Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?

Abstract Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be diagnosed histopathologically by biopsy of the temporal artery, and clinically using the 5-point score of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification. We aimed to find out whether some patients are referred for biopsy unnecessarily. We au...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2016-04, Vol.54 (3), p.327-330
Hauptverfasser: Hussain, Omar, McKay, Andrew, Fairburn, Kevin, Doyle, Peter, Orr, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 330
container_issue 3
container_start_page 327
container_title British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 54
creator Hussain, Omar
McKay, Andrew
Fairburn, Kevin
Doyle, Peter
Orr, Robert
description Abstract Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be diagnosed histopathologically by biopsy of the temporal artery, and clinically using the 5-point score of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification. We aimed to find out whether some patients are referred for biopsy unnecessarily. We audited all referrals (n = 100) made to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery over 34 months, and used the ACR classification to find out whether patients had had a clinical diagnosis of GCA at referral (ACR score: 3 or more). We then compared them with the result of the biopsy. Of the 100 referred, 98 had a biopsy, and of them, 15 were diagnosed with GCA (2 results were not included). Thirteen of the 15 had already been diagnosed clinically (based on the ACR classification) at referral. Our results gave an ACR specificity of 96% (95% CI: 85% to 99%) but only 20% sensitivity (95% CI: 11% to 32%). There was a linear correlation of high ACR scores with histopathological confirmation. Biopsy is most beneficial when there is a degree of diagnostic uncertainty (ACR: 1 or 2), an atypical presentation, or when steroids may be relatively contraindicated. On the basis of our study, we designed a new referral form for biopsy based on the ACR criteria.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1774530616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S026643561500755X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1774530616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-e0391f7d16516539b2656125f7b27afecb617e50ddd917fc600017cbc1b5a7043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhCZCQj1wSPHZsN0iAUIFSqYgDIHGzHGfSdUjirZ1Q7dvjsFsOXCqNNJfv94y_IeQ5sBIYqFd92fRhTCVnIEvgJQPxgGxACl5AXbGHZMO4UkUlpDohT1LqGWOSg3xMTrjSZwrqsw358sHb6ykkn2jo6LW300wdDgO1ccboZ59e09stTjRtwzK09BZp48Mu7em8RTrjuAvRHun9u6fkUWeHhM-O_ZT8-PTx-_nn4urrxeX5-6vCVVDNBTJRQ6dbUDKXqBuupAIuO91wbTt0jQKNkrVtW4PunMqbg3aNg0ZazSpxSl4e3t3FcLNgms3o07q2nTAsyYDWlRRMgcqoOKAuhpQidmYX_Wjj3gAzq0fTm78ezerRADfZY069OA5YmhHbf5k7cRl4cwAwf_O3x2iS8zg5bH1EN5s2-HsGvP0v7wY_eWeHX7jH1IclTtmgAZNywHxbT7leEiRjWsqf4g9uFpkt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774530616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hussain, Omar ; McKay, Andrew ; Fairburn, Kevin ; Doyle, Peter ; Orr, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Omar ; McKay, Andrew ; Fairburn, Kevin ; Doyle, Peter ; Orr, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be diagnosed histopathologically by biopsy of the temporal artery, and clinically using the 5-point score of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification. We aimed to find out whether some patients are referred for biopsy unnecessarily. We audited all referrals (n = 100) made to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery over 34 months, and used the ACR classification to find out whether patients had had a clinical diagnosis of GCA at referral (ACR score: 3 or more). We then compared them with the result of the biopsy. Of the 100 referred, 98 had a biopsy, and of them, 15 were diagnosed with GCA (2 results were not included). Thirteen of the 15 had already been diagnosed clinically (based on the ACR classification) at referral. Our results gave an ACR specificity of 96% (95% CI: 85% to 99%) but only 20% sensitivity (95% CI: 11% to 32%). There was a linear correlation of high ACR scores with histopathological confirmation. Biopsy is most beneficial when there is a degree of diagnostic uncertainty (ACR: 1 or 2), an atypical presentation, or when steroids may be relatively contraindicated. On the basis of our study, we designed a new referral form for biopsy based on the ACR criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26786198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Dentistry ; Giant Cell Arteritis ; Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis ; Humans ; Referral and Consultation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surgery ; Temporal Arteries ; Temporal artery biopsy ; Temporal Cell Arteritis</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery, 2016-04, Vol.54 (3), p.327-330</ispartof><rights>The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-e0391f7d16516539b2656125f7b27afecb617e50ddd917fc600017cbc1b5a7043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-e0391f7d16516539b2656125f7b27afecb617e50ddd917fc600017cbc1b5a7043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairburn, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?</title><title>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be diagnosed histopathologically by biopsy of the temporal artery, and clinically using the 5-point score of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification. We aimed to find out whether some patients are referred for biopsy unnecessarily. We audited all referrals (n = 100) made to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery over 34 months, and used the ACR classification to find out whether patients had had a clinical diagnosis of GCA at referral (ACR score: 3 or more). We then compared them with the result of the biopsy. Of the 100 referred, 98 had a biopsy, and of them, 15 were diagnosed with GCA (2 results were not included). Thirteen of the 15 had already been diagnosed clinically (based on the ACR classification) at referral. Our results gave an ACR specificity of 96% (95% CI: 85% to 99%) but only 20% sensitivity (95% CI: 11% to 32%). There was a linear correlation of high ACR scores with histopathological confirmation. Biopsy is most beneficial when there is a degree of diagnostic uncertainty (ACR: 1 or 2), an atypical presentation, or when steroids may be relatively contraindicated. On the basis of our study, we designed a new referral form for biopsy based on the ACR criteria.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Giant Cell Arteritis</subject><subject>Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Temporal Arteries</subject><subject>Temporal artery biopsy</subject><subject>Temporal Cell Arteritis</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhCZCQj1wSPHZsN0iAUIFSqYgDIHGzHGfSdUjirZ1Q7dvjsFsOXCqNNJfv94y_IeQ5sBIYqFd92fRhTCVnIEvgJQPxgGxACl5AXbGHZMO4UkUlpDohT1LqGWOSg3xMTrjSZwrqsw358sHb6ykkn2jo6LW300wdDgO1ccboZ59e09stTjRtwzK09BZp48Mu7em8RTrjuAvRHun9u6fkUWeHhM-O_ZT8-PTx-_nn4urrxeX5-6vCVVDNBTJRQ6dbUDKXqBuupAIuO91wbTt0jQKNkrVtW4PunMqbg3aNg0ZazSpxSl4e3t3FcLNgms3o07q2nTAsyYDWlRRMgcqoOKAuhpQidmYX_Wjj3gAzq0fTm78ezerRADfZY069OA5YmhHbf5k7cRl4cwAwf_O3x2iS8zg5bH1EN5s2-HsGvP0v7wY_eWeHX7jH1IclTtmgAZNywHxbT7leEiRjWsqf4g9uFpkt</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Hussain, Omar</creator><creator>McKay, Andrew</creator><creator>Fairburn, Kevin</creator><creator>Doyle, Peter</creator><creator>Orr, Robert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?</title><author>Hussain, Omar ; McKay, Andrew ; Fairburn, Kevin ; Doyle, Peter ; Orr, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-e0391f7d16516539b2656125f7b27afecb617e50ddd917fc600017cbc1b5a7043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Giant Cell Arteritis</topic><topic>Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Temporal Arteries</topic><topic>Temporal artery biopsy</topic><topic>Temporal Cell Arteritis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairburn, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hussain, Omar</au><au>McKay, Andrew</au><au>Fairburn, Kevin</au><au>Doyle, Peter</au><au>Orr, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>327-330</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>Abstract Giant cell arteritis (GCA) can be diagnosed histopathologically by biopsy of the temporal artery, and clinically using the 5-point score of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification. We aimed to find out whether some patients are referred for biopsy unnecessarily. We audited all referrals (n = 100) made to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery over 34 months, and used the ACR classification to find out whether patients had had a clinical diagnosis of GCA at referral (ACR score: 3 or more). We then compared them with the result of the biopsy. Of the 100 referred, 98 had a biopsy, and of them, 15 were diagnosed with GCA (2 results were not included). Thirteen of the 15 had already been diagnosed clinically (based on the ACR classification) at referral. Our results gave an ACR specificity of 96% (95% CI: 85% to 99%) but only 20% sensitivity (95% CI: 11% to 32%). There was a linear correlation of high ACR scores with histopathological confirmation. Biopsy is most beneficial when there is a degree of diagnostic uncertainty (ACR: 1 or 2), an atypical presentation, or when steroids may be relatively contraindicated. On the basis of our study, we designed a new referral form for biopsy based on the ACR criteria.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26786198</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.013</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4356
ispartof British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2016-04, Vol.54 (3), p.327-330
issn 0266-4356
1532-1940
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1774530616
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biopsy
Dentistry
Giant Cell Arteritis
Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis
Humans
Referral and Consultation
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surgery
Temporal Arteries
Temporal artery biopsy
Temporal Cell Arteritis
title Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: when should we biopsy the temporal artery?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A34%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20of%20giant%20cell%20arteritis:%20when%20should%20we%20biopsy%20the%20temporal%20artery?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Hussain,%20Omar&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=327-330&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1774530616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774530616&rft_id=info:pmid/26786198&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S026643561500755X&rfr_iscdi=true