Disaster Preparedness among Active Duty Personnel, Retirees, Veterans, and Dependents

With the increase in natural and manmade disasters, preparedness remains a vital area of concern. Despite attempts by government and non-government agencies to stress the importance of preparedness, national levels of preparedness remain unacceptably low. A goal of commands and installations is to e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prehospital and disaster medicine 2016-04, Vol.31 (2), p.132-140
Hauptverfasser: Annis, Heather, Jacoby, Irving, DeMers, Gerard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140
container_issue 2
container_start_page 132
container_title Prehospital and disaster medicine
container_volume 31
creator Annis, Heather
Jacoby, Irving
DeMers, Gerard
description With the increase in natural and manmade disasters, preparedness remains a vital area of concern. Despite attempts by government and non-government agencies to stress the importance of preparedness, national levels of preparedness remain unacceptably low. A goal of commands and installations is to ensure that US Navy beneficiaries are well prepared for disasters. This especially is critical in active service members to meet mission readiness requirements in crisis settings. To evaluate active duty Navy personnel, dependents, veterans, and retirees regarding disaster preparedness status. The authors conducted an anonymous 29-question survey for US Navy active duty, dependents, veterans, and retirees of the Greater San Diego Region (California, USA) evaluating actual basic disaster readiness as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) standards of 3-day minimum supply of emergency stores and equipment. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to analyze data. One thousand one hundred and fifty surveys were returned and analyzed. Nine hundred and eight-three were sufficiently complete for logistic regression analysis with 394 responding "Yes" to having a 72-hour disaster kit (40.1%) while 589 had "No" as a response (59.9%). The surveyed population is no more prepared than the general public, though surveyed beneficiaries overall are at an upper range of preparedness. Lower income and levels of education were associated with lack of preparedness, whereas training in disaster preparedness or having been affected by disasters increased the likelihood of being adequately prepared. Unlike results seen in the general public, those with chronic health care needs in the surveyed population were more, rather than less, likely to be prepared and those with minor children were less likely, rather than more likely, to be prepared. Duty status was assessed and only veterans were emphatically more probable than most to be prepared.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1049023X16000157
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1774531809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1049023X16000157</cupid><sourcerecordid>3988013791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-6f2c99d85389b17467875433d54bb7cb6b0d31905cc9190e4814c3e76d480bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMofv8BXqTgxYPVmSZtmqO4foHgoqt4K2kyK5Vtuiat4H9v1FVE8TQP5vfeDI-xHYRDBJRHtwhCQcYfsAAAzOUSW0cl8hQVL5ejjuv0fb_GNkJ4AshUnhWrbC0rFHAU2Tq7GzVBh558MvY0156soxAS3XbuMTk2ffNCyWjoX5Mx-dA5R7OD5Ib6xhOFg-SeolO7qLSzyYjm5Cy5PmyxlameBdpezE02OTudnFykV9fnlyfHV6kRWPRpMc2MUrbMealqlKKQpcwF5zYXdS1NXdRgOSrIjVFxkChRGE6ysKKE2vBNtv8ZO_fd80Chr9omGJrNtKNuCBVKKXKOJaiI7v1Cn7rBu_jcBwUQr0Ck8JMyvgvB07Sa-6bV_rVCqN4rr_5UHj27i-Shbsl-O746jgBfhOq29o19pB-3_419A4KHiTU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774009050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disaster Preparedness among Active Duty Personnel, Retirees, Veterans, and Dependents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Annis, Heather ; Jacoby, Irving ; DeMers, Gerard</creator><creatorcontrib>Annis, Heather ; Jacoby, Irving ; DeMers, Gerard</creatorcontrib><description>With the increase in natural and manmade disasters, preparedness remains a vital area of concern. Despite attempts by government and non-government agencies to stress the importance of preparedness, national levels of preparedness remain unacceptably low. A goal of commands and installations is to ensure that US Navy beneficiaries are well prepared for disasters. This especially is critical in active service members to meet mission readiness requirements in crisis settings. To evaluate active duty Navy personnel, dependents, veterans, and retirees regarding disaster preparedness status. The authors conducted an anonymous 29-question survey for US Navy active duty, dependents, veterans, and retirees of the Greater San Diego Region (California, USA) evaluating actual basic disaster readiness as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) standards of 3-day minimum supply of emergency stores and equipment. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to analyze data. One thousand one hundred and fifty surveys were returned and analyzed. Nine hundred and eight-three were sufficiently complete for logistic regression analysis with 394 responding "Yes" to having a 72-hour disaster kit (40.1%) while 589 had "No" as a response (59.9%). The surveyed population is no more prepared than the general public, though surveyed beneficiaries overall are at an upper range of preparedness. Lower income and levels of education were associated with lack of preparedness, whereas training in disaster preparedness or having been affected by disasters increased the likelihood of being adequately prepared. Unlike results seen in the general public, those with chronic health care needs in the surveyed population were more, rather than less, likely to be prepared and those with minor children were less likely, rather than more likely, to be prepared. Duty status was assessed and only veterans were emphatically more probable than most to be prepared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-1938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X16000157</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26903142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject><![CDATA[California ; Civil Defense - statistics & numerical data ; Dependents ; Disaster Planning - organization & administration ; Disaster recovery ; Disasters ; Emergency preparedness ; Female ; Government agencies ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Military Family - statistics & numerical data ; Military personnel ; Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data ; Original Research ; Regression analysis ; Retirees ; Retirement - statistics & numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States ; Veterans ; Veterans - statistics & numerical data]]></subject><ispartof>Prehospital and disaster medicine, 2016-04, Vol.31 (2), p.132-140</ispartof><rights>World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-6f2c99d85389b17467875433d54bb7cb6b0d31905cc9190e4814c3e76d480bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-6f2c99d85389b17467875433d54bb7cb6b0d31905cc9190e4814c3e76d480bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1049023X16000157/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Annis, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacoby, Irving</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMers, Gerard</creatorcontrib><title>Disaster Preparedness among Active Duty Personnel, Retirees, Veterans, and Dependents</title><title>Prehospital and disaster medicine</title><addtitle>Prehosp. Disaster med</addtitle><description>With the increase in natural and manmade disasters, preparedness remains a vital area of concern. Despite attempts by government and non-government agencies to stress the importance of preparedness, national levels of preparedness remain unacceptably low. A goal of commands and installations is to ensure that US Navy beneficiaries are well prepared for disasters. This especially is critical in active service members to meet mission readiness requirements in crisis settings. To evaluate active duty Navy personnel, dependents, veterans, and retirees regarding disaster preparedness status. The authors conducted an anonymous 29-question survey for US Navy active duty, dependents, veterans, and retirees of the Greater San Diego Region (California, USA) evaluating actual basic disaster readiness as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) standards of 3-day minimum supply of emergency stores and equipment. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to analyze data. One thousand one hundred and fifty surveys were returned and analyzed. Nine hundred and eight-three were sufficiently complete for logistic regression analysis with 394 responding "Yes" to having a 72-hour disaster kit (40.1%) while 589 had "No" as a response (59.9%). The surveyed population is no more prepared than the general public, though surveyed beneficiaries overall are at an upper range of preparedness. Lower income and levels of education were associated with lack of preparedness, whereas training in disaster preparedness or having been affected by disasters increased the likelihood of being adequately prepared. Unlike results seen in the general public, those with chronic health care needs in the surveyed population were more, rather than less, likely to be prepared and those with minor children were less likely, rather than more likely, to be prepared. Duty status was assessed and only veterans were emphatically more probable than most to be prepared.</description><subject>California</subject><subject>Civil Defense - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Dependents</subject><subject>Disaster Planning - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Disaster recovery</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Military Family - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Military personnel</subject><subject>Military Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retirees</subject><subject>Retirement - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><subject>Veterans - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>1049-023X</issn><issn>1945-1938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMofv8BXqTgxYPVmSZtmqO4foHgoqt4K2kyK5Vtuiat4H9v1FVE8TQP5vfeDI-xHYRDBJRHtwhCQcYfsAAAzOUSW0cl8hQVL5ejjuv0fb_GNkJ4AshUnhWrbC0rFHAU2Tq7GzVBh558MvY0156soxAS3XbuMTk2ffNCyWjoX5Mx-dA5R7OD5Ib6xhOFg-SeolO7qLSzyYjm5Cy5PmyxlameBdpezE02OTudnFykV9fnlyfHV6kRWPRpMc2MUrbMealqlKKQpcwF5zYXdS1NXdRgOSrIjVFxkChRGE6ysKKE2vBNtv8ZO_fd80Chr9omGJrNtKNuCBVKKXKOJaiI7v1Cn7rBu_jcBwUQr0Ck8JMyvgvB07Sa-6bV_rVCqN4rr_5UHj27i-Shbsl-O746jgBfhOq29o19pB-3_419A4KHiTU</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Annis, Heather</creator><creator>Jacoby, Irving</creator><creator>DeMers, Gerard</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Jems Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Disaster Preparedness among Active Duty Personnel, Retirees, Veterans, and Dependents</title><author>Annis, Heather ; Jacoby, Irving ; DeMers, Gerard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-6f2c99d85389b17467875433d54bb7cb6b0d31905cc9190e4814c3e76d480bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>California</topic><topic>Civil Defense - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Dependents</topic><topic>Disaster Planning - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Disaster recovery</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Military Family - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Military personnel</topic><topic>Military Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retirees</topic><topic>Retirement - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><topic>Veterans - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Annis, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacoby, Irving</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMers, Gerard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prehospital and disaster medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Annis, Heather</au><au>Jacoby, Irving</au><au>DeMers, Gerard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disaster Preparedness among Active Duty Personnel, Retirees, Veterans, and Dependents</atitle><jtitle>Prehospital and disaster medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prehosp. Disaster med</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>132-140</pages><issn>1049-023X</issn><eissn>1945-1938</eissn><abstract>With the increase in natural and manmade disasters, preparedness remains a vital area of concern. Despite attempts by government and non-government agencies to stress the importance of preparedness, national levels of preparedness remain unacceptably low. A goal of commands and installations is to ensure that US Navy beneficiaries are well prepared for disasters. This especially is critical in active service members to meet mission readiness requirements in crisis settings. To evaluate active duty Navy personnel, dependents, veterans, and retirees regarding disaster preparedness status. The authors conducted an anonymous 29-question survey for US Navy active duty, dependents, veterans, and retirees of the Greater San Diego Region (California, USA) evaluating actual basic disaster readiness as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) standards of 3-day minimum supply of emergency stores and equipment. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to analyze data. One thousand one hundred and fifty surveys were returned and analyzed. Nine hundred and eight-three were sufficiently complete for logistic regression analysis with 394 responding "Yes" to having a 72-hour disaster kit (40.1%) while 589 had "No" as a response (59.9%). The surveyed population is no more prepared than the general public, though surveyed beneficiaries overall are at an upper range of preparedness. Lower income and levels of education were associated with lack of preparedness, whereas training in disaster preparedness or having been affected by disasters increased the likelihood of being adequately prepared. Unlike results seen in the general public, those with chronic health care needs in the surveyed population were more, rather than less, likely to be prepared and those with minor children were less likely, rather than more likely, to be prepared. Duty status was assessed and only veterans were emphatically more probable than most to be prepared.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>26903142</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1049023X16000157</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-023X
ispartof Prehospital and disaster medicine, 2016-04, Vol.31 (2), p.132-140
issn 1049-023X
1945-1938
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1774531809
source MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals
subjects California
Civil Defense - statistics & numerical data
Dependents
Disaster Planning - organization & administration
Disaster recovery
Disasters
Emergency preparedness
Female
Government agencies
Health technology assessment
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Military Family - statistics & numerical data
Military personnel
Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data
Original Research
Regression analysis
Retirees
Retirement - statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Veterans
Veterans - statistics & numerical data
title Disaster Preparedness among Active Duty Personnel, Retirees, Veterans, and Dependents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T08%3A17%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disaster%20Preparedness%20among%20Active%20Duty%20Personnel,%20Retirees,%20Veterans,%20and%20Dependents&rft.jtitle=Prehospital%20and%20disaster%20medicine&rft.au=Annis,%20Heather&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=132-140&rft.issn=1049-023X&rft.eissn=1945-1938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049023X16000157&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3988013791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774009050&rft_id=info:pmid/26903142&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1049023X16000157&rfr_iscdi=true