Assessment of radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures in four Algerian hospitals
This study was aimed to assess patient dosimetry in interventional cardiology (IC) and radiology (IR) and radiation safety of the medical operating staff. For this purpose, four major Algerian hospitals were investigated. The data collected cover radiation protection tools assigned to the operating...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiation protection dosimetry 2016-01, Vol.168 (1), p.55-60 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 60 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 55 |
container_title | Radiation protection dosimetry |
container_volume | 168 |
creator | Khelassi-Toutaoui, N Toutaoui, A Merad, A Sakhri-Brahimi, Z Baggoura, B Mansouri, B |
description | This study was aimed to assess patient dosimetry in interventional cardiology (IC) and radiology (IR) and radiation safety of the medical operating staff. For this purpose, four major Algerian hospitals were investigated. The data collected cover radiation protection tools assigned to the operating staff and measured radiation doses to some selected patient populations. The analysis revealed that lead aprons are systematically worn by the staff but not lead eye glasses, and only a single personal monitoring badge is assigned to the operating staff. Measured doses to patients exhibited large variations in the maximum skin dose (MSD) and in the dose area product (DAP). The mean MSD registered values are as follows: 0.20, 0.14 and 1.28 Gy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures, respectively. In PTCA, doses to 3 out of 22 patients (13.6 %) had even reached the threshold value of 2 Gy. The mean DAP recorded values are as follows: 21.6, 60.1 and 126 Gy cm(2) in ERCP, CA and PTCA procedures, respectively. Mean fluoroscopic times are 2.5, 5 and 15 min in ERCP, CA and PTCA procedures, respectively. The correlation between DAP and MSD is fair in CA (r = 0.62) and poor in PTCA (r = 0.28). Fluoroscopic time was moderately correlated with DAP in CA (r = 0.55) and PTCA (r = 0.61) procedures. Local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in CA and PTCA procedures have been proposed. In conclusion, this study stresses the need for a continuous patient dose monitoring in interventional procedures with a special emphasis in IC procedures. Common strategies must be undertaken to substantially reduce radiation doses to both patients and medical staff. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rpd/ncv001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773831624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1761462678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-383db4229a88fca9297e5de5094b8f441926f0146f2bec223daa8f1dc3fb4a2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctKxDAUhoMozji68QGkSxHqJCdp2i6HwRsMuNF1SZMTrfRmkg749mac0bUQOOHPdy45PyGXjN4yWvKlG82y11tK2RGZs1xAygWVx2ROmRBpIYDOyJn3H5RCXmbilMwgk0JmkM3JuPIeve-wD8lgE6dMo0Iz9MnohoD65xr1MYoR8YnqTeKDsjZp-ngCum3UI6XaXYpGMzn0u0c7TC5ZtW_oGtUn74Mfm6Baf05ObAx4cYgL8np_97J-TDfPD0_r1SbVHGhIecFNLQBKVRRWqxLKHDODGS1FXVghWAnSxv9JCzVqAG6UKiwzmttaKLB8Qa73deNUnxP6UHWN19i2qsdh8hXL89iDSRD_QGVsBDIvInqzR7UbvHdoq9E1nXJfFaPVzowqmlHtzYjw1aHuVHdo_tDf7fNvuyeISg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761462678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures in four Algerian hospitals</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Khelassi-Toutaoui, N ; Toutaoui, A ; Merad, A ; Sakhri-Brahimi, Z ; Baggoura, B ; Mansouri, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Khelassi-Toutaoui, N ; Toutaoui, A ; Merad, A ; Sakhri-Brahimi, Z ; Baggoura, B ; Mansouri, B</creatorcontrib><description>This study was aimed to assess patient dosimetry in interventional cardiology (IC) and radiology (IR) and radiation safety of the medical operating staff. For this purpose, four major Algerian hospitals were investigated. The data collected cover radiation protection tools assigned to the operating staff and measured radiation doses to some selected patient populations. The analysis revealed that lead aprons are systematically worn by the staff but not lead eye glasses, and only a single personal monitoring badge is assigned to the operating staff. Measured doses to patients exhibited large variations in the maximum skin dose (MSD) and in the dose area product (DAP). The mean MSD registered values are as follows: 0.20, 0.14 and 1.28 Gy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures, respectively. In PTCA, doses to 3 out of 22 patients (13.6 %) had even reached the threshold value of 2 Gy. The mean DAP recorded values are as follows: 21.6, 60.1 and 126 Gy cm(2) in ERCP, CA and PTCA procedures, respectively. Mean fluoroscopic times are 2.5, 5 and 15 min in ERCP, CA and PTCA procedures, respectively. The correlation between DAP and MSD is fair in CA (r = 0.62) and poor in PTCA (r = 0.28). Fluoroscopic time was moderately correlated with DAP in CA (r = 0.55) and PTCA (r = 0.61) procedures. Local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in CA and PTCA procedures have been proposed. In conclusion, this study stresses the need for a continuous patient dose monitoring in interventional procedures with a special emphasis in IC procedures. Common strategies must be undertaken to substantially reduce radiation doses to both patients and medical staff.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25646525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Algeria ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; Calibration ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Coronary Angiography ; Environmental Exposure - prevention & control ; Female ; Film Dosimetry - methods ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Exposure - prevention & control ; Protective Devices ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Monitoring - methods ; Radiation Protection - methods ; Radiometry ; Reference Values ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2016-01, Vol.168 (1), p.55-60</ispartof><rights>The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-383db4229a88fca9297e5de5094b8f441926f0146f2bec223daa8f1dc3fb4a2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-383db4229a88fca9297e5de5094b8f441926f0146f2bec223daa8f1dc3fb4a2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25646525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khelassi-Toutaoui, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toutaoui, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merad, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakhri-Brahimi, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baggoura, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansouri, B</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures in four Algerian hospitals</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>This study was aimed to assess patient dosimetry in interventional cardiology (IC) and radiology (IR) and radiation safety of the medical operating staff. For this purpose, four major Algerian hospitals were investigated. The data collected cover radiation protection tools assigned to the operating staff and measured radiation doses to some selected patient populations. The analysis revealed that lead aprons are systematically worn by the staff but not lead eye glasses, and only a single personal monitoring badge is assigned to the operating staff. Measured doses to patients exhibited large variations in the maximum skin dose (MSD) and in the dose area product (DAP). The mean MSD registered values are as follows: 0.20, 0.14 and 1.28 Gy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures, respectively. In PTCA, doses to 3 out of 22 patients (13.6 %) had even reached the threshold value of 2 Gy. The mean DAP recorded values are as follows: 21.6, 60.1 and 126 Gy cm(2) in ERCP, CA and PTCA procedures, respectively. Mean fluoroscopic times are 2.5, 5 and 15 min in ERCP, CA and PTCA procedures, respectively. The correlation between DAP and MSD is fair in CA (r = 0.62) and poor in PTCA (r = 0.28). Fluoroscopic time was moderately correlated with DAP in CA (r = 0.55) and PTCA (r = 0.61) procedures. Local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in CA and PTCA procedures have been proposed. In conclusion, this study stresses the need for a continuous patient dose monitoring in interventional procedures with a special emphasis in IC procedures. Common strategies must be undertaken to substantially reduce radiation doses to both patients and medical staff.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algeria</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - prevention & control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Film Dosimetry - methods</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - prevention & control</subject><subject>Protective Devices</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Radiation Protection - methods</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctKxDAUhoMozji68QGkSxHqJCdp2i6HwRsMuNF1SZMTrfRmkg749mac0bUQOOHPdy45PyGXjN4yWvKlG82y11tK2RGZs1xAygWVx2ROmRBpIYDOyJn3H5RCXmbilMwgk0JmkM3JuPIeve-wD8lgE6dMo0Iz9MnohoD65xr1MYoR8YnqTeKDsjZp-ngCum3UI6XaXYpGMzn0u0c7TC5ZtW_oGtUn74Mfm6Baf05ObAx4cYgL8np_97J-TDfPD0_r1SbVHGhIecFNLQBKVRRWqxLKHDODGS1FXVghWAnSxv9JCzVqAG6UKiwzmttaKLB8Qa73deNUnxP6UHWN19i2qsdh8hXL89iDSRD_QGVsBDIvInqzR7UbvHdoq9E1nXJfFaPVzowqmlHtzYjw1aHuVHdo_tDf7fNvuyeISg</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Khelassi-Toutaoui, N</creator><creator>Toutaoui, A</creator><creator>Merad, A</creator><creator>Sakhri-Brahimi, Z</creator><creator>Baggoura, B</creator><creator>Mansouri, B</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Assessment of radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures in four Algerian hospitals</title><author>Khelassi-Toutaoui, N ; Toutaoui, A ; Merad, A ; Sakhri-Brahimi, Z ; Baggoura, B ; Mansouri, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-383db4229a88fca9297e5de5094b8f441926f0146f2bec223daa8f1dc3fb4a2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algeria</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - prevention & control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Film Dosimetry - methods</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - prevention & control</topic><topic>Protective Devices</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Radiation Protection - methods</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khelassi-Toutaoui, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toutaoui, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merad, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakhri-Brahimi, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baggoura, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansouri, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khelassi-Toutaoui, N</au><au>Toutaoui, A</au><au>Merad, A</au><au>Sakhri-Brahimi, Z</au><au>Baggoura, B</au><au>Mansouri, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures in four Algerian hospitals</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>168</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>55-60</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>This study was aimed to assess patient dosimetry in interventional cardiology (IC) and radiology (IR) and radiation safety of the medical operating staff. For this purpose, four major Algerian hospitals were investigated. The data collected cover radiation protection tools assigned to the operating staff and measured radiation doses to some selected patient populations. The analysis revealed that lead aprons are systematically worn by the staff but not lead eye glasses, and only a single personal monitoring badge is assigned to the operating staff. Measured doses to patients exhibited large variations in the maximum skin dose (MSD) and in the dose area product (DAP). The mean MSD registered values are as follows: 0.20, 0.14 and 1.28 Gy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures, respectively. In PTCA, doses to 3 out of 22 patients (13.6 %) had even reached the threshold value of 2 Gy. The mean DAP recorded values are as follows: 21.6, 60.1 and 126 Gy cm(2) in ERCP, CA and PTCA procedures, respectively. Mean fluoroscopic times are 2.5, 5 and 15 min in ERCP, CA and PTCA procedures, respectively. The correlation between DAP and MSD is fair in CA (r = 0.62) and poor in PTCA (r = 0.28). Fluoroscopic time was moderately correlated with DAP in CA (r = 0.55) and PTCA (r = 0.61) procedures. Local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in CA and PTCA procedures have been proposed. In conclusion, this study stresses the need for a continuous patient dose monitoring in interventional procedures with a special emphasis in IC procedures. Common strategies must be undertaken to substantially reduce radiation doses to both patients and medical staff.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>25646525</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncv001</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-8420 |
ispartof | Radiation protection dosimetry, 2016-01, Vol.168 (1), p.55-60 |
issn | 0144-8420 1742-3406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773831624 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Algeria Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary Calibration Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Coronary Angiography Environmental Exposure - prevention & control Female Film Dosimetry - methods Fluoroscopy Humans Male Middle Aged Occupational Exposure - prevention & control Protective Devices Radiation Dosage Radiation Monitoring - methods Radiation Protection - methods Radiometry Reference Values Young Adult |
title | Assessment of radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures in four Algerian hospitals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A51%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20radiation%20protection%20of%20patients%20and%20staff%20in%20interventional%20procedures%20in%20four%20Algerian%20hospitals&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Khelassi-Toutaoui,%20N&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=55-60&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncv001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1761462678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761462678&rft_id=info:pmid/25646525&rfr_iscdi=true |