Toxicity and Bioavailability of Copper Herbicides (Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and Copper Sulfate) to Freshwater Animals

In designing aquatic herbicides containing copper, an important goal is to maximize efficacy for target species while minimizing risks for nontarget species. To have a margin of safety for nontarget species, the concentration, duration of exposure (i.e., uptake), and form (i.e., species) of copper u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology 2000-11, Vol.39 (4), p.445-451
Hauptverfasser: Mastin, B. J, Rodgers, Jr., J. H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 451
container_issue 4
container_start_page 445
container_title Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology
container_volume 39
creator Mastin, B. J
Rodgers, Jr., J. H
description In designing aquatic herbicides containing copper, an important goal is to maximize efficacy for target species while minimizing risks for nontarget species. To have a margin of safety for nontarget species, the concentration, duration of exposure (i.e., uptake), and form (i.e., species) of copper used for herbicidal properties should not elicit adverse effects on populations of nontarget species. To determine the potential for risk or adverse effects (conversely the margin of safety), data regarding the comparative toxicity of copper-containing herbicides are crucial. A series of comparative toxicity experiments was conducted, including baseline estimates of toxicity (LC50s, LOECs), sensitive species relationships (thresholds and exposure-response slopes), and bioavailability of toxic concentrations and forms of copper 7 days after initial herbicide application. Aqueous 48-h toxicity experiments were performed to contrast responses of Daphnia magna Strauss, Hyalella azteca Saussure, Chironomus tentans Fabricius, and Pimephales promelas Rafinesque to copper herbicides: Clearigate®, Cutrine®-Plus, and copper sulfate. D. magna was the most sensitive aquatic animal tested for all three herbicides; 48-h LC50s for organisms exposed to Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and copper sulfate were 29.4, 11.3, and 18.9 μg Cu/L, respectively. In terms of potency (calculated from the linearized portion of the exposure-response curves, which included 50% mortality), D. magna was the most sensitive animal tested. Organisms exposed to Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and copper sulfate had exposure-response slopes of 2.55, 8.61, and 5.07% mortality/μg Cu/L, respectively. Bioavailability of Clearigate and Cutrine-Plus was determined by comparing survival data (LC50s) of test organisms exposed to herbicide concentrations during the first and last 48-h of a 7-day exposure period. Even in these relatively simplified water-only exposures, a transformation of copper to less bioavailable species over time was observed with a 100–200% decrease in toxicity (i.e., an increase in 48-h LC50s) for all four test animals. This series of laboratory experiments provides a worst-case scenario for determining the risk associated with the manufacturer's recommended application rates of Clearigate (100–1,000 μg Cu/L), Cutrine-Plus (200–1,000 μg Cu/L), and copper sulfate (100–500 μg Cu/L) in natural waters for four nontarget freshwater animals.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s002440010126
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17736464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16190560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-19bdc16158d075e94f6b90f1ba2b7a67032cb41d36bed5c2d9f3c7e637f7f78e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0s1rFTEQAPAgin1Wj151QRCFrs7kc_dYF2uFgkLb85LNJjUlb_Oa7Fb735vne_h1KTkMCb_MMJkQ8hzhHQKo9xmAcg6AgFQ-ICvkjNaggD0kK4AWas44HpAnOV8XRJuGPyYHiMCQAV-R24v4wxs_31V6GqsPPupb7YMefNieRVd1cbOxqTq1aShutLl60wWrk7_Ssz2qumVOfrL117Dko1859hfOl-CKeFvNsTpJNn_7XnapOp78Wof8lDxyJdhn-3hILk8-XnSn9dmXT5-747PaCNrMNbbDaFCiaEZQwrbcyaEFh4Omg9KydEnNwHFkcrCjMHRsHTPKSqZcWY1lh-T1Lu8mxZvF5rlf-2xsCHqycck9KsUkl_x-KLEFIeF-yIXgIGWBr_6D13FJU-m2R4GKizKYrap3yqSYc7Ku36TyQumuR-i3A-7_GXDxL_ZZl2Ftxz96P9G_yupsdHBJT8bn364pP4DRol7ulNOx11epiMtzCljqgMCmZewnFt20gA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517454346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toxicity and Bioavailability of Copper Herbicides (Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and Copper Sulfate) to Freshwater Animals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mastin, B. J ; Rodgers, Jr., J. H</creator><creatorcontrib>Mastin, B. J ; Rodgers, Jr., J. H</creatorcontrib><description>In designing aquatic herbicides containing copper, an important goal is to maximize efficacy for target species while minimizing risks for nontarget species. To have a margin of safety for nontarget species, the concentration, duration of exposure (i.e., uptake), and form (i.e., species) of copper used for herbicidal properties should not elicit adverse effects on populations of nontarget species. To determine the potential for risk or adverse effects (conversely the margin of safety), data regarding the comparative toxicity of copper-containing herbicides are crucial. A series of comparative toxicity experiments was conducted, including baseline estimates of toxicity (LC50s, LOECs), sensitive species relationships (thresholds and exposure-response slopes), and bioavailability of toxic concentrations and forms of copper 7 days after initial herbicide application. Aqueous 48-h toxicity experiments were performed to contrast responses of Daphnia magna Strauss, Hyalella azteca Saussure, Chironomus tentans Fabricius, and Pimephales promelas Rafinesque to copper herbicides: Clearigate®, Cutrine®-Plus, and copper sulfate. D. magna was the most sensitive aquatic animal tested for all three herbicides; 48-h LC50s for organisms exposed to Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and copper sulfate were 29.4, 11.3, and 18.9 μg Cu/L, respectively. In terms of potency (calculated from the linearized portion of the exposure-response curves, which included 50% mortality), D. magna was the most sensitive animal tested. Organisms exposed to Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and copper sulfate had exposure-response slopes of 2.55, 8.61, and 5.07% mortality/μg Cu/L, respectively. Bioavailability of Clearigate and Cutrine-Plus was determined by comparing survival data (LC50s) of test organisms exposed to herbicide concentrations during the first and last 48-h of a 7-day exposure period. Even in these relatively simplified water-only exposures, a transformation of copper to less bioavailable species over time was observed with a 100–200% decrease in toxicity (i.e., an increase in 48-h LC50s) for all four test animals. This series of laboratory experiments provides a worst-case scenario for determining the risk associated with the manufacturer's recommended application rates of Clearigate (100–1,000 μg Cu/L), Cutrine-Plus (200–1,000 μg Cu/L), and copper sulfate (100–500 μg Cu/L) in natural waters for four nontarget freshwater animals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002440010126</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11031304</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AECTCV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>adverse effects ; Amino Alcohols - pharmacokinetics ; Amino Alcohols - toxicity ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; application rate ; Applied ecology ; Aquatic animals ; Bioavailability ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological Availability ; Chironomidae ; Chironomidae - drug effects ; Chironomidae - metabolism ; Chironomus tentans ; Clearigate ; Copper ; Copper sulfate ; Copper Sulfate - pharmacokinetics ; Copper Sulfate - toxicity ; cupric sulfate ; Cutrine-Plus ; Cyprinidae - metabolism ; Daphnia - drug effects ; Daphnia - metabolism ; Daphnia magna ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Ethanolamine - pharmacokinetics ; Ethanolamine - toxicity ; Ethanolamines ; Experiments ; exposure duration ; Fresh Water ; Fresh water environment ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; herbicidal properties ; Herbicides ; Herbicides - pharmacokinetics ; Herbicides - toxicity ; Hyalella azteca ; laboratory experimentation ; Lethal Dose 50 ; margin of safety ; Mortality ; Natural waters ; nontarget organisms ; Organometallic Compounds - pharmacokinetics ; Organometallic Compounds - toxicity ; pesticide application ; Pimephales promelas ; risk ; Risk reduction ; Side effects ; Sulfates ; Test animals ; Test organisms ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2000-11, Vol.39 (4), p.445-451</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-19bdc16158d075e94f6b90f1ba2b7a67032cb41d36bed5c2d9f3c7e637f7f78e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=828832$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11031304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mastin, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Jr., J. H</creatorcontrib><title>Toxicity and Bioavailability of Copper Herbicides (Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and Copper Sulfate) to Freshwater Animals</title><title>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</title><addtitle>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><description>In designing aquatic herbicides containing copper, an important goal is to maximize efficacy for target species while minimizing risks for nontarget species. To have a margin of safety for nontarget species, the concentration, duration of exposure (i.e., uptake), and form (i.e., species) of copper used for herbicidal properties should not elicit adverse effects on populations of nontarget species. To determine the potential for risk or adverse effects (conversely the margin of safety), data regarding the comparative toxicity of copper-containing herbicides are crucial. A series of comparative toxicity experiments was conducted, including baseline estimates of toxicity (LC50s, LOECs), sensitive species relationships (thresholds and exposure-response slopes), and bioavailability of toxic concentrations and forms of copper 7 days after initial herbicide application. Aqueous 48-h toxicity experiments were performed to contrast responses of Daphnia magna Strauss, Hyalella azteca Saussure, Chironomus tentans Fabricius, and Pimephales promelas Rafinesque to copper herbicides: Clearigate®, Cutrine®-Plus, and copper sulfate. D. magna was the most sensitive aquatic animal tested for all three herbicides; 48-h LC50s for organisms exposed to Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and copper sulfate were 29.4, 11.3, and 18.9 μg Cu/L, respectively. In terms of potency (calculated from the linearized portion of the exposure-response curves, which included 50% mortality), D. magna was the most sensitive animal tested. Organisms exposed to Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and copper sulfate had exposure-response slopes of 2.55, 8.61, and 5.07% mortality/μg Cu/L, respectively. Bioavailability of Clearigate and Cutrine-Plus was determined by comparing survival data (LC50s) of test organisms exposed to herbicide concentrations during the first and last 48-h of a 7-day exposure period. Even in these relatively simplified water-only exposures, a transformation of copper to less bioavailable species over time was observed with a 100–200% decrease in toxicity (i.e., an increase in 48-h LC50s) for all four test animals. This series of laboratory experiments provides a worst-case scenario for determining the risk associated with the manufacturer's recommended application rates of Clearigate (100–1,000 μg Cu/L), Cutrine-Plus (200–1,000 μg Cu/L), and copper sulfate (100–500 μg Cu/L) in natural waters for four nontarget freshwater animals.</description><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>Amino Alcohols - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Amino Alcohols - toxicity</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>application rate</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic animals</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological Availability</subject><subject>Chironomidae</subject><subject>Chironomidae - drug effects</subject><subject>Chironomidae - metabolism</subject><subject>Chironomus tentans</subject><subject>Clearigate</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Copper sulfate</subject><subject>Copper Sulfate - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Copper Sulfate - toxicity</subject><subject>cupric sulfate</subject><subject>Cutrine-Plus</subject><subject>Cyprinidae - metabolism</subject><subject>Daphnia - drug effects</subject><subject>Daphnia - metabolism</subject><subject>Daphnia magna</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Ethanolamine - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Ethanolamine - toxicity</subject><subject>Ethanolamines</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>exposure duration</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>Fresh water environment</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>herbicidal properties</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Herbicides - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Herbicides - toxicity</subject><subject>Hyalella azteca</subject><subject>laboratory experimentation</subject><subject>Lethal Dose 50</subject><subject>margin of safety</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Natural waters</subject><subject>nontarget organisms</subject><subject>Organometallic Compounds - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Organometallic Compounds - toxicity</subject><subject>pesticide application</subject><subject>Pimephales promelas</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Test animals</subject><subject>Test organisms</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>0090-4341</issn><issn>1432-0703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0s1rFTEQAPAgin1Wj151QRCFrs7kc_dYF2uFgkLb85LNJjUlb_Oa7Fb735vne_h1KTkMCb_MMJkQ8hzhHQKo9xmAcg6AgFQ-ICvkjNaggD0kK4AWas44HpAnOV8XRJuGPyYHiMCQAV-R24v4wxs_31V6GqsPPupb7YMefNieRVd1cbOxqTq1aShutLl60wWrk7_Ssz2qumVOfrL117Dko1859hfOl-CKeFvNsTpJNn_7XnapOp78Wof8lDxyJdhn-3hILk8-XnSn9dmXT5-747PaCNrMNbbDaFCiaEZQwrbcyaEFh4Omg9KydEnNwHFkcrCjMHRsHTPKSqZcWY1lh-T1Lu8mxZvF5rlf-2xsCHqycck9KsUkl_x-KLEFIeF-yIXgIGWBr_6D13FJU-m2R4GKizKYrap3yqSYc7Ku36TyQumuR-i3A-7_GXDxL_ZZl2Ftxz96P9G_yupsdHBJT8bn364pP4DRol7ulNOx11epiMtzCljqgMCmZewnFt20gA</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>Mastin, B. J</creator><creator>Rodgers, Jr., J. H</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Toxicity and Bioavailability of Copper Herbicides (Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and Copper Sulfate) to Freshwater Animals</title><author>Mastin, B. J ; Rodgers, Jr., J. H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-19bdc16158d075e94f6b90f1ba2b7a67032cb41d36bed5c2d9f3c7e637f7f78e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>Amino Alcohols - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Amino Alcohols - toxicity</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>application rate</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic animals</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological Availability</topic><topic>Chironomidae</topic><topic>Chironomidae - drug effects</topic><topic>Chironomidae - metabolism</topic><topic>Chironomus tentans</topic><topic>Clearigate</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Copper sulfate</topic><topic>Copper Sulfate - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Copper Sulfate - toxicity</topic><topic>cupric sulfate</topic><topic>Cutrine-Plus</topic><topic>Cyprinidae - metabolism</topic><topic>Daphnia - drug effects</topic><topic>Daphnia - metabolism</topic><topic>Daphnia magna</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Ethanolamine - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Ethanolamine - toxicity</topic><topic>Ethanolamines</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>exposure duration</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>Fresh water environment</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>herbicidal properties</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Herbicides - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Herbicides - toxicity</topic><topic>Hyalella azteca</topic><topic>laboratory experimentation</topic><topic>Lethal Dose 50</topic><topic>margin of safety</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Natural waters</topic><topic>nontarget organisms</topic><topic>Organometallic Compounds - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Organometallic Compounds - toxicity</topic><topic>pesticide application</topic><topic>Pimephales promelas</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Test animals</topic><topic>Test organisms</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mastin, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Jr., J. H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mastin, B. J</au><au>Rodgers, Jr., J. H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toxicity and Bioavailability of Copper Herbicides (Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and Copper Sulfate) to Freshwater Animals</atitle><jtitle>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>451</epage><pages>445-451</pages><issn>0090-4341</issn><eissn>1432-0703</eissn><coden>AECTCV</coden><abstract>In designing aquatic herbicides containing copper, an important goal is to maximize efficacy for target species while minimizing risks for nontarget species. To have a margin of safety for nontarget species, the concentration, duration of exposure (i.e., uptake), and form (i.e., species) of copper used for herbicidal properties should not elicit adverse effects on populations of nontarget species. To determine the potential for risk or adverse effects (conversely the margin of safety), data regarding the comparative toxicity of copper-containing herbicides are crucial. A series of comparative toxicity experiments was conducted, including baseline estimates of toxicity (LC50s, LOECs), sensitive species relationships (thresholds and exposure-response slopes), and bioavailability of toxic concentrations and forms of copper 7 days after initial herbicide application. Aqueous 48-h toxicity experiments were performed to contrast responses of Daphnia magna Strauss, Hyalella azteca Saussure, Chironomus tentans Fabricius, and Pimephales promelas Rafinesque to copper herbicides: Clearigate®, Cutrine®-Plus, and copper sulfate. D. magna was the most sensitive aquatic animal tested for all three herbicides; 48-h LC50s for organisms exposed to Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and copper sulfate were 29.4, 11.3, and 18.9 μg Cu/L, respectively. In terms of potency (calculated from the linearized portion of the exposure-response curves, which included 50% mortality), D. magna was the most sensitive animal tested. Organisms exposed to Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and copper sulfate had exposure-response slopes of 2.55, 8.61, and 5.07% mortality/μg Cu/L, respectively. Bioavailability of Clearigate and Cutrine-Plus was determined by comparing survival data (LC50s) of test organisms exposed to herbicide concentrations during the first and last 48-h of a 7-day exposure period. Even in these relatively simplified water-only exposures, a transformation of copper to less bioavailable species over time was observed with a 100–200% decrease in toxicity (i.e., an increase in 48-h LC50s) for all four test animals. This series of laboratory experiments provides a worst-case scenario for determining the risk associated with the manufacturer's recommended application rates of Clearigate (100–1,000 μg Cu/L), Cutrine-Plus (200–1,000 μg Cu/L), and copper sulfate (100–500 μg Cu/L) in natural waters for four nontarget freshwater animals.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>11031304</pmid><doi>10.1007/s002440010126</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4341
ispartof Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2000-11, Vol.39 (4), p.445-451
issn 0090-4341
1432-0703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17736464
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects adverse effects
Amino Alcohols - pharmacokinetics
Amino Alcohols - toxicity
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
application rate
Applied ecology
Aquatic animals
Bioavailability
Biological and medical sciences
Biological Availability
Chironomidae
Chironomidae - drug effects
Chironomidae - metabolism
Chironomus tentans
Clearigate
Copper
Copper sulfate
Copper Sulfate - pharmacokinetics
Copper Sulfate - toxicity
cupric sulfate
Cutrine-Plus
Cyprinidae - metabolism
Daphnia - drug effects
Daphnia - metabolism
Daphnia magna
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution
Ethanolamine - pharmacokinetics
Ethanolamine - toxicity
Ethanolamines
Experiments
exposure duration
Fresh Water
Fresh water environment
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
herbicidal properties
Herbicides
Herbicides - pharmacokinetics
Herbicides - toxicity
Hyalella azteca
laboratory experimentation
Lethal Dose 50
margin of safety
Mortality
Natural waters
nontarget organisms
Organometallic Compounds - pharmacokinetics
Organometallic Compounds - toxicity
pesticide application
Pimephales promelas
risk
Risk reduction
Side effects
Sulfates
Test animals
Test organisms
Toxicity
title Toxicity and Bioavailability of Copper Herbicides (Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and Copper Sulfate) to Freshwater Animals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toxicity%20and%20Bioavailability%20of%20Copper%20Herbicides%20(Clearigate,%20Cutrine-Plus,%20and%20Copper%20Sulfate)%20to%20Freshwater%20Animals&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20environmental%20contamination%20and%20toxicology&rft.au=Mastin,%20B.%20J&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=451&rft.pages=445-451&rft.issn=0090-4341&rft.eissn=1432-0703&rft.coden=AECTCV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002440010126&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16190560%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517454346&rft_id=info:pmid/11031304&rfr_iscdi=true