Navigating sensory conflict in dynamic environments using adaptive state estimation
Most conventional robots rely on controlling the location of the center of pressure to maintain balance, relying mainly on foot pressure sensors for information. By contrast, humans rely on sensory data from multiple sources, including proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular sources. Several models h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological cybernetics 2011-12, Vol.105 (5-6), p.291-304 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 304 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 291 |
container_title | Biological cybernetics |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Klein, Theresa J. Jeka, John Kiemel, Tim Lewis, M. Anthony |
description | Most conventional robots rely on controlling the location of the center of pressure to maintain balance, relying mainly on foot pressure sensors for information. By contrast, humans rely on sensory data from multiple sources, including proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular sources. Several models have been developed to explain how humans reconcile information from disparate sources to form a stable sense of balance. These models may be useful for developing robots that are able to maintain dynamic balance more readily using multiple sensory sources. Since these information sources may conflict, reliance by the nervous system on any one channel can lead to ambiguity in the system state. In humans, experiments that create conflicts between different sensory channels by moving the visual field or the support surface indicate that sensory information is adaptively reweighted. Unreliable information is rapidly down-weighted, then gradually up-weighted when it becomes valid again. Human balance can also be studied by building robots that model features of human bodies and testing them under similar experimental conditions. We implement a sensory reweighting model based on an adaptive Kalman filter in a bipedal robot, and subject it to sensory tests similar to those used on human subjects. Unlike other implementations of sensory reweighting in robots, our implementation includes vision, by using optic flow to calculate forward rotation using a camera (visual modality), as well as a three-axis gyro to represent the vestibular system (non-visual modality), and foot pressure sensors (proprioceptive modality). Our model estimates measurement noise in real time, which is then used to recompute the Kalman gain on each iteration, improving the ability of the robot to dynamically balance. We observe that we can duplicate many important features of postural sway in humans, including automatic sensory reweighting, effects, constant phase with respect to amplitude, and a temporal asymmetry in the reweighting gains. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00422-011-0466-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1774160469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1774160469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-414eb0415267af201568146c9778d0ff09335f7cc22d1e334bff62ecda4b2f163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFLIzEUx4Os2K76AbzIsCcvo-8lmaQ5iuy6C6IH9RzSTFJSOpmazBT67U2priCIp0Dye__3Xn6EnCFcIoC8ygCc0hoQa-BC1PSATJGzciMl_CBTYBxqpAAT8jPnJQAo2qgjMqGUKkAmpuTx3mzCwgwhLqrsYu7TtrJ99KtghyrEqt1G0wVbubgJqY-di0OuxrzDTWvWQ9i4Kg9mcJXLQ-hKUB9PyKE3q-xO385j8vzn99PN3_ru4fbfzfVdbTnwoebI3Rw4NlRI4ylgI2bIhVVSzlrwHhRjjZfWUtqiY4zPvRfU2dbwOfUo2DG52OeuU_8ylv66C9m61cpE149Zo5QcRfkZ9T0KqARrJMwK-usTuuzHFMsiWqGSzW7eAuEesqnPOTmv16lsn7YlSe_c6L0bXdzonRtNS835W_A471z7v-JdRgHoHsjlKS5c-uj8deor-CqYpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919751526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Navigating sensory conflict in dynamic environments using adaptive state estimation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Klein, Theresa J. ; Jeka, John ; Kiemel, Tim ; Lewis, M. Anthony</creator><creatorcontrib>Klein, Theresa J. ; Jeka, John ; Kiemel, Tim ; Lewis, M. Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>Most conventional robots rely on controlling the location of the center of pressure to maintain balance, relying mainly on foot pressure sensors for information. By contrast, humans rely on sensory data from multiple sources, including proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular sources. Several models have been developed to explain how humans reconcile information from disparate sources to form a stable sense of balance. These models may be useful for developing robots that are able to maintain dynamic balance more readily using multiple sensory sources. Since these information sources may conflict, reliance by the nervous system on any one channel can lead to ambiguity in the system state. In humans, experiments that create conflicts between different sensory channels by moving the visual field or the support surface indicate that sensory information is adaptively reweighted. Unreliable information is rapidly down-weighted, then gradually up-weighted when it becomes valid again. Human balance can also be studied by building robots that model features of human bodies and testing them under similar experimental conditions. We implement a sensory reweighting model based on an adaptive Kalman filter in a bipedal robot, and subject it to sensory tests similar to those used on human subjects. Unlike other implementations of sensory reweighting in robots, our implementation includes vision, by using optic flow to calculate forward rotation using a camera (visual modality), as well as a three-axis gyro to represent the vestibular system (non-visual modality), and foot pressure sensors (proprioceptive modality). Our model estimates measurement noise in real time, which is then used to recompute the Kalman gain on each iteration, improving the ability of the robot to dynamically balance. We observe that we can duplicate many important features of postural sway in humans, including automatic sensory reweighting, effects, constant phase with respect to amplitude, and a temporal asymmetry in the reweighting gains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-1200</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0770</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00422-011-0466-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22290136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology ; Bioinformatics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Channels ; Complex Systems ; Computer Appl. in Life Sciences ; Computer Simulation ; Dynamical systems ; Dynamics ; Environment ; Estimating techniques ; Gain ; Human ; Humans ; Models, Biological ; Neurobiology ; Neurosciences ; Nonlinear Dynamics ; Optic Flow ; Original Paper ; Photic Stimulation ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Pressure sensors ; Robots ; Sensation - physiology ; Sensory perception ; Visual</subject><ispartof>Biological cybernetics, 2011-12, Vol.105 (5-6), p.291-304</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-414eb0415267af201568146c9778d0ff09335f7cc22d1e334bff62ecda4b2f163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-414eb0415267af201568146c9778d0ff09335f7cc22d1e334bff62ecda4b2f163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00422-011-0466-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00422-011-0466-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22290136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klein, Theresa J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeka, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiemel, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, M. Anthony</creatorcontrib><title>Navigating sensory conflict in dynamic environments using adaptive state estimation</title><title>Biological cybernetics</title><addtitle>Biol Cybern</addtitle><addtitle>Biol Cybern</addtitle><description>Most conventional robots rely on controlling the location of the center of pressure to maintain balance, relying mainly on foot pressure sensors for information. By contrast, humans rely on sensory data from multiple sources, including proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular sources. Several models have been developed to explain how humans reconcile information from disparate sources to form a stable sense of balance. These models may be useful for developing robots that are able to maintain dynamic balance more readily using multiple sensory sources. Since these information sources may conflict, reliance by the nervous system on any one channel can lead to ambiguity in the system state. In humans, experiments that create conflicts between different sensory channels by moving the visual field or the support surface indicate that sensory information is adaptively reweighted. Unreliable information is rapidly down-weighted, then gradually up-weighted when it becomes valid again. Human balance can also be studied by building robots that model features of human bodies and testing them under similar experimental conditions. We implement a sensory reweighting model based on an adaptive Kalman filter in a bipedal robot, and subject it to sensory tests similar to those used on human subjects. Unlike other implementations of sensory reweighting in robots, our implementation includes vision, by using optic flow to calculate forward rotation using a camera (visual modality), as well as a three-axis gyro to represent the vestibular system (non-visual modality), and foot pressure sensors (proprioceptive modality). Our model estimates measurement noise in real time, which is then used to recompute the Kalman gain on each iteration, improving the ability of the robot to dynamically balance. We observe that we can duplicate many important features of postural sway in humans, including automatic sensory reweighting, effects, constant phase with respect to amplitude, and a temporal asymmetry in the reweighting gains.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Complex Systems</subject><subject>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Estimating techniques</subject><subject>Gain</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Nonlinear Dynamics</subject><subject>Optic Flow</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Pressure sensors</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Sensation - physiology</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Visual</subject><issn>0340-1200</issn><issn>1432-0770</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFLIzEUx4Os2K76AbzIsCcvo-8lmaQ5iuy6C6IH9RzSTFJSOpmazBT67U2priCIp0Dye__3Xn6EnCFcIoC8ygCc0hoQa-BC1PSATJGzciMl_CBTYBxqpAAT8jPnJQAo2qgjMqGUKkAmpuTx3mzCwgwhLqrsYu7TtrJ99KtghyrEqt1G0wVbubgJqY-di0OuxrzDTWvWQ9i4Kg9mcJXLQ-hKUB9PyKE3q-xO385j8vzn99PN3_ru4fbfzfVdbTnwoebI3Rw4NlRI4ylgI2bIhVVSzlrwHhRjjZfWUtqiY4zPvRfU2dbwOfUo2DG52OeuU_8ylv66C9m61cpE149Zo5QcRfkZ9T0KqARrJMwK-usTuuzHFMsiWqGSzW7eAuEesqnPOTmv16lsn7YlSe_c6L0bXdzonRtNS835W_A471z7v-JdRgHoHsjlKS5c-uj8deor-CqYpg</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Klein, Theresa J.</creator><creator>Jeka, John</creator><creator>Kiemel, Tim</creator><creator>Lewis, M. Anthony</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Navigating sensory conflict in dynamic environments using adaptive state estimation</title><author>Klein, Theresa J. ; Jeka, John ; Kiemel, Tim ; Lewis, M. Anthony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-414eb0415267af201568146c9778d0ff09335f7cc22d1e334bff62ecda4b2f163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Complex Systems</topic><topic>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Estimating techniques</topic><topic>Gain</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Nonlinear Dynamics</topic><topic>Optic Flow</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Pressure sensors</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Sensation - physiology</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Visual</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klein, Theresa J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeka, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiemel, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, M. Anthony</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological cybernetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klein, Theresa J.</au><au>Jeka, John</au><au>Kiemel, Tim</au><au>Lewis, M. Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Navigating sensory conflict in dynamic environments using adaptive state estimation</atitle><jtitle>Biological cybernetics</jtitle><stitle>Biol Cybern</stitle><addtitle>Biol Cybern</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>291-304</pages><issn>0340-1200</issn><eissn>1432-0770</eissn><abstract>Most conventional robots rely on controlling the location of the center of pressure to maintain balance, relying mainly on foot pressure sensors for information. By contrast, humans rely on sensory data from multiple sources, including proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular sources. Several models have been developed to explain how humans reconcile information from disparate sources to form a stable sense of balance. These models may be useful for developing robots that are able to maintain dynamic balance more readily using multiple sensory sources. Since these information sources may conflict, reliance by the nervous system on any one channel can lead to ambiguity in the system state. In humans, experiments that create conflicts between different sensory channels by moving the visual field or the support surface indicate that sensory information is adaptively reweighted. Unreliable information is rapidly down-weighted, then gradually up-weighted when it becomes valid again. Human balance can also be studied by building robots that model features of human bodies and testing them under similar experimental conditions. We implement a sensory reweighting model based on an adaptive Kalman filter in a bipedal robot, and subject it to sensory tests similar to those used on human subjects. Unlike other implementations of sensory reweighting in robots, our implementation includes vision, by using optic flow to calculate forward rotation using a camera (visual modality), as well as a three-axis gyro to represent the vestibular system (non-visual modality), and foot pressure sensors (proprioceptive modality). Our model estimates measurement noise in real time, which is then used to recompute the Kalman gain on each iteration, improving the ability of the robot to dynamically balance. We observe that we can duplicate many important features of postural sway in humans, including automatic sensory reweighting, effects, constant phase with respect to amplitude, and a temporal asymmetry in the reweighting gains.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22290136</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00422-011-0466-2</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-1200 |
ispartof | Biological cybernetics, 2011-12, Vol.105 (5-6), p.291-304 |
issn | 0340-1200 1432-0770 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1774160469 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adaptation, Physiological - physiology Bioinformatics Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Channels Complex Systems Computer Appl. in Life Sciences Computer Simulation Dynamical systems Dynamics Environment Estimating techniques Gain Human Humans Models, Biological Neurobiology Neurosciences Nonlinear Dynamics Optic Flow Original Paper Photic Stimulation Postural Balance - physiology Pressure sensors Robots Sensation - physiology Sensory perception Visual |
title | Navigating sensory conflict in dynamic environments using adaptive state estimation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A24%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Navigating%20sensory%20conflict%20in%20dynamic%20environments%20using%20adaptive%20state%20estimation&rft.jtitle=Biological%20cybernetics&rft.au=Klein,%20Theresa%20J.&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=291-304&rft.issn=0340-1200&rft.eissn=1432-0770&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00422-011-0466-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1774160469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919751526&rft_id=info:pmid/22290136&rfr_iscdi=true |