Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking

Why has fact‐checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact‐checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of communication 2016-02, Vol.66 (1), p.102-138
Hauptverfasser: Graves, Lucas, Nyhan, Brendan, Reifler, Jason
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 1
container_start_page 102
container_title Journal of communication
container_volume 66
creator Graves, Lucas
Nyhan, Brendan
Reifler, Jason
description Why has fact‐checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact‐checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact‐checking increased the prevalence of fact‐checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact‐checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jcom.12198
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771455935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3957376521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4278-6e67698198f6a64d1246c88ab59ccf77e7d1bdd3f976d9e46ed84726f676c1413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF9PwjAUxRujiYi--AmW-OLLsN2fdvWNEEAIEzUSfWtK22lh63AdCt_ejqkP9uXem57fSc4B4BLBHnLvZiXKoocCRJMj0EERhn4QYXwMOhAGyKcU4VNwZu0KujtEsAPMwkhV2Zobqc2bNzGm_OS1Lo31tPGm5bYyPNe21sJ7qLhwU916fW-kVS694W6jKl0oU7uVF9o0FmlZ61-LrKy8kaP8wbsSa_d7Dk4ynlt18TO7YDEaPg_u_Nl8PBn0Z76IApL4WGGCaeJiZJjjSCKXQiQJX8ZUiIwQRSRaShlmlGBJVYSVTCIS4MxhAkUo7ILr1ndTlR9bZWtWaCtUnnOjyq1liBAUxTENYye9-iddtakbFcYhhIRSp0Kt6kvnas82Ljav9gxB1vTOmt7ZoXc2HczTw-YYv2Vcf2r3x_BqzTAJScxe7scsfXqljzSFDIbfZYmHoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766300799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Graves, Lucas ; Nyhan, Brendan ; Reifler, Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Graves, Lucas ; Nyhan, Brendan ; Reifler, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Why has fact‐checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact‐checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact‐checking increased the prevalence of fact‐checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact‐checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2466</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12198</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMNAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Fact-Checking ; Field Experiment ; Journalistic ethics ; Journalistic Innovation ; Media coverage ; Politics</subject><ispartof>Journal of communication, 2016-02, Vol.66 (1), p.102-138</ispartof><rights>2016 International Communication Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4278-6e67698198f6a64d1246c88ab59ccf77e7d1bdd3f976d9e46ed84726f676c1413</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjcom.12198$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjcom.12198$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graves, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyhan, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reifler, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking</title><title>Journal of communication</title><addtitle>J Commun</addtitle><description>Why has fact‐checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact‐checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact‐checking increased the prevalence of fact‐checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact‐checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists.</description><subject>Fact-Checking</subject><subject>Field Experiment</subject><subject>Journalistic ethics</subject><subject>Journalistic Innovation</subject><subject>Media coverage</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>0021-9916</issn><issn>1460-2466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkF9PwjAUxRujiYi--AmW-OLLsN2fdvWNEEAIEzUSfWtK22lh63AdCt_ejqkP9uXem57fSc4B4BLBHnLvZiXKoocCRJMj0EERhn4QYXwMOhAGyKcU4VNwZu0KujtEsAPMwkhV2Zobqc2bNzGm_OS1Lo31tPGm5bYyPNe21sJ7qLhwU916fW-kVS694W6jKl0oU7uVF9o0FmlZ61-LrKy8kaP8wbsSa_d7Dk4ynlt18TO7YDEaPg_u_Nl8PBn0Z76IApL4WGGCaeJiZJjjSCKXQiQJX8ZUiIwQRSRaShlmlGBJVYSVTCIS4MxhAkUo7ILr1ndTlR9bZWtWaCtUnnOjyq1liBAUxTENYye9-iddtakbFcYhhIRSp0Kt6kvnas82Ljav9gxB1vTOmt7ZoXc2HczTw-YYv2Vcf2r3x_BqzTAJScxe7scsfXqljzSFDIbfZYmHoQ</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Graves, Lucas</creator><creator>Nyhan, Brendan</creator><creator>Reifler, Jason</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking</title><author>Graves, Lucas ; Nyhan, Brendan ; Reifler, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4278-6e67698198f6a64d1246c88ab59ccf77e7d1bdd3f976d9e46ed84726f676c1413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Fact-Checking</topic><topic>Field Experiment</topic><topic>Journalistic ethics</topic><topic>Journalistic Innovation</topic><topic>Media coverage</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graves, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyhan, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reifler, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graves, Lucas</au><au>Nyhan, Brendan</au><au>Reifler, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communication</jtitle><addtitle>J Commun</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>102-138</pages><issn>0021-9916</issn><eissn>1460-2466</eissn><coden>JCMNAA</coden><abstract>Why has fact‐checking spread so quickly within U.S. political journalism? In the first field experiment conducted among reporters, we varied journalist exposure to messages that highlight either audience demand for fact‐checking or the prestige it enjoys within the profession. Our results indicate that messages promoting the high status and journalistic values of fact‐checking increased the prevalence of fact‐checking coverage, while messages about audience demand were somewhat less successful. These findings suggest that political fact‐checking is driven primarily by professional motives within journalism, a finding that helps us understand the process by which the practice spreads within the press as well as the factors that influence the behavior of journalists.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jcom.12198</doi><tpages>37</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9916
ispartof Journal of communication, 2016-02, Vol.66 (1), p.102-138
issn 0021-9916
1460-2466
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771455935
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Fact-Checking
Field Experiment
Journalistic ethics
Journalistic Innovation
Media coverage
Politics
title Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-Checking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T00%3A15%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Innovations%20in%20Journalistic%20Practice:%20A%20Field%20Experiment%20Examining%20Motivations%20for%20Fact-Checking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communication&rft.au=Graves,%20Lucas&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=102-138&rft.issn=0021-9916&rft.eissn=1460-2466&rft.coden=JCMNAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jcom.12198&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3957376521%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766300799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true