How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence
Spatial coexistence depends on a variety of biological and physical processes, and the relative scales of these processes may promote or suppress coexistence. We model plant competition in a spatially varying environment to show how shifting scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental hetero...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American naturalist 2004-11, Vol.164 (5), p.633-650 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 650 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 633 |
container_title | The American naturalist |
container_volume | 164 |
creator | Snyder, Robin E. Chesson, Peter |
description | Spatial coexistence depends on a variety of biological and physical processes, and the relative scales of these processes may promote or suppress coexistence. We model plant competition in a spatially varying environment to show how shifting scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity affect coexistence. Spatial coexistence mechanisms are partitioned into three types: the storage effect, nonlinear competitive variance, and growth‐density covariance. We first describe how the strength of each of these mechanisms depends on covariances between population densities and between population densities and the environment, and we then explain how changes in the scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity should affect these covariances. Our quantitative approach allows us to show how changes in the scales of biological and physical processes can shift the relative importance of different classes of spatial coexistence mechanisms and gives us a more complete understanding of how environmental heterogeneity can enable coexistence. For example, we show how environmental heterogeneity can promote coexistence even when competing species have identical responses to the environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/424969 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17712036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/424969</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/424969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-71198313b9bfa72fe930e40b3c219829c84f56f22a3d0a9dc583504633f305da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotsCT4CQhSpODdgZJ46P1VLYSpU4FM6R1xm3XiV2sJ1C3x6jXXUlLpw8I3_-xqOfkDecfeSsaz-JWqhWPSMr3oCsGqjhOVkxxqBiXMgTcprSrrRKqOYlOeFNI1ghV2TehF803yO9nXV2eqS3Ro-YaLD0s0szxqTHC7oO04zZZRf8BdV-oFf-wcXgJ_S5vNlgxhju0KPLj_Tal06bTHOgl9ZiqdYBf7uU0Rt8RV5YPSZ8fTjPyI8vV9_Xm-rm29fr9eVNZaCDXEnOVQcctmprtawtKmAo2BZMXS5qZTphm9bWtYaBaTWYpoOGiRbAAmsGDWfkw947x_BzwZT7ySWD46g9hiX1rWStBAX_BbmUvGbQFvD9P-AuLNGXJfrypbYD1nVHm4khpYi2n6ObdHzsOev_JtXvkyrgu4Nt2U44HLFDNAU43wOLuXdG34U5YkrHmU-et3tsl3KITxoQErgU8Ac8YqIy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198683088</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Snyder, Robin E. ; Chesson, Peter</creator><contributor>Benjamin Bolker ; Associate Editors: Peter J. Morin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Robin E. ; Chesson, Peter ; Benjamin Bolker ; Associate Editors: Peter J. Morin</creatorcontrib><description>Spatial coexistence depends on a variety of biological and physical processes, and the relative scales of these processes may promote or suppress coexistence. We model plant competition in a spatially varying environment to show how shifting scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity affect coexistence. Spatial coexistence mechanisms are partitioned into three types: the storage effect, nonlinear competitive variance, and growth‐density covariance. We first describe how the strength of each of these mechanisms depends on covariances between population densities and between population densities and the environment, and we then explain how changes in the scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity should affect these covariances. Our quantitative approach allows us to show how changes in the scales of biological and physical processes can shift the relative importance of different classes of spatial coexistence mechanisms and gives us a more complete understanding of how environmental heterogeneity can enable coexistence. For example, we show how environmental heterogeneity can promote coexistence even when competing species have identical responses to the environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/424969</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15540153</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; Biodiversity ; Biological competition ; Competition ; Covariance ; Dispersal ; Ecological competition ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Environmental conditions ; Fourier Analysis ; Lotteries ; Mechanics ; Models, Biological ; Nonlinearity ; Plant Development ; Plant Physiological Phenomena ; Population density ; Population distributions ; Population Dynamics ; Population growth rate ; Spatial models</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2004-11, Vol.164 (5), p.633-650</ispartof><rights>2004 by The University of Chicago.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Nov 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-71198313b9bfa72fe930e40b3c219829c84f56f22a3d0a9dc583504633f305da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-71198313b9bfa72fe930e40b3c219829c84f56f22a3d0a9dc583504633f305da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15540153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Benjamin Bolker</contributor><contributor>Associate Editors: Peter J. Morin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Robin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesson, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>Spatial coexistence depends on a variety of biological and physical processes, and the relative scales of these processes may promote or suppress coexistence. We model plant competition in a spatially varying environment to show how shifting scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity affect coexistence. Spatial coexistence mechanisms are partitioned into three types: the storage effect, nonlinear competitive variance, and growth‐density covariance. We first describe how the strength of each of these mechanisms depends on covariances between population densities and between population densities and the environment, and we then explain how changes in the scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity should affect these covariances. Our quantitative approach allows us to show how changes in the scales of biological and physical processes can shift the relative importance of different classes of spatial coexistence mechanisms and gives us a more complete understanding of how environmental heterogeneity can enable coexistence. For example, we show how environmental heterogeneity can promote coexistence even when competing species have identical responses to the environment.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological competition</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Covariance</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Lotteries</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>Plant Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population distributions</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Population growth rate</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotsCT4CQhSpODdgZJ46P1VLYSpU4FM6R1xm3XiV2sJ1C3x6jXXUlLpw8I3_-xqOfkDecfeSsaz-JWqhWPSMr3oCsGqjhOVkxxqBiXMgTcprSrrRKqOYlOeFNI1ghV2TehF803yO9nXV2eqS3Ro-YaLD0s0szxqTHC7oO04zZZRf8BdV-oFf-wcXgJ_S5vNlgxhju0KPLj_Tal06bTHOgl9ZiqdYBf7uU0Rt8RV5YPSZ8fTjPyI8vV9_Xm-rm29fr9eVNZaCDXEnOVQcctmprtawtKmAo2BZMXS5qZTphm9bWtYaBaTWYpoOGiRbAAmsGDWfkw947x_BzwZT7ySWD46g9hiX1rWStBAX_BbmUvGbQFvD9P-AuLNGXJfrypbYD1nVHm4khpYi2n6ObdHzsOev_JtXvkyrgu4Nt2U44HLFDNAU43wOLuXdG34U5YkrHmU-et3tsl3KITxoQErgU8Ac8YqIy</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>Snyder, Robin E.</creator><creator>Chesson, Peter</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence</title><author>Snyder, Robin E. ; Chesson, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-71198313b9bfa72fe930e40b3c219829c84f56f22a3d0a9dc583504633f305da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological competition</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Covariance</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Lotteries</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>Plant Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population distributions</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Population growth rate</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Robin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesson, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, Robin E.</au><au>Chesson, Peter</au><au>Benjamin Bolker</au><au>Associate Editors: Peter J. Morin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>164</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>650</epage><pages>633-650</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>Spatial coexistence depends on a variety of biological and physical processes, and the relative scales of these processes may promote or suppress coexistence. We model plant competition in a spatially varying environment to show how shifting scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity affect coexistence. Spatial coexistence mechanisms are partitioned into three types: the storage effect, nonlinear competitive variance, and growth‐density covariance. We first describe how the strength of each of these mechanisms depends on covariances between population densities and between population densities and the environment, and we then explain how changes in the scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity should affect these covariances. Our quantitative approach allows us to show how changes in the scales of biological and physical processes can shift the relative importance of different classes of spatial coexistence mechanisms and gives us a more complete understanding of how environmental heterogeneity can enable coexistence. For example, we show how environmental heterogeneity can promote coexistence even when competing species have identical responses to the environment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>15540153</pmid><doi>10.1086/424969</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0147 |
ispartof | The American naturalist, 2004-11, Vol.164 (5), p.633-650 |
issn | 0003-0147 1537-5323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17712036 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal populations Biodiversity Biological competition Competition Covariance Dispersal Ecological competition Ecology Ecosystem Environmental conditions Fourier Analysis Lotteries Mechanics Models, Biological Nonlinearity Plant Development Plant Physiological Phenomena Population density Population distributions Population Dynamics Population growth rate Spatial models |
title | How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T07%3A09%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20the%20Spatial%20Scales%20of%20Dispersal,%20Competition,%20and%20Environmental%20Heterogeneity%20Interact%20to%20Affect%20Coexistence&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Snyder,%20Robin%C2%A0E.&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=164&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=650&rft.pages=633-650&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/424969&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/424969%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198683088&rft_id=info:pmid/15540153&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/424969&rfr_iscdi=true |