How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence

Spatial coexistence depends on a variety of biological and physical processes, and the relative scales of these processes may promote or suppress coexistence. We model plant competition in a spatially varying environment to show how shifting scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental hetero...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American naturalist 2004-11, Vol.164 (5), p.633-650
Hauptverfasser: Snyder, Robin E., Chesson, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 650
container_issue 5
container_start_page 633
container_title The American naturalist
container_volume 164
creator Snyder, Robin E.
Chesson, Peter
description Spatial coexistence depends on a variety of biological and physical processes, and the relative scales of these processes may promote or suppress coexistence. We model plant competition in a spatially varying environment to show how shifting scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity affect coexistence. Spatial coexistence mechanisms are partitioned into three types: the storage effect, nonlinear competitive variance, and growth‐density covariance. We first describe how the strength of each of these mechanisms depends on covariances between population densities and between population densities and the environment, and we then explain how changes in the scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity should affect these covariances. Our quantitative approach allows us to show how changes in the scales of biological and physical processes can shift the relative importance of different classes of spatial coexistence mechanisms and gives us a more complete understanding of how environmental heterogeneity can enable coexistence. For example, we show how environmental heterogeneity can promote coexistence even when competing species have identical responses to the environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/424969
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17712036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/424969</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/424969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-71198313b9bfa72fe930e40b3c219829c84f56f22a3d0a9dc583504633f305da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotsCT4CQhSpODdgZJ46P1VLYSpU4FM6R1xm3XiV2sJ1C3x6jXXUlLpw8I3_-xqOfkDecfeSsaz-JWqhWPSMr3oCsGqjhOVkxxqBiXMgTcprSrrRKqOYlOeFNI1ghV2TehF803yO9nXV2eqS3Ro-YaLD0s0szxqTHC7oO04zZZRf8BdV-oFf-wcXgJ_S5vNlgxhju0KPLj_Tal06bTHOgl9ZiqdYBf7uU0Rt8RV5YPSZ8fTjPyI8vV9_Xm-rm29fr9eVNZaCDXEnOVQcctmprtawtKmAo2BZMXS5qZTphm9bWtYaBaTWYpoOGiRbAAmsGDWfkw947x_BzwZT7ySWD46g9hiX1rWStBAX_BbmUvGbQFvD9P-AuLNGXJfrypbYD1nVHm4khpYi2n6ObdHzsOev_JtXvkyrgu4Nt2U44HLFDNAU43wOLuXdG34U5YkrHmU-et3tsl3KITxoQErgU8Ac8YqIy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198683088</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Snyder, Robin E. ; Chesson, Peter</creator><contributor>Benjamin Bolker ; Associate Editors: Peter J. Morin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Robin E. ; Chesson, Peter ; Benjamin Bolker ; Associate Editors: Peter J. Morin</creatorcontrib><description>Spatial coexistence depends on a variety of biological and physical processes, and the relative scales of these processes may promote or suppress coexistence. We model plant competition in a spatially varying environment to show how shifting scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity affect coexistence. Spatial coexistence mechanisms are partitioned into three types: the storage effect, nonlinear competitive variance, and growth‐density covariance. We first describe how the strength of each of these mechanisms depends on covariances between population densities and between population densities and the environment, and we then explain how changes in the scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity should affect these covariances. Our quantitative approach allows us to show how changes in the scales of biological and physical processes can shift the relative importance of different classes of spatial coexistence mechanisms and gives us a more complete understanding of how environmental heterogeneity can enable coexistence. For example, we show how environmental heterogeneity can promote coexistence even when competing species have identical responses to the environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/424969</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15540153</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; Biodiversity ; Biological competition ; Competition ; Covariance ; Dispersal ; Ecological competition ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Environmental conditions ; Fourier Analysis ; Lotteries ; Mechanics ; Models, Biological ; Nonlinearity ; Plant Development ; Plant Physiological Phenomena ; Population density ; Population distributions ; Population Dynamics ; Population growth rate ; Spatial models</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2004-11, Vol.164 (5), p.633-650</ispartof><rights>2004 by The University of Chicago.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Nov 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-71198313b9bfa72fe930e40b3c219829c84f56f22a3d0a9dc583504633f305da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-71198313b9bfa72fe930e40b3c219829c84f56f22a3d0a9dc583504633f305da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15540153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Benjamin Bolker</contributor><contributor>Associate Editors: Peter J. Morin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Robin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesson, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>Spatial coexistence depends on a variety of biological and physical processes, and the relative scales of these processes may promote or suppress coexistence. We model plant competition in a spatially varying environment to show how shifting scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity affect coexistence. Spatial coexistence mechanisms are partitioned into three types: the storage effect, nonlinear competitive variance, and growth‐density covariance. We first describe how the strength of each of these mechanisms depends on covariances between population densities and between population densities and the environment, and we then explain how changes in the scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity should affect these covariances. Our quantitative approach allows us to show how changes in the scales of biological and physical processes can shift the relative importance of different classes of spatial coexistence mechanisms and gives us a more complete understanding of how environmental heterogeneity can enable coexistence. For example, we show how environmental heterogeneity can promote coexistence even when competing species have identical responses to the environment.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological competition</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Covariance</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Lotteries</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>Plant Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population distributions</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Population growth rate</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotsCT4CQhSpODdgZJ46P1VLYSpU4FM6R1xm3XiV2sJ1C3x6jXXUlLpw8I3_-xqOfkDecfeSsaz-JWqhWPSMr3oCsGqjhOVkxxqBiXMgTcprSrrRKqOYlOeFNI1ghV2TehF803yO9nXV2eqS3Ro-YaLD0s0szxqTHC7oO04zZZRf8BdV-oFf-wcXgJ_S5vNlgxhju0KPLj_Tal06bTHOgl9ZiqdYBf7uU0Rt8RV5YPSZ8fTjPyI8vV9_Xm-rm29fr9eVNZaCDXEnOVQcctmprtawtKmAo2BZMXS5qZTphm9bWtYaBaTWYpoOGiRbAAmsGDWfkw947x_BzwZT7ySWD46g9hiX1rWStBAX_BbmUvGbQFvD9P-AuLNGXJfrypbYD1nVHm4khpYi2n6ObdHzsOev_JtXvkyrgu4Nt2U44HLFDNAU43wOLuXdG34U5YkrHmU-et3tsl3KITxoQErgU8Ac8YqIy</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>Snyder, Robin E.</creator><creator>Chesson, Peter</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence</title><author>Snyder, Robin E. ; Chesson, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-71198313b9bfa72fe930e40b3c219829c84f56f22a3d0a9dc583504633f305da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological competition</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Covariance</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Lotteries</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>Plant Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population distributions</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Population growth rate</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Robin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesson, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, Robin E.</au><au>Chesson, Peter</au><au>Benjamin Bolker</au><au>Associate Editors: Peter J. Morin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>164</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>650</epage><pages>633-650</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>Spatial coexistence depends on a variety of biological and physical processes, and the relative scales of these processes may promote or suppress coexistence. We model plant competition in a spatially varying environment to show how shifting scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity affect coexistence. Spatial coexistence mechanisms are partitioned into three types: the storage effect, nonlinear competitive variance, and growth‐density covariance. We first describe how the strength of each of these mechanisms depends on covariances between population densities and between population densities and the environment, and we then explain how changes in the scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity should affect these covariances. Our quantitative approach allows us to show how changes in the scales of biological and physical processes can shift the relative importance of different classes of spatial coexistence mechanisms and gives us a more complete understanding of how environmental heterogeneity can enable coexistence. For example, we show how environmental heterogeneity can promote coexistence even when competing species have identical responses to the environment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>15540153</pmid><doi>10.1086/424969</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0147
ispartof The American naturalist, 2004-11, Vol.164 (5), p.633-650
issn 0003-0147
1537-5323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17712036
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animal behavior
Animal populations
Biodiversity
Biological competition
Competition
Covariance
Dispersal
Ecological competition
Ecology
Ecosystem
Environmental conditions
Fourier Analysis
Lotteries
Mechanics
Models, Biological
Nonlinearity
Plant Development
Plant Physiological Phenomena
Population density
Population distributions
Population Dynamics
Population growth rate
Spatial models
title How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T07%3A09%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20the%20Spatial%20Scales%20of%20Dispersal,%20Competition,%20and%20Environmental%20Heterogeneity%20Interact%20to%20Affect%20Coexistence&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Snyder,%20Robin%C2%A0E.&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=164&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=650&rft.pages=633-650&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/424969&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/424969%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198683088&rft_id=info:pmid/15540153&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/424969&rfr_iscdi=true