Impact of DNA extraction method on bacterial community composition measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

The impact of DNA extraction protocol on soil DNA yield and bacterial community composition was evaluated. Three different procedures to physically disrupt cells were compared: sonication, grinding–freezing–thawing, and bead beating. The three protocols were applied to three different topsoils. For...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil biology & biochemistry 2004-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1607-1614
Hauptverfasser: de Lipthay, Julia R., Enzinger, Christiane, Johnsen, Kaare, Aamand, Jens, Sørensen, Søren J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1614
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1607
container_title Soil biology & biochemistry
container_volume 36
creator de Lipthay, Julia R.
Enzinger, Christiane
Johnsen, Kaare
Aamand, Jens
Sørensen, Søren J.
description The impact of DNA extraction protocol on soil DNA yield and bacterial community composition was evaluated. Three different procedures to physically disrupt cells were compared: sonication, grinding–freezing–thawing, and bead beating. The three protocols were applied to three different topsoils. For all soils, we found that each DNA extraction method resulted in unique community patterns as measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. This indicates the importance of the DNA extraction protocol on data for evaluating soil bacterial diversity. Consistently, the bead-beating procedure gave rise to the highest number of DNA bands, indicating the highest number of bacterial species. Supplementing the bead-beating procedure with additional cell-rupture steps generally did not change the bacterial community profile. The same consistency was not observed when evaluating the efficiency of the different methods on soil DNA yield. This parameter depended on soil type. The DNA size was of highest molecular weight with the sonication and grinding–freezing–thawing procedures (approx. 20 kb). In contrast, the inclusion of bead beating resulted in more sheared DNA (approx. 6–20 kb), and the longer the bead-beating time, the higher the fraction of low-molecular weight DNA. Clearly, the choice of DNA extraction protocol depends on soil type. We found, however, that for the analysis of indigenous soil bacterial communities the bead-beating procedure was appropriate because it is fast, reproducible, and gives very pure DNA of relatively high molecular weight. And very importantly, with this protocol the highest soil bacterial diversity was obtained. We believe that the choice of DNA extraction protocol will influence not only the determined phylogenetic diversity of indigenous microbial communities, but also the obtained functional diversity. This means that the detected presence of a functional gene—and thus the indication of enzyme activity—may depend on the nature of the applied DNA extraction procedure.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.03.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17736741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S003807170400210X</els_id><sourcerecordid>17736741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-50ac436d2948f3f597dfe53d4b7e2b5be08f855600e020656123a57661b29e1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtu1DAUQCMEEkPhExDewC7h2o7tZIWqlkelChbQteXYN1OPkjjYTsX8PR7NSCxZ3YfOfehU1VsKDQUqPx6aFPw0-NAwgLYB3gClz6od7VRf85Z1z6sdAO9qUFS9rF6ldAAAJijfVU9382psJmEkt9-vCf7JsZQ-LGTG_BgcKdlQOhi9mYgN87wtPh9P2RqSv5AmbREdGY7E4WLyFv2yJ_tonMclkz1OBCe0OYb1MURMPr2uXoxmSvjmEq-qhy-ff918q-9_fL27ub6vbSu6XAswtuXSsb7tRj6KXrkRBXftoJANYkDoxk4ICYDAQApJGTdCSUkH1iM1_Kr6cN67xvB7w5T17JPFaTILhi1pqhSXqqUFFGfQxpBSxFGv0c8mHjUFfbKsD_piWZ8sa-C6WC5z7y8HTLJmGqNZrE__hiVVQPsT9-7MjSZos4-FefjJgHKAXihQvBCfzgQWH08eo0626LPofCzutAv-P7_8BT7foJU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17736741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of DNA extraction method on bacterial community composition measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>de Lipthay, Julia R. ; Enzinger, Christiane ; Johnsen, Kaare ; Aamand, Jens ; Sørensen, Søren J.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Lipthay, Julia R. ; Enzinger, Christiane ; Johnsen, Kaare ; Aamand, Jens ; Sørensen, Søren J.</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of DNA extraction protocol on soil DNA yield and bacterial community composition was evaluated. Three different procedures to physically disrupt cells were compared: sonication, grinding–freezing–thawing, and bead beating. The three protocols were applied to three different topsoils. For all soils, we found that each DNA extraction method resulted in unique community patterns as measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. This indicates the importance of the DNA extraction protocol on data for evaluating soil bacterial diversity. Consistently, the bead-beating procedure gave rise to the highest number of DNA bands, indicating the highest number of bacterial species. Supplementing the bead-beating procedure with additional cell-rupture steps generally did not change the bacterial community profile. The same consistency was not observed when evaluating the efficiency of the different methods on soil DNA yield. This parameter depended on soil type. The DNA size was of highest molecular weight with the sonication and grinding–freezing–thawing procedures (approx. 20 kb). In contrast, the inclusion of bead beating resulted in more sheared DNA (approx. 6–20 kb), and the longer the bead-beating time, the higher the fraction of low-molecular weight DNA. Clearly, the choice of DNA extraction protocol depends on soil type. We found, however, that for the analysis of indigenous soil bacterial communities the bead-beating procedure was appropriate because it is fast, reproducible, and gives very pure DNA of relatively high molecular weight. And very importantly, with this protocol the highest soil bacterial diversity was obtained. We believe that the choice of DNA extraction protocol will influence not only the determined phylogenetic diversity of indigenous microbial communities, but also the obtained functional diversity. This means that the detected presence of a functional gene—and thus the indication of enzyme activity—may depend on the nature of the applied DNA extraction procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.03.011</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SBIOAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Bacterial community composition ; Biochemistry and biology ; biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties ; community structure ; DGGE ; DNA ; DNA extraction ; extraction ; functional diversity ; Functional gene ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gel electrophoresis ; methodology ; Microbial diversity ; Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils ; polymerase chain reaction ; soil bacteria ; Soil science</subject><ispartof>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry, 2004-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1607-1614</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-50ac436d2948f3f597dfe53d4b7e2b5be08f855600e020656123a57661b29e1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-50ac436d2948f3f597dfe53d4b7e2b5be08f855600e020656123a57661b29e1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.03.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3549,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16170191$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Lipthay, Julia R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enzinger, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnsen, Kaare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aamand, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Søren J.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of DNA extraction method on bacterial community composition measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis</title><title>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</title><description>The impact of DNA extraction protocol on soil DNA yield and bacterial community composition was evaluated. Three different procedures to physically disrupt cells were compared: sonication, grinding–freezing–thawing, and bead beating. The three protocols were applied to three different topsoils. For all soils, we found that each DNA extraction method resulted in unique community patterns as measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. This indicates the importance of the DNA extraction protocol on data for evaluating soil bacterial diversity. Consistently, the bead-beating procedure gave rise to the highest number of DNA bands, indicating the highest number of bacterial species. Supplementing the bead-beating procedure with additional cell-rupture steps generally did not change the bacterial community profile. The same consistency was not observed when evaluating the efficiency of the different methods on soil DNA yield. This parameter depended on soil type. The DNA size was of highest molecular weight with the sonication and grinding–freezing–thawing procedures (approx. 20 kb). In contrast, the inclusion of bead beating resulted in more sheared DNA (approx. 6–20 kb), and the longer the bead-beating time, the higher the fraction of low-molecular weight DNA. Clearly, the choice of DNA extraction protocol depends on soil type. We found, however, that for the analysis of indigenous soil bacterial communities the bead-beating procedure was appropriate because it is fast, reproducible, and gives very pure DNA of relatively high molecular weight. And very importantly, with this protocol the highest soil bacterial diversity was obtained. We believe that the choice of DNA extraction protocol will influence not only the determined phylogenetic diversity of indigenous microbial communities, but also the obtained functional diversity. This means that the detected presence of a functional gene—and thus the indication of enzyme activity—may depend on the nature of the applied DNA extraction procedure.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Bacterial community composition</subject><subject>Biochemistry and biology</subject><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</subject><subject>community structure</subject><subject>DGGE</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA extraction</subject><subject>extraction</subject><subject>functional diversity</subject><subject>Functional gene</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>Microbial diversity</subject><subject>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</subject><subject>polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>soil bacteria</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><issn>0038-0717</issn><issn>1879-3428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtu1DAUQCMEEkPhExDewC7h2o7tZIWqlkelChbQteXYN1OPkjjYTsX8PR7NSCxZ3YfOfehU1VsKDQUqPx6aFPw0-NAwgLYB3gClz6od7VRf85Z1z6sdAO9qUFS9rF6ldAAAJijfVU9382psJmEkt9-vCf7JsZQ-LGTG_BgcKdlQOhi9mYgN87wtPh9P2RqSv5AmbREdGY7E4WLyFv2yJ_tonMclkz1OBCe0OYb1MURMPr2uXoxmSvjmEq-qhy-ff918q-9_fL27ub6vbSu6XAswtuXSsb7tRj6KXrkRBXftoJANYkDoxk4ICYDAQApJGTdCSUkH1iM1_Kr6cN67xvB7w5T17JPFaTILhi1pqhSXqqUFFGfQxpBSxFGv0c8mHjUFfbKsD_piWZ8sa-C6WC5z7y8HTLJmGqNZrE__hiVVQPsT9-7MjSZos4-FefjJgHKAXihQvBCfzgQWH08eo0626LPofCzutAv-P7_8BT7foJU</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>de Lipthay, Julia R.</creator><creator>Enzinger, Christiane</creator><creator>Johnsen, Kaare</creator><creator>Aamand, Jens</creator><creator>Sørensen, Søren J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Impact of DNA extraction method on bacterial community composition measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis</title><author>de Lipthay, Julia R. ; Enzinger, Christiane ; Johnsen, Kaare ; Aamand, Jens ; Sørensen, Søren J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-50ac436d2948f3f597dfe53d4b7e2b5be08f855600e020656123a57661b29e1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Bacterial community composition</topic><topic>Biochemistry and biology</topic><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</topic><topic>community structure</topic><topic>DGGE</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA extraction</topic><topic>extraction</topic><topic>functional diversity</topic><topic>Functional gene</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>Microbial diversity</topic><topic>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</topic><topic>polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>soil bacteria</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Lipthay, Julia R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enzinger, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnsen, Kaare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aamand, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Søren J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Lipthay, Julia R.</au><au>Enzinger, Christiane</au><au>Johnsen, Kaare</au><au>Aamand, Jens</au><au>Sørensen, Søren J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of DNA extraction method on bacterial community composition measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis</atitle><jtitle>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1607</spage><epage>1614</epage><pages>1607-1614</pages><issn>0038-0717</issn><eissn>1879-3428</eissn><coden>SBIOAH</coden><abstract>The impact of DNA extraction protocol on soil DNA yield and bacterial community composition was evaluated. Three different procedures to physically disrupt cells were compared: sonication, grinding–freezing–thawing, and bead beating. The three protocols were applied to three different topsoils. For all soils, we found that each DNA extraction method resulted in unique community patterns as measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. This indicates the importance of the DNA extraction protocol on data for evaluating soil bacterial diversity. Consistently, the bead-beating procedure gave rise to the highest number of DNA bands, indicating the highest number of bacterial species. Supplementing the bead-beating procedure with additional cell-rupture steps generally did not change the bacterial community profile. The same consistency was not observed when evaluating the efficiency of the different methods on soil DNA yield. This parameter depended on soil type. The DNA size was of highest molecular weight with the sonication and grinding–freezing–thawing procedures (approx. 20 kb). In contrast, the inclusion of bead beating resulted in more sheared DNA (approx. 6–20 kb), and the longer the bead-beating time, the higher the fraction of low-molecular weight DNA. Clearly, the choice of DNA extraction protocol depends on soil type. We found, however, that for the analysis of indigenous soil bacterial communities the bead-beating procedure was appropriate because it is fast, reproducible, and gives very pure DNA of relatively high molecular weight. And very importantly, with this protocol the highest soil bacterial diversity was obtained. We believe that the choice of DNA extraction protocol will influence not only the determined phylogenetic diversity of indigenous microbial communities, but also the obtained functional diversity. This means that the detected presence of a functional gene—and thus the indication of enzyme activity—may depend on the nature of the applied DNA extraction procedure.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.03.011</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0717
ispartof Soil biology & biochemistry, 2004-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1607-1614
issn 0038-0717
1879-3428
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17736741
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Bacterial community composition
Biochemistry and biology
biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties
community structure
DGGE
DNA
DNA extraction
extraction
functional diversity
Functional gene
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gel electrophoresis
methodology
Microbial diversity
Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils
polymerase chain reaction
soil bacteria
Soil science
title Impact of DNA extraction method on bacterial community composition measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A46%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20DNA%20extraction%20method%20on%20bacterial%20community%20composition%20measured%20by%20denaturing%20gradient%20gel%20electrophoresis&rft.jtitle=Soil%20biology%20&%20biochemistry&rft.au=de%20Lipthay,%20Julia%20R.&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1607&rft.epage=1614&rft.pages=1607-1614&rft.issn=0038-0717&rft.eissn=1879-3428&rft.coden=SBIOAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.03.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17736741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17736741&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S003807170400210X&rfr_iscdi=true