Positive indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial prey is not offset by increased predator density

1. Changes in one prey species' density can indirectly affect the abundance of another prey species if a shared predator eats both species. Sometimes, indirect effects occur when prey straddle habitats, including when riparian predator populations grow in response to emergent aquatic insects an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological entomology 2016-02, Vol.41 (1), p.61-71
Hauptverfasser: DREYER, JAMIN, HOEKMAN, DAVID, GRATTON, CLAUDIO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 61
container_title Ecological entomology
container_volume 41
creator DREYER, JAMIN
HOEKMAN, DAVID
GRATTON, CLAUDIO
description 1. Changes in one prey species' density can indirectly affect the abundance of another prey species if a shared predator eats both species. Sometimes, indirect effects occur when prey straddle habitats, including when riparian predator populations grow in response to emergent aquatic insects and increase predation on terrestrial prey. However, predators may largely switch to aquatic insects or become satiated, reducing predation on terrestrial prey. 2. To determine the net indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial arthropods via generalist spider predators, a field experiment was conducted mimicking midge influx and a wolf spider numerical response inside enclosures near an Icelandic lake. Lab mesocosms were also used to assess per capita rates of spider predation u nder differing levels of midge abundance. 3. Midges always decreased sentinel prey predation, but this effect increased with predator density. When midges were absent, predation increased 30% at a high spider density, but predation was equal between spider treatments when midges were present. In situ arthropods showed no effect of midge or spider treatments, although non‐significant abundance patterns were observed congruent with sentinel prey results. 4. In lab mesocosms, prey survivorship increased ≥50% where midges were present and rapidly saturated; the addition of 5, 20, 50, and 100 midges equivalently reduced spider predation, supporting predator distraction rather than satiation as the root cause. 5. The present results demonstrate a strong positive indirect effect of midges and broadly support the concept that predator responses to alternative prey are a major influence on the magnitude and direction of predator‐mediated indirect effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/een.12272
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776649059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1776649059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-b7b122d73cba842c8768ff437d9e54892d27645bc0814592874f2e855b7ab18b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0UtPGzEQAGCrolJTyqG_oJZ6oYcFP9avY4UgIKEWiUd6s7zecWUI62A7qPn3OAT1gC8jzXyyZ8YIfaXkiLZzDDAdUcYU-4BmlEvRMU7pHpoRTlQnTS8_oc-l3BNCmZFmhh6uUok1PgOO0xgz-IohhG1IAbuntavRt1JpmYLThCvkDKXm6JZ4lWGDY8FT2upQoOKhJSafwRUYt_XR1ZTxCFN7ZPMFfQxuWeDgLe6j27PTm5Pz7vL3_OLk52XnuWC1G9TQJhgV94PTPfNaSR1Cz9VoQPTasJEp2YvBE017YZhWfWCghRiUG6ge-D463N27yulp3bq1j7F4WC7dBGldLFVKyt4QYRr9_o7ep3WeWndNCWUI5Vo39WOnfE6lZAh2leOjyxtLid2u3ba129e1N9vtbCwV_v2HLj9YqbgSdvFrbhdkcSPmf-4sb_7bzgeXrPubY7G314xQSQgxrP0efwGeOI3T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757901388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positive indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial prey is not offset by increased predator density</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>DREYER, JAMIN ; HOEKMAN, DAVID ; GRATTON, CLAUDIO</creator><creatorcontrib>DREYER, JAMIN ; HOEKMAN, DAVID ; GRATTON, CLAUDIO</creatorcontrib><description>1. Changes in one prey species' density can indirectly affect the abundance of another prey species if a shared predator eats both species. Sometimes, indirect effects occur when prey straddle habitats, including when riparian predator populations grow in response to emergent aquatic insects and increase predation on terrestrial prey. However, predators may largely switch to aquatic insects or become satiated, reducing predation on terrestrial prey. 2. To determine the net indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial arthropods via generalist spider predators, a field experiment was conducted mimicking midge influx and a wolf spider numerical response inside enclosures near an Icelandic lake. Lab mesocosms were also used to assess per capita rates of spider predation u nder differing levels of midge abundance. 3. Midges always decreased sentinel prey predation, but this effect increased with predator density. When midges were absent, predation increased 30% at a high spider density, but predation was equal between spider treatments when midges were present. In situ arthropods showed no effect of midge or spider treatments, although non‐significant abundance patterns were observed congruent with sentinel prey results. 4. In lab mesocosms, prey survivorship increased ≥50% where midges were present and rapidly saturated; the addition of 5, 20, 50, and 100 midges equivalently reduced spider predation, supporting predator distraction rather than satiation as the root cause. 5. The present results demonstrate a strong positive indirect effect of midges and broadly support the concept that predator responses to alternative prey are a major influence on the magnitude and direction of predator‐mediated indirect effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-6946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2311</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/een.12272</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EENTDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>aquatic insects ; Aquatic-terrestrial linkage ; Araneae ; Arthropoda ; Brackish ; field experimentation ; habitats ; Lake Mývatn ; lakes ; midges ; positive indirect effects ; Predation ; predators ; satiety ; Small mammals ; spiders ; survival rate</subject><ispartof>Ecological entomology, 2016-02, Vol.41 (1), p.61-71</ispartof><rights>2016 The Royal Entomological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-b7b122d73cba842c8768ff437d9e54892d27645bc0814592874f2e855b7ab18b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-b7b122d73cba842c8768ff437d9e54892d27645bc0814592874f2e855b7ab18b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DREYER, JAMIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOEKMAN, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRATTON, CLAUDIO</creatorcontrib><title>Positive indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial prey is not offset by increased predator density</title><title>Ecological entomology</title><addtitle>Ecol Entomol</addtitle><description>1. Changes in one prey species' density can indirectly affect the abundance of another prey species if a shared predator eats both species. Sometimes, indirect effects occur when prey straddle habitats, including when riparian predator populations grow in response to emergent aquatic insects and increase predation on terrestrial prey. However, predators may largely switch to aquatic insects or become satiated, reducing predation on terrestrial prey. 2. To determine the net indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial arthropods via generalist spider predators, a field experiment was conducted mimicking midge influx and a wolf spider numerical response inside enclosures near an Icelandic lake. Lab mesocosms were also used to assess per capita rates of spider predation u nder differing levels of midge abundance. 3. Midges always decreased sentinel prey predation, but this effect increased with predator density. When midges were absent, predation increased 30% at a high spider density, but predation was equal between spider treatments when midges were present. In situ arthropods showed no effect of midge or spider treatments, although non‐significant abundance patterns were observed congruent with sentinel prey results. 4. In lab mesocosms, prey survivorship increased ≥50% where midges were present and rapidly saturated; the addition of 5, 20, 50, and 100 midges equivalently reduced spider predation, supporting predator distraction rather than satiation as the root cause. 5. The present results demonstrate a strong positive indirect effect of midges and broadly support the concept that predator responses to alternative prey are a major influence on the magnitude and direction of predator‐mediated indirect effects.</description><subject>aquatic insects</subject><subject>Aquatic-terrestrial linkage</subject><subject>Araneae</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>Lake Mývatn</subject><subject>lakes</subject><subject>midges</subject><subject>positive indirect effects</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>predators</subject><subject>satiety</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>spiders</subject><subject>survival rate</subject><issn>0307-6946</issn><issn>1365-2311</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0UtPGzEQAGCrolJTyqG_oJZ6oYcFP9avY4UgIKEWiUd6s7zecWUI62A7qPn3OAT1gC8jzXyyZ8YIfaXkiLZzDDAdUcYU-4BmlEvRMU7pHpoRTlQnTS8_oc-l3BNCmZFmhh6uUok1PgOO0xgz-IohhG1IAbuntavRt1JpmYLThCvkDKXm6JZ4lWGDY8FT2upQoOKhJSafwRUYt_XR1ZTxCFN7ZPMFfQxuWeDgLe6j27PTm5Pz7vL3_OLk52XnuWC1G9TQJhgV94PTPfNaSR1Cz9VoQPTasJEp2YvBE017YZhWfWCghRiUG6ge-D463N27yulp3bq1j7F4WC7dBGldLFVKyt4QYRr9_o7ep3WeWndNCWUI5Vo39WOnfE6lZAh2leOjyxtLid2u3ba129e1N9vtbCwV_v2HLj9YqbgSdvFrbhdkcSPmf-4sb_7bzgeXrPubY7G314xQSQgxrP0efwGeOI3T</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>DREYER, JAMIN</creator><creator>HOEKMAN, DAVID</creator><creator>GRATTON, CLAUDIO</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Positive indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial prey is not offset by increased predator density</title><author>DREYER, JAMIN ; HOEKMAN, DAVID ; GRATTON, CLAUDIO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-b7b122d73cba842c8768ff437d9e54892d27645bc0814592874f2e855b7ab18b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>aquatic insects</topic><topic>Aquatic-terrestrial linkage</topic><topic>Araneae</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>Lake Mývatn</topic><topic>lakes</topic><topic>midges</topic><topic>positive indirect effects</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>predators</topic><topic>satiety</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>spiders</topic><topic>survival rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DREYER, JAMIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOEKMAN, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRATTON, CLAUDIO</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecological entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DREYER, JAMIN</au><au>HOEKMAN, DAVID</au><au>GRATTON, CLAUDIO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positive indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial prey is not offset by increased predator density</atitle><jtitle>Ecological entomology</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Entomol</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>61-71</pages><issn>0307-6946</issn><eissn>1365-2311</eissn><coden>EENTDT</coden><abstract>1. Changes in one prey species' density can indirectly affect the abundance of another prey species if a shared predator eats both species. Sometimes, indirect effects occur when prey straddle habitats, including when riparian predator populations grow in response to emergent aquatic insects and increase predation on terrestrial prey. However, predators may largely switch to aquatic insects or become satiated, reducing predation on terrestrial prey. 2. To determine the net indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial arthropods via generalist spider predators, a field experiment was conducted mimicking midge influx and a wolf spider numerical response inside enclosures near an Icelandic lake. Lab mesocosms were also used to assess per capita rates of spider predation u nder differing levels of midge abundance. 3. Midges always decreased sentinel prey predation, but this effect increased with predator density. When midges were absent, predation increased 30% at a high spider density, but predation was equal between spider treatments when midges were present. In situ arthropods showed no effect of midge or spider treatments, although non‐significant abundance patterns were observed congruent with sentinel prey results. 4. In lab mesocosms, prey survivorship increased ≥50% where midges were present and rapidly saturated; the addition of 5, 20, 50, and 100 midges equivalently reduced spider predation, supporting predator distraction rather than satiation as the root cause. 5. The present results demonstrate a strong positive indirect effect of midges and broadly support the concept that predator responses to alternative prey are a major influence on the magnitude and direction of predator‐mediated indirect effects.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/een.12272</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0307-6946
ispartof Ecological entomology, 2016-02, Vol.41 (1), p.61-71
issn 0307-6946
1365-2311
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776649059
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects aquatic insects
Aquatic-terrestrial linkage
Araneae
Arthropoda
Brackish
field experimentation
habitats
Lake Mývatn
lakes
midges
positive indirect effects
Predation
predators
satiety
Small mammals
spiders
survival rate
title Positive indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial prey is not offset by increased predator density
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positive%20indirect%20effect%20of%20aquatic%20insects%20on%20terrestrial%20prey%20is%20not%20offset%20by%20increased%20predator%20density&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20entomology&rft.au=DREYER,%20JAMIN&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=61-71&rft.issn=0307-6946&rft.eissn=1365-2311&rft.coden=EENTDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/een.12272&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1776649059%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757901388&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true