Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works
In response to US accountability policies and yearly performance targets, school districts are implementing periodic or benchmark assessments to provide teachers with data to improve instruction and student achievement. The tests are typically given quarterly to track student progress toward yearly...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability evaluation and accountability, 2015-11, Vol.27 (4), p.347-375 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 375 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 347 |
container_title | Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Abrams, Lisa M. McMillan, James H. Wetzel, Angela P. |
description | In response to US accountability policies and yearly performance targets, school districts are implementing periodic or benchmark assessments to provide teachers with data to improve instruction and student achievement. The tests are typically given quarterly to track student progress toward yearly accountability goals, as well as to inform teaching and identify individualized instructional enhancements to foster student achievement. Fifteen focus group sessions were conducted with 67 elementary and middle school teachers from several school districts surrounding an urban metropolitan area in Virginia to explore and better understand the ways in which benchmark testing can be used effectively as formative assessment. Participants had a range of experience from 1 to 3 to over 20 years in the classroom. The perceived quality of test items, timeliness in receiving results, accessibility of the data, and opportunities to review and discuss the results with others clearly influenced how teachers’ used the assessment results. Teachers described using benchmark test results formatively to make a variety of instructional adjustments, including modifications to whole class instruction, working with students in small groups, and providing individualized support, though important factors influenced the extent of use. The findings of this study suggest that under appropriate conditions, including having valid and transparent test items, support, immediacy of results, and time to discuss with others, benchmark testing programs have the potential of providing meaningful formative assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773215441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713637412</galeid><ericid>EJ1087637</ericid><sourcerecordid>A713637412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-871685abcba0f4a4f34d49c0f58e6d17f653d075874ab42371968ce829242c2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1r3TAQNKWFpml-QA4BQy-9ONHqw5J6CyFNUgK9tL0KWW_1nhLbciU7pf--enFSSqCIlcTOzDLsVNUxkFMgRJ5lAKJpQ0A0mgJv9KvqAJTkjWoJef38F1q-rd7lfEdIK7VmB9WPm2HqccBxDuO27nB0u8Gm-3rG_NjxMe1rsHN4wHpa0hQz5k8Ft26HqX6IwWGubReXuf61s-WK6T6_r95422c8enoPq--fL79dXDe3X69uLs5vG8cVmRsloVXCdq6zxHPLPeMbrh3xQmG7AelbwTZEimLedpwyCbpVDhXVlFNHPTusPq5zpxR_LsWzGUJ22Pd2xLhkA1IyCoJzKNQPL6h3cUljcVdYQirZSsEK63RlbW2PJow-zsm6cjY4BBdH9KH0zyWwlkkOtAhgFbgUc07ozZRCWeFvA8TsozFrNKZEY_bRGF00J6sGU3B_-ZdfgBQXTBacrngu2LjF9I_V_w79A2ojmfI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757876753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Abrams, Lisa M. ; McMillan, James H. ; Wetzel, Angela P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lisa M. ; McMillan, James H. ; Wetzel, Angela P.</creatorcontrib><description>In response to US accountability policies and yearly performance targets, school districts are implementing periodic or benchmark assessments to provide teachers with data to improve instruction and student achievement. The tests are typically given quarterly to track student progress toward yearly accountability goals, as well as to inform teaching and identify individualized instructional enhancements to foster student achievement. Fifteen focus group sessions were conducted with 67 elementary and middle school teachers from several school districts surrounding an urban metropolitan area in Virginia to explore and better understand the ways in which benchmark testing can be used effectively as formative assessment. Participants had a range of experience from 1 to 3 to over 20 years in the classroom. The perceived quality of test items, timeliness in receiving results, accessibility of the data, and opportunities to review and discuss the results with others clearly influenced how teachers’ used the assessment results. Teachers described using benchmark test results formatively to make a variety of instructional adjustments, including modifications to whole class instruction, working with students in small groups, and providing individualized support, though important factors influenced the extent of use. The findings of this study suggest that under appropriate conditions, including having valid and transparent test items, support, immediacy of results, and time to discuss with others, benchmark testing programs have the potential of providing meaningful formative assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1874-8597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-8600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Accountability ; Assessment ; Benchmarking ; Benchmarks ; Best Practices ; Classrooms ; Education ; Educational Practices ; Elementary School Teachers ; Evaluation Utilization ; Feedback ; Focus Groups ; Formative Evaluation ; Learning ; Media Adaptation ; Middle School Teachers ; Outcomes of Education ; Program Implementation ; Quality of education ; School districts ; Students ; Studies ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Testing ; Testing and Evaluation ; Testing Programs ; Usability ; Use Studies ; Virginia</subject><ispartof>Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 2015-11, Vol.27 (4), p.347-375</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-871685abcba0f4a4f34d49c0f58e6d17f653d075874ab42371968ce829242c2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-871685abcba0f4a4f34d49c0f58e6d17f653d075874ab42371968ce829242c2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1087637$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetzel, Angela P.</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works</title><title>Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability</title><addtitle>Educ Asse Eval Acc</addtitle><description>In response to US accountability policies and yearly performance targets, school districts are implementing periodic or benchmark assessments to provide teachers with data to improve instruction and student achievement. The tests are typically given quarterly to track student progress toward yearly accountability goals, as well as to inform teaching and identify individualized instructional enhancements to foster student achievement. Fifteen focus group sessions were conducted with 67 elementary and middle school teachers from several school districts surrounding an urban metropolitan area in Virginia to explore and better understand the ways in which benchmark testing can be used effectively as formative assessment. Participants had a range of experience from 1 to 3 to over 20 years in the classroom. The perceived quality of test items, timeliness in receiving results, accessibility of the data, and opportunities to review and discuss the results with others clearly influenced how teachers’ used the assessment results. Teachers described using benchmark test results formatively to make a variety of instructional adjustments, including modifications to whole class instruction, working with students in small groups, and providing individualized support, though important factors influenced the extent of use. The findings of this study suggest that under appropriate conditions, including having valid and transparent test items, support, immediacy of results, and time to discuss with others, benchmark testing programs have the potential of providing meaningful formative assessment.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Evaluation Utilization</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Formative Evaluation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Media Adaptation</subject><subject>Middle School Teachers</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Quality of education</subject><subject>School districts</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Testing and Evaluation</subject><subject>Testing Programs</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Use Studies</subject><subject>Virginia</subject><issn>1874-8597</issn><issn>1874-8600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1r3TAQNKWFpml-QA4BQy-9ONHqw5J6CyFNUgK9tL0KWW_1nhLbciU7pf--enFSSqCIlcTOzDLsVNUxkFMgRJ5lAKJpQ0A0mgJv9KvqAJTkjWoJef38F1q-rd7lfEdIK7VmB9WPm2HqccBxDuO27nB0u8Gm-3rG_NjxMe1rsHN4wHpa0hQz5k8Ft26HqX6IwWGubReXuf61s-WK6T6_r95422c8enoPq--fL79dXDe3X69uLs5vG8cVmRsloVXCdq6zxHPLPeMbrh3xQmG7AelbwTZEimLedpwyCbpVDhXVlFNHPTusPq5zpxR_LsWzGUJ22Pd2xLhkA1IyCoJzKNQPL6h3cUljcVdYQirZSsEK63RlbW2PJow-zsm6cjY4BBdH9KH0zyWwlkkOtAhgFbgUc07ozZRCWeFvA8TsozFrNKZEY_bRGF00J6sGU3B_-ZdfgBQXTBacrngu2LjF9I_V_w79A2ojmfI</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Abrams, Lisa M.</creator><creator>McMillan, James H.</creator><creator>Wetzel, Angela P.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works</title><author>Abrams, Lisa M. ; McMillan, James H. ; Wetzel, Angela P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-871685abcba0f4a4f34d49c0f58e6d17f653d075874ab42371968ce829242c2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Evaluation Utilization</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Formative Evaluation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Media Adaptation</topic><topic>Middle School Teachers</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Quality of education</topic><topic>School districts</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Testing and Evaluation</topic><topic>Testing Programs</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Use Studies</topic><topic>Virginia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetzel, Angela P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abrams, Lisa M.</au><au>McMillan, James H.</au><au>Wetzel, Angela P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1087637</ericid><atitle>Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works</atitle><jtitle>Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability</jtitle><stitle>Educ Asse Eval Acc</stitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>347-375</pages><issn>1874-8597</issn><eissn>1874-8600</eissn><abstract>In response to US accountability policies and yearly performance targets, school districts are implementing periodic or benchmark assessments to provide teachers with data to improve instruction and student achievement. The tests are typically given quarterly to track student progress toward yearly accountability goals, as well as to inform teaching and identify individualized instructional enhancements to foster student achievement. Fifteen focus group sessions were conducted with 67 elementary and middle school teachers from several school districts surrounding an urban metropolitan area in Virginia to explore and better understand the ways in which benchmark testing can be used effectively as formative assessment. Participants had a range of experience from 1 to 3 to over 20 years in the classroom. The perceived quality of test items, timeliness in receiving results, accessibility of the data, and opportunities to review and discuss the results with others clearly influenced how teachers’ used the assessment results. Teachers described using benchmark test results formatively to make a variety of instructional adjustments, including modifications to whole class instruction, working with students in small groups, and providing individualized support, though important factors influenced the extent of use. The findings of this study suggest that under appropriate conditions, including having valid and transparent test items, support, immediacy of results, and time to discuss with others, benchmark testing programs have the potential of providing meaningful formative assessment.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1874-8597 |
ispartof | Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 2015-11, Vol.27 (4), p.347-375 |
issn | 1874-8597 1874-8600 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773215441 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Academic Achievement Accountability Assessment Benchmarking Benchmarks Best Practices Classrooms Education Educational Practices Elementary School Teachers Evaluation Utilization Feedback Focus Groups Formative Evaluation Learning Media Adaptation Middle School Teachers Outcomes of Education Program Implementation Quality of education School districts Students Studies Teacher Attitudes Teachers Teaching Testing Testing and Evaluation Testing Programs Usability Use Studies Virginia |
title | Implementing benchmark testing for formative purposes: teacher voices about what works |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T18%3A42%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20benchmark%20testing%20for%20formative%20purposes:%20teacher%20voices%20about%20what%20works&rft.jtitle=Educational%20assessment,%20evaluation%20and%20accountability&rft.au=Abrams,%20Lisa%20M.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=347-375&rft.issn=1874-8597&rft.eissn=1874-8600&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11092-015-9214-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713637412%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757876753&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713637412&rft_ericid=EJ1087637&rfr_iscdi=true |