The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for Rating Program Performance for Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Background The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) has developed multidimensional composite quality measures for common cardiac surgery procedures. This first composite measure for general thoracic surgery evaluates STS participant performance for lobectomy in lung cancer patients. Methods The STS lo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2016-04, Vol.101 (4), p.1379-1387
Hauptverfasser: Kozower, Benjamin D., MD, MPH, O’Brien, Sean M., PhD, Kosinski, Andrzej S., PhD, Magee, Mitchell J., MD, Dokholyan, Rachel, MPH, Jacobs, Jeffery P., MD, Shahian, David M., MD, Wright, Cameron D., MD, Fernandez, Felix G., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1387
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1379
container_title The Annals of thoracic surgery
container_volume 101
creator Kozower, Benjamin D., MD, MPH
O’Brien, Sean M., PhD
Kosinski, Andrzej S., PhD
Magee, Mitchell J., MD
Dokholyan, Rachel, MPH
Jacobs, Jeffery P., MD
Shahian, David M., MD
Wright, Cameron D., MD
Fernandez, Felix G., MD
description Background The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) has developed multidimensional composite quality measures for common cardiac surgery procedures. This first composite measure for general thoracic surgery evaluates STS participant performance for lobectomy in lung cancer patients. Methods The STS lobectomy composite score is composed of two outcomes: risk-adjusted mortality; and any-or-none, risk-adjusted major complications. General Thoracic Surgery Database data were included from 2011 to 2014 to provide adequate sample size, and 95% Bayesian credible intervals were used to determine “star ratings.” The STS participants were also compared with national benchmarks (including non-STS participants) using the National Inpatient Sample. Comparisons of discharge mortality, postoperative length of stay, and percent of stage I lung cancers resected using minimally invasive approaches are not included in star ratings but will be reported to participants in STS feedback reports. Results The study population included 20,657 lobectomy patients from 231 participating centers. Operative mortality was 1.5%, major complication rate was 9.6%, and median postoperative length of stay was 4 days. Risk-adjusted mortality and major complication rates varied threefold from highest performing (three-star) to lowest performing (one-star) programs. Approximately 5% of participants were one-star, 7% were three-star, and 88% were two-star programs. Conclusions The STS has developed the first general thoracic surgery quality composite measure to compare programs performing lobectomy for lung cancer. This measure will be used for quality assessment and provider feedback, and will be made available for voluntary public reporting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.081
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1775383044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003497515017531</els_id><sourcerecordid>1775383044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-76c60f7036c3aa86abf532541f105cb5b1d8ca60030c51b5999aaf7a04cc74503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2P1DAMhiMEYmcX_gLKkUtnnaZJ2wsSjJYPaSRWzHCOUk86m6FthqRFmn-PSxeQOHGy7Pe1LT9mjAtYCxD69rS240OIFtMU1zkIReU1VOIJWwml8kznqn7KVgAgs6Iu1RW7TulEaU7yc3aV67JStdQr1u8fHN8F9G688NDy_a-xHvluikcXhsQ3oT-H5EeyYYiOtyHyL3b0w5Hfx3CMtuf3LlK1twMu8jY0DsfQX5ZsIutmFuML9qy1XXIvH-MN-_r-br_5mG0_f_i0ebvNUKp6zEqNGtoSpEZpbaVt0yqZq0K0AhQ2qhGHCq2m6wCVaFRd19a2pYUCsSwUyBv2epl7juH75NJoep_QdZ0dXJiSEWWpZCWhKMhaLVaMIaXoWnOOvrfxYgSYGbY5mb-wzQx7Vgg2tb563DI1vTv8afxNlwzvFoOjW394F00i0ATi4CMBMofg_2fLm3-GYOcHj7b75i4uncIUB2JphEm5AbObnz7_XCgQdKWQPwHH66r_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1775383044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for Rating Program Performance for Lobectomy for Lung Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kozower, Benjamin D., MD, MPH ; O’Brien, Sean M., PhD ; Kosinski, Andrzej S., PhD ; Magee, Mitchell J., MD ; Dokholyan, Rachel, MPH ; Jacobs, Jeffery P., MD ; Shahian, David M., MD ; Wright, Cameron D., MD ; Fernandez, Felix G., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Kozower, Benjamin D., MD, MPH ; O’Brien, Sean M., PhD ; Kosinski, Andrzej S., PhD ; Magee, Mitchell J., MD ; Dokholyan, Rachel, MPH ; Jacobs, Jeffery P., MD ; Shahian, David M., MD ; Wright, Cameron D., MD ; Fernandez, Felix G., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) has developed multidimensional composite quality measures for common cardiac surgery procedures. This first composite measure for general thoracic surgery evaluates STS participant performance for lobectomy in lung cancer patients. Methods The STS lobectomy composite score is composed of two outcomes: risk-adjusted mortality; and any-or-none, risk-adjusted major complications. General Thoracic Surgery Database data were included from 2011 to 2014 to provide adequate sample size, and 95% Bayesian credible intervals were used to determine “star ratings.” The STS participants were also compared with national benchmarks (including non-STS participants) using the National Inpatient Sample. Comparisons of discharge mortality, postoperative length of stay, and percent of stage I lung cancers resected using minimally invasive approaches are not included in star ratings but will be reported to participants in STS feedback reports. Results The study population included 20,657 lobectomy patients from 231 participating centers. Operative mortality was 1.5%, major complication rate was 9.6%, and median postoperative length of stay was 4 days. Risk-adjusted mortality and major complication rates varied threefold from highest performing (three-star) to lowest performing (one-star) programs. Approximately 5% of participants were one-star, 7% were three-star, and 88% were two-star programs. Conclusions The STS has developed the first general thoracic surgery quality composite measure to compare programs performing lobectomy for lung cancer. This measure will be used for quality assessment and provider feedback, and will be made available for voluntary public reporting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.081</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26785936</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiothoracic Surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Pneumonectomy - mortality ; Pneumonectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Program Evaluation ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Societies, Medical ; Surgery ; Thoracic Surgery ; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2016-04, Vol.101 (4), p.1379-1387</ispartof><rights>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><rights>2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-76c60f7036c3aa86abf532541f105cb5b1d8ca60030c51b5999aaf7a04cc74503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-76c60f7036c3aa86abf532541f105cb5b1d8ca60030c51b5999aaf7a04cc74503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.081$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26785936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kozower, Benjamin D., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Sean M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosinski, Andrzej S., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magee, Mitchell J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokholyan, Rachel, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Jeffery P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahian, David M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Cameron D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Felix G., MD</creatorcontrib><title>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for Rating Program Performance for Lobectomy for Lung Cancer</title><title>The Annals of thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><description>Background The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) has developed multidimensional composite quality measures for common cardiac surgery procedures. This first composite measure for general thoracic surgery evaluates STS participant performance for lobectomy in lung cancer patients. Methods The STS lobectomy composite score is composed of two outcomes: risk-adjusted mortality; and any-or-none, risk-adjusted major complications. General Thoracic Surgery Database data were included from 2011 to 2014 to provide adequate sample size, and 95% Bayesian credible intervals were used to determine “star ratings.” The STS participants were also compared with national benchmarks (including non-STS participants) using the National Inpatient Sample. Comparisons of discharge mortality, postoperative length of stay, and percent of stage I lung cancers resected using minimally invasive approaches are not included in star ratings but will be reported to participants in STS feedback reports. Results The study population included 20,657 lobectomy patients from 231 participating centers. Operative mortality was 1.5%, major complication rate was 9.6%, and median postoperative length of stay was 4 days. Risk-adjusted mortality and major complication rates varied threefold from highest performing (three-star) to lowest performing (one-star) programs. Approximately 5% of participants were one-star, 7% were three-star, and 88% were two-star programs. Conclusions The STS has developed the first general thoracic surgery quality composite measure to compare programs performing lobectomy for lung cancer. This measure will be used for quality assessment and provider feedback, and will be made available for voluntary public reporting.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Pneumonectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Pneumonectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0003-4975</issn><issn>1552-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2P1DAMhiMEYmcX_gLKkUtnnaZJ2wsSjJYPaSRWzHCOUk86m6FthqRFmn-PSxeQOHGy7Pe1LT9mjAtYCxD69rS240OIFtMU1zkIReU1VOIJWwml8kznqn7KVgAgs6Iu1RW7TulEaU7yc3aV67JStdQr1u8fHN8F9G688NDy_a-xHvluikcXhsQ3oT-H5EeyYYiOtyHyL3b0w5Hfx3CMtuf3LlK1twMu8jY0DsfQX5ZsIutmFuML9qy1XXIvH-MN-_r-br_5mG0_f_i0ebvNUKp6zEqNGtoSpEZpbaVt0yqZq0K0AhQ2qhGHCq2m6wCVaFRd19a2pYUCsSwUyBv2epl7juH75NJoep_QdZ0dXJiSEWWpZCWhKMhaLVaMIaXoWnOOvrfxYgSYGbY5mb-wzQx7Vgg2tb563DI1vTv8afxNlwzvFoOjW394F00i0ATi4CMBMofg_2fLm3-GYOcHj7b75i4uncIUB2JphEm5AbObnz7_XCgQdKWQPwHH66r_</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Kozower, Benjamin D., MD, MPH</creator><creator>O’Brien, Sean M., PhD</creator><creator>Kosinski, Andrzej S., PhD</creator><creator>Magee, Mitchell J., MD</creator><creator>Dokholyan, Rachel, MPH</creator><creator>Jacobs, Jeffery P., MD</creator><creator>Shahian, David M., MD</creator><creator>Wright, Cameron D., MD</creator><creator>Fernandez, Felix G., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for Rating Program Performance for Lobectomy for Lung Cancer</title><author>Kozower, Benjamin D., MD, MPH ; O’Brien, Sean M., PhD ; Kosinski, Andrzej S., PhD ; Magee, Mitchell J., MD ; Dokholyan, Rachel, MPH ; Jacobs, Jeffery P., MD ; Shahian, David M., MD ; Wright, Cameron D., MD ; Fernandez, Felix G., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-76c60f7036c3aa86abf532541f105cb5b1d8ca60030c51b5999aaf7a04cc74503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiothoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Pneumonectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Pneumonectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kozower, Benjamin D., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Sean M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosinski, Andrzej S., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magee, Mitchell J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokholyan, Rachel, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Jeffery P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahian, David M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Cameron D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Felix G., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kozower, Benjamin D., MD, MPH</au><au>O’Brien, Sean M., PhD</au><au>Kosinski, Andrzej S., PhD</au><au>Magee, Mitchell J., MD</au><au>Dokholyan, Rachel, MPH</au><au>Jacobs, Jeffery P., MD</au><au>Shahian, David M., MD</au><au>Wright, Cameron D., MD</au><au>Fernandez, Felix G., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for Rating Program Performance for Lobectomy for Lung Cancer</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1379</spage><epage>1387</epage><pages>1379-1387</pages><issn>0003-4975</issn><eissn>1552-6259</eissn><abstract>Background The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) has developed multidimensional composite quality measures for common cardiac surgery procedures. This first composite measure for general thoracic surgery evaluates STS participant performance for lobectomy in lung cancer patients. Methods The STS lobectomy composite score is composed of two outcomes: risk-adjusted mortality; and any-or-none, risk-adjusted major complications. General Thoracic Surgery Database data were included from 2011 to 2014 to provide adequate sample size, and 95% Bayesian credible intervals were used to determine “star ratings.” The STS participants were also compared with national benchmarks (including non-STS participants) using the National Inpatient Sample. Comparisons of discharge mortality, postoperative length of stay, and percent of stage I lung cancers resected using minimally invasive approaches are not included in star ratings but will be reported to participants in STS feedback reports. Results The study population included 20,657 lobectomy patients from 231 participating centers. Operative mortality was 1.5%, major complication rate was 9.6%, and median postoperative length of stay was 4 days. Risk-adjusted mortality and major complication rates varied threefold from highest performing (three-star) to lowest performing (one-star) programs. Approximately 5% of participants were one-star, 7% were three-star, and 88% were two-star programs. Conclusions The STS has developed the first general thoracic surgery quality composite measure to compare programs performing lobectomy for lung cancer. This measure will be used for quality assessment and provider feedback, and will be made available for voluntary public reporting.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26785936</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.081</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4975
ispartof The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2016-04, Vol.101 (4), p.1379-1387
issn 0003-4975
1552-6259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1775383044
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Cardiothoracic Surgery
Cohort Studies
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Lung Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pneumonectomy - mortality
Pneumonectomy - statistics & numerical data
Program Evaluation
Quality Indicators, Health Care
Societies, Medical
Surgery
Thoracic Surgery
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
United States
title The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for Rating Program Performance for Lobectomy for Lung Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T01%3A43%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Society%20of%20Thoracic%20Surgeons%20Composite%20Score%20for%20Rating%20Program%20Performance%20for%20Lobectomy%20for%20Lung%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Kozower,%20Benjamin%20D.,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1379&rft.epage=1387&rft.pages=1379-1387&rft.issn=0003-4975&rft.eissn=1552-6259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1775383044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1775383044&rft_id=info:pmid/26785936&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003497515017531&rfr_iscdi=true