Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works

In response to US accountability policies and yearly performance targets, school districts are implementing periodic or benchmark assessments to provide teachers with data to improve instruction and student achievement. The tests are typically given quarterly to track student progress toward yearly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability evaluation and accountability, 2015-11, Vol.27 (4), p.347-375
Hauptverfasser: Abrams, Lisa M., McMillan, James H., Wetzel, Angela P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 375
container_issue 4
container_start_page 347
container_title Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability
container_volume 27
creator Abrams, Lisa M.
McMillan, James H.
Wetzel, Angela P.
description In response to US accountability policies and yearly performance targets, school districts are implementing periodic or benchmark assessments to provide teachers with data to improve instruction and student achievement. The tests are typically given quarterly to track student progress toward yearly accountability goals, as well as to inform teaching and identify individualized instructional enhancements to foster student achievement. Fifteen focus group sessions were conducted with 67 elementary and middle school teachers from several school districts surrounding an urban metropolitan area in Virginia to explore and better understand the ways in which benchmark testing can be used effectively as formative assessment. Participants had a range of experience from 1 to 3 to over 20 years in the classroom. The perceived quality of test items, timeliness in receiving results, accessibility of the data, and opportunities to review and discuss the results with others clearly influenced how teachers’ used the assessment results. Teachers described using benchmark test results formatively to make a variety of instructional adjustments, including modifications to whole class instruction, working with students in small groups, and providing individualized support, though important factors influenced the extent of use. The findings of this study suggest that under appropriate conditions, including having valid and transparent test items, support, immediacy of results, and time to discuss with others, benchmark testing programs have the potential of providing meaningful formative assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773215441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713637412</galeid><ericid>EJ1087637</ericid><sourcerecordid>A713637412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-871685abcba0f4a4f34d49c0f58e6d17f653d075874ab42371968ce829242c2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1r3TAQNKWFpml-QA4BQy-9ONHqw5J6CyFNUgK9tL0KWW_1nhLbciU7pf--enFSSqCIlcTOzDLsVNUxkFMgRJ5lAKJpQ0A0mgJv9KvqAJTkjWoJef38F1q-rd7lfEdIK7VmB9WPm2HqccBxDuO27nB0u8Gm-3rG_NjxMe1rsHN4wHpa0hQz5k8Ft26HqX6IwWGubReXuf61s-WK6T6_r95422c8enoPq--fL79dXDe3X69uLs5vG8cVmRsloVXCdq6zxHPLPeMbrh3xQmG7AelbwTZEimLedpwyCbpVDhXVlFNHPTusPq5zpxR_LsWzGUJ22Pd2xLhkA1IyCoJzKNQPL6h3cUljcVdYQirZSsEK63RlbW2PJow-zsm6cjY4BBdH9KH0zyWwlkkOtAhgFbgUc07ozZRCWeFvA8TsozFrNKZEY_bRGF00J6sGU3B_-ZdfgBQXTBacrngu2LjF9I_V_w79A2ojmfI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757876753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Abrams, Lisa M. ; McMillan, James H. ; Wetzel, Angela P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lisa M. ; McMillan, James H. ; Wetzel, Angela P.</creatorcontrib><description>In response to US accountability policies and yearly performance targets, school districts are implementing periodic or benchmark assessments to provide teachers with data to improve instruction and student achievement. The tests are typically given quarterly to track student progress toward yearly accountability goals, as well as to inform teaching and identify individualized instructional enhancements to foster student achievement. Fifteen focus group sessions were conducted with 67 elementary and middle school teachers from several school districts surrounding an urban metropolitan area in Virginia to explore and better understand the ways in which benchmark testing can be used effectively as formative assessment. Participants had a range of experience from 1 to 3 to over 20 years in the classroom. The perceived quality of test items, timeliness in receiving results, accessibility of the data, and opportunities to review and discuss the results with others clearly influenced how teachers’ used the assessment results. Teachers described using benchmark test results formatively to make a variety of instructional adjustments, including modifications to whole class instruction, working with students in small groups, and providing individualized support, though important factors influenced the extent of use. The findings of this study suggest that under appropriate conditions, including having valid and transparent test items, support, immediacy of results, and time to discuss with others, benchmark testing programs have the potential of providing meaningful formative assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1874-8597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-8600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Accountability ; Assessment ; Benchmarking ; Benchmarks ; Best Practices ; Classrooms ; Education ; Educational Practices ; Elementary School Teachers ; Evaluation Utilization ; Feedback ; Focus Groups ; Formative Evaluation ; Learning ; Media Adaptation ; Middle School Teachers ; Outcomes of Education ; Program Implementation ; Quality of education ; School districts ; Students ; Studies ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Testing ; Testing and Evaluation ; Testing Programs ; Usability ; Use Studies ; Virginia</subject><ispartof>Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 2015-11, Vol.27 (4), p.347-375</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-871685abcba0f4a4f34d49c0f58e6d17f653d075874ab42371968ce829242c2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-871685abcba0f4a4f34d49c0f58e6d17f653d075874ab42371968ce829242c2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1087637$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetzel, Angela P.</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works</title><title>Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability</title><addtitle>Educ Asse Eval Acc</addtitle><description>In response to US accountability policies and yearly performance targets, school districts are implementing periodic or benchmark assessments to provide teachers with data to improve instruction and student achievement. The tests are typically given quarterly to track student progress toward yearly accountability goals, as well as to inform teaching and identify individualized instructional enhancements to foster student achievement. Fifteen focus group sessions were conducted with 67 elementary and middle school teachers from several school districts surrounding an urban metropolitan area in Virginia to explore and better understand the ways in which benchmark testing can be used effectively as formative assessment. Participants had a range of experience from 1 to 3 to over 20 years in the classroom. The perceived quality of test items, timeliness in receiving results, accessibility of the data, and opportunities to review and discuss the results with others clearly influenced how teachers’ used the assessment results. Teachers described using benchmark test results formatively to make a variety of instructional adjustments, including modifications to whole class instruction, working with students in small groups, and providing individualized support, though important factors influenced the extent of use. The findings of this study suggest that under appropriate conditions, including having valid and transparent test items, support, immediacy of results, and time to discuss with others, benchmark testing programs have the potential of providing meaningful formative assessment.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Evaluation Utilization</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Formative Evaluation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Media Adaptation</subject><subject>Middle School Teachers</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Quality of education</subject><subject>School districts</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Testing and Evaluation</subject><subject>Testing Programs</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Use Studies</subject><subject>Virginia</subject><issn>1874-8597</issn><issn>1874-8600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1r3TAQNKWFpml-QA4BQy-9ONHqw5J6CyFNUgK9tL0KWW_1nhLbciU7pf--enFSSqCIlcTOzDLsVNUxkFMgRJ5lAKJpQ0A0mgJv9KvqAJTkjWoJef38F1q-rd7lfEdIK7VmB9WPm2HqccBxDuO27nB0u8Gm-3rG_NjxMe1rsHN4wHpa0hQz5k8Ft26HqX6IwWGubReXuf61s-WK6T6_r95422c8enoPq--fL79dXDe3X69uLs5vG8cVmRsloVXCdq6zxHPLPeMbrh3xQmG7AelbwTZEimLedpwyCbpVDhXVlFNHPTusPq5zpxR_LsWzGUJ22Pd2xLhkA1IyCoJzKNQPL6h3cUljcVdYQirZSsEK63RlbW2PJow-zsm6cjY4BBdH9KH0zyWwlkkOtAhgFbgUc07ozZRCWeFvA8TsozFrNKZEY_bRGF00J6sGU3B_-ZdfgBQXTBacrngu2LjF9I_V_w79A2ojmfI</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Abrams, Lisa M.</creator><creator>McMillan, James H.</creator><creator>Wetzel, Angela P.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works</title><author>Abrams, Lisa M. ; McMillan, James H. ; Wetzel, Angela P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-871685abcba0f4a4f34d49c0f58e6d17f653d075874ab42371968ce829242c2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Evaluation Utilization</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Formative Evaluation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Media Adaptation</topic><topic>Middle School Teachers</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Quality of education</topic><topic>School districts</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Testing and Evaluation</topic><topic>Testing Programs</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Use Studies</topic><topic>Virginia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetzel, Angela P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abrams, Lisa M.</au><au>McMillan, James H.</au><au>Wetzel, Angela P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1087637</ericid><atitle>Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works</atitle><jtitle>Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability</jtitle><stitle>Educ Asse Eval Acc</stitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>347-375</pages><issn>1874-8597</issn><eissn>1874-8600</eissn><abstract>In response to US accountability policies and yearly performance targets, school districts are implementing periodic or benchmark assessments to provide teachers with data to improve instruction and student achievement. The tests are typically given quarterly to track student progress toward yearly accountability goals, as well as to inform teaching and identify individualized instructional enhancements to foster student achievement. Fifteen focus group sessions were conducted with 67 elementary and middle school teachers from several school districts surrounding an urban metropolitan area in Virginia to explore and better understand the ways in which benchmark testing can be used effectively as formative assessment. Participants had a range of experience from 1 to 3 to over 20 years in the classroom. The perceived quality of test items, timeliness in receiving results, accessibility of the data, and opportunities to review and discuss the results with others clearly influenced how teachers’ used the assessment results. Teachers described using benchmark test results formatively to make a variety of instructional adjustments, including modifications to whole class instruction, working with students in small groups, and providing individualized support, though important factors influenced the extent of use. The findings of this study suggest that under appropriate conditions, including having valid and transparent test items, support, immediacy of results, and time to discuss with others, benchmark testing programs have the potential of providing meaningful formative assessment.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1874-8597
ispartof Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 2015-11, Vol.27 (4), p.347-375
issn 1874-8597
1874-8600
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773215441
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Academic Achievement
Accountability
Assessment
Benchmarking
Benchmarks
Best Practices
Classrooms
Education
Educational Practices
Elementary School Teachers
Evaluation Utilization
Feedback
Focus Groups
Formative Evaluation
Learning
Media Adaptation
Middle School Teachers
Outcomes of Education
Program Implementation
Quality of education
School districts
Students
Studies
Teacher Attitudes
Teachers
Teaching
Testing
Testing and Evaluation
Testing Programs
Usability
Use Studies
Virginia
title Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T18%3A42%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20benchmark%20testing%20for%20formative%20purposes:%20teacher%20voices%20about%20what%20works&rft.jtitle=Educational%20assessment,%20evaluation%20and%20accountability&rft.au=Abrams,%20Lisa%20M.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=347-375&rft.issn=1874-8597&rft.eissn=1874-8600&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713637412%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757876753&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713637412&rft_ericid=EJ1087637&rfr_iscdi=true