Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Background Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 2016-04, Vol.126 (4), p.885-893 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 893 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 885 |
container_title | The Laryngoscope |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro Carvalho, André Lopes Filho, Adhemar Longatto Scorsato, Anderson Paulo López, Rossana V. Mendoza Rautava, Jaana Syrjänen, Stina Syrjänen, Kari |
description | Background
Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the studies.
Objective
To perform a systematic review and formal meta‐analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in LSCC.
Methods
Literature was searched from January 1964 until March 2015. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Meta‐regression was used to test the impact of study‐level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin) on effect size. Potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry.
Results
One hundred seventy nine studies were eligible, comprising a sample size of 7,347 LSCCs from different geographic regions. Altogether, 1,830 (25%) cases tested HPV‐positive considering all methods, with effect size of 0.269 (95% CI: 0.242 to 0.297; random‐effects model). In meta‐analysis stratified by the 1) HPV detection technique and 2) geographic study origin, the between‐study heterogeneity was significant only for geographic origin (P = .0001). In meta‐regression, the HPV detection method (P = .876) or geographic origin (P = .234) were not significant study‐level covariates. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for studies from North America and those using non–polymerase chain reaction methods, with a marginal effect on adjusted point estimates for both.
Conclusions
Variability in HPV detection rates in LSCC is explained by geographic origin of study but not by HPV detection method. However, they were not significant study‐level covariates in formal meta‐regression.
Level of Evidence
NA Laryngoscope, 126:885–893, 2016 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lary.25738 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1775382692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1895112980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5508-d8eae2ae1baeb0412eb0bee77306289edca2b16670b53d7a75e95fb06b809b8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhwgdAlrggpBT_iWObW1vKFikCCYqAkzVJZsGtk2ztpO1-e7xs2wOHXsbS-DdvnuYR8pKzA86YeBcgbg6E0tI8IguuJC9Ka9VjssifsjBK_Nwjz1I6Z4xrqdhTsicqVQpWlQty8QEnbCc_DnRc0T9zDwNdw9qHMPZw5eOcqB_odsPwGyHQdDlDP-ZuiyHQFmLrh0y-p982acIeJt_SiFcerykMHe1xggIGCJvk03PyZAUh4Yvbd598_3hydnxa1F-Wn44P66JVipmiMwgoAHkD2LCSi1wbRK0lq4Sx2LUgGl5VmjVKdhq0QqtWDasaw2xjOrlP3ux013G8nDFNrvdp6xcGzNYd11pJIyorMvr6P_R8nGP2myljFefCGvYgpXWpheTWZurtjmrjmFLElVtH3-fLOc7cNii3PaP7F1SGX91Kzk2P3T16l0wG-A649gE3D0i5-vDrrzvRYjfjcxY39zMQL1ylpVbux-elE0f1Ub08PXNa_gX8Ja4X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774723199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro ; Carvalho, André Lopes ; Filho, Adhemar Longatto ; Scorsato, Anderson Paulo ; López, Rossana V. Mendoza ; Rautava, Jaana ; Syrjänen, Stina ; Syrjänen, Kari</creator><creatorcontrib>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro ; Carvalho, André Lopes ; Filho, Adhemar Longatto ; Scorsato, Anderson Paulo ; López, Rossana V. Mendoza ; Rautava, Jaana ; Syrjänen, Stina ; Syrjänen, Kari</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the studies.
Objective
To perform a systematic review and formal meta‐analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in LSCC.
Methods
Literature was searched from January 1964 until March 2015. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Meta‐regression was used to test the impact of study‐level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin) on effect size. Potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry.
Results
One hundred seventy nine studies were eligible, comprising a sample size of 7,347 LSCCs from different geographic regions. Altogether, 1,830 (25%) cases tested HPV‐positive considering all methods, with effect size of 0.269 (95% CI: 0.242 to 0.297; random‐effects model). In meta‐analysis stratified by the 1) HPV detection technique and 2) geographic study origin, the between‐study heterogeneity was significant only for geographic origin (P = .0001). In meta‐regression, the HPV detection method (P = .876) or geographic origin (P = .234) were not significant study‐level covariates. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for studies from North America and those using non–polymerase chain reaction methods, with a marginal effect on adjusted point estimates for both.
Conclusions
Variability in HPV detection rates in LSCC is explained by geographic origin of study but not by HPV detection method. However, they were not significant study‐level covariates in formal meta‐regression.
Level of Evidence
NA Laryngoscope, 126:885–893, 2016</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.25738</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26542064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - epidemiology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology ; Confidence intervals ; detection method ; geographic region ; Human papillomavirus ; Humans ; Laryngeal cancer ; Laryngeal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Laryngeal Neoplasms - virology ; Meta-analysis ; meta-regression ; Methods ; Papillomaviridae - isolation & purification ; papillomavirus ; Papillomavirus Infections - complications ; Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology ; publication bias ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Studies ; study heterogeneity</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2016-04, Vol.126 (4), p.885-893</ispartof><rights>2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2016 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5508-d8eae2ae1baeb0412eb0bee77306289edca2b16670b53d7a75e95fb06b809b8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5508-d8eae2ae1baeb0412eb0bee77306289edca2b16670b53d7a75e95fb06b809b8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.25738$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.25738$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26542064$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, André Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filho, Adhemar Longatto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scorsato, Anderson Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Rossana V. Mendoza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rautava, Jaana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrjänen, Stina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrjänen, Kari</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Background
Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the studies.
Objective
To perform a systematic review and formal meta‐analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in LSCC.
Methods
Literature was searched from January 1964 until March 2015. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Meta‐regression was used to test the impact of study‐level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin) on effect size. Potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry.
Results
One hundred seventy nine studies were eligible, comprising a sample size of 7,347 LSCCs from different geographic regions. Altogether, 1,830 (25%) cases tested HPV‐positive considering all methods, with effect size of 0.269 (95% CI: 0.242 to 0.297; random‐effects model). In meta‐analysis stratified by the 1) HPV detection technique and 2) geographic study origin, the between‐study heterogeneity was significant only for geographic origin (P = .0001). In meta‐regression, the HPV detection method (P = .876) or geographic origin (P = .234) were not significant study‐level covariates. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for studies from North America and those using non–polymerase chain reaction methods, with a marginal effect on adjusted point estimates for both.
Conclusions
Variability in HPV detection rates in LSCC is explained by geographic origin of study but not by HPV detection method. However, they were not significant study‐level covariates in formal meta‐regression.
Level of Evidence
NA Laryngoscope, 126:885–893, 2016</description><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - epidemiology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>detection method</subject><subject>geographic region</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngeal cancer</subject><subject>Laryngeal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Laryngeal Neoplasms - virology</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>meta-regression</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Papillomaviridae - isolation & purification</subject><subject>papillomavirus</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>publication bias</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>study heterogeneity</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhwgdAlrggpBT_iWObW1vKFikCCYqAkzVJZsGtk2ztpO1-e7xs2wOHXsbS-DdvnuYR8pKzA86YeBcgbg6E0tI8IguuJC9Ka9VjssifsjBK_Nwjz1I6Z4xrqdhTsicqVQpWlQty8QEnbCc_DnRc0T9zDwNdw9qHMPZw5eOcqB_odsPwGyHQdDlDP-ZuiyHQFmLrh0y-p982acIeJt_SiFcerykMHe1xggIGCJvk03PyZAUh4Yvbd598_3hydnxa1F-Wn44P66JVipmiMwgoAHkD2LCSi1wbRK0lq4Sx2LUgGl5VmjVKdhq0QqtWDasaw2xjOrlP3ux013G8nDFNrvdp6xcGzNYd11pJIyorMvr6P_R8nGP2myljFefCGvYgpXWpheTWZurtjmrjmFLElVtH3-fLOc7cNii3PaP7F1SGX91Kzk2P3T16l0wG-A649gE3D0i5-vDrrzvRYjfjcxY39zMQL1ylpVbux-elE0f1Ub08PXNa_gX8Ja4X</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro</creator><creator>Carvalho, André Lopes</creator><creator>Filho, Adhemar Longatto</creator><creator>Scorsato, Anderson Paulo</creator><creator>López, Rossana V. Mendoza</creator><creator>Rautava, Jaana</creator><creator>Syrjänen, Stina</creator><creator>Syrjänen, Kari</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro ; Carvalho, André Lopes ; Filho, Adhemar Longatto ; Scorsato, Anderson Paulo ; López, Rossana V. Mendoza ; Rautava, Jaana ; Syrjänen, Stina ; Syrjänen, Kari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5508-d8eae2ae1baeb0412eb0bee77306289edca2b16670b53d7a75e95fb06b809b8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - epidemiology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>detection method</topic><topic>geographic region</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngeal cancer</topic><topic>Laryngeal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Laryngeal Neoplasms - virology</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>meta-regression</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Papillomaviridae - isolation & purification</topic><topic>papillomavirus</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>publication bias</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>study heterogeneity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, André Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filho, Adhemar Longatto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scorsato, Anderson Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Rossana V. Mendoza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rautava, Jaana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrjänen, Stina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrjänen, Kari</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro</au><au>Carvalho, André Lopes</au><au>Filho, Adhemar Longatto</au><au>Scorsato, Anderson Paulo</au><au>López, Rossana V. Mendoza</au><au>Rautava, Jaana</au><au>Syrjänen, Stina</au><au>Syrjänen, Kari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>885</spage><epage>893</epage><pages>885-893</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Background
Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the studies.
Objective
To perform a systematic review and formal meta‐analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in LSCC.
Methods
Literature was searched from January 1964 until March 2015. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Meta‐regression was used to test the impact of study‐level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin) on effect size. Potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry.
Results
One hundred seventy nine studies were eligible, comprising a sample size of 7,347 LSCCs from different geographic regions. Altogether, 1,830 (25%) cases tested HPV‐positive considering all methods, with effect size of 0.269 (95% CI: 0.242 to 0.297; random‐effects model). In meta‐analysis stratified by the 1) HPV detection technique and 2) geographic study origin, the between‐study heterogeneity was significant only for geographic origin (P = .0001). In meta‐regression, the HPV detection method (P = .876) or geographic origin (P = .234) were not significant study‐level covariates. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for studies from North America and those using non–polymerase chain reaction methods, with a marginal effect on adjusted point estimates for both.
Conclusions
Variability in HPV detection rates in LSCC is explained by geographic origin of study but not by HPV detection method. However, they were not significant study‐level covariates in formal meta‐regression.
Level of Evidence
NA Laryngoscope, 126:885–893, 2016</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26542064</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.25738</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 2016-04, Vol.126 (4), p.885-893 |
issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1775382692 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - epidemiology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology Confidence intervals detection method geographic region Human papillomavirus Humans Laryngeal cancer Laryngeal Neoplasms - epidemiology Laryngeal Neoplasms - virology Meta-analysis meta-regression Methods Papillomaviridae - isolation & purification papillomavirus Papillomavirus Infections - complications Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology publication bias Squamous cell carcinoma Studies study heterogeneity |
title | Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A00%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20human%20papillomavirus%20in%20laryngeal%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma:%20Systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Gama,%20Ricardo%20Ribeiro&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=885&rft.epage=893&rft.pages=885-893&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.25738&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1895112980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774723199&rft_id=info:pmid/26542064&rfr_iscdi=true |