A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)

Abstract Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly popular, but high-level evidence for these techniques remains lacking. Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC, and LRC. Design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2016-04, Vol.69 (4), p.613-621
Hauptverfasser: Khan, Muhammad Shamim, Gan, Christine, Ahmed, Kamran, Ismail, Ahmad Fahim, Watkins, Jane, Summers, Jennifer A, Peacock, Janet L, Rimington, Peter, Dasgupta, Prokar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 621
container_issue 4
container_start_page 613
container_title European urology
container_volume 69
creator Khan, Muhammad Shamim
Gan, Christine
Ahmed, Kamran
Ismail, Ahmad Fahim
Watkins, Jane
Summers, Jennifer A
Peacock, Janet L
Rimington, Peter
Dasgupta, Prokar
description Abstract Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly popular, but high-level evidence for these techniques remains lacking. Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC, and LRC. Design, setting, and participants From March 2009 to July 2012, 164 patients requiring radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer were invited to participate, with an aim of recruiting 47 patients into each arm. Overall, 93 were suitable for trial inclusion; 60 (65%) agreed and 33 (35%) declined. Intervention ORC, RARC, or LRC with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary end points were 30- and 90-d complication rates. Secondary end points were perioperative clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). The Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results and limitations The 30-d complication rates (classified by the Clavien-Dindo system) varied significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC: 26%; p = 0.024). ORC complication rates were significantly higher than LRC ( p < 0.01). The 90-d complication rates did not differ significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC 32%; p = 0.068). Mean operative time was significantly longer in RARC compared with ORC or LRC. ORC resulted in a slower return to oral solids than RARC or LRC. There were no significant differences in QoL measures. Major limitations are the small sample size and potential surgeon bias. Conclusions The 30-d complication rates varied by type of surgery and were significantly higher in the ORC arm than the LRC arm. There was no significant difference in 90-d Clavien-graded complication rates between the three arms. Patient summary We compared patients having open, robotic, or laparoscopic bladder removal surgery for bladder cancer and found no difference in Clavien-graded complication rates at 90 d.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773427871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0302283815006971</els_id><sourcerecordid>1773427871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-76f48c0c0453261180a0babfc4d2069a7447387c7c5548e7f77afef312994bec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1DAYhYMo7rj6D0RyucK25qtN5kYYyvoBAyOz43VI07duxrapSSv0yr9uyqxeeONVAjnnvDnPi9BrSnJKaPnunMMc5uBzRmiRE5kTrp6gDVWSZ7IoyVO0IZywjCmurtCLGM-EEF5s-XN0xUomGeNyg37t8L0bvnWQWRimAPjOhG7BXx5MBHw0Q-N7F6HBlU-vvuvS9fQQADITenwKznTYt_gwwnCLj772k7O3ONnw3owm-Gj96GwKapxN0mqJE9jJ9wu-qQ7H3f7tS_SsNV2EV4_nNfr64e5Ufcr2h4-fq90-s0LJKZNlK5QlloiCs5JSRQypTd1a0TBSbo0UQnIlrbRFIRTIVkrTQssp225FDZZfo5tL7hj8jxnipFMvC11nBvBz1FRKLphUkiapuEht-n8M0OoxuN6ERVOiV_T6rC_o9YpeE6kT-mR78zhhrnto_pr-sE6C9xcBpJ4_HQQdrYPBQuNCgqIb7_434d8A27lhBfsdFohnP4chMdRUR6aJvl_Xv26fFiQxSs1-A5M6qyY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773427871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Khan, Muhammad Shamim ; Gan, Christine ; Ahmed, Kamran ; Ismail, Ahmad Fahim ; Watkins, Jane ; Summers, Jennifer A ; Peacock, Janet L ; Rimington, Peter ; Dasgupta, Prokar</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Shamim ; Gan, Christine ; Ahmed, Kamran ; Ismail, Ahmad Fahim ; Watkins, Jane ; Summers, Jennifer A ; Peacock, Janet L ; Rimington, Peter ; Dasgupta, Prokar</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly popular, but high-level evidence for these techniques remains lacking. Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC, and LRC. Design, setting, and participants From March 2009 to July 2012, 164 patients requiring radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer were invited to participate, with an aim of recruiting 47 patients into each arm. Overall, 93 were suitable for trial inclusion; 60 (65%) agreed and 33 (35%) declined. Intervention ORC, RARC, or LRC with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary end points were 30- and 90-d complication rates. Secondary end points were perioperative clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). The Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results and limitations The 30-d complication rates (classified by the Clavien-Dindo system) varied significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC: 26%; p = 0.024). ORC complication rates were significantly higher than LRC ( p &lt; 0.01). The 90-d complication rates did not differ significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC 32%; p = 0.068). Mean operative time was significantly longer in RARC compared with ORC or LRC. ORC resulted in a slower return to oral solids than RARC or LRC. There were no significant differences in QoL measures. Major limitations are the small sample size and potential surgeon bias. Conclusions The 30-d complication rates varied by type of surgery and were significantly higher in the ORC arm than the LRC arm. There was no significant difference in 90-d Clavien-graded complication rates between the three arms. Patient summary We compared patients having open, robotic, or laparoscopic bladder removal surgery for bladder cancer and found no difference in Clavien-graded complication rates at 90 d.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26272237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Complications ; Cystectomy - adverse effects ; Cystectomy - methods ; Cystectomy - mortality ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - mortality ; London ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally invasive surgery ; Muscle-invasive bladder cancer ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Radical cystectomy ; Recovery of Function ; Risk Factors ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - mortality ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - mortality ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2016-04, Vol.69 (4), p.613-621</ispartof><rights>European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2015 European Association of Urology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-76f48c0c0453261180a0babfc4d2069a7447387c7c5548e7f77afef312994bec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-76f48c0c0453261180a0babfc4d2069a7447387c7c5548e7f77afef312994bec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283815006971$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26272237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Shamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Ahmad Fahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Janet L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimington, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Prokar</creatorcontrib><title>A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly popular, but high-level evidence for these techniques remains lacking. Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC, and LRC. Design, setting, and participants From March 2009 to July 2012, 164 patients requiring radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer were invited to participate, with an aim of recruiting 47 patients into each arm. Overall, 93 were suitable for trial inclusion; 60 (65%) agreed and 33 (35%) declined. Intervention ORC, RARC, or LRC with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary end points were 30- and 90-d complication rates. Secondary end points were perioperative clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). The Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results and limitations The 30-d complication rates (classified by the Clavien-Dindo system) varied significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC: 26%; p = 0.024). ORC complication rates were significantly higher than LRC ( p &lt; 0.01). The 90-d complication rates did not differ significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC 32%; p = 0.068). Mean operative time was significantly longer in RARC compared with ORC or LRC. ORC resulted in a slower return to oral solids than RARC or LRC. There were no significant differences in QoL measures. Major limitations are the small sample size and potential surgeon bias. Conclusions The 30-d complication rates varied by type of surgery and were significantly higher in the ORC arm than the LRC arm. There was no significant difference in 90-d Clavien-graded complication rates between the three arms. Patient summary We compared patients having open, robotic, or laparoscopic bladder removal surgery for bladder cancer and found no difference in Clavien-graded complication rates at 90 d.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Cystectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cystectomy - methods</subject><subject>Cystectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - mortality</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally invasive surgery</subject><subject>Muscle-invasive bladder cancer</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radical cystectomy</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1DAYhYMo7rj6D0RyucK25qtN5kYYyvoBAyOz43VI07duxrapSSv0yr9uyqxeeONVAjnnvDnPi9BrSnJKaPnunMMc5uBzRmiRE5kTrp6gDVWSZ7IoyVO0IZywjCmurtCLGM-EEF5s-XN0xUomGeNyg37t8L0bvnWQWRimAPjOhG7BXx5MBHw0Q-N7F6HBlU-vvuvS9fQQADITenwKznTYt_gwwnCLj772k7O3ONnw3owm-Gj96GwKapxN0mqJE9jJ9wu-qQ7H3f7tS_SsNV2EV4_nNfr64e5Ufcr2h4-fq90-s0LJKZNlK5QlloiCs5JSRQypTd1a0TBSbo0UQnIlrbRFIRTIVkrTQssp225FDZZfo5tL7hj8jxnipFMvC11nBvBz1FRKLphUkiapuEht-n8M0OoxuN6ERVOiV_T6rC_o9YpeE6kT-mR78zhhrnto_pr-sE6C9xcBpJ4_HQQdrYPBQuNCgqIb7_434d8A27lhBfsdFohnP4chMdRUR6aJvl_Xv26fFiQxSs1-A5M6qyY</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Khan, Muhammad Shamim</creator><creator>Gan, Christine</creator><creator>Ahmed, Kamran</creator><creator>Ismail, Ahmad Fahim</creator><creator>Watkins, Jane</creator><creator>Summers, Jennifer A</creator><creator>Peacock, Janet L</creator><creator>Rimington, Peter</creator><creator>Dasgupta, Prokar</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)</title><author>Khan, Muhammad Shamim ; Gan, Christine ; Ahmed, Kamran ; Ismail, Ahmad Fahim ; Watkins, Jane ; Summers, Jennifer A ; Peacock, Janet L ; Rimington, Peter ; Dasgupta, Prokar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-76f48c0c0453261180a0babfc4d2069a7447387c7c5548e7f77afef312994bec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Cystectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cystectomy - methods</topic><topic>Cystectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - mortality</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally invasive surgery</topic><topic>Muscle-invasive bladder cancer</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radical cystectomy</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Shamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Ahmad Fahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Janet L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimington, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Prokar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Muhammad Shamim</au><au>Gan, Christine</au><au>Ahmed, Kamran</au><au>Ismail, Ahmad Fahim</au><au>Watkins, Jane</au><au>Summers, Jennifer A</au><au>Peacock, Janet L</au><au>Rimington, Peter</au><au>Dasgupta, Prokar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>621</epage><pages>613-621</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly popular, but high-level evidence for these techniques remains lacking. Objective To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC), RARC, and LRC. Design, setting, and participants From March 2009 to July 2012, 164 patients requiring radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer were invited to participate, with an aim of recruiting 47 patients into each arm. Overall, 93 were suitable for trial inclusion; 60 (65%) agreed and 33 (35%) declined. Intervention ORC, RARC, or LRC with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary end points were 30- and 90-d complication rates. Secondary end points were perioperative clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). The Fisher exact test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results and limitations The 30-d complication rates (classified by the Clavien-Dindo system) varied significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC: 26%; p = 0.024). ORC complication rates were significantly higher than LRC ( p &lt; 0.01). The 90-d complication rates did not differ significantly between the three arms (ORC: 70%; RARC: 55%; LRC 32%; p = 0.068). Mean operative time was significantly longer in RARC compared with ORC or LRC. ORC resulted in a slower return to oral solids than RARC or LRC. There were no significant differences in QoL measures. Major limitations are the small sample size and potential surgeon bias. Conclusions The 30-d complication rates varied by type of surgery and were significantly higher in the ORC arm than the LRC arm. There was no significant difference in 90-d Clavien-graded complication rates between the three arms. Patient summary We compared patients having open, robotic, or laparoscopic bladder removal surgery for bladder cancer and found no difference in Clavien-graded complication rates at 90 d.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26272237</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 2016-04, Vol.69 (4), p.613-621
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773427871
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Complications
Cystectomy - adverse effects
Cystectomy - methods
Cystectomy - mortality
Humans
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Laparoscopy - mortality
London
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally invasive surgery
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prospective Studies
Radical cystectomy
Recovery of Function
Risk Factors
Robotic surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Robotic Surgical Procedures - mortality
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - mortality
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery
Urology
title A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A50%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Single-centre%20Early%20Phase%20Randomised%20Controlled%20Three-arm%20Trial%20of%20Open,%20Robotic,%20and%20Laparoscopic%20Radical%20Cystectomy%20(CORAL)&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Khan,%20Muhammad%20Shamim&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=621&rft.pages=613-621&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1773427871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773427871&rft_id=info:pmid/26272237&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0302283815006971&rfr_iscdi=true