Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research
The cornerstone of good research is establishing integrity. However, identifying and gauging methodological rigour for the Delphi technique remains elusive. This is due to a number of reasons such as the ongoing epistemological debate, along with continual modifications. Consequently, the scant stud...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Technological forecasting & social change 2011-11, Vol.78 (9), p.1695-1704 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1704 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1695 |
| container_title | Technological forecasting & social change |
| container_volume | 78 |
| creator | Hasson, Felicity Keeney, Sinead |
| description | The cornerstone of good research is establishing integrity. However, identifying and gauging methodological rigour for the Delphi technique remains elusive. This is due to a number of reasons such as the ongoing epistemological debate, along with continual modifications. Consequently, the scant studies exploring rigour are mainly experimental, component specific and outdated. This paper discusses the literature on establishing rigour in Delphi studies, the methodological trinity of reliability, validity and trustworthiness. In addition it presents a discussion of the principal forms of establishing rigour, such as the application of rigour using both qualitative and quantitative measurements and corroborating results with relevant evidence in the field for each individual Delphi. Addressing such issues will help enhance the development and utilisation of rigour in the future. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770319167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0040162511000801</els_id><sourcerecordid>1010630440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-cb247b2a387f02bb19fc7a7d7771ff173584ee021815de2f8282f6fe95ba80643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEuXxF1DExJJwr-PYzgYq5SFVYoHZStzrxlVJip0i8e9xVVhYOnk537HuYewKoUBAebsqRrKdGwIVHBALEAVAdcQmqFWZVxXUx2wCICBHyatTdhbjCgBUqeWE4azvmt76fpkFvxy2IfN9NnaUPdB60_lsp-7955ayQJGaYLsLduKadaTL3_ecvT_O3qbP-fz16WV6P8-t0PWY25YL1fKm1MoBb1usnVWNWiil0DlUZaUFEXDUWC2IO801d9JRXbWNBinKc3az927CkP6Po_nw0dJ63fQ0bKNBpaDEGqU6jAKCLEEISOj1P3SVju7TIaZO1VIyjQmSe8iGIcZAzmyC_2jCdzLtZNKszF9zs2tuQJi0TsO7_ZBSmC9PwUTrqbe08IHsaBaDP6T4AT28i2U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900518781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hasson, Felicity ; Keeney, Sinead</creator><creatorcontrib>Hasson, Felicity ; Keeney, Sinead</creatorcontrib><description>The cornerstone of good research is establishing integrity. However, identifying and gauging methodological rigour for the Delphi technique remains elusive. This is due to a number of reasons such as the ongoing epistemological debate, along with continual modifications. Consequently, the scant studies exploring rigour are mainly experimental, component specific and outdated. This paper discusses the literature on establishing rigour in Delphi studies, the methodological trinity of reliability, validity and trustworthiness. In addition it presents a discussion of the principal forms of establishing rigour, such as the application of rigour using both qualitative and quantitative measurements and corroborating results with relevant evidence in the field for each individual Delphi. Addressing such issues will help enhance the development and utilisation of rigour in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-1625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TFSCB3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Delphi ; Delphi method ; Delphi technique ; Epistemology ; Gaging ; Gauging ; Integrity ; Reliability ; Research Methodology ; Studies ; Technological forecasting ; Trustworthiness ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Technological forecasting & social change, 2011-11, Vol.78 (9), p.1695-1704</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-cb247b2a387f02bb19fc7a7d7771ff173584ee021815de2f8282f6fe95ba80643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-cb247b2a387f02bb19fc7a7d7771ff173584ee021815de2f8282f6fe95ba80643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,33755,33756,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hasson, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeney, Sinead</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research</title><title>Technological forecasting & social change</title><description>The cornerstone of good research is establishing integrity. However, identifying and gauging methodological rigour for the Delphi technique remains elusive. This is due to a number of reasons such as the ongoing epistemological debate, along with continual modifications. Consequently, the scant studies exploring rigour are mainly experimental, component specific and outdated. This paper discusses the literature on establishing rigour in Delphi studies, the methodological trinity of reliability, validity and trustworthiness. In addition it presents a discussion of the principal forms of establishing rigour, such as the application of rigour using both qualitative and quantitative measurements and corroborating results with relevant evidence in the field for each individual Delphi. Addressing such issues will help enhance the development and utilisation of rigour in the future.</description><subject>Delphi</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Delphi technique</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Gaging</subject><subject>Gauging</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technological forecasting</subject><subject>Trustworthiness</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0040-1625</issn><issn>1873-5509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEuXxF1DExJJwr-PYzgYq5SFVYoHZStzrxlVJip0i8e9xVVhYOnk537HuYewKoUBAebsqRrKdGwIVHBALEAVAdcQmqFWZVxXUx2wCICBHyatTdhbjCgBUqeWE4azvmt76fpkFvxy2IfN9NnaUPdB60_lsp-7955ayQJGaYLsLduKadaTL3_ecvT_O3qbP-fz16WV6P8-t0PWY25YL1fKm1MoBb1usnVWNWiil0DlUZaUFEXDUWC2IO801d9JRXbWNBinKc3az927CkP6Po_nw0dJ63fQ0bKNBpaDEGqU6jAKCLEEISOj1P3SVju7TIaZO1VIyjQmSe8iGIcZAzmyC_2jCdzLtZNKszF9zs2tuQJi0TsO7_ZBSmC9PwUTrqbe08IHsaBaDP6T4AT28i2U</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Hasson, Felicity</creator><creator>Keeney, Sinead</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research</title><author>Hasson, Felicity ; Keeney, Sinead</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-cb247b2a387f02bb19fc7a7d7771ff173584ee021815de2f8282f6fe95ba80643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Delphi</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Delphi technique</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Gaging</topic><topic>Gauging</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technological forecasting</topic><topic>Trustworthiness</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hasson, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeney, Sinead</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Technological forecasting & social change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hasson, Felicity</au><au>Keeney, Sinead</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research</atitle><jtitle>Technological forecasting & social change</jtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1695</spage><epage>1704</epage><pages>1695-1704</pages><issn>0040-1625</issn><eissn>1873-5509</eissn><coden>TFSCB3</coden><abstract>The cornerstone of good research is establishing integrity. However, identifying and gauging methodological rigour for the Delphi technique remains elusive. This is due to a number of reasons such as the ongoing epistemological debate, along with continual modifications. Consequently, the scant studies exploring rigour are mainly experimental, component specific and outdated. This paper discusses the literature on establishing rigour in Delphi studies, the methodological trinity of reliability, validity and trustworthiness. In addition it presents a discussion of the principal forms of establishing rigour, such as the application of rigour using both qualitative and quantitative measurements and corroborating results with relevant evidence in the field for each individual Delphi. Addressing such issues will help enhance the development and utilisation of rigour in the future.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0040-1625 |
| ispartof | Technological forecasting & social change, 2011-11, Vol.78 (9), p.1695-1704 |
| issn | 0040-1625 1873-5509 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770319167 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Delphi Delphi method Delphi technique Epistemology Gaging Gauging Integrity Reliability Research Methodology Studies Technological forecasting Trustworthiness Validity |
| title | Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A02%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20rigour%20in%20the%20Delphi%20technique%20research&rft.jtitle=Technological%20forecasting%20&%20social%20change&rft.au=Hasson,%20Felicity&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1695&rft.epage=1704&rft.pages=1695-1704&rft.issn=0040-1625&rft.eissn=1873-5509&rft.coden=TFSCB3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010630440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900518781&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0040162511000801&rfr_iscdi=true |