Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2016-04, Vol.126 (4), p.885-893
Hauptverfasser: Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro, Carvalho, André Lopes, Filho, Adhemar Longatto, Scorsato, Anderson Paulo, López, Rossana V. Mendoza, Rautava, Jaana, Syrjänen, Stina, Syrjänen, Kari
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 893
container_issue 4
container_start_page 885
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 126
creator Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro
Carvalho, André Lopes
Filho, Adhemar Longatto
Scorsato, Anderson Paulo
López, Rossana V. Mendoza
Rautava, Jaana
Syrjänen, Stina
Syrjänen, Kari
description Background Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the studies. Objective To perform a systematic review and formal meta‐analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in LSCC. Methods Literature was searched from January 1964 until March 2015. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Meta‐regression was used to test the impact of study‐level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin) on effect size. Potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry. Results One hundred seventy nine studies were eligible, comprising a sample size of 7,347 LSCCs from different geographic regions. Altogether, 1,830 (25%) cases tested HPV‐positive considering all methods, with effect size of 0.269 (95% CI: 0.242 to 0.297; random‐effects model). In meta‐analysis stratified by the 1) HPV detection technique and 2) geographic study origin, the between‐study heterogeneity was significant only for geographic origin (P = .0001). In meta‐regression, the HPV detection method (P = .876) or geographic origin (P = .234) were not significant study‐level covariates. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for studies from North America and those using non–polymerase chain reaction methods, with a marginal effect on adjusted point estimates for both. Conclusions Variability in HPV detection rates in LSCC is explained by geographic origin of study but not by HPV detection method. However, they were not significant study‐level covariates in formal meta‐regression. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 126:885–893, 2016
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lary.25738
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1775382692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1895112980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5508-d8eae2ae1baeb0412eb0bee77306289edca2b16670b53d7a75e95fb06b809b8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhwgdAlrggpBT_iWObW1vKFikCCYqAkzVJZsGtk2ztpO1-e7xs2wOHXsbS-DdvnuYR8pKzA86YeBcgbg6E0tI8IguuJC9Ka9VjssifsjBK_Nwjz1I6Z4xrqdhTsicqVQpWlQty8QEnbCc_DnRc0T9zDwNdw9qHMPZw5eOcqB_odsPwGyHQdDlDP-ZuiyHQFmLrh0y-p982acIeJt_SiFcerykMHe1xggIGCJvk03PyZAUh4Yvbd598_3hydnxa1F-Wn44P66JVipmiMwgoAHkD2LCSi1wbRK0lq4Sx2LUgGl5VmjVKdhq0QqtWDasaw2xjOrlP3ux013G8nDFNrvdp6xcGzNYd11pJIyorMvr6P_R8nGP2myljFefCGvYgpXWpheTWZurtjmrjmFLElVtH3-fLOc7cNii3PaP7F1SGX91Kzk2P3T16l0wG-A649gE3D0i5-vDrrzvRYjfjcxY39zMQL1ylpVbux-elE0f1Ub08PXNa_gX8Ja4X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774723199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro ; Carvalho, André Lopes ; Filho, Adhemar Longatto ; Scorsato, Anderson Paulo ; López, Rossana V. Mendoza ; Rautava, Jaana ; Syrjänen, Stina ; Syrjänen, Kari</creator><creatorcontrib>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro ; Carvalho, André Lopes ; Filho, Adhemar Longatto ; Scorsato, Anderson Paulo ; López, Rossana V. Mendoza ; Rautava, Jaana ; Syrjänen, Stina ; Syrjänen, Kari</creatorcontrib><description>Background Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the studies. Objective To perform a systematic review and formal meta‐analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in LSCC. Methods Literature was searched from January 1964 until March 2015. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Meta‐regression was used to test the impact of study‐level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin) on effect size. Potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry. Results One hundred seventy nine studies were eligible, comprising a sample size of 7,347 LSCCs from different geographic regions. Altogether, 1,830 (25%) cases tested HPV‐positive considering all methods, with effect size of 0.269 (95% CI: 0.242 to 0.297; random‐effects model). In meta‐analysis stratified by the 1) HPV detection technique and 2) geographic study origin, the between‐study heterogeneity was significant only for geographic origin (P = .0001). In meta‐regression, the HPV detection method (P = .876) or geographic origin (P = .234) were not significant study‐level covariates. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for studies from North America and those using non–polymerase chain reaction methods, with a marginal effect on adjusted point estimates for both. Conclusions Variability in HPV detection rates in LSCC is explained by geographic origin of study but not by HPV detection method. However, they were not significant study‐level covariates in formal meta‐regression. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 126:885–893, 2016</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.25738</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26542064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - epidemiology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology ; Confidence intervals ; detection method ; geographic region ; Human papillomavirus ; Humans ; Laryngeal cancer ; Laryngeal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Laryngeal Neoplasms - virology ; Meta-analysis ; meta-regression ; Methods ; Papillomaviridae - isolation &amp; purification ; papillomavirus ; Papillomavirus Infections - complications ; Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology ; publication bias ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Studies ; study heterogeneity</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2016-04, Vol.126 (4), p.885-893</ispartof><rights>2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2016 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5508-d8eae2ae1baeb0412eb0bee77306289edca2b16670b53d7a75e95fb06b809b8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5508-d8eae2ae1baeb0412eb0bee77306289edca2b16670b53d7a75e95fb06b809b8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.25738$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.25738$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26542064$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, André Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filho, Adhemar Longatto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scorsato, Anderson Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Rossana V. Mendoza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rautava, Jaana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrjänen, Stina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrjänen, Kari</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Background Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the studies. Objective To perform a systematic review and formal meta‐analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in LSCC. Methods Literature was searched from January 1964 until March 2015. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Meta‐regression was used to test the impact of study‐level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin) on effect size. Potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry. Results One hundred seventy nine studies were eligible, comprising a sample size of 7,347 LSCCs from different geographic regions. Altogether, 1,830 (25%) cases tested HPV‐positive considering all methods, with effect size of 0.269 (95% CI: 0.242 to 0.297; random‐effects model). In meta‐analysis stratified by the 1) HPV detection technique and 2) geographic study origin, the between‐study heterogeneity was significant only for geographic origin (P = .0001). In meta‐regression, the HPV detection method (P = .876) or geographic origin (P = .234) were not significant study‐level covariates. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for studies from North America and those using non–polymerase chain reaction methods, with a marginal effect on adjusted point estimates for both. Conclusions Variability in HPV detection rates in LSCC is explained by geographic origin of study but not by HPV detection method. However, they were not significant study‐level covariates in formal meta‐regression. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 126:885–893, 2016</description><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - epidemiology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>detection method</subject><subject>geographic region</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngeal cancer</subject><subject>Laryngeal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Laryngeal Neoplasms - virology</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>meta-regression</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Papillomaviridae - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>papillomavirus</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>publication bias</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>study heterogeneity</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhwgdAlrggpBT_iWObW1vKFikCCYqAkzVJZsGtk2ztpO1-e7xs2wOHXsbS-DdvnuYR8pKzA86YeBcgbg6E0tI8IguuJC9Ka9VjssifsjBK_Nwjz1I6Z4xrqdhTsicqVQpWlQty8QEnbCc_DnRc0T9zDwNdw9qHMPZw5eOcqB_odsPwGyHQdDlDP-ZuiyHQFmLrh0y-p982acIeJt_SiFcerykMHe1xggIGCJvk03PyZAUh4Yvbd598_3hydnxa1F-Wn44P66JVipmiMwgoAHkD2LCSi1wbRK0lq4Sx2LUgGl5VmjVKdhq0QqtWDasaw2xjOrlP3ux013G8nDFNrvdp6xcGzNYd11pJIyorMvr6P_R8nGP2myljFefCGvYgpXWpheTWZurtjmrjmFLElVtH3-fLOc7cNii3PaP7F1SGX91Kzk2P3T16l0wG-A649gE3D0i5-vDrrzvRYjfjcxY39zMQL1ylpVbux-elE0f1Ub08PXNa_gX8Ja4X</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro</creator><creator>Carvalho, André Lopes</creator><creator>Filho, Adhemar Longatto</creator><creator>Scorsato, Anderson Paulo</creator><creator>López, Rossana V. Mendoza</creator><creator>Rautava, Jaana</creator><creator>Syrjänen, Stina</creator><creator>Syrjänen, Kari</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro ; Carvalho, André Lopes ; Filho, Adhemar Longatto ; Scorsato, Anderson Paulo ; López, Rossana V. Mendoza ; Rautava, Jaana ; Syrjänen, Stina ; Syrjänen, Kari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5508-d8eae2ae1baeb0412eb0bee77306289edca2b16670b53d7a75e95fb06b809b8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - epidemiology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>detection method</topic><topic>geographic region</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngeal cancer</topic><topic>Laryngeal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Laryngeal Neoplasms - virology</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>meta-regression</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Papillomaviridae - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>papillomavirus</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>publication bias</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>study heterogeneity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, André Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filho, Adhemar Longatto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scorsato, Anderson Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Rossana V. Mendoza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rautava, Jaana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrjänen, Stina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrjänen, Kari</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro</au><au>Carvalho, André Lopes</au><au>Filho, Adhemar Longatto</au><au>Scorsato, Anderson Paulo</au><au>López, Rossana V. Mendoza</au><au>Rautava, Jaana</au><au>Syrjänen, Stina</au><au>Syrjänen, Kari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>885</spage><epage>893</epage><pages>885-893</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Background Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the studies. Objective To perform a systematic review and formal meta‐analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in LSCC. Methods Literature was searched from January 1964 until March 2015. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Meta‐regression was used to test the impact of study‐level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin) on effect size. Potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry. Results One hundred seventy nine studies were eligible, comprising a sample size of 7,347 LSCCs from different geographic regions. Altogether, 1,830 (25%) cases tested HPV‐positive considering all methods, with effect size of 0.269 (95% CI: 0.242 to 0.297; random‐effects model). In meta‐analysis stratified by the 1) HPV detection technique and 2) geographic study origin, the between‐study heterogeneity was significant only for geographic origin (P = .0001). In meta‐regression, the HPV detection method (P = .876) or geographic origin (P = .234) were not significant study‐level covariates. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for studies from North America and those using non–polymerase chain reaction methods, with a marginal effect on adjusted point estimates for both. Conclusions Variability in HPV detection rates in LSCC is explained by geographic origin of study but not by HPV detection method. However, they were not significant study‐level covariates in formal meta‐regression. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 126:885–893, 2016</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26542064</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.25738</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 2016-04, Vol.126 (4), p.885-893
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1775382692
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - epidemiology
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology
Confidence intervals
detection method
geographic region
Human papillomavirus
Humans
Laryngeal cancer
Laryngeal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Laryngeal Neoplasms - virology
Meta-analysis
meta-regression
Methods
Papillomaviridae - isolation & purification
papillomavirus
Papillomavirus Infections - complications
Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology
publication bias
Squamous cell carcinoma
Studies
study heterogeneity
title Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A00%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20human%20papillomavirus%20in%20laryngeal%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma:%20Systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Gama,%20Ricardo%20Ribeiro&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=885&rft.epage=893&rft.pages=885-893&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.25738&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1895112980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774723199&rft_id=info:pmid/26542064&rfr_iscdi=true