Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking
Why has fact‐checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact‐checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of communication 2016-02, Vol.66 (1), p.102-138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 138 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 102 |
container_title | Journal of communication |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Graves, Lucas Nyhan, Brendan Reifler, Jason |
description | Why has fact‐checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact‐checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact‐checking increased the prevalence of fact‐checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact‐checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jcom.12198 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771455935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3957376521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4278-6e67698198f6a64d1246c88ab59ccf77e7d1bdd3f976d9e46ed84726f676c1413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF9PwjAUxRujiYi--AmW-OLLsN2fdvWNEEAIEzUSfWtK22lh63AdCt_ejqkP9uXem57fSc4B4BLBHnLvZiXKoocCRJMj0EERhn4QYXwMOhAGyKcU4VNwZu0KujtEsAPMwkhV2Zobqc2bNzGm_OS1Lo31tPGm5bYyPNe21sJ7qLhwU916fW-kVS694W6jKl0oU7uVF9o0FmlZ61-LrKy8kaP8wbsSa_d7Dk4ynlt18TO7YDEaPg_u_Nl8PBn0Z76IApL4WGGCaeJiZJjjSCKXQiQJX8ZUiIwQRSRaShlmlGBJVYSVTCIS4MxhAkUo7ILr1ndTlR9bZWtWaCtUnnOjyq1liBAUxTENYye9-iddtakbFcYhhIRSp0Kt6kvnas82Ljav9gxB1vTOmt7ZoXc2HczTw-YYv2Vcf2r3x_BqzTAJScxe7scsfXqljzSFDIbfZYmHoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766300799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Graves, Lucas ; Nyhan, Brendan ; Reifler, Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Graves, Lucas ; Nyhan, Brendan ; Reifler, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Why has fact‐checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact‐checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact‐checking increased the prevalence of fact‐checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact‐checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2466</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12198</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMNAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Fact-Checking ; Field Experiment ; Journalistic ethics ; Journalistic Innovation ; Media coverage ; Politics</subject><ispartof>Journal of communication, 2016-02, Vol.66 (1), p.102-138</ispartof><rights>2016 International Communication Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4278-6e67698198f6a64d1246c88ab59ccf77e7d1bdd3f976d9e46ed84726f676c1413</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjcom.12198$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjcom.12198$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graves, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyhan, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reifler, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking</title><title>Journal of communication</title><addtitle>J Commun</addtitle><description>Why has fact‐checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact‐checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact‐checking increased the prevalence of fact‐checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact‐checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists.</description><subject>Fact-Checking</subject><subject>Field Experiment</subject><subject>Journalistic ethics</subject><subject>Journalistic Innovation</subject><subject>Media coverage</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>0021-9916</issn><issn>1460-2466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkF9PwjAUxRujiYi--AmW-OLLsN2fdvWNEEAIEzUSfWtK22lh63AdCt_ejqkP9uXem57fSc4B4BLBHnLvZiXKoocCRJMj0EERhn4QYXwMOhAGyKcU4VNwZu0KujtEsAPMwkhV2Zobqc2bNzGm_OS1Lo31tPGm5bYyPNe21sJ7qLhwU916fW-kVS694W6jKl0oU7uVF9o0FmlZ61-LrKy8kaP8wbsSa_d7Dk4ynlt18TO7YDEaPg_u_Nl8PBn0Z76IApL4WGGCaeJiZJjjSCKXQiQJX8ZUiIwQRSRaShlmlGBJVYSVTCIS4MxhAkUo7ILr1ndTlR9bZWtWaCtUnnOjyq1liBAUxTENYye9-iddtakbFcYhhIRSp0Kt6kvnas82Ljav9gxB1vTOmt7ZoXc2HczTw-YYv2Vcf2r3x_BqzTAJScxe7scsfXqljzSFDIbfZYmHoQ</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Graves, Lucas</creator><creator>Nyhan, Brendan</creator><creator>Reifler, Jason</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking</title><author>Graves, Lucas ; Nyhan, Brendan ; Reifler, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4278-6e67698198f6a64d1246c88ab59ccf77e7d1bdd3f976d9e46ed84726f676c1413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Fact-Checking</topic><topic>Field Experiment</topic><topic>Journalistic ethics</topic><topic>Journalistic Innovation</topic><topic>Media coverage</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graves, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyhan, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reifler, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graves, Lucas</au><au>Nyhan, Brendan</au><au>Reifler, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communication</jtitle><addtitle>J Commun</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>102-138</pages><issn>0021-9916</issn><eissn>1460-2466</eissn><coden>JCMNAA</coden><abstract>Why has fact‐checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact‐checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact‐checking increased the prevalence of fact‐checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact‐checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jcom.12198</doi><tpages>37</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9916 |
ispartof | Journal of communication, 2016-02, Vol.66 (1), p.102-138 |
issn | 0021-9916 1460-2466 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771455935 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Fact-Checking Field Experiment Journalistic ethics Journalistic Innovation Media coverage Politics |
title | Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T00%3A15%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Innovations%20in%20Journalistic%20Practice:%20A%20Field%20Experiment%20Examining%20Motivations%20for%20Fact-Checking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communication&rft.au=Graves,%20Lucas&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=102-138&rft.issn=0021-9916&rft.eissn=1460-2466&rft.coden=JCMNAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jcom.12198&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3957376521%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766300799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |