Advanced process monitoring and feedback control to enhance cell culture process production and robustness

ABSTRACT It is a common practice in biotherapeutic manufacturing to define a fixed‐volume feed strategy for nutrient feeds, based on historical cell demand. However, once the feed volumes are defined, they are inflexible to batch‐to‐batch variations in cell growth and physiology and can lead to inco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotechnology and bioengineering 2015-12, Vol.112 (12), p.2495-2504
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, An, Tsang, Valerie Liu, Moore, Brandon, Shen, Vivian, Huang, Yao-Ming, Kshirsagar, Rashmi, Ryll, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2504
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2495
container_title Biotechnology and bioengineering
container_volume 112
creator Zhang, An
Tsang, Valerie Liu
Moore, Brandon
Shen, Vivian
Huang, Yao-Ming
Kshirsagar, Rashmi
Ryll, Thomas
description ABSTRACT It is a common practice in biotherapeutic manufacturing to define a fixed‐volume feed strategy for nutrient feeds, based on historical cell demand. However, once the feed volumes are defined, they are inflexible to batch‐to‐batch variations in cell growth and physiology and can lead to inconsistent productivity and product quality. In an effort to control critical quality attributes and to apply process analytical technology (PAT), a fully automated cell culture feedback control system has been explored in three different applications. The first study illustrates that frequent monitoring and automatically controlling the complex feed based on a surrogate (glutamate) level improved protein production. More importantly, the resulting feed strategy was translated into a manufacturing‐friendly manual feed strategy without impact on product quality. The second study demonstrates the improved process robustness of an automated feed strategy based on online bio‐capacitance measurements for cell growth. In the third study, glucose and lactate concentrations were measured online and were used to automatically control the glucose feed, which in turn changed lactate metabolism. These studies suggest that the auto‐feedback control system has the potential to significantly increase productivity and improve robustness in manufacturing, with the goal of ensuring process performance and product quality consistency. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015;112: 2495–2504. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The comparison between cIBC based auto feed and fixed feed at low seed density. The cIBC auto‐feedback control low seed process showed similar performance as the control regular seed process. However, the fixed feed low seed process crashed earlier due to over‐feeding.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bit.25684
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770334584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3861630741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-911f9e92b9169120b5ca7815317bacbd2052b87f98d25573232429d8fa5d48c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1PVDEUxRujkQFZ-A-YJm5k8aAfr19LIIpEIkiGmLhp-to-fcObFts-lf_ezgzMwsSE1c3N_Z2Tc3MAeI3RIUaIHHVDOSSMy_YZmGGkRIOIQs_BDCHEG8oU2QG7OS_qKiTnL8EO4RhJidEMLI7dLxOsd_AuRetzhssYhhLTEL5DExzsvXedsbfQxlBSHGGJ0IcfKw20fhyhncYyJb_V1-kmW4YY1voUuymXUC-vwIvejNnvP8w9cPPh_fz0Y3NxeXZ-enzRWMZR2yiMe-UV6RTmChPUMWuExIxiUXN0jiBGOil6JR1hTFBCSUuUk71hrpWW0j3wbuNbk_ycfC56OeRVVBN8nLLGQiBKWybbJ6CUyMrzp6BEEiZawir69h90EacU6s9rw1oQa2WlDjaUTTHn5Ht9l4alSfcaI72qVdda9brWyr55cJy6pXdb8rHHChxtgN_D6O__76RPzuePls1GMeTi_2wVJt1qLqhg-uvnM_3l-opfi09z_Y3-BcHOuhc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732097548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advanced process monitoring and feedback control to enhance cell culture process production and robustness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zhang, An ; Tsang, Valerie Liu ; Moore, Brandon ; Shen, Vivian ; Huang, Yao-Ming ; Kshirsagar, Rashmi ; Ryll, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, An ; Tsang, Valerie Liu ; Moore, Brandon ; Shen, Vivian ; Huang, Yao-Ming ; Kshirsagar, Rashmi ; Ryll, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT It is a common practice in biotherapeutic manufacturing to define a fixed‐volume feed strategy for nutrient feeds, based on historical cell demand. However, once the feed volumes are defined, they are inflexible to batch‐to‐batch variations in cell growth and physiology and can lead to inconsistent productivity and product quality. In an effort to control critical quality attributes and to apply process analytical technology (PAT), a fully automated cell culture feedback control system has been explored in three different applications. The first study illustrates that frequent monitoring and automatically controlling the complex feed based on a surrogate (glutamate) level improved protein production. More importantly, the resulting feed strategy was translated into a manufacturing‐friendly manual feed strategy without impact on product quality. The second study demonstrates the improved process robustness of an automated feed strategy based on online bio‐capacitance measurements for cell growth. In the third study, glucose and lactate concentrations were measured online and were used to automatically control the glucose feed, which in turn changed lactate metabolism. These studies suggest that the auto‐feedback control system has the potential to significantly increase productivity and improve robustness in manufacturing, with the goal of ensuring process performance and product quality consistency. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015;112: 2495–2504. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The comparison between cIBC based auto feed and fixed feed at low seed density. The cIBC auto‐feedback control low seed process showed similar performance as the control regular seed process. However, the fixed feed low seed process crashed earlier due to over‐feeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bit.25684</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26108810</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIBIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; auto-feedback control ; Bioreactors ; Biotechnology ; capacitance ; Cell culture ; Cell Culture Techniques - methods ; Cell growth ; Cell Proliferation ; Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell culture ; CHO Cells - physiology ; Control systems ; Cricetulus ; Culture Media - chemistry ; fed-batch ; Feedback control ; Feedback control systems ; Feeds ; Glucose ; Glucose - metabolism ; glucose/lactate control ; human embryonic kidney (HEK) cell culture ; Lactic Acid - metabolism ; Metabolism ; Product quality ; Productivity ; Robustness ; Seeds ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2015-12, Vol.112 (12), p.2495-2504</ispartof><rights>2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Dec 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-911f9e92b9169120b5ca7815317bacbd2052b87f98d25573232429d8fa5d48c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-911f9e92b9169120b5ca7815317bacbd2052b87f98d25573232429d8fa5d48c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbit.25684$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbit.25684$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26108810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Valerie Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yao-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kshirsagar, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryll, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Advanced process monitoring and feedback control to enhance cell culture process production and robustness</title><title>Biotechnology and bioengineering</title><addtitle>Biotechnol. Bioeng</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT It is a common practice in biotherapeutic manufacturing to define a fixed‐volume feed strategy for nutrient feeds, based on historical cell demand. However, once the feed volumes are defined, they are inflexible to batch‐to‐batch variations in cell growth and physiology and can lead to inconsistent productivity and product quality. In an effort to control critical quality attributes and to apply process analytical technology (PAT), a fully automated cell culture feedback control system has been explored in three different applications. The first study illustrates that frequent monitoring and automatically controlling the complex feed based on a surrogate (glutamate) level improved protein production. More importantly, the resulting feed strategy was translated into a manufacturing‐friendly manual feed strategy without impact on product quality. The second study demonstrates the improved process robustness of an automated feed strategy based on online bio‐capacitance measurements for cell growth. In the third study, glucose and lactate concentrations were measured online and were used to automatically control the glucose feed, which in turn changed lactate metabolism. These studies suggest that the auto‐feedback control system has the potential to significantly increase productivity and improve robustness in manufacturing, with the goal of ensuring process performance and product quality consistency. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015;112: 2495–2504. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The comparison between cIBC based auto feed and fixed feed at low seed density. The cIBC auto‐feedback control low seed process showed similar performance as the control regular seed process. However, the fixed feed low seed process crashed earlier due to over‐feeding.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>auto-feedback control</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>capacitance</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Cell growth</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell culture</subject><subject>CHO Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Cricetulus</subject><subject>Culture Media - chemistry</subject><subject>fed-batch</subject><subject>Feedback control</subject><subject>Feedback control systems</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glucose - metabolism</subject><subject>glucose/lactate control</subject><subject>human embryonic kidney (HEK) cell culture</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - metabolism</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Product quality</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>0006-3592</issn><issn>1097-0290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1PVDEUxRujkQFZ-A-YJm5k8aAfr19LIIpEIkiGmLhp-to-fcObFts-lf_ezgzMwsSE1c3N_Z2Tc3MAeI3RIUaIHHVDOSSMy_YZmGGkRIOIQs_BDCHEG8oU2QG7OS_qKiTnL8EO4RhJidEMLI7dLxOsd_AuRetzhssYhhLTEL5DExzsvXedsbfQxlBSHGGJ0IcfKw20fhyhncYyJb_V1-kmW4YY1voUuymXUC-vwIvejNnvP8w9cPPh_fz0Y3NxeXZ-enzRWMZR2yiMe-UV6RTmChPUMWuExIxiUXN0jiBGOil6JR1hTFBCSUuUk71hrpWW0j3wbuNbk_ycfC56OeRVVBN8nLLGQiBKWybbJ6CUyMrzp6BEEiZawir69h90EacU6s9rw1oQa2WlDjaUTTHn5Ht9l4alSfcaI72qVdda9brWyr55cJy6pXdb8rHHChxtgN_D6O__76RPzuePls1GMeTi_2wVJt1qLqhg-uvnM_3l-opfi09z_Y3-BcHOuhc</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Zhang, An</creator><creator>Tsang, Valerie Liu</creator><creator>Moore, Brandon</creator><creator>Shen, Vivian</creator><creator>Huang, Yao-Ming</creator><creator>Kshirsagar, Rashmi</creator><creator>Ryll, Thomas</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Advanced process monitoring and feedback control to enhance cell culture process production and robustness</title><author>Zhang, An ; Tsang, Valerie Liu ; Moore, Brandon ; Shen, Vivian ; Huang, Yao-Ming ; Kshirsagar, Rashmi ; Ryll, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-911f9e92b9169120b5ca7815317bacbd2052b87f98d25573232429d8fa5d48c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>auto-feedback control</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>capacitance</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Cell growth</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell culture</topic><topic>CHO Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Cricetulus</topic><topic>Culture Media - chemistry</topic><topic>fed-batch</topic><topic>Feedback control</topic><topic>Feedback control systems</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glucose - metabolism</topic><topic>glucose/lactate control</topic><topic>human embryonic kidney (HEK) cell culture</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - metabolism</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Product quality</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Valerie Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yao-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kshirsagar, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryll, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, An</au><au>Tsang, Valerie Liu</au><au>Moore, Brandon</au><au>Shen, Vivian</au><au>Huang, Yao-Ming</au><au>Kshirsagar, Rashmi</au><au>Ryll, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advanced process monitoring and feedback control to enhance cell culture process production and robustness</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle><addtitle>Biotechnol. Bioeng</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2495</spage><epage>2504</epage><pages>2495-2504</pages><issn>0006-3592</issn><eissn>1097-0290</eissn><coden>BIBIAU</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT It is a common practice in biotherapeutic manufacturing to define a fixed‐volume feed strategy for nutrient feeds, based on historical cell demand. However, once the feed volumes are defined, they are inflexible to batch‐to‐batch variations in cell growth and physiology and can lead to inconsistent productivity and product quality. In an effort to control critical quality attributes and to apply process analytical technology (PAT), a fully automated cell culture feedback control system has been explored in three different applications. The first study illustrates that frequent monitoring and automatically controlling the complex feed based on a surrogate (glutamate) level improved protein production. More importantly, the resulting feed strategy was translated into a manufacturing‐friendly manual feed strategy without impact on product quality. The second study demonstrates the improved process robustness of an automated feed strategy based on online bio‐capacitance measurements for cell growth. In the third study, glucose and lactate concentrations were measured online and were used to automatically control the glucose feed, which in turn changed lactate metabolism. These studies suggest that the auto‐feedback control system has the potential to significantly increase productivity and improve robustness in manufacturing, with the goal of ensuring process performance and product quality consistency. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015;112: 2495–2504. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The comparison between cIBC based auto feed and fixed feed at low seed density. The cIBC auto‐feedback control low seed process showed similar performance as the control regular seed process. However, the fixed feed low seed process crashed earlier due to over‐feeding.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26108810</pmid><doi>10.1002/bit.25684</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3592
ispartof Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2015-12, Vol.112 (12), p.2495-2504
issn 0006-3592
1097-0290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770334584
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
auto-feedback control
Bioreactors
Biotechnology
capacitance
Cell culture
Cell Culture Techniques - methods
Cell growth
Cell Proliferation
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell culture
CHO Cells - physiology
Control systems
Cricetulus
Culture Media - chemistry
fed-batch
Feedback control
Feedback control systems
Feeds
Glucose
Glucose - metabolism
glucose/lactate control
human embryonic kidney (HEK) cell culture
Lactic Acid - metabolism
Metabolism
Product quality
Productivity
Robustness
Seeds
Strategy
title Advanced process monitoring and feedback control to enhance cell culture process production and robustness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T13%3A37%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advanced%20process%20monitoring%20and%20feedback%20control%20to%20enhance%20cell%20culture%20process%20production%20and%20robustness&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20and%20bioengineering&rft.au=Zhang,%20An&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2495&rft.epage=2504&rft.pages=2495-2504&rft.issn=0006-3592&rft.eissn=1097-0290&rft.coden=BIBIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bit.25684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3861630741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732097548&rft_id=info:pmid/26108810&rfr_iscdi=true