A nationwide assessment comparing nonelective open with minimally invasive complex colorectal procedures
Aim The use of minimally invasive colorectal surgery has increased greatly for both benign and malignant disease. Studies evaluating complex procedures have been largely limited to elective indications. We aimed to compare the outcome of a laparoscopic with an open transverse (TC) and total abdomina...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Colorectal disease 2016-03, Vol.18 (3), p.301-311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim
The use of minimally invasive colorectal surgery has increased greatly for both benign and malignant disease. Studies evaluating complex procedures have been largely limited to elective indications. We aimed to compare the outcome of a laparoscopic with an open transverse (TC) and total abdominal colectomy (TAC) in the nonelective setting.
Method
Comparative analysis was made using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2008–11) of patients undergoing a nonelective TC or TAC identified by ICD‐9‐CM procedure codes. The risk‐adjusted 30‐day outcome was assessed using regression modelling accounting for patient characteristics, comorbidity and surgical procedure.
Results
We identified 7261 admissions including 818 laparoscopic and 6443 open procedures. The mean age of the population was 65 ± 17 years and patients in the laparoscopic group were younger (56 ± 20 vs 66 ± 17 years; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1462-8910 1463-1318 |
DOI: | 10.1111/codi.13113 |