Rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Summary Introduction The role of rectus sheath blocks (RSB) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in pediatric surgery has not been well established. Objective We aimed to determine if RSB and TAP blocks decrease postoperative pain and improve recovery in children. Data sources Duplicate sear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric anesthesia 2016-04, Vol.26 (4), p.363-371
Hauptverfasser: Hamill, James K., Rahiri, Jamie-Lee, Liley, Andrew, Hill, Andrew G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 371
container_issue 4
container_start_page 363
container_title Pediatric anesthesia
container_volume 26
creator Hamill, James K.
Rahiri, Jamie-Lee
Liley, Andrew
Hill, Andrew G.
description Summary Introduction The role of rectus sheath blocks (RSB) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in pediatric surgery has not been well established. Objective We aimed to determine if RSB and TAP blocks decrease postoperative pain and improve recovery in children. Data sources Duplicate searching of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and trial registries databases by two reviewers. Study selection Included were randomized trials in children on RSB or TAP block in abdominal operations, excluding inguinal procedures. Data extraction Independent duplicate data extraction and quality assessment using a standardized form. Results Ten trials met inclusion criteria (n = 599), RSB in five and TAP block in five. A linear mixed effects model on patient level data from three trials showed nerve blocks lowered morphine requirements 6–8 h after surgery, −0.03 mg·kg−1 (95% CI −0.05, −0.002). Pooled analysis of summary data showed nerve blocks lowered 0–10 scale pain scores immediately after the operation, −0.7 (95% CI −1.3, −0.1); lowered 4–16 scale pain scores, −2.0 (95% CI −2.3, −1.7); and delayed the time to first rescue analgesia, 17 min (95% CI 1.3, 33). Quality assessment showed some studies at moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusion Abdominal wall blocks reduce pain and opiate use in children. We advise cautious interpretation of the results given the heterogeneity of studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pan.12855
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1772145781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3974471911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4615-aa95508e5f079769d15ccb7dd9f0927b31f02053b9f4fddcad5d4219aedcdcfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9rFDEUx4MotlYP_gMS8KKHaZPMZDLxVou2xaWKKIKX8CZ5YdPOj20y07riH292t-1BMJcXwud9Hi9fQl5ydsjzOVrBcMhFI-Ujss-rmhVaavE437mUhawruUeepXTJGC9FLZ6SPVE3Vd00ep_8-Yp2mhNNS4RpSWFwdIowpBuMKT9D68Y-DCHRVQcD0rYb7VWiYaB2GToXcXhHgaZ1mrCHKVga8Sbg7dbT4wQFDNCtU-4fPc3eje03bmYE6NJz8sTngi_u6gH5_vHDt5OzYvH59PzkeFHYquayANBSsgalZ0qrWjsurW2Vc9ozLVRbcs8Ek2WrfeWds-CkqwTXgM466115QN7svKs4Xs-YJtOHZLHbrDTOyXClBK-kanhGX_-DXo5zzEtsKV5mr6wz9XZH2TimFNGbVQw9xLXhzGwiMTkSs40ks6_ujHPbo3sg7zPIwNEOuA0drv9vMl-OL-6Vxa4j5H__9dAB8crUqlTS_Lg4NfL9pwUX5U9TlX8BIFCmrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771342156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hamill, James K. ; Rahiri, Jamie-Lee ; Liley, Andrew ; Hill, Andrew G.</creator><contributor>Lonnqvist, Per-Arne ; Lonnqvist, Per‐Arne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hamill, James K. ; Rahiri, Jamie-Lee ; Liley, Andrew ; Hill, Andrew G. ; Lonnqvist, Per-Arne ; Lonnqvist, Per‐Arne</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Introduction The role of rectus sheath blocks (RSB) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in pediatric surgery has not been well established. Objective We aimed to determine if RSB and TAP blocks decrease postoperative pain and improve recovery in children. Data sources Duplicate searching of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and trial registries databases by two reviewers. Study selection Included were randomized trials in children on RSB or TAP block in abdominal operations, excluding inguinal procedures. Data extraction Independent duplicate data extraction and quality assessment using a standardized form. Results Ten trials met inclusion criteria (n = 599), RSB in five and TAP block in five. A linear mixed effects model on patient level data from three trials showed nerve blocks lowered morphine requirements 6–8 h after surgery, −0.03 mg·kg−1 (95% CI −0.05, −0.002). Pooled analysis of summary data showed nerve blocks lowered 0–10 scale pain scores immediately after the operation, −0.7 (95% CI −1.3, −0.1); lowered 4–16 scale pain scores, −2.0 (95% CI −2.3, −1.7); and delayed the time to first rescue analgesia, 17 min (95% CI 1.3, 33). Quality assessment showed some studies at moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusion Abdominal wall blocks reduce pain and opiate use in children. We advise cautious interpretation of the results given the heterogeneity of studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1155-5645</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pan.12855</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26846889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdominal Wall ; child ; Humans ; meta-analysis ; nerve block ; Nerve Block - methods ; pediatrics ; postoperative pain ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Rectus Abdominis ; regional anesthesia</subject><ispartof>Pediatric anesthesia, 2016-04, Vol.26 (4), p.363-371</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4615-aa95508e5f079769d15ccb7dd9f0927b31f02053b9f4fddcad5d4219aedcdcfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4615-aa95508e5f079769d15ccb7dd9f0927b31f02053b9f4fddcad5d4219aedcdcfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpan.12855$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpan.12855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Lonnqvist, Per-Arne</contributor><contributor>Lonnqvist, Per‐Arne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hamill, James K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahiri, Jamie-Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liley, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><title>Rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials</title><title>Pediatric anesthesia</title><addtitle>Paediatr Anaesth</addtitle><description>Summary Introduction The role of rectus sheath blocks (RSB) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in pediatric surgery has not been well established. Objective We aimed to determine if RSB and TAP blocks decrease postoperative pain and improve recovery in children. Data sources Duplicate searching of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and trial registries databases by two reviewers. Study selection Included were randomized trials in children on RSB or TAP block in abdominal operations, excluding inguinal procedures. Data extraction Independent duplicate data extraction and quality assessment using a standardized form. Results Ten trials met inclusion criteria (n = 599), RSB in five and TAP block in five. A linear mixed effects model on patient level data from three trials showed nerve blocks lowered morphine requirements 6–8 h after surgery, −0.03 mg·kg−1 (95% CI −0.05, −0.002). Pooled analysis of summary data showed nerve blocks lowered 0–10 scale pain scores immediately after the operation, −0.7 (95% CI −1.3, −0.1); lowered 4–16 scale pain scores, −2.0 (95% CI −2.3, −1.7); and delayed the time to first rescue analgesia, 17 min (95% CI 1.3, 33). Quality assessment showed some studies at moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusion Abdominal wall blocks reduce pain and opiate use in children. We advise cautious interpretation of the results given the heterogeneity of studies.</description><subject>Abdominal Wall</subject><subject>child</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>nerve block</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>pediatrics</subject><subject>postoperative pain</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Rectus Abdominis</subject><subject>regional anesthesia</subject><issn>1155-5645</issn><issn>1460-9592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9rFDEUx4MotlYP_gMS8KKHaZPMZDLxVou2xaWKKIKX8CZ5YdPOj20y07riH292t-1BMJcXwud9Hi9fQl5ydsjzOVrBcMhFI-Ujss-rmhVaavE437mUhawruUeepXTJGC9FLZ6SPVE3Vd00ep_8-Yp2mhNNS4RpSWFwdIowpBuMKT9D68Y-DCHRVQcD0rYb7VWiYaB2GToXcXhHgaZ1mrCHKVga8Sbg7dbT4wQFDNCtU-4fPc3eje03bmYE6NJz8sTngi_u6gH5_vHDt5OzYvH59PzkeFHYquayANBSsgalZ0qrWjsurW2Vc9ozLVRbcs8Ek2WrfeWds-CkqwTXgM466115QN7svKs4Xs-YJtOHZLHbrDTOyXClBK-kanhGX_-DXo5zzEtsKV5mr6wz9XZH2TimFNGbVQw9xLXhzGwiMTkSs40ks6_ujHPbo3sg7zPIwNEOuA0drv9vMl-OL-6Vxa4j5H__9dAB8crUqlTS_Lg4NfL9pwUX5U9TlX8BIFCmrQ</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Hamill, James K.</creator><creator>Rahiri, Jamie-Lee</creator><creator>Liley, Andrew</creator><creator>Hill, Andrew G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials</title><author>Hamill, James K. ; Rahiri, Jamie-Lee ; Liley, Andrew ; Hill, Andrew G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4615-aa95508e5f079769d15ccb7dd9f0927b31f02053b9f4fddcad5d4219aedcdcfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Wall</topic><topic>child</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>nerve block</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>pediatrics</topic><topic>postoperative pain</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Rectus Abdominis</topic><topic>regional anesthesia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamill, James K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahiri, Jamie-Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liley, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamill, James K.</au><au>Rahiri, Jamie-Lee</au><au>Liley, Andrew</au><au>Hill, Andrew G.</au><au>Lonnqvist, Per-Arne</au><au>Lonnqvist, Per‐Arne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Paediatr Anaesth</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>363-371</pages><issn>1155-5645</issn><eissn>1460-9592</eissn><abstract>Summary Introduction The role of rectus sheath blocks (RSB) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in pediatric surgery has not been well established. Objective We aimed to determine if RSB and TAP blocks decrease postoperative pain and improve recovery in children. Data sources Duplicate searching of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and trial registries databases by two reviewers. Study selection Included were randomized trials in children on RSB or TAP block in abdominal operations, excluding inguinal procedures. Data extraction Independent duplicate data extraction and quality assessment using a standardized form. Results Ten trials met inclusion criteria (n = 599), RSB in five and TAP block in five. A linear mixed effects model on patient level data from three trials showed nerve blocks lowered morphine requirements 6–8 h after surgery, −0.03 mg·kg−1 (95% CI −0.05, −0.002). Pooled analysis of summary data showed nerve blocks lowered 0–10 scale pain scores immediately after the operation, −0.7 (95% CI −1.3, −0.1); lowered 4–16 scale pain scores, −2.0 (95% CI −2.3, −1.7); and delayed the time to first rescue analgesia, 17 min (95% CI 1.3, 33). Quality assessment showed some studies at moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusion Abdominal wall blocks reduce pain and opiate use in children. We advise cautious interpretation of the results given the heterogeneity of studies.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26846889</pmid><doi>10.1111/pan.12855</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1155-5645
ispartof Pediatric anesthesia, 2016-04, Vol.26 (4), p.363-371
issn 1155-5645
1460-9592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1772145781
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abdominal Wall
child
Humans
meta-analysis
nerve block
Nerve Block - methods
pediatrics
postoperative pain
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Rectus Abdominis
regional anesthesia
title Rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T05%3A46%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rectus%20sheath%20and%20transversus%20abdominis%20plane%20blocks%20in%20children:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20trials&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20anesthesia&rft.au=Hamill,%20James%20K.&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=363-371&rft.issn=1155-5645&rft.eissn=1460-9592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pan.12855&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3974471911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771342156&rft_id=info:pmid/26846889&rfr_iscdi=true