The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact
•The effect of vehicle front height on pedestrian ground contact mechanism is investigated.•The results of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations are presented.•Six recurring ground-impact mechanisms are identified.•Statistically significant difference exists among the seven impact mechanisms.•Res...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Accident analysis and prevention 2015-06, Vol.79, p.56-69 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 69 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 56 |
container_title | Accident analysis and prevention |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Crocetta, Gianmarco Piantini, Simone Pierini, Marco Simms, Ciaran |
description | •The effect of vehicle front height on pedestrian ground contact mechanism is investigated.•The results of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations are presented.•Six recurring ground-impact mechanisms are identified.•Statistically significant difference exists among the seven impact mechanisms.•Resulting ground impact mechanism is affected by vehicle front height.
Accident data have shown that in pedestrian accidents with high-fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the risk of pedestrian head injuries from the contact with the ground is higher than with low-fronted vehicles (passenger cars). However, the reasons for this remain poorly understood. This paper addresses this question using multibody modelling to investigate the influence of vehicle front height and shape in pedestrian accidents on the mechanism of impact with the ground and on head ground impact speed. To this end, a set of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations was carried out using the MADYMO multibody simulation software. Impacts were simulated with six vehicle types at three impact speeds (20, 30, 40km/h) and three pedestrian types (50th % male, 5th % female, and 6-year-old child) at six different initial stance configurations, stationary and walking at 1.4m/s.
Six different ground impact mechanisms, distinguished from each other by the manner in which the pedestrian impacted the ground, were identified. These configurations have statistically distinct and considerably different distributions of head–ground impact speeds. Pedestrian initial stance configuration (gait and walking speed) introduced a high variability to the head–ground impact speed. Nonetheless, the head–ground impact speed varied significantly between the different ground impact mechanisms identified and the distribution of impact mechanisms was strongly associated with vehicle type. In general, impact mechanisms for adults resulting in a head-first contact with the ground were more severe with high fronted vehicles compared to low fronted vehicles, though there is a speed dependency to these findings. With high fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the pedestrian was mainly pushed forward and for children this resulted in high head ground contact speeds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770323438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001457515000834</els_id><sourcerecordid>1680185419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-e58d17a28fe01ba3d4d96d9c9856955bc2e1b598ad9edb861a4f6052cde849f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxA7xIj15aJ03TJHiSxS8QvOg5pMlUs3TbmmwX_Pdm2dWjnmaGeeZleAi5oFBQoPX1sjBmLEqgvABWAKgDMqdSqLwELg7JHABoXnHBZ-QkxmUahRT8mMxKLikTNczJ3esHZr5vuwl7i9nQZhv88LbDrA1Dv86xd5nD6N_7bOizEVO_Dt702XsYprTzq9HY9Rk5ak0X8XxfT8nb_d3r4jF_fnl4Wtw-55aXLIVx6agwpWwRaGOYq5yqnbJK8lpx3tgSacOVNE6ha2RNTdXWwEvrUFaq5eyUXO1yxzB8TukVvfLRYteZHocpaioEsJJVTP6P1hKo5BVVCaU71IYhxoCtHoNfmfClKeitaL3USbTeitbAdBKdbi738VOzQvd78WM2ATc7AJOPjcego_Vbx84HtGvtBv9H_Dcqvo1I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680185419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Crocetta, Gianmarco ; Piantini, Simone ; Pierini, Marco ; Simms, Ciaran</creator><creatorcontrib>Crocetta, Gianmarco ; Piantini, Simone ; Pierini, Marco ; Simms, Ciaran</creatorcontrib><description>•The effect of vehicle front height on pedestrian ground contact mechanism is investigated.•The results of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations are presented.•Six recurring ground-impact mechanisms are identified.•Statistically significant difference exists among the seven impact mechanisms.•Resulting ground impact mechanism is affected by vehicle front height.
Accident data have shown that in pedestrian accidents with high-fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the risk of pedestrian head injuries from the contact with the ground is higher than with low-fronted vehicles (passenger cars). However, the reasons for this remain poorly understood. This paper addresses this question using multibody modelling to investigate the influence of vehicle front height and shape in pedestrian accidents on the mechanism of impact with the ground and on head ground impact speed. To this end, a set of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations was carried out using the MADYMO multibody simulation software. Impacts were simulated with six vehicle types at three impact speeds (20, 30, 40km/h) and three pedestrian types (50th % male, 5th % female, and 6-year-old child) at six different initial stance configurations, stationary and walking at 1.4m/s.
Six different ground impact mechanisms, distinguished from each other by the manner in which the pedestrian impacted the ground, were identified. These configurations have statistically distinct and considerably different distributions of head–ground impact speeds. Pedestrian initial stance configuration (gait and walking speed) introduced a high variability to the head–ground impact speed. Nonetheless, the head–ground impact speed varied significantly between the different ground impact mechanisms identified and the distribution of impact mechanisms was strongly associated with vehicle type. In general, impact mechanisms for adults resulting in a head-first contact with the ground were more severe with high fronted vehicles compared to low fronted vehicles, though there is a speed dependency to these findings. With high fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the pedestrian was mainly pushed forward and for children this resulted in high head ground contact speeds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25813760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data ; Adult ; Automobiles ; Automotive engineering ; Bonnet leading edge height ; Child ; Contact ; Craniocerebral Trauma - epidemiology ; Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology ; Crashworthiness ; Equipment Design - adverse effects ; Female ; Ground impact ; Ground impact mechanism ; Grounds ; Head–ground impact speed ; Humans ; Impact strength ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Motor Vehicles - statistics & numerical data ; Pedestrians ; Pedestrians - statistics & numerical data ; Vehicle–pedestrian collision ; Walking - injuries</subject><ispartof>Accident analysis and prevention, 2015-06, Vol.79, p.56-69</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-e58d17a28fe01ba3d4d96d9c9856955bc2e1b598ad9edb861a4f6052cde849f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-e58d17a28fe01ba3d4d96d9c9856955bc2e1b598ad9edb861a4f6052cde849f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25813760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crocetta, Gianmarco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piantini, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simms, Ciaran</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact</title><title>Accident analysis and prevention</title><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><description>•The effect of vehicle front height on pedestrian ground contact mechanism is investigated.•The results of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations are presented.•Six recurring ground-impact mechanisms are identified.•Statistically significant difference exists among the seven impact mechanisms.•Resulting ground impact mechanism is affected by vehicle front height.
Accident data have shown that in pedestrian accidents with high-fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the risk of pedestrian head injuries from the contact with the ground is higher than with low-fronted vehicles (passenger cars). However, the reasons for this remain poorly understood. This paper addresses this question using multibody modelling to investigate the influence of vehicle front height and shape in pedestrian accidents on the mechanism of impact with the ground and on head ground impact speed. To this end, a set of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations was carried out using the MADYMO multibody simulation software. Impacts were simulated with six vehicle types at three impact speeds (20, 30, 40km/h) and three pedestrian types (50th % male, 5th % female, and 6-year-old child) at six different initial stance configurations, stationary and walking at 1.4m/s.
Six different ground impact mechanisms, distinguished from each other by the manner in which the pedestrian impacted the ground, were identified. These configurations have statistically distinct and considerably different distributions of head–ground impact speeds. Pedestrian initial stance configuration (gait and walking speed) introduced a high variability to the head–ground impact speed. Nonetheless, the head–ground impact speed varied significantly between the different ground impact mechanisms identified and the distribution of impact mechanisms was strongly associated with vehicle type. In general, impact mechanisms for adults resulting in a head-first contact with the ground were more severe with high fronted vehicles compared to low fronted vehicles, though there is a speed dependency to these findings. With high fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the pedestrian was mainly pushed forward and for children this resulted in high head ground contact speeds.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Bonnet leading edge height</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Contact</subject><subject>Craniocerebral Trauma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology</subject><subject>Crashworthiness</subject><subject>Equipment Design - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ground impact</subject><subject>Ground impact mechanism</subject><subject>Grounds</subject><subject>Head–ground impact speed</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact strength</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Motor Vehicles - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pedestrians</subject><subject>Pedestrians - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Vehicle–pedestrian collision</subject><subject>Walking - injuries</subject><issn>0001-4575</issn><issn>1879-2057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxA7xIj15aJ03TJHiSxS8QvOg5pMlUs3TbmmwX_Pdm2dWjnmaGeeZleAi5oFBQoPX1sjBmLEqgvABWAKgDMqdSqLwELg7JHABoXnHBZ-QkxmUahRT8mMxKLikTNczJ3esHZr5vuwl7i9nQZhv88LbDrA1Dv86xd5nD6N_7bOizEVO_Dt702XsYprTzq9HY9Rk5ak0X8XxfT8nb_d3r4jF_fnl4Wtw-55aXLIVx6agwpWwRaGOYq5yqnbJK8lpx3tgSacOVNE6ha2RNTdXWwEvrUFaq5eyUXO1yxzB8TukVvfLRYteZHocpaioEsJJVTP6P1hKo5BVVCaU71IYhxoCtHoNfmfClKeitaL3USbTeitbAdBKdbi738VOzQvd78WM2ATc7AJOPjcego_Vbx84HtGvtBv9H_Dcqvo1I</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Crocetta, Gianmarco</creator><creator>Piantini, Simone</creator><creator>Pierini, Marco</creator><creator>Simms, Ciaran</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact</title><author>Crocetta, Gianmarco ; Piantini, Simone ; Pierini, Marco ; Simms, Ciaran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-e58d17a28fe01ba3d4d96d9c9856955bc2e1b598ad9edb861a4f6052cde849f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Bonnet leading edge height</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Contact</topic><topic>Craniocerebral Trauma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology</topic><topic>Crashworthiness</topic><topic>Equipment Design - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ground impact</topic><topic>Ground impact mechanism</topic><topic>Grounds</topic><topic>Head–ground impact speed</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact strength</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Motor Vehicles - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pedestrians</topic><topic>Pedestrians - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Vehicle–pedestrian collision</topic><topic>Walking - injuries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crocetta, Gianmarco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piantini, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simms, Ciaran</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crocetta, Gianmarco</au><au>Piantini, Simone</au><au>Pierini, Marco</au><au>Simms, Ciaran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact</atitle><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>79</volume><spage>56</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>56-69</pages><issn>0001-4575</issn><eissn>1879-2057</eissn><abstract>•The effect of vehicle front height on pedestrian ground contact mechanism is investigated.•The results of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations are presented.•Six recurring ground-impact mechanisms are identified.•Statistically significant difference exists among the seven impact mechanisms.•Resulting ground impact mechanism is affected by vehicle front height.
Accident data have shown that in pedestrian accidents with high-fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the risk of pedestrian head injuries from the contact with the ground is higher than with low-fronted vehicles (passenger cars). However, the reasons for this remain poorly understood. This paper addresses this question using multibody modelling to investigate the influence of vehicle front height and shape in pedestrian accidents on the mechanism of impact with the ground and on head ground impact speed. To this end, a set of 648 pedestrian/vehicle crash simulations was carried out using the MADYMO multibody simulation software. Impacts were simulated with six vehicle types at three impact speeds (20, 30, 40km/h) and three pedestrian types (50th % male, 5th % female, and 6-year-old child) at six different initial stance configurations, stationary and walking at 1.4m/s.
Six different ground impact mechanisms, distinguished from each other by the manner in which the pedestrian impacted the ground, were identified. These configurations have statistically distinct and considerably different distributions of head–ground impact speeds. Pedestrian initial stance configuration (gait and walking speed) introduced a high variability to the head–ground impact speed. Nonetheless, the head–ground impact speed varied significantly between the different ground impact mechanisms identified and the distribution of impact mechanisms was strongly associated with vehicle type. In general, impact mechanisms for adults resulting in a head-first contact with the ground were more severe with high fronted vehicles compared to low fronted vehicles, though there is a speed dependency to these findings. With high fronted vehicles (SUVs and vans) the pedestrian was mainly pushed forward and for children this resulted in high head ground contact speeds.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25813760</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4575 |
ispartof | Accident analysis and prevention, 2015-06, Vol.79, p.56-69 |
issn | 0001-4575 1879-2057 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770323438 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Accidents Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data Adult Automobiles Automotive engineering Bonnet leading edge height Child Contact Craniocerebral Trauma - epidemiology Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology Crashworthiness Equipment Design - adverse effects Female Ground impact Ground impact mechanism Grounds Head–ground impact speed Humans Impact strength Male Models, Theoretical Motor Vehicles - statistics & numerical data Pedestrians Pedestrians - statistics & numerical data Vehicle–pedestrian collision Walking - injuries |
title | The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A00%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20vehicle%20front-end%20design%20on%20pedestrian%20ground%20impact&rft.jtitle=Accident%20analysis%20and%20prevention&rft.au=Crocetta,%20Gianmarco&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=79&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=56-69&rft.issn=0001-4575&rft.eissn=1879-2057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680185419%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680185419&rft_id=info:pmid/25813760&rft_els_id=S0001457515000834&rfr_iscdi=true |