Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax
Variability in children's language acquisition is likely due to a number of cognitive and social variables. The current study investigated whether individual differences in statistical learning (SL), which has been implicated in language acquisition, independently predicted 6- to 8-year-old...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child development 2016-01, Vol.87 (1), p.184-193 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 193 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 184 |
container_title | Child development |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Kidd, Evan Arciuli, Joanne |
description | Variability in children's language acquisition is likely due to a number of cognitive and social variables. The current study investigated whether individual differences in statistical learning (SL), which has been implicated in language acquisition, independently predicted 6- to 8-year-old's comprehension of syntax. Sixty-eight (N = 68) English-speaking children completed a test of comprehension of four syntactic structures, a test of SL utilizing nonlinguistic visual stimuli, and several additional control measures. The results revealed that SL independently predicted comprehension of two syntactic structures that show considerable variability in this age range: passives and object relative clauses. These data suggest that individual differences in children's capacity for SL are associated with the acquisition of the syntax of natural languages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cdev.12461 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771456624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1089293</ericid><jstor_id>24698542</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24698542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-cc2f5bc7b35a32fb9dd612be1f9a138213660bcc4f347e6357273797e14b628b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9v0zAYhi3ExMrgwh0UiQMIKcOf7djxEXVd2FQB0vghTpbjOMwldYqdjPW_x1u6InGY8MWynkfvJ_s1Qs8AH0Nab01jr46BMA4P0AwYF3nJCXuIZhhjmVNJ8CF6HOMqHQmX9BE6JLwADLycoe9nvnFXrhl1l524trXBemNj5nx2MejBxcGZhJZWB-_8j-xTsI0zQza_dF2T3Fcxm_frTbCX1kfX-6xvs4utH_T1E3TQ6i7ap7v9CH05XXyev8-XH6uz-btlbjjmkBtD2qI2oqaFpqStZdNwILWFVmqgJQHKOa6NYS1lwnJaCCKokMICqzkpa3qEXk-5m9D_Gm0c1NpFY7tOe9uPUYEQwAqeXuQ_VA4s5d-qL_9RV_0YfLqIAllyDIISfq-VstLzA4NkvZksE_oYg23VJri1DlsFWN00qG4aVLcNJvnFLnKs17bZq3eVJeH5JNjgzB4vzgGXkkiaOEz8t-vs9p5Ran6y-Ho3dJe5ikMf_s5kXJYFI4nnE0__wV7vuQ4_FU9tFOrbh0pVpxiqouKK0D-kj8US</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761009141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kidd, Evan ; Arciuli, Joanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Kidd, Evan ; Arciuli, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>Variability in children's language acquisition is likely due to a number of cognitive and social variables. The current study investigated whether individual differences in statistical learning (SL), which has been implicated in language acquisition, independently predicted 6- to 8-year-old's comprehension of syntax. Sixty-eight (N = 68) English-speaking children completed a test of comprehension of four syntactic structures, a test of SL utilizing nonlinguistic visual stimuli, and several additional control measures. The results revealed that SL independently predicted comprehension of two syntactic structures that show considerable variability in this age range: passives and object relative clauses. These data suggest that individual differences in children's capacity for SL are associated with the acquisition of the syntax of natural languages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-3920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12461</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26510168</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHDEAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquisition ; Child ; Child development ; Child language ; Children ; Children & youth ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Comprehension ; Comprehension - physiology ; EMPIRICAL REPORTS ; English ; English language ; Female ; Form Classes (Languages) ; Humans ; Individual Differences ; Individuality ; Language ; Language Acquisition ; Language Processing ; Language Tests ; Learning ; Male ; Native language acquisition ; Natural language ; Phrase Structure ; Prediction ; Probability Learning ; Relative clauses ; Statistics ; Syntactic structures ; Syntax ; Variability ; Visual Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Child development, 2016-01, Vol.87 (1), p.184-193</ispartof><rights>2016 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. Child Development © 2015 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><rights>Child Development © 2016 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-cc2f5bc7b35a32fb9dd612be1f9a138213660bcc4f347e6357273797e14b628b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-cc2f5bc7b35a32fb9dd612be1f9a138213660bcc4f347e6357273797e14b628b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24698542$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24698542$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1089293$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510168$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kidd, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arciuli, Joanne</creatorcontrib><title>Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax</title><title>Child development</title><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><description>Variability in children's language acquisition is likely due to a number of cognitive and social variables. The current study investigated whether individual differences in statistical learning (SL), which has been implicated in language acquisition, independently predicted 6- to 8-year-old's comprehension of syntax. Sixty-eight (N = 68) English-speaking children completed a test of comprehension of four syntactic structures, a test of SL utilizing nonlinguistic visual stimuli, and several additional control measures. The results revealed that SL independently predicted comprehension of two syntactic structures that show considerable variability in this age range: passives and object relative clauses. These data suggest that individual differences in children's capacity for SL are associated with the acquisition of the syntax of natural languages.</description><subject>Acquisition</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child language</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>EMPIRICAL REPORTS</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Form Classes (Languages)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Natural language</subject><subject>Phrase Structure</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Probability Learning</subject><subject>Relative clauses</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Syntactic structures</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><issn>0009-3920</issn><issn>1467-8624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9v0zAYhi3ExMrgwh0UiQMIKcOf7djxEXVd2FQB0vghTpbjOMwldYqdjPW_x1u6InGY8MWynkfvJ_s1Qs8AH0Nab01jr46BMA4P0AwYF3nJCXuIZhhjmVNJ8CF6HOMqHQmX9BE6JLwADLycoe9nvnFXrhl1l524trXBemNj5nx2MejBxcGZhJZWB-_8j-xTsI0zQza_dF2T3Fcxm_frTbCX1kfX-6xvs4utH_T1E3TQ6i7ap7v9CH05XXyev8-XH6uz-btlbjjmkBtD2qI2oqaFpqStZdNwILWFVmqgJQHKOa6NYS1lwnJaCCKokMICqzkpa3qEXk-5m9D_Gm0c1NpFY7tOe9uPUYEQwAqeXuQ_VA4s5d-qL_9RV_0YfLqIAllyDIISfq-VstLzA4NkvZksE_oYg23VJri1DlsFWN00qG4aVLcNJvnFLnKs17bZq3eVJeH5JNjgzB4vzgGXkkiaOEz8t-vs9p5Ran6y-Ho3dJe5ikMf_s5kXJYFI4nnE0__wV7vuQ4_FU9tFOrbh0pVpxiqouKK0D-kj8US</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Kidd, Evan</creator><creator>Arciuli, Joanne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley for the Society for Research in Child Development</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax</title><author>Kidd, Evan ; Arciuli, Joanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-cc2f5bc7b35a32fb9dd612be1f9a138213660bcc4f347e6357273797e14b628b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acquisition</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child language</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>EMPIRICAL REPORTS</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Form Classes (Languages)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Natural language</topic><topic>Phrase Structure</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Probability Learning</topic><topic>Relative clauses</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Syntactic structures</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kidd, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arciuli, Joanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kidd, Evan</au><au>Arciuli, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1089293</ericid><atitle>Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax</atitle><jtitle>Child development</jtitle><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>184</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>184-193</pages><issn>0009-3920</issn><eissn>1467-8624</eissn><coden>CHDEAW</coden><abstract>Variability in children's language acquisition is likely due to a number of cognitive and social variables. The current study investigated whether individual differences in statistical learning (SL), which has been implicated in language acquisition, independently predicted 6- to 8-year-old's comprehension of syntax. Sixty-eight (N = 68) English-speaking children completed a test of comprehension of four syntactic structures, a test of SL utilizing nonlinguistic visual stimuli, and several additional control measures. The results revealed that SL independently predicted comprehension of two syntactic structures that show considerable variability in this age range: passives and object relative clauses. These data suggest that individual differences in children's capacity for SL are associated with the acquisition of the syntax of natural languages.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26510168</pmid><doi>10.1111/cdev.12461</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-3920 |
ispartof | Child development, 2016-01, Vol.87 (1), p.184-193 |
issn | 0009-3920 1467-8624 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771456624 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Acquisition Child Child development Child language Children Children & youth Cognition & reasoning Cognitive ability Comprehension Comprehension - physiology EMPIRICAL REPORTS English English language Female Form Classes (Languages) Humans Individual Differences Individuality Language Language Acquisition Language Processing Language Tests Learning Male Native language acquisition Natural language Phrase Structure Prediction Probability Learning Relative clauses Statistics Syntactic structures Syntax Variability Visual Stimuli |
title | Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A01%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20Differences%20in%20Statistical%20Learning%20Predict%20Children's%20Comprehension%20of%20Syntax&rft.jtitle=Child%20development&rft.au=Kidd,%20Evan&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=184&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=184-193&rft.issn=0009-3920&rft.eissn=1467-8624&rft.coden=CHDEAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cdev.12461&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24698542%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761009141&rft_id=info:pmid/26510168&rft_ericid=EJ1089293&rft_jstor_id=24698542&rfr_iscdi=true |