Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes

To analyze the diagnostic efficacy of normalization of corneal deformation variables by the IOP in healthy, primary-angle closure (PACG), and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. Fifty-nine healthy, 83 POAG, and 57 PACG eyes, matched for age and pachymetry, were included in a prospective, ob...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2016-03, Vol.57 (3), p.1082-1086
Hauptverfasser: Tejwani, Sushma, Devi, Sathi, Dinakaran, Shoruba, Shetty, Rohit, Meshram, Priti, Francis, Mathew, Sinha Roy, Abhijit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1086
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1082
container_title Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
container_volume 57
creator Tejwani, Sushma
Devi, Sathi
Dinakaran, Shoruba
Shetty, Rohit
Meshram, Priti
Francis, Mathew
Sinha Roy, Abhijit
description To analyze the diagnostic efficacy of normalization of corneal deformation variables by the IOP in healthy, primary-angle closure (PACG), and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. Fifty-nine healthy, 83 POAG, and 57 PACG eyes, matched for age and pachymetry, were included in a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT-IOP), Corvis-ST IOP, IOPg (Goldmann correlated), and IOPcc (cornea compensated) from the ocular response analyzer were acquired. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) from the ORA, and deformation amplitude (DA) from Corvis-ST were analyzed. Further, ratios of CH, CRF, and DA to IOP were assessed among the groups and defined as new variables (e.g., ratio [CH, IOPcc] was the ratio of CH to IOPcc). Goldmann applanation tonometry-IOP, IOPcc, and IOPg of PACG and POAG eyes were significantly higher than normal (P < 0.05). Corvis-ST IOP of healthy eyes was similar to POAG (P > 0.05) but lower than PACG (P = 0.02). Corneal hysteresis and CRF of PACG and POAG were significantly lower than normal (P < 0.0001). The ratio (CH, IOPcc), ratio (CRF, IOPcc), and ratio (DA, IOPcc) of healthy eyes were significantly higher than those of PACG and POAG eyes (P < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of ratio (CRF, IOPcc) and ratio (DA, IOPcc) was significantly better than CRF and DA alone in PACG eyes (P < 0.001). However in POAG, only the sensitivity and specificity of ratio (DA, IOPcc) was significantly better than DA alone (P < 0.001). Presence of glaucoma may be indicated better by ratio variables than by CH, CRF, or DA alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/iovs.15-18569
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773427025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1773427025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b8133e53613830741832b95ced70de9beabff284f0af3849fcf555e3ada3c5553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkDFPwzAQhS0EoqUwsiKPLCl2HCfOiNpSKlXAAKzRxTmDURoXO6lUfj1NKYjpnt5993R6hFxyNuY8zW6s24QxlxFXMs2PyJBLGUcyU-L4nx6QsxA-GIs5j9kpGcRpnqpMqCHZTC28NS60VtOZMVaD3lJn6IPzK6jtF7TWNb0xcb5BqOkUTb_a26_gLZQ1BlpuafuOdNG0HpzuavD0yWMInUdqGzqvodNud-W6QGdbDOfkxEAd8OIwR-TlbvY8uY-Wj_PF5HYZaZGrNioVFwKlSLlQgmUJVyIuc6mxyliFeYlQGhOrxDAwQiW50UZKiQIqEHqnxIhc_-SuvfvsMLTFygaNdQ0N7n4peJaJJM5Y3KPRD6q9C8GjKdbersBvC86Kvuqir7rgsthXveOvDtFducLqj_7tVnwDAAt8lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773427025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tejwani, Sushma ; Devi, Sathi ; Dinakaran, Shoruba ; Shetty, Rohit ; Meshram, Priti ; Francis, Mathew ; Sinha Roy, Abhijit</creator><creatorcontrib>Tejwani, Sushma ; Devi, Sathi ; Dinakaran, Shoruba ; Shetty, Rohit ; Meshram, Priti ; Francis, Mathew ; Sinha Roy, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze the diagnostic efficacy of normalization of corneal deformation variables by the IOP in healthy, primary-angle closure (PACG), and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. Fifty-nine healthy, 83 POAG, and 57 PACG eyes, matched for age and pachymetry, were included in a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT-IOP), Corvis-ST IOP, IOPg (Goldmann correlated), and IOPcc (cornea compensated) from the ocular response analyzer were acquired. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) from the ORA, and deformation amplitude (DA) from Corvis-ST were analyzed. Further, ratios of CH, CRF, and DA to IOP were assessed among the groups and defined as new variables (e.g., ratio [CH, IOPcc] was the ratio of CH to IOPcc). Goldmann applanation tonometry-IOP, IOPcc, and IOPg of PACG and POAG eyes were significantly higher than normal (P &lt; 0.05). Corvis-ST IOP of healthy eyes was similar to POAG (P &gt; 0.05) but lower than PACG (P = 0.02). Corneal hysteresis and CRF of PACG and POAG were significantly lower than normal (P &lt; 0.0001). The ratio (CH, IOPcc), ratio (CRF, IOPcc), and ratio (DA, IOPcc) of healthy eyes were significantly higher than those of PACG and POAG eyes (P &lt; 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of ratio (CRF, IOPcc) and ratio (DA, IOPcc) was significantly better than CRF and DA alone in PACG eyes (P &lt; 0.001). However in POAG, only the sensitivity and specificity of ratio (DA, IOPcc) was significantly better than DA alone (P &lt; 0.001). Presence of glaucoma may be indicated better by ratio variables than by CH, CRF, or DA alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18569</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26968738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cornea - pathology ; Cornea - physiopathology ; Corneal Pachymetry - methods ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Elasticity ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - diagnosis ; Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - pathology ; Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - physiopathology ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - pathology ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology ; Gonioscopy ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure - physiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tonometry, Ocular ; Visual Fields</subject><ispartof>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science, 2016-03, Vol.57 (3), p.1082-1086</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b8133e53613830741832b95ced70de9beabff284f0af3849fcf555e3ada3c5553</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26968738$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tejwani, Sushma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devi, Sathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinakaran, Shoruba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Rohit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meshram, Priti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Mathew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha Roy, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes</title><title>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</title><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><description>To analyze the diagnostic efficacy of normalization of corneal deformation variables by the IOP in healthy, primary-angle closure (PACG), and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. Fifty-nine healthy, 83 POAG, and 57 PACG eyes, matched for age and pachymetry, were included in a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT-IOP), Corvis-ST IOP, IOPg (Goldmann correlated), and IOPcc (cornea compensated) from the ocular response analyzer were acquired. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) from the ORA, and deformation amplitude (DA) from Corvis-ST were analyzed. Further, ratios of CH, CRF, and DA to IOP were assessed among the groups and defined as new variables (e.g., ratio [CH, IOPcc] was the ratio of CH to IOPcc). Goldmann applanation tonometry-IOP, IOPcc, and IOPg of PACG and POAG eyes were significantly higher than normal (P &lt; 0.05). Corvis-ST IOP of healthy eyes was similar to POAG (P &gt; 0.05) but lower than PACG (P = 0.02). Corneal hysteresis and CRF of PACG and POAG were significantly lower than normal (P &lt; 0.0001). The ratio (CH, IOPcc), ratio (CRF, IOPcc), and ratio (DA, IOPcc) of healthy eyes were significantly higher than those of PACG and POAG eyes (P &lt; 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of ratio (CRF, IOPcc) and ratio (DA, IOPcc) was significantly better than CRF and DA alone in PACG eyes (P &lt; 0.001). However in POAG, only the sensitivity and specificity of ratio (DA, IOPcc) was significantly better than DA alone (P &lt; 0.001). Presence of glaucoma may be indicated better by ratio variables than by CH, CRF, or DA alone.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cornea - pathology</subject><subject>Cornea - physiopathology</subject><subject>Corneal Pachymetry - methods</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - pathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - physiopathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - pathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology</subject><subject>Gonioscopy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular</subject><subject>Visual Fields</subject><issn>1552-5783</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkDFPwzAQhS0EoqUwsiKPLCl2HCfOiNpSKlXAAKzRxTmDURoXO6lUfj1NKYjpnt5993R6hFxyNuY8zW6s24QxlxFXMs2PyJBLGUcyU-L4nx6QsxA-GIs5j9kpGcRpnqpMqCHZTC28NS60VtOZMVaD3lJn6IPzK6jtF7TWNb0xcb5BqOkUTb_a26_gLZQ1BlpuafuOdNG0HpzuavD0yWMInUdqGzqvodNud-W6QGdbDOfkxEAd8OIwR-TlbvY8uY-Wj_PF5HYZaZGrNioVFwKlSLlQgmUJVyIuc6mxyliFeYlQGhOrxDAwQiW50UZKiQIqEHqnxIhc_-SuvfvsMLTFygaNdQ0N7n4peJaJJM5Y3KPRD6q9C8GjKdbersBvC86Kvuqir7rgsthXveOvDtFducLqj_7tVnwDAAt8lg</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Tejwani, Sushma</creator><creator>Devi, Sathi</creator><creator>Dinakaran, Shoruba</creator><creator>Shetty, Rohit</creator><creator>Meshram, Priti</creator><creator>Francis, Mathew</creator><creator>Sinha Roy, Abhijit</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes</title><author>Tejwani, Sushma ; Devi, Sathi ; Dinakaran, Shoruba ; Shetty, Rohit ; Meshram, Priti ; Francis, Mathew ; Sinha Roy, Abhijit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b8133e53613830741832b95ced70de9beabff284f0af3849fcf555e3ada3c5553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cornea - pathology</topic><topic>Cornea - physiopathology</topic><topic>Corneal Pachymetry - methods</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - pathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - physiopathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - pathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology</topic><topic>Gonioscopy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular</topic><topic>Visual Fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tejwani, Sushma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devi, Sathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinakaran, Shoruba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Rohit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meshram, Priti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Mathew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha Roy, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tejwani, Sushma</au><au>Devi, Sathi</au><au>Dinakaran, Shoruba</au><au>Shetty, Rohit</au><au>Meshram, Priti</au><au>Francis, Mathew</au><au>Sinha Roy, Abhijit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes</atitle><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1082</spage><epage>1086</epage><pages>1082-1086</pages><issn>1552-5783</issn><eissn>1552-5783</eissn><abstract>To analyze the diagnostic efficacy of normalization of corneal deformation variables by the IOP in healthy, primary-angle closure (PACG), and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. Fifty-nine healthy, 83 POAG, and 57 PACG eyes, matched for age and pachymetry, were included in a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT-IOP), Corvis-ST IOP, IOPg (Goldmann correlated), and IOPcc (cornea compensated) from the ocular response analyzer were acquired. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) from the ORA, and deformation amplitude (DA) from Corvis-ST were analyzed. Further, ratios of CH, CRF, and DA to IOP were assessed among the groups and defined as new variables (e.g., ratio [CH, IOPcc] was the ratio of CH to IOPcc). Goldmann applanation tonometry-IOP, IOPcc, and IOPg of PACG and POAG eyes were significantly higher than normal (P &lt; 0.05). Corvis-ST IOP of healthy eyes was similar to POAG (P &gt; 0.05) but lower than PACG (P = 0.02). Corneal hysteresis and CRF of PACG and POAG were significantly lower than normal (P &lt; 0.0001). The ratio (CH, IOPcc), ratio (CRF, IOPcc), and ratio (DA, IOPcc) of healthy eyes were significantly higher than those of PACG and POAG eyes (P &lt; 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of ratio (CRF, IOPcc) and ratio (DA, IOPcc) was significantly better than CRF and DA alone in PACG eyes (P &lt; 0.001). However in POAG, only the sensitivity and specificity of ratio (DA, IOPcc) was significantly better than DA alone (P &lt; 0.001). Presence of glaucoma may be indicated better by ratio variables than by CH, CRF, or DA alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26968738</pmid><doi>10.1167/iovs.15-18569</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5783
ispartof Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2016-03, Vol.57 (3), p.1082-1086
issn 1552-5783
1552-5783
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773427025
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Aged
Cornea - pathology
Cornea - physiopathology
Corneal Pachymetry - methods
Cross-Sectional Studies
Elasticity
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - diagnosis
Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - pathology
Glaucoma, Angle-Closure - physiopathology
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - pathology
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology
Gonioscopy
Humans
Intraocular Pressure - physiology
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Tonometry, Ocular
Visual Fields
title Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Efficacy%20of%20Normalization%20of%20Corneal%20Deformation%20Variables%20by%20the%20Intraocular%20Pressure%20in%20Glaucomatous%20Eyes&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20ophthalmology%20&%20visual%20science&rft.au=Tejwani,%20Sushma&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1082&rft.epage=1086&rft.pages=1082-1086&rft.issn=1552-5783&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/iovs.15-18569&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1773427025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773427025&rft_id=info:pmid/26968738&rfr_iscdi=true