Comparative study of erosion–corrosion performance on a range of stainless steels
Erosion–corrosion is one of the most severe types of material deterioration that occur in hydraulic machinery. Corrosion resistant alloys perform well in some marine applications. These materials do have their limitations, though, and for this reason a comparison of their performances is significant...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wear 2015-05, Vol.332-333, p.1051-1058 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1058 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1051 |
container_title | Wear |
container_volume | 332-333 |
creator | Giourntas, L. Hodgkiess, T. Galloway, A.M. |
description | Erosion–corrosion is one of the most severe types of material deterioration that occur in hydraulic machinery. Corrosion resistant alloys perform well in some marine applications. These materials do have their limitations, though, and for this reason a comparison of their performances is significant. This study focuses on the assessment of the relative behaviour of four different types of stainless steel (UNS S31600, UNS S32760, UNS S42000, and UNS S17400) in erosion–corrosion environments. The study was expanded to include a carbon steel (UNS G10400). Test pieces have been investigated in a submerged jet impingement apparatus in 3.5% NaCl solution with suspended solid particles at temperatures of 30–35°C. In situ corrosion monitoring was also undertaken and the influence of the application of cathodic protection was studied. This facilitated assessment of the relative roles of erosion, corrosion and synergy on the overall degradation processes. A variety of examination techniques were utilised (i.e. mass loss, surface profiling, microscopy) in order to obtain detailed information on those different modes of attack. Differences between stainless steels and carbon steel were observed and the superduplex stainless steel exhibited the best performance of the four types of stainless steel investigated herein.
•Study of a range of stainless steels in solid/saline water impingement at 90°.•Superduplex UNS S32760 exhibited superior erosion–corrosion resistance.•Martensitic stainless steels and UNS S316000 had similar performance.•No correlation between hardness and material loss under erosion-dominated conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wear.2014.12.052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770371880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043164815000058</els_id><sourcerecordid>1770371880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-3cc32fa620ec1d5c43747de1a07761d0e3ecc20cf837122d6dc341b40acb760e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoOI6-gKsu3bTe_LSp4EYG_2DAhboOmeRWMrRNTToj7nwH39AnMaWuXd1zuee7cA4h5xQKCrS63BYfqEPBgIqCsgJKdkAWtJY8Z6WUh2QBIHhOK1Efk5MYtwBAr8pqQZ5Xvht00KPbYxbHnf3MfJNh8NH5_ufr2_gw62zA0PjQ6d5glladBd2_4eSOo3Z9izEmhdjGU3LU6Dbi2d9ckte725fVQ75-un9c3axzI4Qcc24MZ42uGKChtjSCSyEtUg1SVtQCcjSGgWlqLiljtrKGC7oRoM1GVum8JBfz3yH49x3GUXUuGmxb3aPfRUWlhITWNSQrm60mpYkBGzUE1-nwqSioqUG1VVODampQUaZSgwm6nqGUCfcOg4rGYcpvXUAzKuvdf_gvSI58Kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770371880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study of erosion–corrosion performance on a range of stainless steels</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Giourntas, L. ; Hodgkiess, T. ; Galloway, A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giourntas, L. ; Hodgkiess, T. ; Galloway, A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Erosion–corrosion is one of the most severe types of material deterioration that occur in hydraulic machinery. Corrosion resistant alloys perform well in some marine applications. These materials do have their limitations, though, and for this reason a comparison of their performances is significant. This study focuses on the assessment of the relative behaviour of four different types of stainless steel (UNS S31600, UNS S32760, UNS S42000, and UNS S17400) in erosion–corrosion environments. The study was expanded to include a carbon steel (UNS G10400). Test pieces have been investigated in a submerged jet impingement apparatus in 3.5% NaCl solution with suspended solid particles at temperatures of 30–35°C. In situ corrosion monitoring was also undertaken and the influence of the application of cathodic protection was studied. This facilitated assessment of the relative roles of erosion, corrosion and synergy on the overall degradation processes. A variety of examination techniques were utilised (i.e. mass loss, surface profiling, microscopy) in order to obtain detailed information on those different modes of attack. Differences between stainless steels and carbon steel were observed and the superduplex stainless steel exhibited the best performance of the four types of stainless steel investigated herein.
•Study of a range of stainless steels in solid/saline water impingement at 90°.•Superduplex UNS S32760 exhibited superior erosion–corrosion resistance.•Martensitic stainless steels and UNS S316000 had similar performance.•No correlation between hardness and material loss under erosion-dominated conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2014.12.052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Carbon steels ; Corrosion ; Degradation ; Duplex stainless steels ; Electrochemistry ; Erosion ; Erosion-corrosion ; Impingement ; Microscopy ; Stainless steels</subject><ispartof>Wear, 2015-05, Vol.332-333, p.1051-1058</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-3cc32fa620ec1d5c43747de1a07761d0e3ecc20cf837122d6dc341b40acb760e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-3cc32fa620ec1d5c43747de1a07761d0e3ecc20cf837122d6dc341b40acb760e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2014.12.052$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giourntas, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgkiess, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study of erosion–corrosion performance on a range of stainless steels</title><title>Wear</title><description>Erosion–corrosion is one of the most severe types of material deterioration that occur in hydraulic machinery. Corrosion resistant alloys perform well in some marine applications. These materials do have their limitations, though, and for this reason a comparison of their performances is significant. This study focuses on the assessment of the relative behaviour of four different types of stainless steel (UNS S31600, UNS S32760, UNS S42000, and UNS S17400) in erosion–corrosion environments. The study was expanded to include a carbon steel (UNS G10400). Test pieces have been investigated in a submerged jet impingement apparatus in 3.5% NaCl solution with suspended solid particles at temperatures of 30–35°C. In situ corrosion monitoring was also undertaken and the influence of the application of cathodic protection was studied. This facilitated assessment of the relative roles of erosion, corrosion and synergy on the overall degradation processes. A variety of examination techniques were utilised (i.e. mass loss, surface profiling, microscopy) in order to obtain detailed information on those different modes of attack. Differences between stainless steels and carbon steel were observed and the superduplex stainless steel exhibited the best performance of the four types of stainless steel investigated herein.
•Study of a range of stainless steels in solid/saline water impingement at 90°.•Superduplex UNS S32760 exhibited superior erosion–corrosion resistance.•Martensitic stainless steels and UNS S316000 had similar performance.•No correlation between hardness and material loss under erosion-dominated conditions.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Carbon steels</subject><subject>Corrosion</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Duplex stainless steels</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Erosion-corrosion</subject><subject>Impingement</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Stainless steels</subject><issn>0043-1648</issn><issn>1873-2577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoOI6-gKsu3bTe_LSp4EYG_2DAhboOmeRWMrRNTToj7nwH39AnMaWuXd1zuee7cA4h5xQKCrS63BYfqEPBgIqCsgJKdkAWtJY8Z6WUh2QBIHhOK1Efk5MYtwBAr8pqQZ5Xvht00KPbYxbHnf3MfJNh8NH5_ufr2_gw62zA0PjQ6d5glladBd2_4eSOo3Z9izEmhdjGU3LU6Dbi2d9ckte725fVQ75-un9c3axzI4Qcc24MZ42uGKChtjSCSyEtUg1SVtQCcjSGgWlqLiljtrKGC7oRoM1GVum8JBfz3yH49x3GUXUuGmxb3aPfRUWlhITWNSQrm60mpYkBGzUE1-nwqSioqUG1VVODampQUaZSgwm6nqGUCfcOg4rGYcpvXUAzKuvdf_gvSI58Kg</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Giourntas, L.</creator><creator>Hodgkiess, T.</creator><creator>Galloway, A.M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Comparative study of erosion–corrosion performance on a range of stainless steels</title><author>Giourntas, L. ; Hodgkiess, T. ; Galloway, A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-3cc32fa620ec1d5c43747de1a07761d0e3ecc20cf837122d6dc341b40acb760e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Carbon steels</topic><topic>Corrosion</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Duplex stainless steels</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Erosion-corrosion</topic><topic>Impingement</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Stainless steels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giourntas, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgkiess, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, A.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Wear</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giourntas, L.</au><au>Hodgkiess, T.</au><au>Galloway, A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study of erosion–corrosion performance on a range of stainless steels</atitle><jtitle>Wear</jtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>332-333</volume><spage>1051</spage><epage>1058</epage><pages>1051-1058</pages><issn>0043-1648</issn><eissn>1873-2577</eissn><abstract>Erosion–corrosion is one of the most severe types of material deterioration that occur in hydraulic machinery. Corrosion resistant alloys perform well in some marine applications. These materials do have their limitations, though, and for this reason a comparison of their performances is significant. This study focuses on the assessment of the relative behaviour of four different types of stainless steel (UNS S31600, UNS S32760, UNS S42000, and UNS S17400) in erosion–corrosion environments. The study was expanded to include a carbon steel (UNS G10400). Test pieces have been investigated in a submerged jet impingement apparatus in 3.5% NaCl solution with suspended solid particles at temperatures of 30–35°C. In situ corrosion monitoring was also undertaken and the influence of the application of cathodic protection was studied. This facilitated assessment of the relative roles of erosion, corrosion and synergy on the overall degradation processes. A variety of examination techniques were utilised (i.e. mass loss, surface profiling, microscopy) in order to obtain detailed information on those different modes of attack. Differences between stainless steels and carbon steel were observed and the superduplex stainless steel exhibited the best performance of the four types of stainless steel investigated herein.
•Study of a range of stainless steels in solid/saline water impingement at 90°.•Superduplex UNS S32760 exhibited superior erosion–corrosion resistance.•Martensitic stainless steels and UNS S316000 had similar performance.•No correlation between hardness and material loss under erosion-dominated conditions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.wear.2014.12.052</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1648 |
ispartof | Wear, 2015-05, Vol.332-333, p.1051-1058 |
issn | 0043-1648 1873-2577 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770371880 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Assessments Carbon steels Corrosion Degradation Duplex stainless steels Electrochemistry Erosion Erosion-corrosion Impingement Microscopy Stainless steels |
title | Comparative study of erosion–corrosion performance on a range of stainless steels |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A08%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20of%20erosion%E2%80%93corrosion%20performance%20on%20a%20range%20of%20stainless%20steels&rft.jtitle=Wear&rft.au=Giourntas,%20L.&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=332-333&rft.spage=1051&rft.epage=1058&rft.pages=1051-1058&rft.issn=0043-1648&rft.eissn=1873-2577&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wear.2014.12.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770371880%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770371880&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0043164815000058&rfr_iscdi=true |