Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns
This paper describes a test program on austenitic stainless steel beam-columns. Two types of section were investigated: cold-formed square hollow section and welded H section. Twelve material tensile coupon tests and four stub column tests were conducted to provide the material properties of the spe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of constructional steel research 2015-08, Vol.111, p.1-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of constructional steel research |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Zheng, Baofeng Hua, Xia Shu, Ganping |
description | This paper describes a test program on austenitic stainless steel beam-columns. Two types of section were investigated: cold-formed square hollow section and welded H section. Twelve material tensile coupon tests and four stub column tests were conducted to provide the material properties of the specimens. The overall initial geometric imperfections were measured. Ten beam-columns were tested between pin-ended conditions with sideway supports. Results from the tests, including the strengths, the load-deformation responses, and the failure modes were presented. The test strengths and the strengths of all the previous available test specimens were compared with the design strengths predicted using Eurocode (EN 1993-1-4:2006) and American code (SEI/ASCE 8-02). It is shown that the design strengths predicted by these two design codes are generally conservative, and the performance of the American code is better than that of the Eurocode. A modified design rule based on the American code was proposed. Comparison of the predicted strengths with the tests strengths shows that the proposed method offers improved accuracy and reduced scatter. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770361657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1770361657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-7a3dc06b74a570e571ce7050933d0013ba60ecb7280b341248f22f5b5343b6453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9LxDAQR3NQcF39Ap569NI6aZKmC15k8R8seFnBW0jSKbSk7ZppEb-9KetpfofH8HiM3XEoOPDqoS96T7EogasCZAHAL9gGuBT5TsuvK3ZN1ANAvRP1hj0ekWbKpjbzU2jydooDNpkdm-wHQ5MmzbYbAxKlhRgyh3bIE7sMI92wy9YGwtv_u2WfL8_H_Vt--Hh93z8dcl_WMOfaisZD5bS0SgMqzT1qULATokl2wtkK0DudYCckL2XdlmWrnBJSuEoqsWX357-nOH0vSdgMHXkMwY44LWS41iAqXimd0PKM-jgRRWzNKXaDjb-Gg1nzmN6secyax4A0q8AfKeBaeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770361657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zheng, Baofeng ; Hua, Xia ; Shu, Ganping</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Baofeng ; Hua, Xia ; Shu, Ganping</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes a test program on austenitic stainless steel beam-columns. Two types of section were investigated: cold-formed square hollow section and welded H section. Twelve material tensile coupon tests and four stub column tests were conducted to provide the material properties of the specimens. The overall initial geometric imperfections were measured. Ten beam-columns were tested between pin-ended conditions with sideway supports. Results from the tests, including the strengths, the load-deformation responses, and the failure modes were presented. The test strengths and the strengths of all the previous available test specimens were compared with the design strengths predicted using Eurocode (EN 1993-1-4:2006) and American code (SEI/ASCE 8-02). It is shown that the design strengths predicted by these two design codes are generally conservative, and the performance of the American code is better than that of the Eurocode. A modified design rule based on the American code was proposed. Comparison of the predicted strengths with the tests strengths shows that the proposed method offers improved accuracy and reduced scatter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-974X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.001</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Austenitic stainless steels ; Beam-columns ; Building codes ; Cold forming ; Cold working ; Rule based ; Steel construction ; Strength</subject><ispartof>Journal of constructional steel research, 2015-08, Vol.111, p.1-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-7a3dc06b74a570e571ce7050933d0013ba60ecb7280b341248f22f5b5343b6453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-7a3dc06b74a570e571ce7050933d0013ba60ecb7280b341248f22f5b5343b6453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Baofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shu, Ganping</creatorcontrib><title>Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns</title><title>Journal of constructional steel research</title><description>This paper describes a test program on austenitic stainless steel beam-columns. Two types of section were investigated: cold-formed square hollow section and welded H section. Twelve material tensile coupon tests and four stub column tests were conducted to provide the material properties of the specimens. The overall initial geometric imperfections were measured. Ten beam-columns were tested between pin-ended conditions with sideway supports. Results from the tests, including the strengths, the load-deformation responses, and the failure modes were presented. The test strengths and the strengths of all the previous available test specimens were compared with the design strengths predicted using Eurocode (EN 1993-1-4:2006) and American code (SEI/ASCE 8-02). It is shown that the design strengths predicted by these two design codes are generally conservative, and the performance of the American code is better than that of the Eurocode. A modified design rule based on the American code was proposed. Comparison of the predicted strengths with the tests strengths shows that the proposed method offers improved accuracy and reduced scatter.</description><subject>Austenitic stainless steels</subject><subject>Beam-columns</subject><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Cold forming</subject><subject>Cold working</subject><subject>Rule based</subject><subject>Steel construction</subject><subject>Strength</subject><issn>0143-974X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE9LxDAQR3NQcF39Ap569NI6aZKmC15k8R8seFnBW0jSKbSk7ZppEb-9KetpfofH8HiM3XEoOPDqoS96T7EogasCZAHAL9gGuBT5TsuvK3ZN1ANAvRP1hj0ekWbKpjbzU2jydooDNpkdm-wHQ5MmzbYbAxKlhRgyh3bIE7sMI92wy9YGwtv_u2WfL8_H_Vt--Hh93z8dcl_WMOfaisZD5bS0SgMqzT1qULATokl2wtkK0DudYCckL2XdlmWrnBJSuEoqsWX357-nOH0vSdgMHXkMwY44LWS41iAqXimd0PKM-jgRRWzNKXaDjb-Gg1nzmN6secyax4A0q8AfKeBaeQ</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Zheng, Baofeng</creator><creator>Hua, Xia</creator><creator>Shu, Ganping</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns</title><author>Zheng, Baofeng ; Hua, Xia ; Shu, Ganping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-7a3dc06b74a570e571ce7050933d0013ba60ecb7280b341248f22f5b5343b6453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Austenitic stainless steels</topic><topic>Beam-columns</topic><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Cold forming</topic><topic>Cold working</topic><topic>Rule based</topic><topic>Steel construction</topic><topic>Strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Baofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shu, Ganping</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of constructional steel research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, Baofeng</au><au>Hua, Xia</au><au>Shu, Ganping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns</atitle><jtitle>Journal of constructional steel research</jtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0143-974X</issn><abstract>This paper describes a test program on austenitic stainless steel beam-columns. Two types of section were investigated: cold-formed square hollow section and welded H section. Twelve material tensile coupon tests and four stub column tests were conducted to provide the material properties of the specimens. The overall initial geometric imperfections were measured. Ten beam-columns were tested between pin-ended conditions with sideway supports. Results from the tests, including the strengths, the load-deformation responses, and the failure modes were presented. The test strengths and the strengths of all the previous available test specimens were compared with the design strengths predicted using Eurocode (EN 1993-1-4:2006) and American code (SEI/ASCE 8-02). It is shown that the design strengths predicted by these two design codes are generally conservative, and the performance of the American code is better than that of the Eurocode. A modified design rule based on the American code was proposed. Comparison of the predicted strengths with the tests strengths shows that the proposed method offers improved accuracy and reduced scatter.</abstract><doi>10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-974X |
ispartof | Journal of constructional steel research, 2015-08, Vol.111, p.1-10 |
issn | 0143-974X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770361657 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Austenitic stainless steels Beam-columns Building codes Cold forming Cold working Rule based Steel construction Strength |
title | Tests of cold-formed and welded stainless steel beam-columns |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A32%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tests%20of%20cold-formed%20and%20welded%20stainless%20steel%20beam-columns&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20constructional%20steel%20research&rft.au=Zheng,%20Baofeng&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0143-974X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770361657%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770361657&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |