A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)
Abstract Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly popular, but high-level evidence for these techniques remains lacking. Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC, and LRC. Design...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European urology 2016-04, Vol.69 (4), p.613-621 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 621 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 613 |
container_title | European urology |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Khan, Muhammad Shamim Gan, Christine Ahmed, Kamran Ismail, Ahmad Fahim Watkins, Jane Summers, Jennifer A Peacock, Janet L Rimington, Peter Dasgupta, Prokar |
description | Abstract Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly popular, but high-level evidence for these techniques remains lacking. Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC, and LRC. Design, setting, and participants From March 2009 to July 2012, 164 patients requiring radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer were invited to participate, with an aim of recruiting 47 patients into each arm. Overall, 93 were suitable for trial inclusion; 60 (65%) agreed and 33 (35%) declined. Intervention ORC, RARC, or LRC with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary end points were 30- and 90-d complication rates. Secondary end points were perioperative clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). The Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results and limitations The 30-d complication rates (classified by the Clavien-Dindo system) varied significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC: 26%; p = 0.024). ORC complication rates were significantly higher than LRC ( p < 0.01). The 90-d complication rates did not differ significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC 32%; p = 0.068). Mean operative time was significantly longer in RARC compared with ORC or LRC. ORC resulted in a slower return to oral solids than RARC or LRC. There were no significant differences in QoL measures. Major limitations are the small sample size and potential surgeon bias. Conclusions The 30-d complication rates varied by type of surgery and were significantly higher in the ORC arm than the LRC arm. There was no significant difference in 90-d Clavien-graded complication rates between the three arms. Patient summary We compared patients having open, robotic, or laparoscopic bladder removal surgery for bladder cancer and found no difference in Clavien-graded complication rates at 90 d. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773427871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0302283815006971</els_id><sourcerecordid>1773427871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-76f48c0c0453261180a0babfc4d2069a7447387c7c5548e7f77afef312994bec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1DAYhYMo7rj6D0RyucK25qtN5kYYyvoBAyOz43VI07duxrapSSv0yr9uyqxeeONVAjnnvDnPi9BrSnJKaPnunMMc5uBzRmiRE5kTrp6gDVWSZ7IoyVO0IZywjCmurtCLGM-EEF5s-XN0xUomGeNyg37t8L0bvnWQWRimAPjOhG7BXx5MBHw0Q-N7F6HBlU-vvuvS9fQQADITenwKznTYt_gwwnCLj772k7O3ONnw3owm-Gj96GwKapxN0mqJE9jJ9wu-qQ7H3f7tS_SsNV2EV4_nNfr64e5Ufcr2h4-fq90-s0LJKZNlK5QlloiCs5JSRQypTd1a0TBSbo0UQnIlrbRFIRTIVkrTQssp225FDZZfo5tL7hj8jxnipFMvC11nBvBz1FRKLphUkiapuEht-n8M0OoxuN6ERVOiV_T6rC_o9YpeE6kT-mR78zhhrnto_pr-sE6C9xcBpJ4_HQQdrYPBQuNCgqIb7_434d8A27lhBfsdFohnP4chMdRUR6aJvl_Xv26fFiQxSs1-A5M6qyY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773427871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Khan, Muhammad Shamim ; Gan, Christine ; Ahmed, Kamran ; Ismail, Ahmad Fahim ; Watkins, Jane ; Summers, Jennifer A ; Peacock, Janet L ; Rimington, Peter ; Dasgupta, Prokar</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Shamim ; Gan, Christine ; Ahmed, Kamran ; Ismail, Ahmad Fahim ; Watkins, Jane ; Summers, Jennifer A ; Peacock, Janet L ; Rimington, Peter ; Dasgupta, Prokar</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly popular, but high-level evidence for these techniques remains lacking. Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC, and LRC. Design, setting, and participants From March 2009 to July 2012, 164 patients requiring radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer were invited to participate, with an aim of recruiting 47 patients into each arm. Overall, 93 were suitable for trial inclusion; 60 (65%) agreed and 33 (35%) declined. Intervention ORC, RARC, or LRC with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary end points were 30- and 90-d complication rates. Secondary end points were perioperative clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). The Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results and limitations The 30-d complication rates (classified by the Clavien-Dindo system) varied significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC: 26%; p = 0.024). ORC complication rates were significantly higher than LRC ( p < 0.01). The 90-d complication rates did not differ significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC 32%; p = 0.068). Mean operative time was significantly longer in RARC compared with ORC or LRC. ORC resulted in a slower return to oral solids than RARC or LRC. There were no significant differences in QoL measures. Major limitations are the small sample size and potential surgeon bias. Conclusions The 30-d complication rates varied by type of surgery and were significantly higher in the ORC arm than the LRC arm. There was no significant difference in 90-d Clavien-graded complication rates between the three arms. Patient summary We compared patients having open, robotic, or laparoscopic bladder removal surgery for bladder cancer and found no difference in Clavien-graded complication rates at 90 d.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26272237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Complications ; Cystectomy - adverse effects ; Cystectomy - methods ; Cystectomy - mortality ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - mortality ; London ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally invasive surgery ; Muscle-invasive bladder cancer ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Radical cystectomy ; Recovery of Function ; Risk Factors ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - mortality ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - mortality ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2016-04, Vol.69 (4), p.613-621</ispartof><rights>European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2015 European Association of Urology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-76f48c0c0453261180a0babfc4d2069a7447387c7c5548e7f77afef312994bec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-76f48c0c0453261180a0babfc4d2069a7447387c7c5548e7f77afef312994bec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283815006971$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26272237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Shamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Ahmad Fahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Janet L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimington, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Prokar</creatorcontrib><title>A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly popular, but high-level evidence for these techniques remains lacking. Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC, and LRC. Design, setting, and participants From March 2009 to July 2012, 164 patients requiring radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer were invited to participate, with an aim of recruiting 47 patients into each arm. Overall, 93 were suitable for trial inclusion; 60 (65%) agreed and 33 (35%) declined. Intervention ORC, RARC, or LRC with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary end points were 30- and 90-d complication rates. Secondary end points were perioperative clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). The Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results and limitations The 30-d complication rates (classified by the Clavien-Dindo system) varied significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC: 26%; p = 0.024). ORC complication rates were significantly higher than LRC ( p < 0.01). The 90-d complication rates did not differ significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC 32%; p = 0.068). Mean operative time was significantly longer in RARC compared with ORC or LRC. ORC resulted in a slower return to oral solids than RARC or LRC. There were no significant differences in QoL measures. Major limitations are the small sample size and potential surgeon bias. Conclusions The 30-d complication rates varied by type of surgery and were significantly higher in the ORC arm than the LRC arm. There was no significant difference in 90-d Clavien-graded complication rates between the three arms. Patient summary We compared patients having open, robotic, or laparoscopic bladder removal surgery for bladder cancer and found no difference in Clavien-graded complication rates at 90 d.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Cystectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cystectomy - methods</subject><subject>Cystectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - mortality</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally invasive surgery</subject><subject>Muscle-invasive bladder cancer</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radical cystectomy</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1DAYhYMo7rj6D0RyucK25qtN5kYYyvoBAyOz43VI07duxrapSSv0yr9uyqxeeONVAjnnvDnPi9BrSnJKaPnunMMc5uBzRmiRE5kTrp6gDVWSZ7IoyVO0IZywjCmurtCLGM-EEF5s-XN0xUomGeNyg37t8L0bvnWQWRimAPjOhG7BXx5MBHw0Q-N7F6HBlU-vvuvS9fQQADITenwKznTYt_gwwnCLj772k7O3ONnw3owm-Gj96GwKapxN0mqJE9jJ9wu-qQ7H3f7tS_SsNV2EV4_nNfr64e5Ufcr2h4-fq90-s0LJKZNlK5QlloiCs5JSRQypTd1a0TBSbo0UQnIlrbRFIRTIVkrTQssp225FDZZfo5tL7hj8jxnipFMvC11nBvBz1FRKLphUkiapuEht-n8M0OoxuN6ERVOiV_T6rC_o9YpeE6kT-mR78zhhrnto_pr-sE6C9xcBpJ4_HQQdrYPBQuNCgqIb7_434d8A27lhBfsdFohnP4chMdRUR6aJvl_Xv26fFiQxSs1-A5M6qyY</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Khan, Muhammad Shamim</creator><creator>Gan, Christine</creator><creator>Ahmed, Kamran</creator><creator>Ismail, Ahmad Fahim</creator><creator>Watkins, Jane</creator><creator>Summers, Jennifer A</creator><creator>Peacock, Janet L</creator><creator>Rimington, Peter</creator><creator>Dasgupta, Prokar</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)</title><author>Khan, Muhammad Shamim ; Gan, Christine ; Ahmed, Kamran ; Ismail, Ahmad Fahim ; Watkins, Jane ; Summers, Jennifer A ; Peacock, Janet L ; Rimington, Peter ; Dasgupta, Prokar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-76f48c0c0453261180a0babfc4d2069a7447387c7c5548e7f77afef312994bec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Cystectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cystectomy - methods</topic><topic>Cystectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - mortality</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally invasive surgery</topic><topic>Muscle-invasive bladder cancer</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radical cystectomy</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Shamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Ahmad Fahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Janet L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimington, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Prokar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Muhammad Shamim</au><au>Gan, Christine</au><au>Ahmed, Kamran</au><au>Ismail, Ahmad Fahim</au><au>Watkins, Jane</au><au>Summers, Jennifer A</au><au>Peacock, Janet L</au><au>Rimington, Peter</au><au>Dasgupta, Prokar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>621</epage><pages>613-621</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly popular, but high-level evidence for these techniques remains lacking. Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC, and LRC. Design, setting, and participants From March 2009 to July 2012, 164 patients requiring radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer were invited to participate, with an aim of recruiting 47 patients into each arm. Overall, 93 were suitable for trial inclusion; 60 (65%) agreed and 33 (35%) declined. Intervention ORC, RARC, or LRC with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary end points were 30- and 90-d complication rates. Secondary end points were perioperative clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). The Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results and limitations The 30-d complication rates (classified by the Clavien-Dindo system) varied significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC: 26%; p = 0.024). ORC complication rates were significantly higher than LRC ( p < 0.01). The 90-d complication rates did not differ significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC 32%; p = 0.068). Mean operative time was significantly longer in RARC compared with ORC or LRC. ORC resulted in a slower return to oral solids than RARC or LRC. There were no significant differences in QoL measures. Major limitations are the small sample size and potential surgeon bias. Conclusions The 30-d complication rates varied by type of surgery and were significantly higher in the ORC arm than the LRC arm. There was no significant difference in 90-d Clavien-graded complication rates between the three arms. Patient summary We compared patients having open, robotic, or laparoscopic bladder removal surgery for bladder cancer and found no difference in Clavien-graded complication rates at 90 d.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26272237</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-2838 |
ispartof | European urology, 2016-04, Vol.69 (4), p.613-621 |
issn | 0302-2838 1873-7560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773427871 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Complications Cystectomy - adverse effects Cystectomy - methods Cystectomy - mortality Humans Laparoscopy - adverse effects Laparoscopy - mortality London Male Middle Aged Minimally invasive surgery Muscle-invasive bladder cancer Operative Time Postoperative Complications - etiology Prospective Studies Radical cystectomy Recovery of Function Risk Factors Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Robotic Surgical Procedures - mortality Time Factors Treatment Outcome Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - mortality Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery Urology |
title | A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A50%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Single-centre%20Early%20Phase%20Randomised%20Controlled%20Three-arm%20Trial%20of%20Open,%20Robotic,%20and%20Laparoscopic%20Radical%20Cystectomy%20(CORAL)&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Khan,%20Muhammad%20Shamim&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=621&rft.pages=613-621&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1773427871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773427871&rft_id=info:pmid/26272237&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0302283815006971&rfr_iscdi=true |