Evaluation of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, the Mean Deviation, and the Visual Field Index in Progressive Glaucoma

PURPOSE:To determine and compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, the mean deviation, and the visual field index (VFI) in glaucoma cases with progression detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and optic disc stereophotographs. MET...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of glaucoma 2016-03, Vol.25 (3), p.e229-e235
Hauptverfasser: Banegas, Sebastián A, Antón, Alfonso, Morilla, Antonio, Bogado, Marco, Ayala, Eleonora M, Fernandez-Guardiola, Agustín, Moreno-Montañes, Javier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e235
container_issue 3
container_start_page e229
container_title Journal of glaucoma
container_volume 25
creator Banegas, Sebastián A
Antón, Alfonso
Morilla, Antonio
Bogado, Marco
Ayala, Eleonora M
Fernandez-Guardiola, Agustín
Moreno-Montañes, Javier
description PURPOSE:To determine and compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, the mean deviation, and the visual field index (VFI) in glaucoma cases with progression detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and optic disc stereophotographs. METHODS:The authors studied 246 eyes of 148 patients prospectively (97 glaucoma cases, 132 suspects, and 17 healthy eyes). SAP fields, optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, and optic disc stereophotographs were obtained every 6 to 12 months. Progression was determined in SAP and in OCT with a Glaucoma Progression Analysis software, and also by masked assessment of the stereophotograph series. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to evaluate differences between methods in RNFL thickness, visual field (VF) mean deviation, and VFI. The relationship between the baseline classification and the detection of glaucomatous progression by the different tests was assessed by the χ statistic. RESULTS:Ninety-nine eyes (40.2%) presented glaucomatous progression detected by at least 1 examination method. Progressing eyes detected only by OCT had a higher mean RNFL thickness and mean VFI than progressing eyes detected only by VF or stereophotographs (P
doi_str_mv 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000280
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771229978</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1771229978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4020-45336d945493961fe70c0a61c01db8cacfdb0b4d5c541d2955437612d4b0169b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPAyEYRYnR-Kj-A2NYunAqMMyDpVFba-ojRo27CQPfWJTOKMxUXfjfxVaNcSEL-ELOuZCL0DYlfUpEtj86HfbJ78VysoTWaRKnEc_p3XKYSZJFJGdiDW14_xAQwhhdRWssDWOai3X0fjyTtpOtaWrcVLidAL6C1tTS4nNwM8ADU4LDY_kW9uuJUY81eL83B89A1vgIZmau72FZ6_n9rfFd8AcGrMajWsMrNjW-dM29C64JoUMrO9VM5SZaqaT1sPV19tDN4Pj68CQaXwxHhwfjSPHw0YgncZxqwRMuYpHSCjKiiEypIlSXuZKq0iUpuU5UwqlmIkl4nKWUaV4Smooy7qHdRe6Ta5478G0xNV6BtbKGpvMFzTLKmBBZHlC-QJVrvHdQFU_OTKV7KygpPosvQvHF3-KDtvP1QldOQf9I300HIF8AL41twflH272AKyYgbTv5P_sDgoOOTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771229978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, the Mean Deviation, and the Visual Field Index in Progressive Glaucoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Banegas, Sebastián A ; Antón, Alfonso ; Morilla, Antonio ; Bogado, Marco ; Ayala, Eleonora M ; Fernandez-Guardiola, Agustín ; Moreno-Montañes, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Banegas, Sebastián A ; Antón, Alfonso ; Morilla, Antonio ; Bogado, Marco ; Ayala, Eleonora M ; Fernandez-Guardiola, Agustín ; Moreno-Montañes, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE:To determine and compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, the mean deviation, and the visual field index (VFI) in glaucoma cases with progression detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and optic disc stereophotographs. METHODS:The authors studied 246 eyes of 148 patients prospectively (97 glaucoma cases, 132 suspects, and 17 healthy eyes). SAP fields, optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, and optic disc stereophotographs were obtained every 6 to 12 months. Progression was determined in SAP and in OCT with a Glaucoma Progression Analysis software, and also by masked assessment of the stereophotograph series. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to evaluate differences between methods in RNFL thickness, visual field (VF) mean deviation, and VFI. The relationship between the baseline classification and the detection of glaucomatous progression by the different tests was assessed by the χ statistic. RESULTS:Ninety-nine eyes (40.2%) presented glaucomatous progression detected by at least 1 examination method. Progressing eyes detected only by OCT had a higher mean RNFL thickness and mean VFI than progressing eyes detected only by VF or stereophotographs (P&lt;0.003). Most progressive cases detected by OCT (68%) were initially classified at baseline as suspects, whereas most eyes with VF progression (61%) were initially classified as glaucoma. The initial classification was significantly related to the presence of progression by different tests [χ (2)=9.643 for VF event analysis and 7.290 for OCT event analysis (P&lt;0.005)]. CONCLUSIONS:Different tests are more likely to detect the progression in different clinical circumstances or stages of glaucoma; these should be taken into consideration when performing the difficult task of progression detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-0829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-481X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000280</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26020689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Fibers - pathology ; Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis ; Optic Disk - pathology ; Photography ; Prospective Studies ; Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology ; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods ; Visual Field Tests ; Visual Fields - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of glaucoma, 2016-03, Vol.25 (3), p.e229-e235</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4020-45336d945493961fe70c0a61c01db8cacfdb0b4d5c541d2955437612d4b0169b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4020-45336d945493961fe70c0a61c01db8cacfdb0b4d5c541d2955437612d4b0169b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26020689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Banegas, Sebastián A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antón, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morilla, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogado, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayala, Eleonora M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Guardiola, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Montañes, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, the Mean Deviation, and the Visual Field Index in Progressive Glaucoma</title><title>Journal of glaucoma</title><addtitle>J Glaucoma</addtitle><description>PURPOSE:To determine and compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, the mean deviation, and the visual field index (VFI) in glaucoma cases with progression detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and optic disc stereophotographs. METHODS:The authors studied 246 eyes of 148 patients prospectively (97 glaucoma cases, 132 suspects, and 17 healthy eyes). SAP fields, optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, and optic disc stereophotographs were obtained every 6 to 12 months. Progression was determined in SAP and in OCT with a Glaucoma Progression Analysis software, and also by masked assessment of the stereophotograph series. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to evaluate differences between methods in RNFL thickness, visual field (VF) mean deviation, and VFI. The relationship between the baseline classification and the detection of glaucomatous progression by the different tests was assessed by the χ statistic. RESULTS:Ninety-nine eyes (40.2%) presented glaucomatous progression detected by at least 1 examination method. Progressing eyes detected only by OCT had a higher mean RNFL thickness and mean VFI than progressing eyes detected only by VF or stereophotographs (P&lt;0.003). Most progressive cases detected by OCT (68%) were initially classified at baseline as suspects, whereas most eyes with VF progression (61%) were initially classified as glaucoma. The initial classification was significantly related to the presence of progression by different tests [χ (2)=9.643 for VF event analysis and 7.290 for OCT event analysis (P&lt;0.005)]. CONCLUSIONS:Different tests are more likely to detect the progression in different clinical circumstances or stages of glaucoma; these should be taken into consideration when performing the difficult task of progression detection.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nerve Fibers - pathology</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Optic Disk - pathology</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</subject><subject>Visual Field Tests</subject><subject>Visual Fields - physiology</subject><issn>1057-0829</issn><issn>1536-481X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPAyEYRYnR-Kj-A2NYunAqMMyDpVFba-ojRo27CQPfWJTOKMxUXfjfxVaNcSEL-ELOuZCL0DYlfUpEtj86HfbJ78VysoTWaRKnEc_p3XKYSZJFJGdiDW14_xAQwhhdRWssDWOai3X0fjyTtpOtaWrcVLidAL6C1tTS4nNwM8ADU4LDY_kW9uuJUY81eL83B89A1vgIZmau72FZ6_n9rfFd8AcGrMajWsMrNjW-dM29C64JoUMrO9VM5SZaqaT1sPV19tDN4Pj68CQaXwxHhwfjSPHw0YgncZxqwRMuYpHSCjKiiEypIlSXuZKq0iUpuU5UwqlmIkl4nKWUaV4Smooy7qHdRe6Ta5478G0xNV6BtbKGpvMFzTLKmBBZHlC-QJVrvHdQFU_OTKV7KygpPosvQvHF3-KDtvP1QldOQf9I300HIF8AL41twflH272AKyYgbTv5P_sDgoOOTg</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Banegas, Sebastián A</creator><creator>Antón, Alfonso</creator><creator>Morilla, Antonio</creator><creator>Bogado, Marco</creator><creator>Ayala, Eleonora M</creator><creator>Fernandez-Guardiola, Agustín</creator><creator>Moreno-Montañes, Javier</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, the Mean Deviation, and the Visual Field Index in Progressive Glaucoma</title><author>Banegas, Sebastián A ; Antón, Alfonso ; Morilla, Antonio ; Bogado, Marco ; Ayala, Eleonora M ; Fernandez-Guardiola, Agustín ; Moreno-Montañes, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4020-45336d945493961fe70c0a61c01db8cacfdb0b4d5c541d2955437612d4b0169b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nerve Fibers - pathology</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Optic Disk - pathology</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</topic><topic>Visual Field Tests</topic><topic>Visual Fields - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Banegas, Sebastián A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antón, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morilla, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogado, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayala, Eleonora M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Guardiola, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Montañes, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of glaucoma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Banegas, Sebastián A</au><au>Antón, Alfonso</au><au>Morilla, Antonio</au><au>Bogado, Marco</au><au>Ayala, Eleonora M</au><au>Fernandez-Guardiola, Agustín</au><au>Moreno-Montañes, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, the Mean Deviation, and the Visual Field Index in Progressive Glaucoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of glaucoma</jtitle><addtitle>J Glaucoma</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e229</spage><epage>e235</epage><pages>e229-e235</pages><issn>1057-0829</issn><eissn>1536-481X</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE:To determine and compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, the mean deviation, and the visual field index (VFI) in glaucoma cases with progression detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and optic disc stereophotographs. METHODS:The authors studied 246 eyes of 148 patients prospectively (97 glaucoma cases, 132 suspects, and 17 healthy eyes). SAP fields, optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, and optic disc stereophotographs were obtained every 6 to 12 months. Progression was determined in SAP and in OCT with a Glaucoma Progression Analysis software, and also by masked assessment of the stereophotograph series. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to evaluate differences between methods in RNFL thickness, visual field (VF) mean deviation, and VFI. The relationship between the baseline classification and the detection of glaucomatous progression by the different tests was assessed by the χ statistic. RESULTS:Ninety-nine eyes (40.2%) presented glaucomatous progression detected by at least 1 examination method. Progressing eyes detected only by OCT had a higher mean RNFL thickness and mean VFI than progressing eyes detected only by VF or stereophotographs (P&lt;0.003). Most progressive cases detected by OCT (68%) were initially classified at baseline as suspects, whereas most eyes with VF progression (61%) were initially classified as glaucoma. The initial classification was significantly related to the presence of progression by different tests [χ (2)=9.643 for VF event analysis and 7.290 for OCT event analysis (P&lt;0.005)]. CONCLUSIONS:Different tests are more likely to detect the progression in different clinical circumstances or stages of glaucoma; these should be taken into consideration when performing the difficult task of progression detection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>26020689</pmid><doi>10.1097/IJG.0000000000000280</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-0829
ispartof Journal of glaucoma, 2016-03, Vol.25 (3), p.e229-e235
issn 1057-0829
1536-481X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771229978
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Cohort Studies
Disease Progression
Female
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Male
Middle Aged
Nerve Fibers - pathology
Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis
Optic Disk - pathology
Photography
Prospective Studies
Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology
Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods
Visual Field Tests
Visual Fields - physiology
title Evaluation of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, the Mean Deviation, and the Visual Field Index in Progressive Glaucoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A33%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Retinal%20Nerve%20Fiber%20Layer%20Thickness,%20the%20Mean%20Deviation,%20and%20the%20Visual%20Field%20Index%20in%20Progressive%20Glaucoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20glaucoma&rft.au=Banegas,%20Sebasti%C3%A1n%20A&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e229&rft.epage=e235&rft.pages=e229-e235&rft.issn=1057-0829&rft.eissn=1536-481X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1771229978%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771229978&rft_id=info:pmid/26020689&rfr_iscdi=true