Efficacy of Ribbond and a fibre post on the fracture resistance of reattached maxillary central incisors with two fracture patterns: a comparative in vitro study
Aim To compare the fracture resistance of maxillary central incisor fragments having two different fracture patterns and re‐attached using two different posts – fibre post and Ribbond. Materials and methods Sixty extracted human maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups of thi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dental traumatology 2016-04, Vol.32 (2), p.110-115 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 115 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 110 |
| container_title | Dental traumatology |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Ramesh, Poornima Mathew, Sylvia Murthy, Sreenivasa B.V. George, John V. Hegde, Swaroop Premkumar, Remya |
| description | Aim
To compare the fracture resistance of maxillary central incisor fragments having two different fracture patterns and re‐attached using two different posts – fibre post and Ribbond.
Materials and methods
Sixty extracted human maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups of thirty samples each. Group A consisted of samples with ‘labio‐palatal’ fracture pattern and Group B with a ‘palato‐labial’ fracture pattern. The crowns of all the samples were sectioned using safe‐sided diamond discs. Following cleaning and shaping and sectional obturation, the samples were randomly subdivided into two subgroups of 15 samples each. Prefabricated fibre post (Reforpost, Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil) was placed in all samples of Subgroup I, and Ribbond (Ribbond Inc., Seattle, WA, USA) was placed in all samples of Subgroup II. The fragments were re‐attached, fracture resistance was tested using Instron Universal Testing Machine, and the failure modes were assessed using a stereomicroscope.
Results
Group A with a labio‐palatal fracture pattern exhibited higher fracture resistance as compared to Group B (palato‐labial) in both subgroups. The fibre post (Subgroup I) exhibited higher fracture resistance as compared to Ribbond (Subgroup II). The Ribbond group exhibited significantly more number of repairable failures as compared to fibre post group.
Conclusion
The labio‐palatal pattern of fracture is a favourable type of fracture on palatal load application. The fragments re‐attached using the fibre post (Reforpost) had a higher resistance to fracture. However, teeth restored with Ribbond posts exhibited 100% repairable failures upon load application. The fracture pattern had no influence on the failure modes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/edt.12223 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1775171317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1775171317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2783-31e5bc5b1fa76866dfc48ad33ad9ec1621b4365e57b86e0e660554d17d086c1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1uFCEYhomxsT964A0YDvVgWhhmYNYzXbfVtFHT1OgZYeAji84MIzDd7t00XkqvTLa7rUeSEAh5npd8eRF6SckxzesETDqmZVmyJ-iAckKKGa_F0929qvhsHx3G-JMQysWMPEP7JWeckoYcoD8La51Weo29xZeubf1gsNpsbF0bAI8-JuwHnJaAbVA6TfkxQHQxqUHDRgugUlJ6CQb36sZ1nQprrGFIQXXYDdpFHyJeubTEaeX_pYxZgzDEt_kz7ftRBZXcNWTl7vbapeBxTJNZP0d7VnURXuzOI_TtdHE1_1hcfDn7NH93UehSNKxgFOpW1y21SvCGc2N11SjDmDIz0JSXtK0Yr6EWbcOBAOekritDhSEN11SzI_R6mzsG_3uCmGTvooY8zgB-ipIKUVNBGRUZfbNFdfAxBrByDK7PY0tK5KYSmSuR95Vk9tUudmp7MI_kQwcZONkCK9fB-v9JcvHh6iGy2Bq5BLh5NFT4JblgopbfP5_J-el79vWyOZc_2F8Ew6iK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1775171317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of Ribbond and a fibre post on the fracture resistance of reattached maxillary central incisors with two fracture patterns: a comparative in vitro study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ramesh, Poornima ; Mathew, Sylvia ; Murthy, Sreenivasa B.V. ; George, John V. ; Hegde, Swaroop ; Premkumar, Remya</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, Poornima ; Mathew, Sylvia ; Murthy, Sreenivasa B.V. ; George, John V. ; Hegde, Swaroop ; Premkumar, Remya</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To compare the fracture resistance of maxillary central incisor fragments having two different fracture patterns and re‐attached using two different posts – fibre post and Ribbond.
Materials and methods
Sixty extracted human maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups of thirty samples each. Group A consisted of samples with ‘labio‐palatal’ fracture pattern and Group B with a ‘palato‐labial’ fracture pattern. The crowns of all the samples were sectioned using safe‐sided diamond discs. Following cleaning and shaping and sectional obturation, the samples were randomly subdivided into two subgroups of 15 samples each. Prefabricated fibre post (Reforpost, Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil) was placed in all samples of Subgroup I, and Ribbond (Ribbond Inc., Seattle, WA, USA) was placed in all samples of Subgroup II. The fragments were re‐attached, fracture resistance was tested using Instron Universal Testing Machine, and the failure modes were assessed using a stereomicroscope.
Results
Group A with a labio‐palatal fracture pattern exhibited higher fracture resistance as compared to Group B (palato‐labial) in both subgroups. The fibre post (Subgroup I) exhibited higher fracture resistance as compared to Ribbond (Subgroup II). The Ribbond group exhibited significantly more number of repairable failures as compared to fibre post group.
Conclusion
The labio‐palatal pattern of fracture is a favourable type of fracture on palatal load application. The fragments re‐attached using the fibre post (Reforpost) had a higher resistance to fracture. However, teeth restored with Ribbond posts exhibited 100% repairable failures upon load application. The fracture pattern had no influence on the failure modes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-4469</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-9657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/edt.12223</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26361080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; fibre post ; fracture resistance ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Incisor - injuries ; Polyethylenes - chemistry ; Post and Core Technique ; Random Allocation ; re-attachment ; Ribbond ; Tooth Fractures - therapy</subject><ispartof>Dental traumatology, 2016-04, Vol.32 (2), p.110-115</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2783-31e5bc5b1fa76866dfc48ad33ad9ec1621b4365e57b86e0e660554d17d086c1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2783-31e5bc5b1fa76866dfc48ad33ad9ec1621b4365e57b86e0e660554d17d086c1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fedt.12223$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fedt.12223$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26361080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, Poornima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Sreenivasa B.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, John V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegde, Swaroop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Premkumar, Remya</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of Ribbond and a fibre post on the fracture resistance of reattached maxillary central incisors with two fracture patterns: a comparative in vitro study</title><title>Dental traumatology</title><addtitle>Dent Traumatol</addtitle><description>Aim
To compare the fracture resistance of maxillary central incisor fragments having two different fracture patterns and re‐attached using two different posts – fibre post and Ribbond.
Materials and methods
Sixty extracted human maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups of thirty samples each. Group A consisted of samples with ‘labio‐palatal’ fracture pattern and Group B with a ‘palato‐labial’ fracture pattern. The crowns of all the samples were sectioned using safe‐sided diamond discs. Following cleaning and shaping and sectional obturation, the samples were randomly subdivided into two subgroups of 15 samples each. Prefabricated fibre post (Reforpost, Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil) was placed in all samples of Subgroup I, and Ribbond (Ribbond Inc., Seattle, WA, USA) was placed in all samples of Subgroup II. The fragments were re‐attached, fracture resistance was tested using Instron Universal Testing Machine, and the failure modes were assessed using a stereomicroscope.
Results
Group A with a labio‐palatal fracture pattern exhibited higher fracture resistance as compared to Group B (palato‐labial) in both subgroups. The fibre post (Subgroup I) exhibited higher fracture resistance as compared to Ribbond (Subgroup II). The Ribbond group exhibited significantly more number of repairable failures as compared to fibre post group.
Conclusion
The labio‐palatal pattern of fracture is a favourable type of fracture on palatal load application. The fragments re‐attached using the fibre post (Reforpost) had a higher resistance to fracture. However, teeth restored with Ribbond posts exhibited 100% repairable failures upon load application. The fracture pattern had no influence on the failure modes.</description><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>fibre post</subject><subject>fracture resistance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Incisor - injuries</subject><subject>Polyethylenes - chemistry</subject><subject>Post and Core Technique</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>re-attachment</subject><subject>Ribbond</subject><subject>Tooth Fractures - therapy</subject><issn>1600-4469</issn><issn>1600-9657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd1uFCEYhomxsT964A0YDvVgWhhmYNYzXbfVtFHT1OgZYeAji84MIzDd7t00XkqvTLa7rUeSEAh5npd8eRF6SckxzesETDqmZVmyJ-iAckKKGa_F0929qvhsHx3G-JMQysWMPEP7JWeckoYcoD8La51Weo29xZeubf1gsNpsbF0bAI8-JuwHnJaAbVA6TfkxQHQxqUHDRgugUlJ6CQb36sZ1nQprrGFIQXXYDdpFHyJeubTEaeX_pYxZgzDEt_kz7ftRBZXcNWTl7vbapeBxTJNZP0d7VnURXuzOI_TtdHE1_1hcfDn7NH93UehSNKxgFOpW1y21SvCGc2N11SjDmDIz0JSXtK0Yr6EWbcOBAOekritDhSEN11SzI_R6mzsG_3uCmGTvooY8zgB-ipIKUVNBGRUZfbNFdfAxBrByDK7PY0tK5KYSmSuR95Vk9tUudmp7MI_kQwcZONkCK9fB-v9JcvHh6iGy2Bq5BLh5NFT4JblgopbfP5_J-el79vWyOZc_2F8Ew6iK</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Ramesh, Poornima</creator><creator>Mathew, Sylvia</creator><creator>Murthy, Sreenivasa B.V.</creator><creator>George, John V.</creator><creator>Hegde, Swaroop</creator><creator>Premkumar, Remya</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Efficacy of Ribbond and a fibre post on the fracture resistance of reattached maxillary central incisors with two fracture patterns: a comparative in vitro study</title><author>Ramesh, Poornima ; Mathew, Sylvia ; Murthy, Sreenivasa B.V. ; George, John V. ; Hegde, Swaroop ; Premkumar, Remya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2783-31e5bc5b1fa76866dfc48ad33ad9ec1621b4365e57b86e0e660554d17d086c1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>fibre post</topic><topic>fracture resistance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Incisor - injuries</topic><topic>Polyethylenes - chemistry</topic><topic>Post and Core Technique</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>re-attachment</topic><topic>Ribbond</topic><topic>Tooth Fractures - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, Poornima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Sreenivasa B.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, John V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegde, Swaroop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Premkumar, Remya</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dental traumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramesh, Poornima</au><au>Mathew, Sylvia</au><au>Murthy, Sreenivasa B.V.</au><au>George, John V.</au><au>Hegde, Swaroop</au><au>Premkumar, Remya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of Ribbond and a fibre post on the fracture resistance of reattached maxillary central incisors with two fracture patterns: a comparative in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>Dental traumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Traumatol</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>110-115</pages><issn>1600-4469</issn><eissn>1600-9657</eissn><abstract>Aim
To compare the fracture resistance of maxillary central incisor fragments having two different fracture patterns and re‐attached using two different posts – fibre post and Ribbond.
Materials and methods
Sixty extracted human maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups of thirty samples each. Group A consisted of samples with ‘labio‐palatal’ fracture pattern and Group B with a ‘palato‐labial’ fracture pattern. The crowns of all the samples were sectioned using safe‐sided diamond discs. Following cleaning and shaping and sectional obturation, the samples were randomly subdivided into two subgroups of 15 samples each. Prefabricated fibre post (Reforpost, Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil) was placed in all samples of Subgroup I, and Ribbond (Ribbond Inc., Seattle, WA, USA) was placed in all samples of Subgroup II. The fragments were re‐attached, fracture resistance was tested using Instron Universal Testing Machine, and the failure modes were assessed using a stereomicroscope.
Results
Group A with a labio‐palatal fracture pattern exhibited higher fracture resistance as compared to Group B (palato‐labial) in both subgroups. The fibre post (Subgroup I) exhibited higher fracture resistance as compared to Ribbond (Subgroup II). The Ribbond group exhibited significantly more number of repairable failures as compared to fibre post group.
Conclusion
The labio‐palatal pattern of fracture is a favourable type of fracture on palatal load application. The fragments re‐attached using the fibre post (Reforpost) had a higher resistance to fracture. However, teeth restored with Ribbond posts exhibited 100% repairable failures upon load application. The fracture pattern had no influence on the failure modes.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26361080</pmid><doi>10.1111/edt.12223</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1600-4469 |
| ispartof | Dental traumatology, 2016-04, Vol.32 (2), p.110-115 |
| issn | 1600-4469 1600-9657 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1775171317 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Dental Materials - chemistry Dental Restoration Failure Dental Stress Analysis Dentistry fibre post fracture resistance Humans In Vitro Techniques Incisor - injuries Polyethylenes - chemistry Post and Core Technique Random Allocation re-attachment Ribbond Tooth Fractures - therapy |
| title | Efficacy of Ribbond and a fibre post on the fracture resistance of reattached maxillary central incisors with two fracture patterns: a comparative in vitro study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A43%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20Ribbond%20and%20a%20fibre%20post%20on%20the%20fracture%20resistance%20of%20reattached%20maxillary%20central%20incisors%20with%20two%20fracture%20patterns:%20a%20comparative%20in%C2%A0vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=Dental%20traumatology&rft.au=Ramesh,%20Poornima&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=110-115&rft.issn=1600-4469&rft.eissn=1600-9657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/edt.12223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1775171317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1775171317&rft_id=info:pmid/26361080&rfr_iscdi=true |