The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact

•The effect of vehicle front height on pedestrian ground contact mechanism is investigated.•The results of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations are presented.•Six recurring ground-impact mechanisms are identified.•Statistically significant difference exists among the seven impact mechanisms.•Res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accident analysis and prevention 2015-06, Vol.79, p.56-69
Hauptverfasser: Crocetta, Gianmarco, Piantini, Simone, Pierini, Marco, Simms, Ciaran
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue
container_start_page 56
container_title Accident analysis and prevention
container_volume 79
creator Crocetta, Gianmarco
Piantini, Simone
Pierini, Marco
Simms, Ciaran
description •The effect of vehicle front height on pedestrian ground contact mechanism is investigated.•The results of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations are presented.•Six recurring ground-impact mechanisms are identified.•Statistically significant difference exists among the seven impact mechanisms.•Resulting ground impact mechanism is affected by vehicle front height. Accident data have shown that in pedestrian accidents with high-fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the risk of pedestrian head injuries from the contact with the ground is higher than with low-fronted vehicles (passenger cars). However, the reasons for this remain poorly understood. This paper addresses this question using multibody modelling to investigate the influence of vehicle front height and shape in pedestrian accidents on the mechanism of impact with the ground and on head ground impact speed. To this end, a set of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations was carried out using the MADYMO multibody simulation software. Impacts were simulated with six vehicle types at three impact speeds (20, 30, 40km/h) and three pedestrian types (50th % male, 5th % female, and 6-year-old child) at six different initial stance configurations, stationary and walking at 1.4m/s. Six different ground impact mechanisms, distinguished from each other by the manner in which the pedestrian impacted the ground, were identified. These configurations have statistically distinct and considerably different distributions of head–ground impact speeds. Pedestrian initial stance configuration (gait and walking speed) introduced a high variability to the head–ground impact speed. Nonetheless, the head–ground impact speed varied significantly between the different ground impact mechanisms identified and the distribution of impact mechanisms was strongly associated with vehicle type. In general, impact mechanisms for adults resulting in a head-first contact with the ground were more severe with high fronted vehicles compared to low fronted vehicles, though there is a speed dependency to these findings. With high fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the pedestrian was mainly pushed forward and for children this resulted in high head ground contact speeds.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770323438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001457515000834</els_id><sourcerecordid>1680185419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-e58d17a28fe01ba3d4d96d9c9856955bc2e1b598ad9edb861a4f6052cde849f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxA7xIj15aJ03TJHiSxS8QvOg5pMlUs3TbmmwX_Pdm2dWjnmaGeeZleAi5oFBQoPX1sjBmLEqgvABWAKgDMqdSqLwELg7JHABoXnHBZ-QkxmUahRT8mMxKLikTNczJ3esHZr5vuwl7i9nQZhv88LbDrA1Dv86xd5nD6N_7bOizEVO_Dt702XsYprTzq9HY9Rk5ak0X8XxfT8nb_d3r4jF_fnl4Wtw-55aXLIVx6agwpWwRaGOYq5yqnbJK8lpx3tgSacOVNE6ha2RNTdXWwEvrUFaq5eyUXO1yxzB8TukVvfLRYteZHocpaioEsJJVTP6P1hKo5BVVCaU71IYhxoCtHoNfmfClKeitaL3USbTeitbAdBKdbi738VOzQvd78WM2ATc7AJOPjcego_Vbx84HtGvtBv9H_Dcqvo1I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680185419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Crocetta, Gianmarco ; Piantini, Simone ; Pierini, Marco ; Simms, Ciaran</creator><creatorcontrib>Crocetta, Gianmarco ; Piantini, Simone ; Pierini, Marco ; Simms, Ciaran</creatorcontrib><description>•The effect of vehicle front height on pedestrian ground contact mechanism is investigated.•The results of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations are presented.•Six recurring ground-impact mechanisms are identified.•Statistically significant difference exists among the seven impact mechanisms.•Resulting ground impact mechanism is affected by vehicle front height. Accident data have shown that in pedestrian accidents with high-fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the risk of pedestrian head injuries from the contact with the ground is higher than with low-fronted vehicles (passenger cars). However, the reasons for this remain poorly understood. This paper addresses this question using multibody modelling to investigate the influence of vehicle front height and shape in pedestrian accidents on the mechanism of impact with the ground and on head ground impact speed. To this end, a set of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations was carried out using the MADYMO multibody simulation software. Impacts were simulated with six vehicle types at three impact speeds (20, 30, 40km/h) and three pedestrian types (50th % male, 5th % female, and 6-year-old child) at six different initial stance configurations, stationary and walking at 1.4m/s. Six different ground impact mechanisms, distinguished from each other by the manner in which the pedestrian impacted the ground, were identified. These configurations have statistically distinct and considerably different distributions of head–ground impact speeds. Pedestrian initial stance configuration (gait and walking speed) introduced a high variability to the head–ground impact speed. Nonetheless, the head–ground impact speed varied significantly between the different ground impact mechanisms identified and the distribution of impact mechanisms was strongly associated with vehicle type. In general, impact mechanisms for adults resulting in a head-first contact with the ground were more severe with high fronted vehicles compared to low fronted vehicles, though there is a speed dependency to these findings. With high fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the pedestrian was mainly pushed forward and for children this resulted in high head ground contact speeds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25813760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Accidents, Traffic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Adult ; Automobiles ; Automotive engineering ; Bonnet leading edge height ; Child ; Contact ; Craniocerebral Trauma - epidemiology ; Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology ; Crashworthiness ; Equipment Design - adverse effects ; Female ; Ground impact ; Ground impact mechanism ; Grounds ; Head–ground impact speed ; Humans ; Impact strength ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Motor Vehicles - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pedestrians ; Pedestrians - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Vehicle–pedestrian collision ; Walking - injuries</subject><ispartof>Accident analysis and prevention, 2015-06, Vol.79, p.56-69</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-e58d17a28fe01ba3d4d96d9c9856955bc2e1b598ad9edb861a4f6052cde849f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-e58d17a28fe01ba3d4d96d9c9856955bc2e1b598ad9edb861a4f6052cde849f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25813760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crocetta, Gianmarco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piantini, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simms, Ciaran</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact</title><title>Accident analysis and prevention</title><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><description>•The effect of vehicle front height on pedestrian ground contact mechanism is investigated.•The results of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations are presented.•Six recurring ground-impact mechanisms are identified.•Statistically significant difference exists among the seven impact mechanisms.•Resulting ground impact mechanism is affected by vehicle front height. Accident data have shown that in pedestrian accidents with high-fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the risk of pedestrian head injuries from the contact with the ground is higher than with low-fronted vehicles (passenger cars). However, the reasons for this remain poorly understood. This paper addresses this question using multibody modelling to investigate the influence of vehicle front height and shape in pedestrian accidents on the mechanism of impact with the ground and on head ground impact speed. To this end, a set of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations was carried out using the MADYMO multibody simulation software. Impacts were simulated with six vehicle types at three impact speeds (20, 30, 40km/h) and three pedestrian types (50th % male, 5th % female, and 6-year-old child) at six different initial stance configurations, stationary and walking at 1.4m/s. Six different ground impact mechanisms, distinguished from each other by the manner in which the pedestrian impacted the ground, were identified. These configurations have statistically distinct and considerably different distributions of head–ground impact speeds. Pedestrian initial stance configuration (gait and walking speed) introduced a high variability to the head–ground impact speed. Nonetheless, the head–ground impact speed varied significantly between the different ground impact mechanisms identified and the distribution of impact mechanisms was strongly associated with vehicle type. In general, impact mechanisms for adults resulting in a head-first contact with the ground were more severe with high fronted vehicles compared to low fronted vehicles, though there is a speed dependency to these findings. With high fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the pedestrian was mainly pushed forward and for children this resulted in high head ground contact speeds.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Accidents, Traffic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Bonnet leading edge height</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Contact</subject><subject>Craniocerebral Trauma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology</subject><subject>Crashworthiness</subject><subject>Equipment Design - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ground impact</subject><subject>Ground impact mechanism</subject><subject>Grounds</subject><subject>Head–ground impact speed</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact strength</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Motor Vehicles - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pedestrians</subject><subject>Pedestrians - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Vehicle–pedestrian collision</subject><subject>Walking - injuries</subject><issn>0001-4575</issn><issn>1879-2057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxA7xIj15aJ03TJHiSxS8QvOg5pMlUs3TbmmwX_Pdm2dWjnmaGeeZleAi5oFBQoPX1sjBmLEqgvABWAKgDMqdSqLwELg7JHABoXnHBZ-QkxmUahRT8mMxKLikTNczJ3esHZr5vuwl7i9nQZhv88LbDrA1Dv86xd5nD6N_7bOizEVO_Dt702XsYprTzq9HY9Rk5ak0X8XxfT8nb_d3r4jF_fnl4Wtw-55aXLIVx6agwpWwRaGOYq5yqnbJK8lpx3tgSacOVNE6ha2RNTdXWwEvrUFaq5eyUXO1yxzB8TukVvfLRYteZHocpaioEsJJVTP6P1hKo5BVVCaU71IYhxoCtHoNfmfClKeitaL3USbTeitbAdBKdbi738VOzQvd78WM2ATc7AJOPjcego_Vbx84HtGvtBv9H_Dcqvo1I</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Crocetta, Gianmarco</creator><creator>Piantini, Simone</creator><creator>Pierini, Marco</creator><creator>Simms, Ciaran</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact</title><author>Crocetta, Gianmarco ; Piantini, Simone ; Pierini, Marco ; Simms, Ciaran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-e58d17a28fe01ba3d4d96d9c9856955bc2e1b598ad9edb861a4f6052cde849f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Accidents, Traffic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Bonnet leading edge height</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Contact</topic><topic>Craniocerebral Trauma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology</topic><topic>Crashworthiness</topic><topic>Equipment Design - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ground impact</topic><topic>Ground impact mechanism</topic><topic>Grounds</topic><topic>Head–ground impact speed</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact strength</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Motor Vehicles - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pedestrians</topic><topic>Pedestrians - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Vehicle–pedestrian collision</topic><topic>Walking - injuries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crocetta, Gianmarco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piantini, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simms, Ciaran</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crocetta, Gianmarco</au><au>Piantini, Simone</au><au>Pierini, Marco</au><au>Simms, Ciaran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact</atitle><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>79</volume><spage>56</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>56-69</pages><issn>0001-4575</issn><eissn>1879-2057</eissn><abstract>•The effect of vehicle front height on pedestrian ground contact mechanism is investigated.•The results of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations are presented.•Six recurring ground-impact mechanisms are identified.•Statistically significant difference exists among the seven impact mechanisms.•Resulting ground impact mechanism is affected by vehicle front height. Accident data have shown that in pedestrian accidents with high-fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the risk of pedestrian head injuries from the contact with the ground is higher than with low-fronted vehicles (passenger cars). However, the reasons for this remain poorly understood. This paper addresses this question using multibody modelling to investigate the influence of vehicle front height and shape in pedestrian accidents on the mechanism of impact with the ground and on head ground impact speed. To this end, a set of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations was carried out using the MADYMO multibody simulation software. Impacts were simulated with six vehicle types at three impact speeds (20, 30, 40km/h) and three pedestrian types (50th % male, 5th % female, and 6-year-old child) at six different initial stance configurations, stationary and walking at 1.4m/s. Six different ground impact mechanisms, distinguished from each other by the manner in which the pedestrian impacted the ground, were identified. These configurations have statistically distinct and considerably different distributions of head–ground impact speeds. Pedestrian initial stance configuration (gait and walking speed) introduced a high variability to the head–ground impact speed. Nonetheless, the head–ground impact speed varied significantly between the different ground impact mechanisms identified and the distribution of impact mechanisms was strongly associated with vehicle type. In general, impact mechanisms for adults resulting in a head-first contact with the ground were more severe with high fronted vehicles compared to low fronted vehicles, though there is a speed dependency to these findings. With high fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the pedestrian was mainly pushed forward and for children this resulted in high head ground contact speeds.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25813760</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4575
ispartof Accident analysis and prevention, 2015-06, Vol.79, p.56-69
issn 0001-4575
1879-2057
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770323438
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Accidents
Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data
Adult
Automobiles
Automotive engineering
Bonnet leading edge height
Child
Contact
Craniocerebral Trauma - epidemiology
Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology
Crashworthiness
Equipment Design - adverse effects
Female
Ground impact
Ground impact mechanism
Grounds
Head–ground impact speed
Humans
Impact strength
Male
Models, Theoretical
Motor Vehicles - statistics & numerical data
Pedestrians
Pedestrians - statistics & numerical data
Vehicle–pedestrian collision
Walking - injuries
title The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A00%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20vehicle%20front-end%20design%20on%20pedestrian%20ground%20impact&rft.jtitle=Accident%20analysis%20and%20prevention&rft.au=Crocetta,%20Gianmarco&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=79&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=56-69&rft.issn=0001-4575&rft.eissn=1879-2057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680185419%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680185419&rft_id=info:pmid/25813760&rft_els_id=S0001457515000834&rfr_iscdi=true