Practicable methods for delimiting a plant invasion

AIM: Invasive populations are often irregularly distributed due to sporadic dispersal events and patchy distribution of suitable habitat, making it difficult to recognize the population boundary and effectively target management. We designed a survey prioritization that addresses these irregularitie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2016-02, Vol.22 (2), p.136-147
Hauptverfasser: Hauser, Cindy E, Giljohann, Katherine M, Rigby, Michael, Herbert, Karen, Curran, Iris, Pascoe, Charlie, Williams, Nicholas S. G, Cousens, Roger D, Moore, Joslin L, Wilson, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147
container_issue 2
container_start_page 136
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 22
creator Hauser, Cindy E
Giljohann, Katherine M
Rigby, Michael
Herbert, Karen
Curran, Iris
Pascoe, Charlie
Williams, Nicholas S. G
Cousens, Roger D
Moore, Joslin L
Wilson, John
description AIM: Invasive populations are often irregularly distributed due to sporadic dispersal events and patchy distribution of suitable habitat, making it difficult to recognize the population boundary and effectively target management. We designed a survey prioritization that addresses these irregularities and tested it on an invasive King Devil Hawkweed (Hieracium praealtum) population. LOCATION: Bogong High Plains, Victoria, Australia. METHODS: Our optimal design prioritized discovery of infestations beyond the known population boundary, while accounting for the diminishing likelihood of occurrence, plant detectability and the search resources available. Hawkweed management agencies implemented this design in the field. We evaluated its practicality and their progress towards delimitation. RESULTS: The survey design favoured locations outside the known population boundary with a relatively high likelihood of species occurrence and high capacity to detect individuals. Difficult‐to‐search sites were selected for intensive survey when the likelihood of occurrence was sufficiently high. The GPS tracks recorded by managing agencies during the survey corresponded well with the priority rankings, but did not include search effort information. In subsequent surveys, managing agencies have improved recording protocols and expanded their performance metrics. This will facilitate future evaluation of progress towards delimitation and eradication. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Our optimization method effectively identified priorities for delimiting an invading population, accounting for the agencies' budget and the risk of detection failures. Probabilistic maps proved useful for communicating search priorities, and GPS track logs provided valuable spatial data for inferring where the species is likely to be absent. When comprehensive spatio‐temporal data are available, survey findings can be used to update species occurrence models and thus our quantitative understanding of the population's extent. A probabilistic map provides a more nuanced view of delimitation than drawing a strict boundary around known infestations. Burgman et al.'s extended delimitation score is a promising summary statistic for reporting.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ddi.12388
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776646712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24817462</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24817462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4498-6de6e0118357381aa95f788f99ea598e8400abf8153a348b867c9236b422cecb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLxDAUhYMoqKMLf4BYcKOLOnk_luJzYFBBR5chbVPN2GnGpOPj3xutzkLwbnLhfCecnACwg-ARSjOsKneEMJFyBWwgKnBOOcWraSec54ohvg42Y5xCCAlheAOQm2DKzpWmaGw2s92Tr2JW-5BVtnEz17n2MTPZvDFtl7n21UTn2y2wVpsm2u2fcwAm52d3J5f5-PpidHI8zktKlcx5ZbmFCEnCBJHIGMVqIWWtlDVMSSsphKaoJWLEECoLyUWpMOEFxbi0ZUEG4KC_dx78y8LGTs9cLG2Twli_iBoJwTnlIr13APb_oFO_CG1KlygmFIRSoEQd9lQZfIzB1noe3MyED42g_qpPp_r0d32JHfbsm2vsx_-gPj0d_Tp2e8c0dj4sHZhKJCj_ypj3uoudfV_qJjxrLohg-uHqQlN-M1ZsfKnvE7_X87Xx2jwGF_XkFkPE0-cpyKkkn-e7kFY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757900871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practicable methods for delimiting a plant invasion</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Hauser, Cindy E ; Giljohann, Katherine M ; Rigby, Michael ; Herbert, Karen ; Curran, Iris ; Pascoe, Charlie ; Williams, Nicholas S. G ; Cousens, Roger D ; Moore, Joslin L ; Wilson, John</creator><contributor>Wilson, John ; Wilson, John</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Cindy E ; Giljohann, Katherine M ; Rigby, Michael ; Herbert, Karen ; Curran, Iris ; Pascoe, Charlie ; Williams, Nicholas S. G ; Cousens, Roger D ; Moore, Joslin L ; Wilson, John ; Wilson, John ; Wilson, John</creatorcontrib><description>AIM: Invasive populations are often irregularly distributed due to sporadic dispersal events and patchy distribution of suitable habitat, making it difficult to recognize the population boundary and effectively target management. We designed a survey prioritization that addresses these irregularities and tested it on an invasive King Devil Hawkweed (Hieracium praealtum) population. LOCATION: Bogong High Plains, Victoria, Australia. METHODS: Our optimal design prioritized discovery of infestations beyond the known population boundary, while accounting for the diminishing likelihood of occurrence, plant detectability and the search resources available. Hawkweed management agencies implemented this design in the field. We evaluated its practicality and their progress towards delimitation. RESULTS: The survey design favoured locations outside the known population boundary with a relatively high likelihood of species occurrence and high capacity to detect individuals. Difficult‐to‐search sites were selected for intensive survey when the likelihood of occurrence was sufficiently high. The GPS tracks recorded by managing agencies during the survey corresponded well with the priority rankings, but did not include search effort information. In subsequent surveys, managing agencies have improved recording protocols and expanded their performance metrics. This will facilitate future evaluation of progress towards delimitation and eradication. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Our optimization method effectively identified priorities for delimiting an invading population, accounting for the agencies' budget and the risk of detection failures. Probabilistic maps proved useful for communicating search priorities, and GPS track logs provided valuable spatial data for inferring where the species is likely to be absent. When comprehensive spatio‐temporal data are available, survey findings can be used to update species occurrence models and thus our quantitative understanding of the population's extent. A probabilistic map provides a more nuanced view of delimitation than drawing a strict boundary around known infestations. Burgman et al.'s extended delimitation score is a promising summary statistic for reporting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Science</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Conservation ; delimitation ; ecological invasion ; Flowers &amp; plants ; global positioning systems ; habitats ; Hieracium ; Hieracium praealtum ; invasive species ; King Devil Hawkweed ; Nonnative species ; pest ; Plant populations ; prioritization ; risk ; spatial data ; survey design ; surveys ; system optimization ; weed management</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2016-02, Vol.22 (2), p.136-147</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4498-6de6e0118357381aa95f788f99ea598e8400abf8153a348b867c9236b422cecb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4498-6de6e0118357381aa95f788f99ea598e8400abf8153a348b867c9236b422cecb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24817462$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24817462$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fddi.12388$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Wilson, John</contributor><contributor>Wilson, John</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Cindy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giljohann, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curran, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascoe, Charlie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Nicholas S. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cousens, Roger D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Joslin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, John</creatorcontrib><title>Practicable methods for delimiting a plant invasion</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><description>AIM: Invasive populations are often irregularly distributed due to sporadic dispersal events and patchy distribution of suitable habitat, making it difficult to recognize the population boundary and effectively target management. We designed a survey prioritization that addresses these irregularities and tested it on an invasive King Devil Hawkweed (Hieracium praealtum) population. LOCATION: Bogong High Plains, Victoria, Australia. METHODS: Our optimal design prioritized discovery of infestations beyond the known population boundary, while accounting for the diminishing likelihood of occurrence, plant detectability and the search resources available. Hawkweed management agencies implemented this design in the field. We evaluated its practicality and their progress towards delimitation. RESULTS: The survey design favoured locations outside the known population boundary with a relatively high likelihood of species occurrence and high capacity to detect individuals. Difficult‐to‐search sites were selected for intensive survey when the likelihood of occurrence was sufficiently high. The GPS tracks recorded by managing agencies during the survey corresponded well with the priority rankings, but did not include search effort information. In subsequent surveys, managing agencies have improved recording protocols and expanded their performance metrics. This will facilitate future evaluation of progress towards delimitation and eradication. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Our optimization method effectively identified priorities for delimiting an invading population, accounting for the agencies' budget and the risk of detection failures. Probabilistic maps proved useful for communicating search priorities, and GPS track logs provided valuable spatial data for inferring where the species is likely to be absent. When comprehensive spatio‐temporal data are available, survey findings can be used to update species occurrence models and thus our quantitative understanding of the population's extent. A probabilistic map provides a more nuanced view of delimitation than drawing a strict boundary around known infestations. Burgman et al.'s extended delimitation score is a promising summary statistic for reporting.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>delimitation</subject><subject>ecological invasion</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>global positioning systems</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>Hieracium</subject><subject>Hieracium praealtum</subject><subject>invasive species</subject><subject>King Devil Hawkweed</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>pest</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>prioritization</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>spatial data</subject><subject>survey design</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>system optimization</subject><subject>weed management</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtLxDAUhYMoqKMLf4BYcKOLOnk_luJzYFBBR5chbVPN2GnGpOPj3xutzkLwbnLhfCecnACwg-ARSjOsKneEMJFyBWwgKnBOOcWraSec54ohvg42Y5xCCAlheAOQm2DKzpWmaGw2s92Tr2JW-5BVtnEz17n2MTPZvDFtl7n21UTn2y2wVpsm2u2fcwAm52d3J5f5-PpidHI8zktKlcx5ZbmFCEnCBJHIGMVqIWWtlDVMSSsphKaoJWLEECoLyUWpMOEFxbi0ZUEG4KC_dx78y8LGTs9cLG2Twli_iBoJwTnlIr13APb_oFO_CG1KlygmFIRSoEQd9lQZfIzB1noe3MyED42g_qpPp_r0d32JHfbsm2vsx_-gPj0d_Tp2e8c0dj4sHZhKJCj_ypj3uoudfV_qJjxrLohg-uHqQlN-M1ZsfKnvE7_X87Xx2jwGF_XkFkPE0-cpyKkkn-e7kFY</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Hauser, Cindy E</creator><creator>Giljohann, Katherine M</creator><creator>Rigby, Michael</creator><creator>Herbert, Karen</creator><creator>Curran, Iris</creator><creator>Pascoe, Charlie</creator><creator>Williams, Nicholas S. G</creator><creator>Cousens, Roger D</creator><creator>Moore, Joslin L</creator><creator>Wilson, John</creator><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Practicable methods for delimiting a plant invasion</title><author>Hauser, Cindy E ; Giljohann, Katherine M ; Rigby, Michael ; Herbert, Karen ; Curran, Iris ; Pascoe, Charlie ; Williams, Nicholas S. G ; Cousens, Roger D ; Moore, Joslin L ; Wilson, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4498-6de6e0118357381aa95f788f99ea598e8400abf8153a348b867c9236b422cecb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>delimitation</topic><topic>ecological invasion</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>global positioning systems</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>Hieracium</topic><topic>Hieracium praealtum</topic><topic>invasive species</topic><topic>King Devil Hawkweed</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>pest</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>prioritization</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>spatial data</topic><topic>survey design</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>system optimization</topic><topic>weed management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hauser, Cindy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giljohann, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curran, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascoe, Charlie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Nicholas S. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cousens, Roger D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Joslin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, John</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hauser, Cindy E</au><au>Giljohann, Katherine M</au><au>Rigby, Michael</au><au>Herbert, Karen</au><au>Curran, Iris</au><au>Pascoe, Charlie</au><au>Williams, Nicholas S. G</au><au>Cousens, Roger D</au><au>Moore, Joslin L</au><au>Wilson, John</au><au>Wilson, John</au><au>Wilson, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practicable methods for delimiting a plant invasion</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>136-147</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>AIM: Invasive populations are often irregularly distributed due to sporadic dispersal events and patchy distribution of suitable habitat, making it difficult to recognize the population boundary and effectively target management. We designed a survey prioritization that addresses these irregularities and tested it on an invasive King Devil Hawkweed (Hieracium praealtum) population. LOCATION: Bogong High Plains, Victoria, Australia. METHODS: Our optimal design prioritized discovery of infestations beyond the known population boundary, while accounting for the diminishing likelihood of occurrence, plant detectability and the search resources available. Hawkweed management agencies implemented this design in the field. We evaluated its practicality and their progress towards delimitation. RESULTS: The survey design favoured locations outside the known population boundary with a relatively high likelihood of species occurrence and high capacity to detect individuals. Difficult‐to‐search sites were selected for intensive survey when the likelihood of occurrence was sufficiently high. The GPS tracks recorded by managing agencies during the survey corresponded well with the priority rankings, but did not include search effort information. In subsequent surveys, managing agencies have improved recording protocols and expanded their performance metrics. This will facilitate future evaluation of progress towards delimitation and eradication. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Our optimization method effectively identified priorities for delimiting an invading population, accounting for the agencies' budget and the risk of detection failures. Probabilistic maps proved useful for communicating search priorities, and GPS track logs provided valuable spatial data for inferring where the species is likely to be absent. When comprehensive spatio‐temporal data are available, survey findings can be used to update species occurrence models and thus our quantitative understanding of the population's extent. A probabilistic map provides a more nuanced view of delimitation than drawing a strict boundary around known infestations. Burgman et al.'s extended delimitation score is a promising summary statistic for reporting.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Science</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.12388</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2016-02, Vol.22 (2), p.136-147
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776646712
source Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Biodiversity
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH
Conservation
delimitation
ecological invasion
Flowers & plants
global positioning systems
habitats
Hieracium
Hieracium praealtum
invasive species
King Devil Hawkweed
Nonnative species
pest
Plant populations
prioritization
risk
spatial data
survey design
surveys
system optimization
weed management
title Practicable methods for delimiting a plant invasion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A38%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practicable%20methods%20for%20delimiting%20a%20plant%20invasion&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Hauser,%20Cindy%20E&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=136-147&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.12388&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E24817462%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757900871&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24817462&rfr_iscdi=true