Predicting Risk of Urinary Incontinence and Adverse Events After Midurethral Sling Surgery in Women

To construct and validate models that predict a patient's risk of developing stress and urgency urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after sling surgery. This was a secondary analysis of four randomized trials. Twenty-five candidate predictors (patient characteristics and urodynami...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2016-02, Vol.127 (2), p.330-340
Hauptverfasser: Jelovsek, J Eric, Hill, Audra Jolyn, Chagin, Kevin M, Kattan, Michael W, Barber, Matthew D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 340
container_issue 2
container_start_page 330
container_title Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)
container_volume 127
creator Jelovsek, J Eric
Hill, Audra Jolyn
Chagin, Kevin M
Kattan, Michael W
Barber, Matthew D
description To construct and validate models that predict a patient's risk of developing stress and urgency urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after sling surgery. This was a secondary analysis of four randomized trials. Twenty-five candidate predictors (patient characteristics and urodynamic variables) were identified from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (N=597). Multiple logistic models were fit to predict four different outcomes: 1) bothersome stress urinary incontinence; 2) a positive stress test; 3) bothersome urgency urinary incontinence; and 4) any adverse event up to 12 months after sling surgery. Model discrimination was measured using a concordance index. Each model's concordance index was internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap samples and calibration curves were plotted. Final models were externally validated on a separate data set (n=902) from a combination of three different multicenter randomized trials. Four best models discriminated on internal validation between women with bothersome stress urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.728, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.683-0.773), a positive stress test (concordance index 0.712, 95% CI 0.669-0.758), bothersome urgency urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.722, 95% CI 0.680-0.764), and any adverse event (concordance index 0.640, 95% CI 0.595-0.681) after sling surgery. Each model's concordance index was reduced as expected when important variables were removed for external validation, but model discrimination remained stable with bothersome stress urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.548), a positive stress test (concordance index 0.656), bothersome urgency urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.621), and any adverse event (concordance index 0.567). Predicted probabilities are closest to actual probabilities when predictions are less than 50%. Four best and modified models discriminate between women who will and will not develop urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after midurethral sling surgery 64-73% and 55-66% of the time, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001269
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770883949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1770883949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ce9155d04fb2d7b06079407b56e52937fbad3cdaa32ac7178f683366a12008fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5E9ekndjySbPYZSa6FSsRa9hc3upEaTTd1NCv57U6oizmUO87wzzIPQJSVjSqS4SZezMflTlMXyCA1pInjAOH85RkNCmAxEEoYDdOb92x6KJT9Fgx4NGY_ZEOkHB6bUbWk3-LH077gp8NqVVrlPPLe6sf0ErAasrMGp2YHzgKc7sK3HadGCw_el6Ry0r05VeFXt96w6t4E-X1r83NRgz9FJoSoPF999hNa306fJXbBYzuaTdBFoHvE20CBpFBkSFjkzIicxETIkIo9iiJjkosiV4dooxZnSgoqkiBPO41hRRkhS5HyErg97t6756MC3WV16DVWlLDSdz6gQJEm4DGWPhgdUu8Z7B0W2dWXdP51Rku31Zr3e7L_ePnb1faHLazC_oR-f_AvxknWH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770883949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Risk of Urinary Incontinence and Adverse Events After Midurethral Sling Surgery in Women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Jelovsek, J Eric ; Hill, Audra Jolyn ; Chagin, Kevin M ; Kattan, Michael W ; Barber, Matthew D</creator><creatorcontrib>Jelovsek, J Eric ; Hill, Audra Jolyn ; Chagin, Kevin M ; Kattan, Michael W ; Barber, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><description>To construct and validate models that predict a patient's risk of developing stress and urgency urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after sling surgery. This was a secondary analysis of four randomized trials. Twenty-five candidate predictors (patient characteristics and urodynamic variables) were identified from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (N=597). Multiple logistic models were fit to predict four different outcomes: 1) bothersome stress urinary incontinence; 2) a positive stress test; 3) bothersome urgency urinary incontinence; and 4) any adverse event up to 12 months after sling surgery. Model discrimination was measured using a concordance index. Each model's concordance index was internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap samples and calibration curves were plotted. Final models were externally validated on a separate data set (n=902) from a combination of three different multicenter randomized trials. Four best models discriminated on internal validation between women with bothersome stress urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.728, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.683-0.773), a positive stress test (concordance index 0.712, 95% CI 0.669-0.758), bothersome urgency urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.722, 95% CI 0.680-0.764), and any adverse event (concordance index 0.640, 95% CI 0.595-0.681) after sling surgery. Each model's concordance index was reduced as expected when important variables were removed for external validation, but model discrimination remained stable with bothersome stress urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.548), a positive stress test (concordance index 0.656), bothersome urgency urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.621), and any adverse event (concordance index 0.567). Predicted probabilities are closest to actual probabilities when predictions are less than 50%. Four best and modified models discriminate between women who will and will not develop urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after midurethral sling surgery 64-73% and 55-66% of the time, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001269</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26942362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Middle Aged ; Ohio ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; Suburethral Slings - adverse effects ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - epidemiology ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology ; Urinary Incontinence, Urge - epidemiology ; Urinary Incontinence, Urge - etiology ; Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology ; Urodynamics - physiology</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2016-02, Vol.127 (2), p.330-340</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ce9155d04fb2d7b06079407b56e52937fbad3cdaa32ac7178f683366a12008fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ce9155d04fb2d7b06079407b56e52937fbad3cdaa32ac7178f683366a12008fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jelovsek, J Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Audra Jolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chagin, Kevin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kattan, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Risk of Urinary Incontinence and Adverse Events After Midurethral Sling Surgery in Women</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>To construct and validate models that predict a patient's risk of developing stress and urgency urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after sling surgery. This was a secondary analysis of four randomized trials. Twenty-five candidate predictors (patient characteristics and urodynamic variables) were identified from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (N=597). Multiple logistic models were fit to predict four different outcomes: 1) bothersome stress urinary incontinence; 2) a positive stress test; 3) bothersome urgency urinary incontinence; and 4) any adverse event up to 12 months after sling surgery. Model discrimination was measured using a concordance index. Each model's concordance index was internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap samples and calibration curves were plotted. Final models were externally validated on a separate data set (n=902) from a combination of three different multicenter randomized trials. Four best models discriminated on internal validation between women with bothersome stress urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.728, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.683-0.773), a positive stress test (concordance index 0.712, 95% CI 0.669-0.758), bothersome urgency urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.722, 95% CI 0.680-0.764), and any adverse event (concordance index 0.640, 95% CI 0.595-0.681) after sling surgery. Each model's concordance index was reduced as expected when important variables were removed for external validation, but model discrimination remained stable with bothersome stress urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.548), a positive stress test (concordance index 0.656), bothersome urgency urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.621), and any adverse event (concordance index 0.567). Predicted probabilities are closest to actual probabilities when predictions are less than 50%. Four best and modified models discriminate between women who will and will not develop urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after midurethral sling surgery 64-73% and 55-66% of the time, respectively.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ohio</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Suburethral Slings - adverse effects</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology</subject><subject>Urodynamics - physiology</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5E9ekndjySbPYZSa6FSsRa9hc3upEaTTd1NCv57U6oizmUO87wzzIPQJSVjSqS4SZezMflTlMXyCA1pInjAOH85RkNCmAxEEoYDdOb92x6KJT9Fgx4NGY_ZEOkHB6bUbWk3-LH077gp8NqVVrlPPLe6sf0ErAasrMGp2YHzgKc7sK3HadGCw_el6Ry0r05VeFXt96w6t4E-X1r83NRgz9FJoSoPF999hNa306fJXbBYzuaTdBFoHvE20CBpFBkSFjkzIicxETIkIo9iiJjkosiV4dooxZnSgoqkiBPO41hRRkhS5HyErg97t6756MC3WV16DVWlLDSdz6gQJEm4DGWPhgdUu8Z7B0W2dWXdP51Rku31Zr3e7L_ePnb1faHLazC_oR-f_AvxknWH</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Jelovsek, J Eric</creator><creator>Hill, Audra Jolyn</creator><creator>Chagin, Kevin M</creator><creator>Kattan, Michael W</creator><creator>Barber, Matthew D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Predicting Risk of Urinary Incontinence and Adverse Events After Midurethral Sling Surgery in Women</title><author>Jelovsek, J Eric ; Hill, Audra Jolyn ; Chagin, Kevin M ; Kattan, Michael W ; Barber, Matthew D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ce9155d04fb2d7b06079407b56e52937fbad3cdaa32ac7178f683366a12008fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ohio</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Suburethral Slings - adverse effects</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology</topic><topic>Urodynamics - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jelovsek, J Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Audra Jolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chagin, Kevin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kattan, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jelovsek, J Eric</au><au>Hill, Audra Jolyn</au><au>Chagin, Kevin M</au><au>Kattan, Michael W</au><au>Barber, Matthew D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Risk of Urinary Incontinence and Adverse Events After Midurethral Sling Surgery in Women</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>330</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>330-340</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><abstract>To construct and validate models that predict a patient's risk of developing stress and urgency urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after sling surgery. This was a secondary analysis of four randomized trials. Twenty-five candidate predictors (patient characteristics and urodynamic variables) were identified from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (N=597). Multiple logistic models were fit to predict four different outcomes: 1) bothersome stress urinary incontinence; 2) a positive stress test; 3) bothersome urgency urinary incontinence; and 4) any adverse event up to 12 months after sling surgery. Model discrimination was measured using a concordance index. Each model's concordance index was internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap samples and calibration curves were plotted. Final models were externally validated on a separate data set (n=902) from a combination of three different multicenter randomized trials. Four best models discriminated on internal validation between women with bothersome stress urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.728, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.683-0.773), a positive stress test (concordance index 0.712, 95% CI 0.669-0.758), bothersome urgency urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.722, 95% CI 0.680-0.764), and any adverse event (concordance index 0.640, 95% CI 0.595-0.681) after sling surgery. Each model's concordance index was reduced as expected when important variables were removed for external validation, but model discrimination remained stable with bothersome stress urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.548), a positive stress test (concordance index 0.656), bothersome urgency urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.621), and any adverse event (concordance index 0.567). Predicted probabilities are closest to actual probabilities when predictions are less than 50%. Four best and modified models discriminate between women who will and will not develop urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after midurethral sling surgery 64-73% and 55-66% of the time, respectively.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26942362</pmid><doi>10.1097/AOG.0000000000001269</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-7844
ispartof Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2016-02, Vol.127 (2), p.330-340
issn 0029-7844
1873-233X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770883949
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Middle Aged
Ohio
Predictive Value of Tests
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Suburethral Slings - adverse effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - epidemiology
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology
Urinary Incontinence, Urge - epidemiology
Urinary Incontinence, Urge - etiology
Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology
Urodynamics - physiology
title Predicting Risk of Urinary Incontinence and Adverse Events After Midurethral Sling Surgery in Women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A43%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Risk%20of%20Urinary%20Incontinence%20and%20Adverse%20Events%20After%20Midurethral%20Sling%20Surgery%20in%20Women&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=Jelovsek,%20J%20Eric&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=330&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=330-340&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001269&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770883949%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770883949&rft_id=info:pmid/26942362&rfr_iscdi=true