On the nature, influence and magnitudes of flame heat transfer during surface flame spread

The basic equation describing steady surface flame spread on solid surfaces indicates that the primary characteristics describing surface flame spread are flame heat flux, forward heating length scale and a thermally affected depth of solid material. There is however great variability in the reporte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fire safety journal 2000-10, Vol.35 (3), p.189-222
Hauptverfasser: Azhakesan, M.A, Shields, T.J, Silcock, G.W.H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 222
container_issue 3
container_start_page 189
container_title Fire safety journal
container_volume 35
creator Azhakesan, M.A
Shields, T.J
Silcock, G.W.H
description The basic equation describing steady surface flame spread on solid surfaces indicates that the primary characteristics describing surface flame spread are flame heat flux, forward heating length scale and a thermally affected depth of solid material. There is however great variability in the reported estimations of the average flame heat flux incident over the effective heated length scale, particularly for opposed flow flame spread. In addition, there has been little consideration given in the literature as to how flame heat fluxes derived from different methodologies relate to each other and to the actual processes of surface flame spread. This paper addresses these issues with particular regard to opposed flow flame spread. It is suggested that the controlling mechanisms of wind aided and opposed flow flame spread are similar despite the obvious difference in geometric view factors associated with each mode of flame spread. Thus, the attainment of a strong, steady, piloted ignition condition occurring during opposed flow flame spread results in transition flame heat spreading fluxes that are of similar magnitudes to those which control steady wind aided flame spread rates, i.e., 16–33 kW m −2. It is concluded that the transition ignition and flame propagation heat fluxes controlling opposed flow flame spread encompass a range of 5–70 kW m −2. The major source of difference between the two generic modes of surface flame spread lies in the definition and magnitude of a critical flame heat influenced length scale, l h which is defined for the case of opposed flow flame spread in this paper.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00036-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17711774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0379711200000369</els_id><sourcerecordid>17711774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-e8d796bb656407e095a9322130781613f24da90dcdacc5f1f036c9b74a3a2af83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhvegYK3-BCEHEQVXJ_uV5iRS_IJCD-rFS5gmkzaym63JruC_d9uKHj0NDM87w_skyQmHKw68un6GXMhUcJ6dA1wAQF6lci8Z_a4PksMY3wG4AJCj5G3uWbci5rHrA10y523dk9fE0BvW4NK7rjcUWWuZrbEhtiLsWBfQR0uBmT44v2SxDxaH0A6J60BojpJ9i3Wk4585Tl7v716mj-ls_vA0vZ2lOq9El9LECFktFlVZFSAIZIkyzzKeg5jwiuc2KwxKMNqg1qXldqik5UIUmGOGdpKPk7Pd3XVoP3qKnWpc1FTX6Knto-Ji6C1EMYDlDtShjTGQVevgGgxfioPa2FNbe2qjSQGorT0lh9zpzwOMGms7dNcu_oWLSSkrMWA3O4yGsp-OgorabVQaF0h3yrTun0ffwXKFmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17711774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the nature, influence and magnitudes of flame heat transfer during surface flame spread</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Azhakesan, M.A ; Shields, T.J ; Silcock, G.W.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Azhakesan, M.A ; Shields, T.J ; Silcock, G.W.H</creatorcontrib><description>The basic equation describing steady surface flame spread on solid surfaces indicates that the primary characteristics describing surface flame spread are flame heat flux, forward heating length scale and a thermally affected depth of solid material. There is however great variability in the reported estimations of the average flame heat flux incident over the effective heated length scale, particularly for opposed flow flame spread. In addition, there has been little consideration given in the literature as to how flame heat fluxes derived from different methodologies relate to each other and to the actual processes of surface flame spread. This paper addresses these issues with particular regard to opposed flow flame spread. It is suggested that the controlling mechanisms of wind aided and opposed flow flame spread are similar despite the obvious difference in geometric view factors associated with each mode of flame spread. Thus, the attainment of a strong, steady, piloted ignition condition occurring during opposed flow flame spread results in transition flame heat spreading fluxes that are of similar magnitudes to those which control steady wind aided flame spread rates, i.e., 16–33 kW m −2. It is concluded that the transition ignition and flame propagation heat fluxes controlling opposed flow flame spread encompass a range of 5–70 kW m −2. The major source of difference between the two generic modes of surface flame spread lies in the definition and magnitude of a critical flame heat influenced length scale, l h which is defined for the case of opposed flow flame spread in this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-7112</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00036-9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FSJODZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Building technical equipments ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fire behavior of materials and structures ; Fire protection ; Flame heat transfer ; Flame spread ; heat transfer</subject><ispartof>Fire safety journal, 2000-10, Vol.35 (3), p.189-222</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-e8d796bb656407e095a9322130781613f24da90dcdacc5f1f036c9b74a3a2af83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-e8d796bb656407e095a9322130781613f24da90dcdacc5f1f036c9b74a3a2af83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00036-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1485967$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azhakesan, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silcock, G.W.H</creatorcontrib><title>On the nature, influence and magnitudes of flame heat transfer during surface flame spread</title><title>Fire safety journal</title><description>The basic equation describing steady surface flame spread on solid surfaces indicates that the primary characteristics describing surface flame spread are flame heat flux, forward heating length scale and a thermally affected depth of solid material. There is however great variability in the reported estimations of the average flame heat flux incident over the effective heated length scale, particularly for opposed flow flame spread. In addition, there has been little consideration given in the literature as to how flame heat fluxes derived from different methodologies relate to each other and to the actual processes of surface flame spread. This paper addresses these issues with particular regard to opposed flow flame spread. It is suggested that the controlling mechanisms of wind aided and opposed flow flame spread are similar despite the obvious difference in geometric view factors associated with each mode of flame spread. Thus, the attainment of a strong, steady, piloted ignition condition occurring during opposed flow flame spread results in transition flame heat spreading fluxes that are of similar magnitudes to those which control steady wind aided flame spread rates, i.e., 16–33 kW m −2. It is concluded that the transition ignition and flame propagation heat fluxes controlling opposed flow flame spread encompass a range of 5–70 kW m −2. The major source of difference between the two generic modes of surface flame spread lies in the definition and magnitude of a critical flame heat influenced length scale, l h which is defined for the case of opposed flow flame spread in this paper.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building technical equipments</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fire behavior of materials and structures</subject><subject>Fire protection</subject><subject>Flame heat transfer</subject><subject>Flame spread</subject><subject>heat transfer</subject><issn>0379-7112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhvegYK3-BCEHEQVXJ_uV5iRS_IJCD-rFS5gmkzaym63JruC_d9uKHj0NDM87w_skyQmHKw68un6GXMhUcJ6dA1wAQF6lci8Z_a4PksMY3wG4AJCj5G3uWbci5rHrA10y523dk9fE0BvW4NK7rjcUWWuZrbEhtiLsWBfQR0uBmT44v2SxDxaH0A6J60BojpJ9i3Wk4585Tl7v716mj-ls_vA0vZ2lOq9El9LECFktFlVZFSAIZIkyzzKeg5jwiuc2KwxKMNqg1qXldqik5UIUmGOGdpKPk7Pd3XVoP3qKnWpc1FTX6Knto-Ji6C1EMYDlDtShjTGQVevgGgxfioPa2FNbe2qjSQGorT0lh9zpzwOMGms7dNcu_oWLSSkrMWA3O4yGsp-OgorabVQaF0h3yrTun0ffwXKFmw</recordid><startdate>20001001</startdate><enddate>20001001</enddate><creator>Azhakesan, M.A</creator><creator>Shields, T.J</creator><creator>Silcock, G.W.H</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001001</creationdate><title>On the nature, influence and magnitudes of flame heat transfer during surface flame spread</title><author>Azhakesan, M.A ; Shields, T.J ; Silcock, G.W.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-e8d796bb656407e095a9322130781613f24da90dcdacc5f1f036c9b74a3a2af83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building technical equipments</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fire behavior of materials and structures</topic><topic>Fire protection</topic><topic>Flame heat transfer</topic><topic>Flame spread</topic><topic>heat transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azhakesan, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silcock, G.W.H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Fire safety journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azhakesan, M.A</au><au>Shields, T.J</au><au>Silcock, G.W.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the nature, influence and magnitudes of flame heat transfer during surface flame spread</atitle><jtitle>Fire safety journal</jtitle><date>2000-10-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>189-222</pages><issn>0379-7112</issn><coden>FSJODZ</coden><abstract>The basic equation describing steady surface flame spread on solid surfaces indicates that the primary characteristics describing surface flame spread are flame heat flux, forward heating length scale and a thermally affected depth of solid material. There is however great variability in the reported estimations of the average flame heat flux incident over the effective heated length scale, particularly for opposed flow flame spread. In addition, there has been little consideration given in the literature as to how flame heat fluxes derived from different methodologies relate to each other and to the actual processes of surface flame spread. This paper addresses these issues with particular regard to opposed flow flame spread. It is suggested that the controlling mechanisms of wind aided and opposed flow flame spread are similar despite the obvious difference in geometric view factors associated with each mode of flame spread. Thus, the attainment of a strong, steady, piloted ignition condition occurring during opposed flow flame spread results in transition flame heat spreading fluxes that are of similar magnitudes to those which control steady wind aided flame spread rates, i.e., 16–33 kW m −2. It is concluded that the transition ignition and flame propagation heat fluxes controlling opposed flow flame spread encompass a range of 5–70 kW m −2. The major source of difference between the two generic modes of surface flame spread lies in the definition and magnitude of a critical flame heat influenced length scale, l h which is defined for the case of opposed flow flame spread in this paper.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00036-9</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0379-7112
ispartof Fire safety journal, 2000-10, Vol.35 (3), p.189-222
issn 0379-7112
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17711774
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Applied sciences
Building technical equipments
Buildings
Buildings. Public works
Exact sciences and technology
Fire behavior of materials and structures
Fire protection
Flame heat transfer
Flame spread
heat transfer
title On the nature, influence and magnitudes of flame heat transfer during surface flame spread
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A04%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20nature,%20influence%20and%20magnitudes%20of%20flame%20heat%20transfer%20during%20surface%20flame%20spread&rft.jtitle=Fire%20safety%20journal&rft.au=Azhakesan,%20M.A&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=189-222&rft.issn=0379-7112&rft.coden=FSJODZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00036-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17711774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17711774&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0379711200000369&rfr_iscdi=true