Evaluation of laboratory dolomite core sample size using representative elementary volume concepts
The adequacy for laboratory testing of four dolomite cores from the Culebra Dolomite of the Rustler Formation at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico, were evaluated using representative elementary volume (REV) theory. Gamma ray computerized tomography created three‐dimensional...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Water Resources Research 2000-05, Vol.36 (5), p.1199-1207 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1207 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1199 |
container_title | Journal of Water Resources Research |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Brown, G. O. Hsieh, H. T. Lucero, D. A. |
description | The adequacy for laboratory testing of four dolomite cores from the Culebra Dolomite of the Rustler Formation at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico, were evaluated using representative elementary volume (REV) theory. Gamma ray computerized tomography created three‐dimensional grids of bulk density and macropore index over volumes from 1.4 × 10−7 to 1.6 L. Three different methods for both volume averaging and REV analysis were applied and compared. Both density and macropore index converged to single values with increasing volume, which meets the most common qualitative definition of a REV. Statistical test results for the relatively homogeneous samples indicate that volumes larger than 1 to 7 mL have constant properties. Contrarily, a highly varied sample required 250 and 373 mL to achieve invariant density and macropore characteristics, respectively. Prismatic volume averaging was found to be better than slice averaging, while a qualitative test for the REV provided similar results as a rigorous statistical method. All cores were larger than the REV but were significantly different from one another. This implies that multiple cores are necessary to determine the entire range of transport properties within the rock. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2000WR900017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17758952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17758952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4327-d1a42ec9b17eab1cbbf69c7f44d24a781107e7408a21013872b7316ad08e703c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhq0KpC4tN35AuHAixV_JJEe0apeKVYtWoD1ajndSDE4cbGeh_Pp6FYQ4cZlXIz3PaGYIecXoFaO8fccppftdmyuDM7JirZQltCCekRWlUpRMtHBOXsT4LROyqmFFuuujdrNO1o-F7wunOx908uGxOHjnB5uwMD5gEfUwuRz2NxZztONDEXAKGHFMWT5igQ6HU5PNo3fzcPJGg1OKl-R5r13El3_ygny5uf68_lBu7ze36_fbUkvBoTwwLTmatmOAumOm6_q6NdBLeeBSQ8MYBQRJG80ZZaIB3oFgtT7QBoEKIy7I62Wuj8mqaPLu5mteYkSTFNSCVU1m3izMFPyPGWNSg40GndMj-jkqBlA1bcUz-HYBTfAxBuzVFOyQr1OMqtOz1b_Pzjhf8J_W4eN_WbXfrXdNVZ2kcpFsTPjrr6TDd1WDgErt7zbq0922-SjWG8XEE10okNc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17758952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of laboratory dolomite core sample size using representative elementary volume concepts</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Brown, G. O. ; Hsieh, H. T. ; Lucero, D. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, G. O. ; Hsieh, H. T. ; Lucero, D. A. ; Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore, CA (US)</creatorcontrib><description>The adequacy for laboratory testing of four dolomite cores from the Culebra Dolomite of the Rustler Formation at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico, were evaluated using representative elementary volume (REV) theory. Gamma ray computerized tomography created three‐dimensional grids of bulk density and macropore index over volumes from 1.4 × 10−7 to 1.6 L. Three different methods for both volume averaging and REV analysis were applied and compared. Both density and macropore index converged to single values with increasing volume, which meets the most common qualitative definition of a REV. Statistical test results for the relatively homogeneous samples indicate that volumes larger than 1 to 7 mL have constant properties. Contrarily, a highly varied sample required 250 and 373 mL to achieve invariant density and macropore characteristics, respectively. Prismatic volume averaging was found to be better than slice averaging, while a qualitative test for the REV provided similar results as a rigorous statistical method. All cores were larger than the REV but were significantly different from one another. This implies that multiple cores are necessary to determine the entire range of transport properties within the rock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2000WR900017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>DOLOMITE ; DRILL CORES ; EVALUATION ; GEOSCIENCES ; SAMPLING ; USA, New Mexico ; VOLUME</subject><ispartof>Journal of Water Resources Research, 2000-05, Vol.36 (5), p.1199-1207</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4327-d1a42ec9b17eab1cbbf69c7f44d24a781107e7408a21013872b7316ad08e703c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4327-d1a42ec9b17eab1cbbf69c7f44d24a781107e7408a21013872b7316ad08e703c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2000WR900017$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2000WR900017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,11497,27907,27908,45557,45558,46451,46875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/763158$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, G. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, H. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucero, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore, CA (US)</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of laboratory dolomite core sample size using representative elementary volume concepts</title><title>Journal of Water Resources Research</title><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><description>The adequacy for laboratory testing of four dolomite cores from the Culebra Dolomite of the Rustler Formation at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico, were evaluated using representative elementary volume (REV) theory. Gamma ray computerized tomography created three‐dimensional grids of bulk density and macropore index over volumes from 1.4 × 10−7 to 1.6 L. Three different methods for both volume averaging and REV analysis were applied and compared. Both density and macropore index converged to single values with increasing volume, which meets the most common qualitative definition of a REV. Statistical test results for the relatively homogeneous samples indicate that volumes larger than 1 to 7 mL have constant properties. Contrarily, a highly varied sample required 250 and 373 mL to achieve invariant density and macropore characteristics, respectively. Prismatic volume averaging was found to be better than slice averaging, while a qualitative test for the REV provided similar results as a rigorous statistical method. All cores were larger than the REV but were significantly different from one another. This implies that multiple cores are necessary to determine the entire range of transport properties within the rock.</description><subject>DOLOMITE</subject><subject>DRILL CORES</subject><subject>EVALUATION</subject><subject>GEOSCIENCES</subject><subject>SAMPLING</subject><subject>USA, New Mexico</subject><subject>VOLUME</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhq0KpC4tN35AuHAixV_JJEe0apeKVYtWoD1ajndSDE4cbGeh_Pp6FYQ4cZlXIz3PaGYIecXoFaO8fccppftdmyuDM7JirZQltCCekRWlUpRMtHBOXsT4LROyqmFFuuujdrNO1o-F7wunOx908uGxOHjnB5uwMD5gEfUwuRz2NxZztONDEXAKGHFMWT5igQ6HU5PNo3fzcPJGg1OKl-R5r13El3_ygny5uf68_lBu7ze36_fbUkvBoTwwLTmatmOAumOm6_q6NdBLeeBSQ8MYBQRJG80ZZaIB3oFgtT7QBoEKIy7I62Wuj8mqaPLu5mteYkSTFNSCVU1m3izMFPyPGWNSg40GndMj-jkqBlA1bcUz-HYBTfAxBuzVFOyQr1OMqtOz1b_Pzjhf8J_W4eN_WbXfrXdNVZ2kcpFsTPjrr6TDd1WDgErt7zbq0922-SjWG8XEE10okNc</recordid><startdate>200005</startdate><enddate>200005</enddate><creator>Brown, G. O.</creator><creator>Hsieh, H. T.</creator><creator>Lucero, D. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200005</creationdate><title>Evaluation of laboratory dolomite core sample size using representative elementary volume concepts</title><author>Brown, G. O. ; Hsieh, H. T. ; Lucero, D. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4327-d1a42ec9b17eab1cbbf69c7f44d24a781107e7408a21013872b7316ad08e703c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>DOLOMITE</topic><topic>DRILL CORES</topic><topic>EVALUATION</topic><topic>GEOSCIENCES</topic><topic>SAMPLING</topic><topic>USA, New Mexico</topic><topic>VOLUME</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, G. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, H. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucero, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore, CA (US)</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of Water Resources Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, G. O.</au><au>Hsieh, H. T.</au><au>Lucero, D. A.</au><aucorp>Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore, CA (US)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of laboratory dolomite core sample size using representative elementary volume concepts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Water Resources Research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><date>2000-05</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1199</spage><epage>1207</epage><pages>1199-1207</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>The adequacy for laboratory testing of four dolomite cores from the Culebra Dolomite of the Rustler Formation at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico, were evaluated using representative elementary volume (REV) theory. Gamma ray computerized tomography created three‐dimensional grids of bulk density and macropore index over volumes from 1.4 × 10−7 to 1.6 L. Three different methods for both volume averaging and REV analysis were applied and compared. Both density and macropore index converged to single values with increasing volume, which meets the most common qualitative definition of a REV. Statistical test results for the relatively homogeneous samples indicate that volumes larger than 1 to 7 mL have constant properties. Contrarily, a highly varied sample required 250 and 373 mL to achieve invariant density and macropore characteristics, respectively. Prismatic volume averaging was found to be better than slice averaging, while a qualitative test for the REV provided similar results as a rigorous statistical method. All cores were larger than the REV but were significantly different from one another. This implies that multiple cores are necessary to determine the entire range of transport properties within the rock.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2000WR900017</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Journal of Water Resources Research, 2000-05, Vol.36 (5), p.1199-1207 |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17758952 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | DOLOMITE DRILL CORES EVALUATION GEOSCIENCES SAMPLING USA, New Mexico VOLUME |
title | Evaluation of laboratory dolomite core sample size using representative elementary volume concepts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A09%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20laboratory%20dolomite%20core%20sample%20size%20using%20representative%20elementary%20volume%20concepts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Water%20Resources%20Research&rft.au=Brown,%20G.%20O.&rft.aucorp=Sandia%20National%20Labs.,%20Albuquerque,%20NM,%20and%20Livermore,%20CA%20(US)&rft.date=2000-05&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1199&rft.epage=1207&rft.pages=1199-1207&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2000WR900017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E17758952%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17758952&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |