employing this strategy are thought to have low reproductive success (less flowers yielding fruits) because of low polli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of ecology 2016-03, Vol.104 (2), p.343-351
Hauptverfasser: Sonkoly, Judit, E. Vojtkó, Anna, Tökölyi, Jácint, Török, Péter, Sramkó, Gábor, Illyés, Zoltán, Molnár V., Attila, Bartomeus, Ignasi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 351
container_issue 2
container_start_page 343
container_title The Journal of ecology
container_volume 104
creator Sonkoly, Judit
E. Vojtkó, Anna
Tökölyi, Jácint
Török, Péter
Sramkó, Gábor
Illyés, Zoltán
Molnár V., Attila
Bartomeus, Ignasi
description Floral deception is widespread in orchids, with more than one‐third of the species being pollinated this way. The evolutionary success of deceptive orchids is puzzling, as species employing this strategy are thought to have low reproductive success (less flowers yielding fruits) because of low pollination rates. However, direct measurements of total seed production in orchids – which is a better measure of reproductive success – are scarce due to the extremely small size of their seeds. Here, we quantified seed numbers in 1015 fruits belonging to 48 orchid species from the Pannonian ecoregion (central Europe) and obtained fruit set and thousand‐seed weight data for these species from the literature. We used phylogenetic comparative methods to test the hypothesis that deceptive species should compensate for their lower fruit set by having either more flowers, larger seeds or more seeds in a fruit. Similarly to previous studies, we found that deceptive orchids have substantially lower fruits‐set than nectar‐rewarding ones. Also, we found that deceptive species have more seeds in a fruit but not more flowers or larger seeds compared to nectar‐rewarding ones. Based on our results, deceptive species compensate for their lower fruit set by having higher seed numbers per fruit. As a consequence, their seed numbers per shoot do not differ from that of nectar‐rewarding ones. Together with other benefits of deceptive pollination (e.g. lower energy expenditure due to the lack of nectar production and higher genetic variability due to decreased probability of geitonogamous pollination), our results can explain why deceptive strategies are so widespread in the orchid family. Synthesis. Our results indicate that deceptive orchids can compensate for their lower fruit set by having more (but not larger) seeds in a fruit than rewarding species. These findings highlight possible ways in which plants can increase their reproductive success in face of pollinator limitation. We emphasize that fruit set in itself is an inappropriate measure of the reproductive success of orchids – the total number of seeds per shoot is a much better approximation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2745.12511
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776655536</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24762957</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24762957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5051-7a221b1922b1f47e6a1682fe167b817996d4858c5ecb37febf499116ed7eabe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EEqUwMyEisbCE-hx_NCOq-BQSAzBbTnIGV2lc7ATEv8clwMCCl7Punsey3iPkEOgZpDODQoqcKS7OgAmALTL57WyTCaWM5ZQrtUv2YlxSSqUSdEKurt3zC4YsIjZZN6yqdK_9ao1dND3GzPqQtf49dW0YXJ-4PnNd1mCN6969YeZD_eKauE92rGkjHnzXKXm8vHhcXOd391c3i_O7vBZUQK4MY1BByVgFliuUBuScWQSpqjmospQNn4t5LbCuCmWxsrwsASQ2Ck2FxZScjs-ug38dMPZ65WKNbWs69EPUoJSUQohCJvTkD7r0Q-jS5xIlZVlIzjfUbKTq4GMMaPU6uJUJHxqo3uSqNynqTYr6K9dkiNF4dy1-_Ifr24vFj3c0esvY-_DrMa4kK4VK8-Nxbo3X5jm4qJ8eGAWZdlWygkPxCX5wizc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766936446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Higher seed number compensates for lower fruit set in deceptive orchids</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sonkoly, Judit ; E. Vojtkó, Anna ; Tökölyi, Jácint ; Török, Péter ; Sramkó, Gábor ; Illyés, Zoltán ; Molnár V., Attila ; Bartomeus, Ignasi</creator><contributor>Bartomeus, Ignasi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sonkoly, Judit ; E. Vojtkó, Anna ; Tökölyi, Jácint ; Török, Péter ; Sramkó, Gábor ; Illyés, Zoltán ; Molnár V., Attila ; Bartomeus, Ignasi ; Bartomeus, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><description>Floral deception is widespread in orchids, with more than one‐third of the species being pollinated this way. The evolutionary success of deceptive orchids is puzzling, as species employing this strategy are thought to have low reproductive success (less flowers yielding fruits) because of low pollination rates. However, direct measurements of total seed production in orchids – which is a better measure of reproductive success – are scarce due to the extremely small size of their seeds. Here, we quantified seed numbers in 1015 fruits belonging to 48 orchid species from the Pannonian ecoregion (central Europe) and obtained fruit set and thousand‐seed weight data for these species from the literature. We used phylogenetic comparative methods to test the hypothesis that deceptive species should compensate for their lower fruit set by having either more flowers, larger seeds or more seeds in a fruit. Similarly to previous studies, we found that deceptive orchids have substantially lower fruits‐set than nectar‐rewarding ones. Also, we found that deceptive species have more seeds in a fruit but not more flowers or larger seeds compared to nectar‐rewarding ones. Based on our results, deceptive species compensate for their lower fruit set by having higher seed numbers per fruit. As a consequence, their seed numbers per shoot do not differ from that of nectar‐rewarding ones. Together with other benefits of deceptive pollination (e.g. lower energy expenditure due to the lack of nectar production and higher genetic variability due to decreased probability of geitonogamous pollination), our results can explain why deceptive strategies are so widespread in the orchid family. Synthesis. Our results indicate that deceptive orchids can compensate for their lower fruit set by having more (but not larger) seeds in a fruit than rewarding species. These findings highlight possible ways in which plants can increase their reproductive success in face of pollinator limitation. We emphasize that fruit set in itself is an inappropriate measure of the reproductive success of orchids – the total number of seeds per shoot is a much better approximation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12511</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publ</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Cactus ; deception ; ecoregions ; energy expenditure ; flowers ; fruit set ; Fruits ; genetic variation ; nectar reward ; nectar secretion ; Orchidaceae ; phylogenetic comparative methods ; phylogeny ; Plant nectar ; Plant reproduction ; pollination ; probability ; Reproductive ecology ; reproductive success ; seed mass ; seed number ; Seeds ; Success ; thousand‐seed weight</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2016-03, Vol.104 (2), p.343-351</ispartof><rights>2016 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. Journal of Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Journal of Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5051-7a221b1922b1f47e6a1682fe167b817996d4858c5ecb37febf499116ed7eabe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5051-7a221b1922b1f47e6a1682fe167b817996d4858c5ecb37febf499116ed7eabe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24762957$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24762957$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Bartomeus, Ignasi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sonkoly, Judit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>E. Vojtkó, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tökölyi, Jácint</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Török, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sramkó, Gábor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illyés, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molnár V., Attila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartomeus, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><title>Higher seed number compensates for lower fruit set in deceptive orchids</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>Floral deception is widespread in orchids, with more than one‐third of the species being pollinated this way. The evolutionary success of deceptive orchids is puzzling, as species employing this strategy are thought to have low reproductive success (less flowers yielding fruits) because of low pollination rates. However, direct measurements of total seed production in orchids – which is a better measure of reproductive success – are scarce due to the extremely small size of their seeds. Here, we quantified seed numbers in 1015 fruits belonging to 48 orchid species from the Pannonian ecoregion (central Europe) and obtained fruit set and thousand‐seed weight data for these species from the literature. We used phylogenetic comparative methods to test the hypothesis that deceptive species should compensate for their lower fruit set by having either more flowers, larger seeds or more seeds in a fruit. Similarly to previous studies, we found that deceptive orchids have substantially lower fruits‐set than nectar‐rewarding ones. Also, we found that deceptive species have more seeds in a fruit but not more flowers or larger seeds compared to nectar‐rewarding ones. Based on our results, deceptive species compensate for their lower fruit set by having higher seed numbers per fruit. As a consequence, their seed numbers per shoot do not differ from that of nectar‐rewarding ones. Together with other benefits of deceptive pollination (e.g. lower energy expenditure due to the lack of nectar production and higher genetic variability due to decreased probability of geitonogamous pollination), our results can explain why deceptive strategies are so widespread in the orchid family. Synthesis. Our results indicate that deceptive orchids can compensate for their lower fruit set by having more (but not larger) seeds in a fruit than rewarding species. These findings highlight possible ways in which plants can increase their reproductive success in face of pollinator limitation. We emphasize that fruit set in itself is an inappropriate measure of the reproductive success of orchids – the total number of seeds per shoot is a much better approximation.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Cactus</subject><subject>deception</subject><subject>ecoregions</subject><subject>energy expenditure</subject><subject>flowers</subject><subject>fruit set</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>genetic variation</subject><subject>nectar reward</subject><subject>nectar secretion</subject><subject>Orchidaceae</subject><subject>phylogenetic comparative methods</subject><subject>phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant nectar</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>pollination</subject><subject>probability</subject><subject>Reproductive ecology</subject><subject>reproductive success</subject><subject>seed mass</subject><subject>seed number</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>thousand‐seed weight</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EEqUwMyEisbCE-hx_NCOq-BQSAzBbTnIGV2lc7ATEv8clwMCCl7Punsey3iPkEOgZpDODQoqcKS7OgAmALTL57WyTCaWM5ZQrtUv2YlxSSqUSdEKurt3zC4YsIjZZN6yqdK_9ao1dND3GzPqQtf49dW0YXJ-4PnNd1mCN6969YeZD_eKauE92rGkjHnzXKXm8vHhcXOd391c3i_O7vBZUQK4MY1BByVgFliuUBuScWQSpqjmospQNn4t5LbCuCmWxsrwsASQ2Ck2FxZScjs-ug38dMPZ65WKNbWs69EPUoJSUQohCJvTkD7r0Q-jS5xIlZVlIzjfUbKTq4GMMaPU6uJUJHxqo3uSqNynqTYr6K9dkiNF4dy1-_Ifr24vFj3c0esvY-_DrMa4kK4VK8-Nxbo3X5jm4qJ8eGAWZdlWygkPxCX5wizc</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Sonkoly, Judit</creator><creator>E. Vojtkó, Anna</creator><creator>Tökölyi, Jácint</creator><creator>Török, Péter</creator><creator>Sramkó, Gábor</creator><creator>Illyés, Zoltán</creator><creator>Molnár V., Attila</creator><creator>Bartomeus, Ignasi</creator><general>Blackwell Scientific Publ</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Higher seed number compensates for lower fruit set in deceptive orchids</title><author>Sonkoly, Judit ; E. Vojtkó, Anna ; Tökölyi, Jácint ; Török, Péter ; Sramkó, Gábor ; Illyés, Zoltán ; Molnár V., Attila ; Bartomeus, Ignasi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5051-7a221b1922b1f47e6a1682fe167b817996d4858c5ecb37febf499116ed7eabe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Cactus</topic><topic>deception</topic><topic>ecoregions</topic><topic>energy expenditure</topic><topic>flowers</topic><topic>fruit set</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>genetic variation</topic><topic>nectar reward</topic><topic>nectar secretion</topic><topic>Orchidaceae</topic><topic>phylogenetic comparative methods</topic><topic>phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant nectar</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>pollination</topic><topic>probability</topic><topic>Reproductive ecology</topic><topic>reproductive success</topic><topic>seed mass</topic><topic>seed number</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>thousand‐seed weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sonkoly, Judit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>E. Vojtkó, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tökölyi, Jácint</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Török, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sramkó, Gábor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illyés, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molnár V., Attila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartomeus, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sonkoly, Judit</au><au>E. Vojtkó, Anna</au><au>Tökölyi, Jácint</au><au>Török, Péter</au><au>Sramkó, Gábor</au><au>Illyés, Zoltán</au><au>Molnár V., Attila</au><au>Bartomeus, Ignasi</au><au>Bartomeus, Ignasi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Higher seed number compensates for lower fruit set in deceptive orchids</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>343-351</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><coden>JECOAB</coden><abstract>Floral deception is widespread in orchids, with more than one‐third of the species being pollinated this way. The evolutionary success of deceptive orchids is puzzling, as species employing this strategy are thought to have low reproductive success (less flowers yielding fruits) because of low pollination rates. However, direct measurements of total seed production in orchids – which is a better measure of reproductive success – are scarce due to the extremely small size of their seeds. Here, we quantified seed numbers in 1015 fruits belonging to 48 orchid species from the Pannonian ecoregion (central Europe) and obtained fruit set and thousand‐seed weight data for these species from the literature. We used phylogenetic comparative methods to test the hypothesis that deceptive species should compensate for their lower fruit set by having either more flowers, larger seeds or more seeds in a fruit. Similarly to previous studies, we found that deceptive orchids have substantially lower fruits‐set than nectar‐rewarding ones. Also, we found that deceptive species have more seeds in a fruit but not more flowers or larger seeds compared to nectar‐rewarding ones. Based on our results, deceptive species compensate for their lower fruit set by having higher seed numbers per fruit. As a consequence, their seed numbers per shoot do not differ from that of nectar‐rewarding ones. Together with other benefits of deceptive pollination (e.g. lower energy expenditure due to the lack of nectar production and higher genetic variability due to decreased probability of geitonogamous pollination), our results can explain why deceptive strategies are so widespread in the orchid family. Synthesis. Our results indicate that deceptive orchids can compensate for their lower fruit set by having more (but not larger) seeds in a fruit than rewarding species. These findings highlight possible ways in which plants can increase their reproductive success in face of pollinator limitation. We emphasize that fruit set in itself is an inappropriate measure of the reproductive success of orchids – the total number of seeds per shoot is a much better approximation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Scientific Publ</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2745.12511</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0477
ispartof The Journal of ecology, 2016-03, Vol.104 (2), p.343-351
issn 0022-0477
1365-2745
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776655536
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Wiley Online Library Free Content; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animal reproduction
Cactus
deception
ecoregions
energy expenditure
flowers
fruit set
Fruits
genetic variation
nectar reward
nectar secretion
Orchidaceae
phylogenetic comparative methods
phylogeny
Plant nectar
Plant reproduction
pollination
probability
Reproductive ecology
reproductive success
seed mass
seed number
Seeds
Success
thousand‐seed weight
title Higher seed number compensates for lower fruit set in deceptive orchids
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A18%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Higher%20seed%20number%20compensates%20for%20lower%20fruit%20set%20in%20deceptive%20orchids&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Sonkoly,%20Judit&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=343-351&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft.coden=JECOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2745.12511&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24762957%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766936446&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24762957&rfr_iscdi=true