Disturbance impacts on large rain-forest vertebrates differ with edge type and regional context in Sulawesi, Indonesia
Anthropogenic edge effects, whereby disturbance strength increases in proximity to ecotone boundaries, are known to strongly affect individual species but we lack a general understanding of how they vary by species, disturbance type and regional context. We deployed 46 camera-trap stations for a tot...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of tropical ecology 2015-11, Vol.31 (6), p.509-517 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 517 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 509 |
container_title | Journal of tropical ecology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Froese, Graden Z.L. Contasti, Adrienne L. Mustari, Abdul Haris Brodie, Jedediah F. |
description | Anthropogenic edge effects, whereby disturbance strength increases in proximity to ecotone boundaries, are known to strongly affect individual species but we lack a general understanding of how they vary by species, disturbance type and regional context. We deployed 46 camera-trap stations for a total of 3545 trap-days at two sites in Sulawesi, Indonesia, obtaining 937 detections of five vertebrate species. Anoa (Bubalus spp.) were more abundant near edges, booted macaque (Macaca ochreata) and red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) were less abundant near edges, and edges did not impact Sulawesi warty pig (Sus celebensis) or Malay civet (Viverra tangalunga). But the relative importance of habitat disturbance from agriculture, roads and villages differed for each species, and edge-induced disturbances varied not only in magnitude but also in direction between the study areas. In the strongest instance, macaque local abundance was 3.5 times higher near villages than it was 3 km into the forest in one reserve, but 2.8 times higher 3 km into the forest than near villages in the other reserve. Our results suggest that responses to habitat edges among species and edge types are idiosyncratic, and that landscape-level context can strongly alter the influence of local disturbance on biodiversity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0266467415000450 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776651103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266467415000450</cupid><jstor_id>26563581</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26563581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-93ed1ef97b1de2fc97bc11483cec273c62ef483d3507c182cd5721caf1e7ad9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9rFTEQxYMoeK1-AB-EgC8-dDWTbJLdR6n_CoU-VJ-XbDKpuexNrkm2td--udwiovQpE87vnGFmCHkN7D0w0B-uGFeqV7oHyRjrJXtCNtCrsdODgKdkc5C7g_6cvChl25hRSrEhN59CqWueTbRIw25vbC00RbqYfI00mxA7nzKWSm8wV5yzqVioC95jpreh_qToGljv9khNdDTjdUjRLNSmWPF3pSHSq3Uxt1jCKT2PLsVWmZfkmTdLwVcP7wn58eXz97Nv3cXl1_Ozjxed7Xteu1GgA_SjnsEh97YVFqAfhEXLtbCKo28_JyTTFgZundQcrPGA2rhxFifk3TF3n9OvtY0x7UKxuCwmYlrLBForJQGYaOjbf9BtWnMb5UBxNgjRVtkoOFI2p1Iy-mmfw87kuwnYdLjE9N8lmufN0bMtNeU_Bq6kEnKApouHTLObc2j7_Kv1o6n3ZfyVmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1720833783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disturbance impacts on large rain-forest vertebrates differ with edge type and regional context in Sulawesi, Indonesia</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Froese, Graden Z.L. ; Contasti, Adrienne L. ; Mustari, Abdul Haris ; Brodie, Jedediah F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Froese, Graden Z.L. ; Contasti, Adrienne L. ; Mustari, Abdul Haris ; Brodie, Jedediah F.</creatorcontrib><description>Anthropogenic edge effects, whereby disturbance strength increases in proximity to ecotone boundaries, are known to strongly affect individual species but we lack a general understanding of how they vary by species, disturbance type and regional context. We deployed 46 camera-trap stations for a total of 3545 trap-days at two sites in Sulawesi, Indonesia, obtaining 937 detections of five vertebrate species. Anoa (Bubalus spp.) were more abundant near edges, booted macaque (Macaca ochreata) and red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) were less abundant near edges, and edges did not impact Sulawesi warty pig (Sus celebensis) or Malay civet (Viverra tangalunga). But the relative importance of habitat disturbance from agriculture, roads and villages differed for each species, and edge-induced disturbances varied not only in magnitude but also in direction between the study areas. In the strongest instance, macaque local abundance was 3.5 times higher near villages than it was 3 km into the forest in one reserve, but 2.8 times higher 3 km into the forest than near villages in the other reserve. Our results suggest that responses to habitat edges among species and edge types are idiosyncratic, and that landscape-level context can strongly alter the influence of local disturbance on biodiversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266467415000450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Anthropogenic factors ; Disturbance ; Environmental impact ; Gallus gallus ; Human influences ; Macaca ; Rainforests ; Sus celebensis ; Vertebrates ; Villages</subject><ispartof>Journal of tropical ecology, 2015-11, Vol.31 (6), p.509-517</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-93ed1ef97b1de2fc97bc11483cec273c62ef483d3507c182cd5721caf1e7ad9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-93ed1ef97b1de2fc97bc11483cec273c62ef483d3507c182cd5721caf1e7ad9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26563581$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266467415000450/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,800,27905,27906,55609,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Froese, Graden Z.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contasti, Adrienne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustari, Abdul Haris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodie, Jedediah F.</creatorcontrib><title>Disturbance impacts on large rain-forest vertebrates differ with edge type and regional context in Sulawesi, Indonesia</title><title>Journal of tropical ecology</title><addtitle>J. Trop. Ecol</addtitle><description>Anthropogenic edge effects, whereby disturbance strength increases in proximity to ecotone boundaries, are known to strongly affect individual species but we lack a general understanding of how they vary by species, disturbance type and regional context. We deployed 46 camera-trap stations for a total of 3545 trap-days at two sites in Sulawesi, Indonesia, obtaining 937 detections of five vertebrate species. Anoa (Bubalus spp.) were more abundant near edges, booted macaque (Macaca ochreata) and red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) were less abundant near edges, and edges did not impact Sulawesi warty pig (Sus celebensis) or Malay civet (Viverra tangalunga). But the relative importance of habitat disturbance from agriculture, roads and villages differed for each species, and edge-induced disturbances varied not only in magnitude but also in direction between the study areas. In the strongest instance, macaque local abundance was 3.5 times higher near villages than it was 3 km into the forest in one reserve, but 2.8 times higher 3 km into the forest than near villages in the other reserve. Our results suggest that responses to habitat edges among species and edge types are idiosyncratic, and that landscape-level context can strongly alter the influence of local disturbance on biodiversity.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Disturbance</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Gallus gallus</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Macaca</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Sus celebensis</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Villages</subject><issn>0266-4674</issn><issn>1469-7831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9rFTEQxYMoeK1-AB-EgC8-dDWTbJLdR6n_CoU-VJ-XbDKpuexNrkm2td--udwiovQpE87vnGFmCHkN7D0w0B-uGFeqV7oHyRjrJXtCNtCrsdODgKdkc5C7g_6cvChl25hRSrEhN59CqWueTbRIw25vbC00RbqYfI00mxA7nzKWSm8wV5yzqVioC95jpreh_qToGljv9khNdDTjdUjRLNSmWPF3pSHSq3Uxt1jCKT2PLsVWmZfkmTdLwVcP7wn58eXz97Nv3cXl1_Ozjxed7Xteu1GgA_SjnsEh97YVFqAfhEXLtbCKo28_JyTTFgZundQcrPGA2rhxFifk3TF3n9OvtY0x7UKxuCwmYlrLBForJQGYaOjbf9BtWnMb5UBxNgjRVtkoOFI2p1Iy-mmfw87kuwnYdLjE9N8lmufN0bMtNeU_Bq6kEnKApouHTLObc2j7_Kv1o6n3ZfyVmw</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Froese, Graden Z.L.</creator><creator>Contasti, Adrienne L.</creator><creator>Mustari, Abdul Haris</creator><creator>Brodie, Jedediah F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Disturbance impacts on large rain-forest vertebrates differ with edge type and regional context in Sulawesi, Indonesia</title><author>Froese, Graden Z.L. ; Contasti, Adrienne L. ; Mustari, Abdul Haris ; Brodie, Jedediah F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-93ed1ef97b1de2fc97bc11483cec273c62ef483d3507c182cd5721caf1e7ad9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Disturbance</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Gallus gallus</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Macaca</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Sus celebensis</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Villages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Froese, Graden Z.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contasti, Adrienne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustari, Abdul Haris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodie, Jedediah F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of tropical ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Froese, Graden Z.L.</au><au>Contasti, Adrienne L.</au><au>Mustari, Abdul Haris</au><au>Brodie, Jedediah F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disturbance impacts on large rain-forest vertebrates differ with edge type and regional context in Sulawesi, Indonesia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of tropical ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Trop. Ecol</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>517</epage><pages>509-517</pages><issn>0266-4674</issn><eissn>1469-7831</eissn><abstract>Anthropogenic edge effects, whereby disturbance strength increases in proximity to ecotone boundaries, are known to strongly affect individual species but we lack a general understanding of how they vary by species, disturbance type and regional context. We deployed 46 camera-trap stations for a total of 3545 trap-days at two sites in Sulawesi, Indonesia, obtaining 937 detections of five vertebrate species. Anoa (Bubalus spp.) were more abundant near edges, booted macaque (Macaca ochreata) and red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) were less abundant near edges, and edges did not impact Sulawesi warty pig (Sus celebensis) or Malay civet (Viverra tangalunga). But the relative importance of habitat disturbance from agriculture, roads and villages differed for each species, and edge-induced disturbances varied not only in magnitude but also in direction between the study areas. In the strongest instance, macaque local abundance was 3.5 times higher near villages than it was 3 km into the forest in one reserve, but 2.8 times higher 3 km into the forest than near villages in the other reserve. Our results suggest that responses to habitat edges among species and edge types are idiosyncratic, and that landscape-level context can strongly alter the influence of local disturbance on biodiversity.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0266467415000450</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4674 |
ispartof | Journal of tropical ecology, 2015-11, Vol.31 (6), p.509-517 |
issn | 0266-4674 1469-7831 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776651103 |
source | Cambridge Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Animal populations Anthropogenic factors Disturbance Environmental impact Gallus gallus Human influences Macaca Rainforests Sus celebensis Vertebrates Villages |
title | Disturbance impacts on large rain-forest vertebrates differ with edge type and regional context in Sulawesi, Indonesia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T21%3A58%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disturbance%20impacts%20on%20large%20rain-forest%20vertebrates%20differ%20with%20edge%20type%20and%20regional%20context%20in%20Sulawesi,%20Indonesia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20tropical%20ecology&rft.au=Froese,%20Graden%20Z.L.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=517&rft.pages=509-517&rft.issn=0266-4674&rft.eissn=1469-7831&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266467415000450&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26563581%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1720833783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266467415000450&rft_jstor_id=26563581&rfr_iscdi=true |