Cryopreserved amniotic membrane as transplant allograft: viability and post-transplant outcome
Amniotic membrane (AM) transplantation is increasingly used in ophthalmological and dermatological surgeries to promote re-epithelialization and wound healing. Biologically active cells in the epithelial and stromal layers deliver growth factors and cytokines with anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cell and tissue banking 2016-03, Vol.17 (1), p.39-50 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 50 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | Cell and tissue banking |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Perepelkin, Natasha M. J. Hayward, Kirsten Mokoena, Tumelo Bentley, Michael J. Ross-Rodriguez, Lisa U. Marquez-Curtis, Leah McGann, Locksley E. Holovati, Jelena L. Elliott, Janet A. W. |
description | Amniotic membrane (AM) transplantation is increasingly used in ophthalmological and dermatological surgeries to promote re-epithelialization and wound healing. Biologically active cells in the epithelial and stromal layers deliver growth factors and cytokines with anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, anti-immunogenic and anti-fibrotic properties. In this work, confocal microscopy was used to show that our cryopreservation protocol for AM yielded viable cells in both the stromal and epithelial layers with favorable post-transplant outcome. AM was obtained from Caesarean-section placenta, processed into allograft pieces of different sizes (3 cm × 3 cm, 5 cm × 5 cm, and 10 cm × 10 cm) and cryopreserved in 10 % dimethyl sulfoxide using non-linear controlled rate freezing. Post-thaw cell viability in the entire piece of AM and in the stromal and epithelial cell layers was assessed using a dual fluorescent nuclear dye and compared to hypothermically stored AM, while surveys from surgical end-users provided information on post-transplant patient outcomes. There was no significant statistical difference in the cell viability in the entire piece, epithelial and stromal layers regardless of the size of allograft piece (
p
= 0.092, 0.188 and 0.581, respectively), and in the entire piece and stromal layer of hypothermically stored versus cryopreserved AM (
p
= 0.054 and 0.646, respectively). Surgical end-user feedback (n = 49) indicated that 16.3 % of AM allografts were excellent and 61.2 % were satisfactory. These results support the expanded clinical use of different sizes of cryopreserved AM allografts and address the issue of orientation of the AM during transplant for the treatment of dermatological defects and ocular surface disorders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10561-015-9530-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776644255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3978757401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d0792303303c7d73eed35756cf740cf9b8c0bb8ac9873103386a8a0740657db83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1L5TAQhsOi7NGjP8CbpeDN3mRNOs2Xd3LYXRcEb_TWkKap9NA23SQVzr_fHOuKCIIwMAPzzDszvAidUfKDEiIuIiWMU0wow4oBweoLOqJMAOaSVge5BqmwAoAVOo5xS0hJRAlf0arkwKmq1BF62ISdn4KLLjy5pjDD2PnU2WJwQx3M6AoTi5SLOPVmTIXpe_8YTJsui6fO1F3fpV1hxqaYfEz4DejnZP3gTtBha_roTl_yGt3_-nm3ucY3t7__bK5usGUVTbghQpVAIIcVjQDnGmCCcduKithW1dKSupbGKimAZk5yIw3JTc5EU0tYo--L7hT839nFpIcuWtfnW5yfo6ZCcF5VJWOfQUsJFPJBa3T-Dt36OYz5kWeKVBzK_W66UDb4GINr9RS6wYSdpkTvfdKLTzr7pPc-aZVnvr0oz_XgmteJ_8ZkoFyAmFvjowtvVn-o-g_lEZ0u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772046328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cryopreserved amniotic membrane as transplant allograft: viability and post-transplant outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Perepelkin, Natasha M. J. ; Hayward, Kirsten ; Mokoena, Tumelo ; Bentley, Michael J. ; Ross-Rodriguez, Lisa U. ; Marquez-Curtis, Leah ; McGann, Locksley E. ; Holovati, Jelena L. ; Elliott, Janet A. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Perepelkin, Natasha M. J. ; Hayward, Kirsten ; Mokoena, Tumelo ; Bentley, Michael J. ; Ross-Rodriguez, Lisa U. ; Marquez-Curtis, Leah ; McGann, Locksley E. ; Holovati, Jelena L. ; Elliott, Janet A. W.</creatorcontrib><description>Amniotic membrane (AM) transplantation is increasingly used in ophthalmological and dermatological surgeries to promote re-epithelialization and wound healing. Biologically active cells in the epithelial and stromal layers deliver growth factors and cytokines with anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, anti-immunogenic and anti-fibrotic properties. In this work, confocal microscopy was used to show that our cryopreservation protocol for AM yielded viable cells in both the stromal and epithelial layers with favorable post-transplant outcome. AM was obtained from Caesarean-section placenta, processed into allograft pieces of different sizes (3 cm × 3 cm, 5 cm × 5 cm, and 10 cm × 10 cm) and cryopreserved in 10 % dimethyl sulfoxide using non-linear controlled rate freezing. Post-thaw cell viability in the entire piece of AM and in the stromal and epithelial cell layers was assessed using a dual fluorescent nuclear dye and compared to hypothermically stored AM, while surveys from surgical end-users provided information on post-transplant patient outcomes. There was no significant statistical difference in the cell viability in the entire piece, epithelial and stromal layers regardless of the size of allograft piece (
p
= 0.092, 0.188 and 0.581, respectively), and in the entire piece and stromal layer of hypothermically stored versus cryopreserved AM (
p
= 0.054 and 0.646, respectively). Surgical end-user feedback (n = 49) indicated that 16.3 % of AM allografts were excellent and 61.2 % were satisfactory. These results support the expanded clinical use of different sizes of cryopreserved AM allografts and address the issue of orientation of the AM during transplant for the treatment of dermatological defects and ocular surface disorders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6814</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10561-015-9530-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26361949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Allografts - transplantation ; Amnion - transplantation ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cell Biology ; Cell Survival ; Cryopreservation - methods ; Epithelial Cells - cytology ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Life Sciences ; Membranes ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Original Paper ; Placenta - physiology ; Pregnancy ; Skin ; Skin & tissue grafts ; Staining and Labeling ; Stromal Cells - cytology ; Surgery ; Tissue engineering ; Tissue Survival ; Transplant Surgery ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Cell and tissue banking, 2016-03, Vol.17 (1), p.39-50</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d0792303303c7d73eed35756cf740cf9b8c0bb8ac9873103386a8a0740657db83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d0792303303c7d73eed35756cf740cf9b8c0bb8ac9873103386a8a0740657db83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10561-015-9530-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10561-015-9530-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26361949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perepelkin, Natasha M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokoena, Tumelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross-Rodriguez, Lisa U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquez-Curtis, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGann, Locksley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holovati, Jelena L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Janet A. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Cryopreserved amniotic membrane as transplant allograft: viability and post-transplant outcome</title><title>Cell and tissue banking</title><addtitle>Cell Tissue Bank</addtitle><addtitle>Cell Tissue Bank</addtitle><description>Amniotic membrane (AM) transplantation is increasingly used in ophthalmological and dermatological surgeries to promote re-epithelialization and wound healing. Biologically active cells in the epithelial and stromal layers deliver growth factors and cytokines with anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, anti-immunogenic and anti-fibrotic properties. In this work, confocal microscopy was used to show that our cryopreservation protocol for AM yielded viable cells in both the stromal and epithelial layers with favorable post-transplant outcome. AM was obtained from Caesarean-section placenta, processed into allograft pieces of different sizes (3 cm × 3 cm, 5 cm × 5 cm, and 10 cm × 10 cm) and cryopreserved in 10 % dimethyl sulfoxide using non-linear controlled rate freezing. Post-thaw cell viability in the entire piece of AM and in the stromal and epithelial cell layers was assessed using a dual fluorescent nuclear dye and compared to hypothermically stored AM, while surveys from surgical end-users provided information on post-transplant patient outcomes. There was no significant statistical difference in the cell viability in the entire piece, epithelial and stromal layers regardless of the size of allograft piece (
p
= 0.092, 0.188 and 0.581, respectively), and in the entire piece and stromal layer of hypothermically stored versus cryopreserved AM (
p
= 0.054 and 0.646, respectively). Surgical end-user feedback (n = 49) indicated that 16.3 % of AM allografts were excellent and 61.2 % were satisfactory. These results support the expanded clinical use of different sizes of cryopreserved AM allografts and address the issue of orientation of the AM during transplant for the treatment of dermatological defects and ocular surface disorders.</description><subject>Allografts - transplantation</subject><subject>Amnion - transplantation</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - methods</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Placenta - physiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Skin & tissue grafts</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling</subject><subject>Stromal Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>Tissue Survival</subject><subject>Transplant Surgery</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>1389-9333</issn><issn>1573-6814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1L5TAQhsOi7NGjP8CbpeDN3mRNOs2Xd3LYXRcEb_TWkKap9NA23SQVzr_fHOuKCIIwMAPzzDszvAidUfKDEiIuIiWMU0wow4oBweoLOqJMAOaSVge5BqmwAoAVOo5xS0hJRAlf0arkwKmq1BF62ISdn4KLLjy5pjDD2PnU2WJwQx3M6AoTi5SLOPVmTIXpe_8YTJsui6fO1F3fpV1hxqaYfEz4DejnZP3gTtBha_roTl_yGt3_-nm3ucY3t7__bK5usGUVTbghQpVAIIcVjQDnGmCCcduKithW1dKSupbGKimAZk5yIw3JTc5EU0tYo--L7hT839nFpIcuWtfnW5yfo6ZCcF5VJWOfQUsJFPJBa3T-Dt36OYz5kWeKVBzK_W66UDb4GINr9RS6wYSdpkTvfdKLTzr7pPc-aZVnvr0oz_XgmteJ_8ZkoFyAmFvjowtvVn-o-g_lEZ0u</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Perepelkin, Natasha M. J.</creator><creator>Hayward, Kirsten</creator><creator>Mokoena, Tumelo</creator><creator>Bentley, Michael J.</creator><creator>Ross-Rodriguez, Lisa U.</creator><creator>Marquez-Curtis, Leah</creator><creator>McGann, Locksley E.</creator><creator>Holovati, Jelena L.</creator><creator>Elliott, Janet A. W.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Cryopreserved amniotic membrane as transplant allograft: viability and post-transplant outcome</title><author>Perepelkin, Natasha M. J. ; Hayward, Kirsten ; Mokoena, Tumelo ; Bentley, Michael J. ; Ross-Rodriguez, Lisa U. ; Marquez-Curtis, Leah ; McGann, Locksley E. ; Holovati, Jelena L. ; Elliott, Janet A. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-d0792303303c7d73eed35756cf740cf9b8c0bb8ac9873103386a8a0740657db83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Allografts - transplantation</topic><topic>Amnion - transplantation</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - methods</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Placenta - physiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Skin & tissue grafts</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling</topic><topic>Stromal Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>Tissue Survival</topic><topic>Transplant Surgery</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perepelkin, Natasha M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokoena, Tumelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross-Rodriguez, Lisa U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquez-Curtis, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGann, Locksley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holovati, Jelena L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Janet A. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Cell and tissue banking</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perepelkin, Natasha M. J.</au><au>Hayward, Kirsten</au><au>Mokoena, Tumelo</au><au>Bentley, Michael J.</au><au>Ross-Rodriguez, Lisa U.</au><au>Marquez-Curtis, Leah</au><au>McGann, Locksley E.</au><au>Holovati, Jelena L.</au><au>Elliott, Janet A. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cryopreserved amniotic membrane as transplant allograft: viability and post-transplant outcome</atitle><jtitle>Cell and tissue banking</jtitle><stitle>Cell Tissue Bank</stitle><addtitle>Cell Tissue Bank</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>39-50</pages><issn>1389-9333</issn><eissn>1573-6814</eissn><abstract>Amniotic membrane (AM) transplantation is increasingly used in ophthalmological and dermatological surgeries to promote re-epithelialization and wound healing. Biologically active cells in the epithelial and stromal layers deliver growth factors and cytokines with anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, anti-immunogenic and anti-fibrotic properties. In this work, confocal microscopy was used to show that our cryopreservation protocol for AM yielded viable cells in both the stromal and epithelial layers with favorable post-transplant outcome. AM was obtained from Caesarean-section placenta, processed into allograft pieces of different sizes (3 cm × 3 cm, 5 cm × 5 cm, and 10 cm × 10 cm) and cryopreserved in 10 % dimethyl sulfoxide using non-linear controlled rate freezing. Post-thaw cell viability in the entire piece of AM and in the stromal and epithelial cell layers was assessed using a dual fluorescent nuclear dye and compared to hypothermically stored AM, while surveys from surgical end-users provided information on post-transplant patient outcomes. There was no significant statistical difference in the cell viability in the entire piece, epithelial and stromal layers regardless of the size of allograft piece (
p
= 0.092, 0.188 and 0.581, respectively), and in the entire piece and stromal layer of hypothermically stored versus cryopreserved AM (
p
= 0.054 and 0.646, respectively). Surgical end-user feedback (n = 49) indicated that 16.3 % of AM allografts were excellent and 61.2 % were satisfactory. These results support the expanded clinical use of different sizes of cryopreserved AM allografts and address the issue of orientation of the AM during transplant for the treatment of dermatological defects and ocular surface disorders.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>26361949</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10561-015-9530-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-9333 |
ispartof | Cell and tissue banking, 2016-03, Vol.17 (1), p.39-50 |
issn | 1389-9333 1573-6814 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1776644255 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Allografts - transplantation Amnion - transplantation Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cell Biology Cell Survival Cryopreservation - methods Epithelial Cells - cytology Female Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Life Sciences Membranes Microscopy, Confocal Original Paper Placenta - physiology Pregnancy Skin Skin & tissue grafts Staining and Labeling Stromal Cells - cytology Surgery Tissue engineering Tissue Survival Transplant Surgery Transplants & implants |
title | Cryopreserved amniotic membrane as transplant allograft: viability and post-transplant outcome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A19%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cryopreserved%20amniotic%20membrane%20as%20transplant%20allograft:%20viability%20and%20post-transplant%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Cell%20and%20tissue%20banking&rft.au=Perepelkin,%20Natasha%20M.%20J.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=39-50&rft.issn=1389-9333&rft.eissn=1573-6814&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10561-015-9530-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3978757401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772046328&rft_id=info:pmid/26361949&rfr_iscdi=true |