Calorie delivery and clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To determine the effect of calorie delivery on hospital mortality among critically ill adults receiving enteral nutrition (EN). Secondary outcomes included the effect of calorie delivery on intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and incidence o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care and resuscitation 2016-03, Vol.18 (1), p.17-e19
Hauptverfasser: Parikh, Harshel G, Miller, Asaf, Chapman, Marianne, Moran, John L, Peake, Sandra L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e19
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title Critical care and resuscitation
container_volume 18
creator Parikh, Harshel G
Miller, Asaf
Chapman, Marianne
Moran, John L
Peake, Sandra L
description To determine the effect of calorie delivery on hospital mortality among critically ill adults receiving enteral nutrition (EN). Secondary outcomes included the effect of calorie delivery on intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and incidence of new-onset pneumonia. We identified randomised clinical trials of EN, with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN), involving adult ICU patients for whom mortality data were available, and when there was a significant difference in calorie supplementation between intervention arms (P < 0.05). We searched English language electronic databases (1946-2014), bibliographies of nutrition society guidelines and high-impact nutrition and critical care journals. We calculated summary odds ratio (OR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals using a random effects estimator, and used meta-regression to assess the effect on mortality of average calories delivered. Of 1545 articles identified, 16 eligible studies involving 3473 patients were included. Five studies involved supplemental PN. Mean calorie delivery ranged from 126 kcal/day (SD, 115 kcal/day) to 2086 kcal/day (SD, 460 kcal/day). Mortality was 26.0% in the lower calorie delivery group and 26.5% in the higher calorie delivery group. There was no effect of increased calorie delivery on mortality (OR, 1.02; 95% CI , 0.85-1.24; P = 0.27; I2 = 16.3%). ICU and hospital LOS and incidence of newonset pneumonia did not differ between groups. Duration of MV was decreased with lower calorie delivery (weighted mean difference, 2.92 days; 95% CI, -4.49 to -1.35 days; P < 0.001; I2 = 14.7%). Meta-regression analysis did not show an overall effect on mortality of average calories delivered (P = 0.73; I2 = 40.8%). Delivery of increased calories via the enteral route, with or without supplemental PN, was not associated with a survival benefit.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1441-2772(23)00927-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771452816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1771452816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1fd4f58f4e33d6d78f246d78dd31210bfdab70293c20780dcedba6dd05ed471f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4CSAfyyHgV-KWG6p4SZU4AGfLsdfCyEmKnRTl35O0paeRZndmtR9CV5TcUkKLu3cqBM2YlGzO-A0hSyYzcYKmR3uCzlP6JoQtRSHP0IQVSyEFZVNkVjo00QO2EPwWYo91bbEJvvZGB9x0rWkqSNjXuP0CbKJvx0HosQ_hHmuc-tRCpQcXR9h6-N0VVNDqTNc69MmnC3TqdEhwedAZ-nx6_Fi9ZOu359fVwzozPC_ajDorXL5wAji3hZULx8Qo1nLKKCmd1aUcXuCGEbkg1oAtdWEtycEKSR2fofm-dxObnw5SqyqfDISga2i6pKiUVORsQYthNd-vmtikFMGpTfSVjr2iRI1M1Y6pGuEpxtWOqRJD7vpwoisrsMfUP1D-B4MjdcU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771452816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calorie delivery and clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Parikh, Harshel G ; Miller, Asaf ; Chapman, Marianne ; Moran, John L ; Peake, Sandra L</creator><creatorcontrib>Parikh, Harshel G ; Miller, Asaf ; Chapman, Marianne ; Moran, John L ; Peake, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the effect of calorie delivery on hospital mortality among critically ill adults receiving enteral nutrition (EN). Secondary outcomes included the effect of calorie delivery on intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and incidence of new-onset pneumonia. We identified randomised clinical trials of EN, with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN), involving adult ICU patients for whom mortality data were available, and when there was a significant difference in calorie supplementation between intervention arms (P &lt; 0.05). We searched English language electronic databases (1946-2014), bibliographies of nutrition society guidelines and high-impact nutrition and critical care journals. We calculated summary odds ratio (OR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals using a random effects estimator, and used meta-regression to assess the effect on mortality of average calories delivered. Of 1545 articles identified, 16 eligible studies involving 3473 patients were included. Five studies involved supplemental PN. Mean calorie delivery ranged from 126 kcal/day (SD, 115 kcal/day) to 2086 kcal/day (SD, 460 kcal/day). Mortality was 26.0% in the lower calorie delivery group and 26.5% in the higher calorie delivery group. There was no effect of increased calorie delivery on mortality (OR, 1.02; 95% CI , 0.85-1.24; P = 0.27; I2 = 16.3%). ICU and hospital LOS and incidence of newonset pneumonia did not differ between groups. Duration of MV was decreased with lower calorie delivery (weighted mean difference, 2.92 days; 95% CI, -4.49 to -1.35 days; P &lt; 0.001; I2 = 14.7%). Meta-regression analysis did not show an overall effect on mortality of average calories delivered (P = 0.73; I2 = 40.8%). Delivery of increased calories via the enteral route, with or without supplemental PN, was not associated with a survival benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1441-2772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1441-2772(23)00927-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26947412</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>Critical Care ; Energy Intake ; Humans ; Nutritional Support ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><ispartof>Critical care and resuscitation, 2016-03, Vol.18 (1), p.17-e19</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1fd4f58f4e33d6d78f246d78dd31210bfdab70293c20780dcedba6dd05ed471f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1fd4f58f4e33d6d78f246d78dd31210bfdab70293c20780dcedba6dd05ed471f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26947412$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parikh, Harshel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Asaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, John L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peake, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><title>Calorie delivery and clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Critical care and resuscitation</title><addtitle>Crit Care Resusc</addtitle><description>To determine the effect of calorie delivery on hospital mortality among critically ill adults receiving enteral nutrition (EN). Secondary outcomes included the effect of calorie delivery on intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and incidence of new-onset pneumonia. We identified randomised clinical trials of EN, with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN), involving adult ICU patients for whom mortality data were available, and when there was a significant difference in calorie supplementation between intervention arms (P &lt; 0.05). We searched English language electronic databases (1946-2014), bibliographies of nutrition society guidelines and high-impact nutrition and critical care journals. We calculated summary odds ratio (OR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals using a random effects estimator, and used meta-regression to assess the effect on mortality of average calories delivered. Of 1545 articles identified, 16 eligible studies involving 3473 patients were included. Five studies involved supplemental PN. Mean calorie delivery ranged from 126 kcal/day (SD, 115 kcal/day) to 2086 kcal/day (SD, 460 kcal/day). Mortality was 26.0% in the lower calorie delivery group and 26.5% in the higher calorie delivery group. There was no effect of increased calorie delivery on mortality (OR, 1.02; 95% CI , 0.85-1.24; P = 0.27; I2 = 16.3%). ICU and hospital LOS and incidence of newonset pneumonia did not differ between groups. Duration of MV was decreased with lower calorie delivery (weighted mean difference, 2.92 days; 95% CI, -4.49 to -1.35 days; P &lt; 0.001; I2 = 14.7%). Meta-regression analysis did not show an overall effect on mortality of average calories delivered (P = 0.73; I2 = 40.8%). Delivery of increased calories via the enteral route, with or without supplemental PN, was not associated with a survival benefit.</description><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nutritional Support</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><issn>1441-2772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4CSAfyyHgV-KWG6p4SZU4AGfLsdfCyEmKnRTl35O0paeRZndmtR9CV5TcUkKLu3cqBM2YlGzO-A0hSyYzcYKmR3uCzlP6JoQtRSHP0IQVSyEFZVNkVjo00QO2EPwWYo91bbEJvvZGB9x0rWkqSNjXuP0CbKJvx0HosQ_hHmuc-tRCpQcXR9h6-N0VVNDqTNc69MmnC3TqdEhwedAZ-nx6_Fi9ZOu359fVwzozPC_ajDorXL5wAji3hZULx8Qo1nLKKCmd1aUcXuCGEbkg1oAtdWEtycEKSR2fofm-dxObnw5SqyqfDISga2i6pKiUVORsQYthNd-vmtikFMGpTfSVjr2iRI1M1Y6pGuEpxtWOqRJD7vpwoisrsMfUP1D-B4MjdcU</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Parikh, Harshel G</creator><creator>Miller, Asaf</creator><creator>Chapman, Marianne</creator><creator>Moran, John L</creator><creator>Peake, Sandra L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Calorie delivery and clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Parikh, Harshel G ; Miller, Asaf ; Chapman, Marianne ; Moran, John L ; Peake, Sandra L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1fd4f58f4e33d6d78f246d78dd31210bfdab70293c20780dcedba6dd05ed471f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nutritional Support</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parikh, Harshel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Asaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, John L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peake, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Critical care and resuscitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parikh, Harshel G</au><au>Miller, Asaf</au><au>Chapman, Marianne</au><au>Moran, John L</au><au>Peake, Sandra L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calorie delivery and clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Critical care and resuscitation</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Resusc</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>e19</epage><pages>17-e19</pages><issn>1441-2772</issn><abstract>To determine the effect of calorie delivery on hospital mortality among critically ill adults receiving enteral nutrition (EN). Secondary outcomes included the effect of calorie delivery on intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and incidence of new-onset pneumonia. We identified randomised clinical trials of EN, with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN), involving adult ICU patients for whom mortality data were available, and when there was a significant difference in calorie supplementation between intervention arms (P &lt; 0.05). We searched English language electronic databases (1946-2014), bibliographies of nutrition society guidelines and high-impact nutrition and critical care journals. We calculated summary odds ratio (OR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals using a random effects estimator, and used meta-regression to assess the effect on mortality of average calories delivered. Of 1545 articles identified, 16 eligible studies involving 3473 patients were included. Five studies involved supplemental PN. Mean calorie delivery ranged from 126 kcal/day (SD, 115 kcal/day) to 2086 kcal/day (SD, 460 kcal/day). Mortality was 26.0% in the lower calorie delivery group and 26.5% in the higher calorie delivery group. There was no effect of increased calorie delivery on mortality (OR, 1.02; 95% CI , 0.85-1.24; P = 0.27; I2 = 16.3%). ICU and hospital LOS and incidence of newonset pneumonia did not differ between groups. Duration of MV was decreased with lower calorie delivery (weighted mean difference, 2.92 days; 95% CI, -4.49 to -1.35 days; P &lt; 0.001; I2 = 14.7%). Meta-regression analysis did not show an overall effect on mortality of average calories delivered (P = 0.73; I2 = 40.8%). Delivery of increased calories via the enteral route, with or without supplemental PN, was not associated with a survival benefit.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>26947412</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1441-2772(23)00927-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1441-2772
ispartof Critical care and resuscitation, 2016-03, Vol.18 (1), p.17-e19
issn 1441-2772
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771452816
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Critical Care
Energy Intake
Humans
Nutritional Support
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
title Calorie delivery and clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A35%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calorie%20delivery%20and%20clinical%20outcomes%20in%20the%20critically%20ill:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20and%20resuscitation&rft.au=Parikh,%20Harshel%20G&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=e19&rft.pages=17-e19&rft.issn=1441-2772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1441-2772(23)00927-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1771452816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771452816&rft_id=info:pmid/26947412&rfr_iscdi=true