Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax

Variability in children's language acquisition is likely due to a number of cognitive and social variables. The current study investigated whether individual differences in statistical learning (SL), which has been implicated in language acquisition, independently predicted 6- to 8-year-old...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child development 2016-01, Vol.87 (1), p.184-193
Hauptverfasser: Kidd, Evan, Arciuli, Joanne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 193
container_issue 1
container_start_page 184
container_title Child development
container_volume 87
creator Kidd, Evan
Arciuli, Joanne
description Variability in children's language acquisition is likely due to a number of cognitive and social variables. The current study investigated whether individual differences in statistical learning (SL), which has been implicated in language acquisition, independently predicted 6- to 8-year-old's comprehension of syntax. Sixty-eight (N = 68) English-speaking children completed a test of comprehension of four syntactic structures, a test of SL utilizing nonlinguistic visual stimuli, and several additional control measures. The results revealed that SL independently predicted comprehension of two syntactic structures that show considerable variability in this age range: passives and object relative clauses. These data suggest that individual differences in children's capacity for SL are associated with the acquisition of the syntax of natural languages.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cdev.12461
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771456624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1089293</ericid><jstor_id>24698542</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24698542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-cc2f5bc7b35a32fb9dd612be1f9a138213660bcc4f347e6357273797e14b628b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9v0zAYhi3ExMrgwh0UiQMIKcOf7djxEXVd2FQB0vghTpbjOMwldYqdjPW_x1u6InGY8MWynkfvJ_s1Qs8AH0Nab01jr46BMA4P0AwYF3nJCXuIZhhjmVNJ8CF6HOMqHQmX9BE6JLwADLycoe9nvnFXrhl1l524trXBemNj5nx2MejBxcGZhJZWB-_8j-xTsI0zQza_dF2T3Fcxm_frTbCX1kfX-6xvs4utH_T1E3TQ6i7ap7v9CH05XXyev8-XH6uz-btlbjjmkBtD2qI2oqaFpqStZdNwILWFVmqgJQHKOa6NYS1lwnJaCCKokMICqzkpa3qEXk-5m9D_Gm0c1NpFY7tOe9uPUYEQwAqeXuQ_VA4s5d-qL_9RV_0YfLqIAllyDIISfq-VstLzA4NkvZksE_oYg23VJri1DlsFWN00qG4aVLcNJvnFLnKs17bZq3eVJeH5JNjgzB4vzgGXkkiaOEz8t-vs9p5Ran6y-Ho3dJe5ikMf_s5kXJYFI4nnE0__wV7vuQ4_FU9tFOrbh0pVpxiqouKK0D-kj8US</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761009141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kidd, Evan ; Arciuli, Joanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Kidd, Evan ; Arciuli, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>Variability in children's language acquisition is likely due to a number of cognitive and social variables. The current study investigated whether individual differences in statistical learning (SL), which has been implicated in language acquisition, independently predicted 6- to 8-year-old's comprehension of syntax. Sixty-eight (N = 68) English-speaking children completed a test of comprehension of four syntactic structures, a test of SL utilizing nonlinguistic visual stimuli, and several additional control measures. The results revealed that SL independently predicted comprehension of two syntactic structures that show considerable variability in this age range: passives and object relative clauses. These data suggest that individual differences in children's capacity for SL are associated with the acquisition of the syntax of natural languages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-3920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12461</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26510168</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHDEAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquisition ; Child ; Child development ; Child language ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Comprehension ; Comprehension - physiology ; EMPIRICAL REPORTS ; English ; English language ; Female ; Form Classes (Languages) ; Humans ; Individual Differences ; Individuality ; Language ; Language Acquisition ; Language Processing ; Language Tests ; Learning ; Male ; Native language acquisition ; Natural language ; Phrase Structure ; Prediction ; Probability Learning ; Relative clauses ; Statistics ; Syntactic structures ; Syntax ; Variability ; Visual Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Child development, 2016-01, Vol.87 (1), p.184-193</ispartof><rights>2016 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. Child Development © 2015 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><rights>Child Development © 2016 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-cc2f5bc7b35a32fb9dd612be1f9a138213660bcc4f347e6357273797e14b628b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-cc2f5bc7b35a32fb9dd612be1f9a138213660bcc4f347e6357273797e14b628b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24698542$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24698542$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1089293$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510168$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kidd, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arciuli, Joanne</creatorcontrib><title>Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax</title><title>Child development</title><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><description>Variability in children's language acquisition is likely due to a number of cognitive and social variables. The current study investigated whether individual differences in statistical learning (SL), which has been implicated in language acquisition, independently predicted 6- to 8-year-old's comprehension of syntax. Sixty-eight (N = 68) English-speaking children completed a test of comprehension of four syntactic structures, a test of SL utilizing nonlinguistic visual stimuli, and several additional control measures. The results revealed that SL independently predicted comprehension of two syntactic structures that show considerable variability in this age range: passives and object relative clauses. These data suggest that individual differences in children's capacity for SL are associated with the acquisition of the syntax of natural languages.</description><subject>Acquisition</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child language</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>EMPIRICAL REPORTS</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Form Classes (Languages)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Natural language</subject><subject>Phrase Structure</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Probability Learning</subject><subject>Relative clauses</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Syntactic structures</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><issn>0009-3920</issn><issn>1467-8624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9v0zAYhi3ExMrgwh0UiQMIKcOf7djxEXVd2FQB0vghTpbjOMwldYqdjPW_x1u6InGY8MWynkfvJ_s1Qs8AH0Nab01jr46BMA4P0AwYF3nJCXuIZhhjmVNJ8CF6HOMqHQmX9BE6JLwADLycoe9nvnFXrhl1l524trXBemNj5nx2MejBxcGZhJZWB-_8j-xTsI0zQza_dF2T3Fcxm_frTbCX1kfX-6xvs4utH_T1E3TQ6i7ap7v9CH05XXyev8-XH6uz-btlbjjmkBtD2qI2oqaFpqStZdNwILWFVmqgJQHKOa6NYS1lwnJaCCKokMICqzkpa3qEXk-5m9D_Gm0c1NpFY7tOe9uPUYEQwAqeXuQ_VA4s5d-qL_9RV_0YfLqIAllyDIISfq-VstLzA4NkvZksE_oYg23VJri1DlsFWN00qG4aVLcNJvnFLnKs17bZq3eVJeH5JNjgzB4vzgGXkkiaOEz8t-vs9p5Ran6y-Ho3dJe5ikMf_s5kXJYFI4nnE0__wV7vuQ4_FU9tFOrbh0pVpxiqouKK0D-kj8US</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Kidd, Evan</creator><creator>Arciuli, Joanne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley for the Society for Research in Child Development</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax</title><author>Kidd, Evan ; Arciuli, Joanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-cc2f5bc7b35a32fb9dd612be1f9a138213660bcc4f347e6357273797e14b628b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acquisition</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child language</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>EMPIRICAL REPORTS</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Form Classes (Languages)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Natural language</topic><topic>Phrase Structure</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Probability Learning</topic><topic>Relative clauses</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Syntactic structures</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kidd, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arciuli, Joanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kidd, Evan</au><au>Arciuli, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1089293</ericid><atitle>Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax</atitle><jtitle>Child development</jtitle><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>184</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>184-193</pages><issn>0009-3920</issn><eissn>1467-8624</eissn><coden>CHDEAW</coden><abstract>Variability in children's language acquisition is likely due to a number of cognitive and social variables. The current study investigated whether individual differences in statistical learning (SL), which has been implicated in language acquisition, independently predicted 6- to 8-year-old's comprehension of syntax. Sixty-eight (N = 68) English-speaking children completed a test of comprehension of four syntactic structures, a test of SL utilizing nonlinguistic visual stimuli, and several additional control measures. The results revealed that SL independently predicted comprehension of two syntactic structures that show considerable variability in this age range: passives and object relative clauses. These data suggest that individual differences in children's capacity for SL are associated with the acquisition of the syntax of natural languages.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26510168</pmid><doi>10.1111/cdev.12461</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-3920
ispartof Child development, 2016-01, Vol.87 (1), p.184-193
issn 0009-3920
1467-8624
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771456624
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Acquisition
Child
Child development
Child language
Children
Children & youth
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Comprehension
Comprehension - physiology
EMPIRICAL REPORTS
English
English language
Female
Form Classes (Languages)
Humans
Individual Differences
Individuality
Language
Language Acquisition
Language Processing
Language Tests
Learning
Male
Native language acquisition
Natural language
Phrase Structure
Prediction
Probability Learning
Relative clauses
Statistics
Syntactic structures
Syntax
Variability
Visual Stimuli
title Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A01%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20Differences%20in%20Statistical%20Learning%20Predict%20Children's%20Comprehension%20of%20Syntax&rft.jtitle=Child%20development&rft.au=Kidd,%20Evan&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=184&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=184-193&rft.issn=0009-3920&rft.eissn=1467-8624&rft.coden=CHDEAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cdev.12461&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24698542%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761009141&rft_id=info:pmid/26510168&rft_ericid=EJ1089293&rft_jstor_id=24698542&rfr_iscdi=true