Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns

This paper describes a test program on austenitic stainless steel beam-columns. Two types of section were investigated: cold-formed square hollow section and welded H section. Twelve material tensile coupon tests and four stub column tests were conducted to provide the material properties of the spe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of constructional steel research 2015-08, Vol.111, p.1-10
Hauptverfasser: Zheng, Baofeng, Hua, Xia, Shu, Ganping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of constructional steel research
container_volume 111
creator Zheng, Baofeng
Hua, Xia
Shu, Ganping
description This paper describes a test program on austenitic stainless steel beam-columns. Two types of section were investigated: cold-formed square hollow section and welded H section. Twelve material tensile coupon tests and four stub column tests were conducted to provide the material properties of the specimens. The overall initial geometric imperfections were measured. Ten beam-columns were tested between pin-ended conditions with sideway supports. Results from the tests, including the strengths, the load-deformation responses, and the failure modes were presented. The test strengths and the strengths of all the previous available test specimens were compared with the design strengths predicted using Eurocode (EN 1993-1-4:2006) and American code (SEI/ASCE 8-02). It is shown that the design strengths predicted by these two design codes are generally conservative, and the performance of the American code is better than that of the Eurocode. A modified design rule based on the American code was proposed. Comparison of the predicted strengths with the tests strengths shows that the proposed method offers improved accuracy and reduced scatter.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770361657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1770361657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-7a3dc06b74a570e571ce7050933d0013ba60ecb7280b341248f22f5b5343b6453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9LxDAQR3NQcF39Ap569NI6aZKmC15k8R8seFnBW0jSKbSk7ZppEb-9KetpfofH8HiM3XEoOPDqoS96T7EogasCZAHAL9gGuBT5TsuvK3ZN1ANAvRP1hj0ekWbKpjbzU2jydooDNpkdm-wHQ5MmzbYbAxKlhRgyh3bIE7sMI92wy9YGwtv_u2WfL8_H_Vt--Hh93z8dcl_WMOfaisZD5bS0SgMqzT1qULATokl2wtkK0DudYCckL2XdlmWrnBJSuEoqsWX357-nOH0vSdgMHXkMwY44LWS41iAqXimd0PKM-jgRRWzNKXaDjb-Gg1nzmN6secyax4A0q8AfKeBaeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770361657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zheng, Baofeng ; Hua, Xia ; Shu, Ganping</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Baofeng ; Hua, Xia ; Shu, Ganping</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes a test program on austenitic stainless steel beam-columns. Two types of section were investigated: cold-formed square hollow section and welded H section. Twelve material tensile coupon tests and four stub column tests were conducted to provide the material properties of the specimens. The overall initial geometric imperfections were measured. Ten beam-columns were tested between pin-ended conditions with sideway supports. Results from the tests, including the strengths, the load-deformation responses, and the failure modes were presented. The test strengths and the strengths of all the previous available test specimens were compared with the design strengths predicted using Eurocode (EN 1993-1-4:2006) and American code (SEI/ASCE 8-02). It is shown that the design strengths predicted by these two design codes are generally conservative, and the performance of the American code is better than that of the Eurocode. A modified design rule based on the American code was proposed. Comparison of the predicted strengths with the tests strengths shows that the proposed method offers improved accuracy and reduced scatter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-974X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.001</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Austenitic stainless steels ; Beam-columns ; Building codes ; Cold forming ; Cold working ; Rule based ; Steel construction ; Strength</subject><ispartof>Journal of constructional steel research, 2015-08, Vol.111, p.1-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-7a3dc06b74a570e571ce7050933d0013ba60ecb7280b341248f22f5b5343b6453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-7a3dc06b74a570e571ce7050933d0013ba60ecb7280b341248f22f5b5343b6453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Baofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shu, Ganping</creatorcontrib><title>Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns</title><title>Journal of constructional steel research</title><description>This paper describes a test program on austenitic stainless steel beam-columns. Two types of section were investigated: cold-formed square hollow section and welded H section. Twelve material tensile coupon tests and four stub column tests were conducted to provide the material properties of the specimens. The overall initial geometric imperfections were measured. Ten beam-columns were tested between pin-ended conditions with sideway supports. Results from the tests, including the strengths, the load-deformation responses, and the failure modes were presented. The test strengths and the strengths of all the previous available test specimens were compared with the design strengths predicted using Eurocode (EN 1993-1-4:2006) and American code (SEI/ASCE 8-02). It is shown that the design strengths predicted by these two design codes are generally conservative, and the performance of the American code is better than that of the Eurocode. A modified design rule based on the American code was proposed. Comparison of the predicted strengths with the tests strengths shows that the proposed method offers improved accuracy and reduced scatter.</description><subject>Austenitic stainless steels</subject><subject>Beam-columns</subject><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Cold forming</subject><subject>Cold working</subject><subject>Rule based</subject><subject>Steel construction</subject><subject>Strength</subject><issn>0143-974X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE9LxDAQR3NQcF39Ap569NI6aZKmC15k8R8seFnBW0jSKbSk7ZppEb-9KetpfofH8HiM3XEoOPDqoS96T7EogasCZAHAL9gGuBT5TsuvK3ZN1ANAvRP1hj0ekWbKpjbzU2jydooDNpkdm-wHQ5MmzbYbAxKlhRgyh3bIE7sMI92wy9YGwtv_u2WfL8_H_Vt--Hh93z8dcl_WMOfaisZD5bS0SgMqzT1qULATokl2wtkK0DudYCckL2XdlmWrnBJSuEoqsWX357-nOH0vSdgMHXkMwY44LWS41iAqXimd0PKM-jgRRWzNKXaDjb-Gg1nzmN6secyax4A0q8AfKeBaeQ</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Zheng, Baofeng</creator><creator>Hua, Xia</creator><creator>Shu, Ganping</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns</title><author>Zheng, Baofeng ; Hua, Xia ; Shu, Ganping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-7a3dc06b74a570e571ce7050933d0013ba60ecb7280b341248f22f5b5343b6453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Austenitic stainless steels</topic><topic>Beam-columns</topic><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Cold forming</topic><topic>Cold working</topic><topic>Rule based</topic><topic>Steel construction</topic><topic>Strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Baofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shu, Ganping</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of constructional steel research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, Baofeng</au><au>Hua, Xia</au><au>Shu, Ganping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns</atitle><jtitle>Journal of constructional steel research</jtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0143-974X</issn><abstract>This paper describes a test program on austenitic stainless steel beam-columns. Two types of section were investigated: cold-formed square hollow section and welded H section. Twelve material tensile coupon tests and four stub column tests were conducted to provide the material properties of the specimens. The overall initial geometric imperfections were measured. Ten beam-columns were tested between pin-ended conditions with sideway supports. Results from the tests, including the strengths, the load-deformation responses, and the failure modes were presented. The test strengths and the strengths of all the previous available test specimens were compared with the design strengths predicted using Eurocode (EN 1993-1-4:2006) and American code (SEI/ASCE 8-02). It is shown that the design strengths predicted by these two design codes are generally conservative, and the performance of the American code is better than that of the Eurocode. A modified design rule based on the American code was proposed. Comparison of the predicted strengths with the tests strengths shows that the proposed method offers improved accuracy and reduced scatter.</abstract><doi>10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-974X
ispartof Journal of constructional steel research, 2015-08, Vol.111, p.1-10
issn 0143-974X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770361657
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Austenitic stainless steels
Beam-columns
Building codes
Cold forming
Cold working
Rule based
Steel construction
Strength
title Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A32%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tests%20of%20cold-formed%20and%20welded%20stainless%20steel%20beam-columns&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20constructional%20steel%20research&rft.au=Zheng,%20Baofeng&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0143-974X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770361657%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770361657&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true