Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?
Abstract Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be diagnosed histopathologically by biopsy of the temporal artery, and clinically using the 5-point score of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification. We aimed to find out whether some patients are referred for biopsy unnecessarily. We au...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2016-04, Vol.54 (3), p.327-330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 330 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 327 |
container_title | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Hussain, Omar McKay, Andrew Fairburn, Kevin Doyle, Peter Orr, Robert |
description | Abstract Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be diagnosed histopathologically by biopsy of the temporal artery, and clinically using the 5-point score of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification. We aimed to find out whether some patients are referred for biopsy unnecessarily. We audited all referrals (n = 100) made to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery over 34 months, and used the ACR classification to find out whether patients had had a clinical diagnosis of GCA at referral (ACR score: 3 or more). We then compared them with the result of the biopsy. Of the 100 referred, 98 had a biopsy, and of them, 15 were diagnosed with GCA (2 results were not included). Thirteen of the 15 had already been diagnosed clinically (based on the ACR classification) at referral. Our results gave an ACR specificity of 96% (95% CI: 85% to 99%) but only 20% sensitivity (95% CI: 11% to 32%). There was a linear correlation of high ACR scores with histopathological confirmation. Biopsy is most beneficial when there is a degree of diagnostic uncertainty (ACR: 1 or 2), an atypical presentation, or when steroids may be relatively contraindicated. On the basis of our study, we designed a new referral form for biopsy based on the ACR criteria. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1774530616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S026643561500755X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1774530616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-e0391f7d16516539b2656125f7b27afecb617e50ddd917fc600017cbc1b5a7043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhCZCQj1wSPHZsN0iAUIFSqYgDIHGzHGfSdUjirZ1Q7dvjsFsOXCqNNJfv94y_IeQ5sBIYqFd92fRhTCVnIEvgJQPxgGxACl5AXbGHZMO4UkUlpDohT1LqGWOSg3xMTrjSZwrqsw358sHb6ykkn2jo6LW300wdDgO1ccboZ59e09stTjRtwzK09BZp48Mu7em8RTrjuAvRHun9u6fkUWeHhM-O_ZT8-PTx-_nn4urrxeX5-6vCVVDNBTJRQ6dbUDKXqBuupAIuO91wbTt0jQKNkrVtW4PunMqbg3aNg0ZazSpxSl4e3t3FcLNgms3o07q2nTAsyYDWlRRMgcqoOKAuhpQidmYX_Wjj3gAzq0fTm78ezerRADfZY069OA5YmhHbf5k7cRl4cwAwf_O3x2iS8zg5bH1EN5s2-HsGvP0v7wY_eWeHX7jH1IclTtmgAZNywHxbT7leEiRjWsqf4g9uFpkt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774530616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hussain, Omar ; McKay, Andrew ; Fairburn, Kevin ; Doyle, Peter ; Orr, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Omar ; McKay, Andrew ; Fairburn, Kevin ; Doyle, Peter ; Orr, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be diagnosed histopathologically by biopsy of the temporal artery, and clinically using the 5-point score of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification. We aimed to find out whether some patients are referred for biopsy unnecessarily. We audited all referrals (n = 100) made to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery over 34 months, and used the ACR classification to find out whether patients had had a clinical diagnosis of GCA at referral (ACR score: 3 or more). We then compared them with the result of the biopsy. Of the 100 referred, 98 had a biopsy, and of them, 15 were diagnosed with GCA (2 results were not included). Thirteen of the 15 had already been diagnosed clinically (based on the ACR classification) at referral. Our results gave an ACR specificity of 96% (95% CI: 85% to 99%) but only 20% sensitivity (95% CI: 11% to 32%). There was a linear correlation of high ACR scores with histopathological confirmation. Biopsy is most beneficial when there is a degree of diagnostic uncertainty (ACR: 1 or 2), an atypical presentation, or when steroids may be relatively contraindicated. On the basis of our study, we designed a new referral form for biopsy based on the ACR criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26786198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Dentistry ; Giant Cell Arteritis ; Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis ; Humans ; Referral and Consultation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surgery ; Temporal Arteries ; Temporal artery biopsy ; Temporal Cell Arteritis</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2016-04, Vol.54 (3), p.327-330</ispartof><rights>The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-e0391f7d16516539b2656125f7b27afecb617e50ddd917fc600017cbc1b5a7043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-e0391f7d16516539b2656125f7b27afecb617e50ddd917fc600017cbc1b5a7043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairburn, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?</title><title>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be diagnosed histopathologically by biopsy of the temporal artery, and clinically using the 5-point score of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification. We aimed to find out whether some patients are referred for biopsy unnecessarily. We audited all referrals (n = 100) made to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery over 34 months, and used the ACR classification to find out whether patients had had a clinical diagnosis of GCA at referral (ACR score: 3 or more). We then compared them with the result of the biopsy. Of the 100 referred, 98 had a biopsy, and of them, 15 were diagnosed with GCA (2 results were not included). Thirteen of the 15 had already been diagnosed clinically (based on the ACR classification) at referral. Our results gave an ACR specificity of 96% (95% CI: 85% to 99%) but only 20% sensitivity (95% CI: 11% to 32%). There was a linear correlation of high ACR scores with histopathological confirmation. Biopsy is most beneficial when there is a degree of diagnostic uncertainty (ACR: 1 or 2), an atypical presentation, or when steroids may be relatively contraindicated. On the basis of our study, we designed a new referral form for biopsy based on the ACR criteria.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Giant Cell Arteritis</subject><subject>Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Temporal Arteries</subject><subject>Temporal artery biopsy</subject><subject>Temporal Cell Arteritis</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhCZCQj1wSPHZsN0iAUIFSqYgDIHGzHGfSdUjirZ1Q7dvjsFsOXCqNNJfv94y_IeQ5sBIYqFd92fRhTCVnIEvgJQPxgGxACl5AXbGHZMO4UkUlpDohT1LqGWOSg3xMTrjSZwrqsw358sHb6ykkn2jo6LW300wdDgO1ccboZ59e09stTjRtwzK09BZp48Mu7em8RTrjuAvRHun9u6fkUWeHhM-O_ZT8-PTx-_nn4urrxeX5-6vCVVDNBTJRQ6dbUDKXqBuupAIuO91wbTt0jQKNkrVtW4PunMqbg3aNg0ZazSpxSl4e3t3FcLNgms3o07q2nTAsyYDWlRRMgcqoOKAuhpQidmYX_Wjj3gAzq0fTm78ezerRADfZY069OA5YmhHbf5k7cRl4cwAwf_O3x2iS8zg5bH1EN5s2-HsGvP0v7wY_eWeHX7jH1IclTtmgAZNywHxbT7leEiRjWsqf4g9uFpkt</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Hussain, Omar</creator><creator>McKay, Andrew</creator><creator>Fairburn, Kevin</creator><creator>Doyle, Peter</creator><creator>Orr, Robert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?</title><author>Hussain, Omar ; McKay, Andrew ; Fairburn, Kevin ; Doyle, Peter ; Orr, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-e0391f7d16516539b2656125f7b27afecb617e50ddd917fc600017cbc1b5a7043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Giant Cell Arteritis</topic><topic>Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Temporal Arteries</topic><topic>Temporal artery biopsy</topic><topic>Temporal Cell Arteritis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairburn, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hussain, Omar</au><au>McKay, Andrew</au><au>Fairburn, Kevin</au><au>Doyle, Peter</au><au>Orr, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>327-330</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>Abstract Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be diagnosed histopathologically by biopsy of the temporal artery, and clinically using the 5-point score of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification. We aimed to find out whether some patients are referred for biopsy unnecessarily. We audited all referrals (n = 100) made to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery over 34 months, and used the ACR classification to find out whether patients had had a clinical diagnosis of GCA at referral (ACR score: 3 or more). We then compared them with the result of the biopsy. Of the 100 referred, 98 had a biopsy, and of them, 15 were diagnosed with GCA (2 results were not included). Thirteen of the 15 had already been diagnosed clinically (based on the ACR classification) at referral. Our results gave an ACR specificity of 96% (95% CI: 85% to 99%) but only 20% sensitivity (95% CI: 11% to 32%). There was a linear correlation of high ACR scores with histopathological confirmation. Biopsy is most beneficial when there is a degree of diagnostic uncertainty (ACR: 1 or 2), an atypical presentation, or when steroids may be relatively contraindicated. On the basis of our study, we designed a new referral form for biopsy based on the ACR criteria.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26786198</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.013</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4356 |
ispartof | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2016-04, Vol.54 (3), p.327-330 |
issn | 0266-4356 1532-1940 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1774530616 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Biopsy Dentistry Giant Cell Arteritis Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis Humans Referral and Consultation Sensitivity and Specificity Surgery Temporal Arteries Temporal artery biopsy Temporal Cell Arteritis |
title | Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A34%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20of%20giant%20cell%20arteritis:%20when%20should%20we%20biopsy%20the%20temporal%20artery?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Hussain,%20Omar&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=327-330&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1774530616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774530616&rft_id=info:pmid/26786198&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S026643561500755X&rfr_iscdi=true |