Headed stud shear connector for thin ultrahigh-performance concrete bridge deck

Ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) provides much higher compressive and tensile strength than conventional concrete. UHPC is advantageous for use as a bridge slab deck owing to its higher strength, stiffness, and durability. One drawback, however, is the fact that the joint region connecting the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of constructional steel research 2015-05, Vol.108, p.23-30
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Jee-Sang, Kwark, Jongwon, Joh, Changbin, Yoo, Sung-Won, Lee, Kyoung-Chan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue
container_start_page 23
container_title Journal of constructional steel research
container_volume 108
creator Kim, Jee-Sang
Kwark, Jongwon
Joh, Changbin
Yoo, Sung-Won
Lee, Kyoung-Chan
description Ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) provides much higher compressive and tensile strength than conventional concrete. UHPC is advantageous for use as a bridge slab deck owing to its higher strength, stiffness, and durability. One drawback, however, is the fact that the joint region connecting the deck and girder generally has a thicker cross-section to ensure proper shear connection, which hinders making the overall UHPC deck thinner and lighter. In addition, the shear strength of stud shear connectors embedded in UHPC slab has not been verified to be the same as that in a conventional concrete deck. This study investigates a stud shear connector embedded in a UHPC deck through 15 push-out tests. The ultimate strength of the stud and relative slips are measured. The test parameters were chosen to prove the feasibility of a thinner slab. The stud aspect ratio, overall height-to-diameter, and cover thickness on top of the stud head requirement are also examined to verify the existing geometrical constraints specified in the AASHTO LRFD and Eurocode-4 design codes for UHPC decks. It was shown that the aspect ratio can be reduced from 4 to 3.1 without loss of shear strength of the stud, and the cover could be reduced from 50mm to 25mm without causing a splitting crack at the UHPC slab. However, the required ductility demand, 6mm, was not realized in all cases. Therefore, the stud shear connectors in a UHPC deck should be designed according to the elastic criterion. •Stud shear connectors provide sufficient shear strength for UHPC deck.•Aspect ratio of stud can be as low as 3.1 without a loss of strength for UHPC deck.•Cover thickness over the stud can be as low as 25mm without causing a splitting crack.•Stud shear connectors do not satisfy ductility demands for UHPC deck.•Stud shear connectors in a UHPC deck should be used as per elastic design concept.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770310198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0143974X15000346</els_id><sourcerecordid>1770310198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-902ffd6242043fe5c1b6c172a6aa1d7425d56fac72ab8780384064c65acfa17a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhYMouK7-AU89emmdJG3TghdZ1BUW9qLgLWSTyTa1265JK_jvTVnPHmYGHu8NvI-QWwoZBVret1mrg88Y0CIDlgHQM7KgleBpUVf8nCyA5jytRf5xSa5CaAGgqnm1INs1KoMmCeMUV4PKJ3roe9Tj4BMbZ2xcn0zd6FXj9k16RB_Vg-o1zkbtccRk553ZY2JQf16TC6u6gDd_d0nen5_eVut0s315XT1uUs3rekxrYNaakuUMcm6x0HRXaiqYKpWiRuSsMEVplY7KrhIV8CqHMtdlobRVVCi-JHenv0c_fE0YRnlwQWPXqR6HKUgqBPCIJrZfEnayaj-E4NHKo3cH5X8kBTnTk62c6cmZngQmI70YejiFMJb4duhl0A5ja-N8hCPN4P6L_wJTSHkm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770310198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Headed stud shear connector for thin ultrahigh-performance concrete bridge deck</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kim, Jee-Sang ; Kwark, Jongwon ; Joh, Changbin ; Yoo, Sung-Won ; Lee, Kyoung-Chan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jee-Sang ; Kwark, Jongwon ; Joh, Changbin ; Yoo, Sung-Won ; Lee, Kyoung-Chan</creatorcontrib><description>Ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) provides much higher compressive and tensile strength than conventional concrete. UHPC is advantageous for use as a bridge slab deck owing to its higher strength, stiffness, and durability. One drawback, however, is the fact that the joint region connecting the deck and girder generally has a thicker cross-section to ensure proper shear connection, which hinders making the overall UHPC deck thinner and lighter. In addition, the shear strength of stud shear connectors embedded in UHPC slab has not been verified to be the same as that in a conventional concrete deck. This study investigates a stud shear connector embedded in a UHPC deck through 15 push-out tests. The ultimate strength of the stud and relative slips are measured. The test parameters were chosen to prove the feasibility of a thinner slab. The stud aspect ratio, overall height-to-diameter, and cover thickness on top of the stud head requirement are also examined to verify the existing geometrical constraints specified in the AASHTO LRFD and Eurocode-4 design codes for UHPC decks. It was shown that the aspect ratio can be reduced from 4 to 3.1 without loss of shear strength of the stud, and the cover could be reduced from 50mm to 25mm without causing a splitting crack at the UHPC slab. However, the required ductility demand, 6mm, was not realized in all cases. Therefore, the stud shear connectors in a UHPC deck should be designed according to the elastic criterion. •Stud shear connectors provide sufficient shear strength for UHPC deck.•Aspect ratio of stud can be as low as 3.1 without a loss of strength for UHPC deck.•Cover thickness over the stud can be as low as 25mm without causing a splitting crack.•Stud shear connectors do not satisfy ductility demands for UHPC deck.•Stud shear connectors in a UHPC deck should be used as per elastic design concept.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-974X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bridge slab deck ; Composite beam ; Concretes ; Connectors ; Decks ; Headed stud ; Shear ; Shear connector ; Shear strength ; Slabs ; Studs ; Ultimate tensile strength ; Ultrahigh-performance concrete</subject><ispartof>Journal of constructional steel research, 2015-05, Vol.108, p.23-30</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-902ffd6242043fe5c1b6c172a6aa1d7425d56fac72ab8780384064c65acfa17a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-902ffd6242043fe5c1b6c172a6aa1d7425d56fac72ab8780384064c65acfa17a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3530-5544 ; 0000-0002-3068-0591</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jee-Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwark, Jongwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joh, Changbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Sung-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyoung-Chan</creatorcontrib><title>Headed stud shear connector for thin ultrahigh-performance concrete bridge deck</title><title>Journal of constructional steel research</title><description>Ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) provides much higher compressive and tensile strength than conventional concrete. UHPC is advantageous for use as a bridge slab deck owing to its higher strength, stiffness, and durability. One drawback, however, is the fact that the joint region connecting the deck and girder generally has a thicker cross-section to ensure proper shear connection, which hinders making the overall UHPC deck thinner and lighter. In addition, the shear strength of stud shear connectors embedded in UHPC slab has not been verified to be the same as that in a conventional concrete deck. This study investigates a stud shear connector embedded in a UHPC deck through 15 push-out tests. The ultimate strength of the stud and relative slips are measured. The test parameters were chosen to prove the feasibility of a thinner slab. The stud aspect ratio, overall height-to-diameter, and cover thickness on top of the stud head requirement are also examined to verify the existing geometrical constraints specified in the AASHTO LRFD and Eurocode-4 design codes for UHPC decks. It was shown that the aspect ratio can be reduced from 4 to 3.1 without loss of shear strength of the stud, and the cover could be reduced from 50mm to 25mm without causing a splitting crack at the UHPC slab. However, the required ductility demand, 6mm, was not realized in all cases. Therefore, the stud shear connectors in a UHPC deck should be designed according to the elastic criterion. •Stud shear connectors provide sufficient shear strength for UHPC deck.•Aspect ratio of stud can be as low as 3.1 without a loss of strength for UHPC deck.•Cover thickness over the stud can be as low as 25mm without causing a splitting crack.•Stud shear connectors do not satisfy ductility demands for UHPC deck.•Stud shear connectors in a UHPC deck should be used as per elastic design concept.</description><subject>Bridge slab deck</subject><subject>Composite beam</subject><subject>Concretes</subject><subject>Connectors</subject><subject>Decks</subject><subject>Headed stud</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>Shear connector</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Slabs</subject><subject>Studs</subject><subject>Ultimate tensile strength</subject><subject>Ultrahigh-performance concrete</subject><issn>0143-974X</issn><issn>1873-5983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhYMouK7-AU89emmdJG3TghdZ1BUW9qLgLWSTyTa1265JK_jvTVnPHmYGHu8NvI-QWwoZBVret1mrg88Y0CIDlgHQM7KgleBpUVf8nCyA5jytRf5xSa5CaAGgqnm1INs1KoMmCeMUV4PKJ3roe9Tj4BMbZ2xcn0zd6FXj9k16RB_Vg-o1zkbtccRk553ZY2JQf16TC6u6gDd_d0nen5_eVut0s315XT1uUs3rekxrYNaakuUMcm6x0HRXaiqYKpWiRuSsMEVplY7KrhIV8CqHMtdlobRVVCi-JHenv0c_fE0YRnlwQWPXqR6HKUgqBPCIJrZfEnayaj-E4NHKo3cH5X8kBTnTk62c6cmZngQmI70YejiFMJb4duhl0A5ja-N8hCPN4P6L_wJTSHkm</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Kim, Jee-Sang</creator><creator>Kwark, Jongwon</creator><creator>Joh, Changbin</creator><creator>Yoo, Sung-Won</creator><creator>Lee, Kyoung-Chan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3530-5544</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3068-0591</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Headed stud shear connector for thin ultrahigh-performance concrete bridge deck</title><author>Kim, Jee-Sang ; Kwark, Jongwon ; Joh, Changbin ; Yoo, Sung-Won ; Lee, Kyoung-Chan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-902ffd6242043fe5c1b6c172a6aa1d7425d56fac72ab8780384064c65acfa17a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bridge slab deck</topic><topic>Composite beam</topic><topic>Concretes</topic><topic>Connectors</topic><topic>Decks</topic><topic>Headed stud</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>Shear connector</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Slabs</topic><topic>Studs</topic><topic>Ultimate tensile strength</topic><topic>Ultrahigh-performance concrete</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jee-Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwark, Jongwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joh, Changbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Sung-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyoung-Chan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of constructional steel research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jee-Sang</au><au>Kwark, Jongwon</au><au>Joh, Changbin</au><au>Yoo, Sung-Won</au><au>Lee, Kyoung-Chan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Headed stud shear connector for thin ultrahigh-performance concrete bridge deck</atitle><jtitle>Journal of constructional steel research</jtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>108</volume><spage>23</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>23-30</pages><issn>0143-974X</issn><eissn>1873-5983</eissn><abstract>Ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) provides much higher compressive and tensile strength than conventional concrete. UHPC is advantageous for use as a bridge slab deck owing to its higher strength, stiffness, and durability. One drawback, however, is the fact that the joint region connecting the deck and girder generally has a thicker cross-section to ensure proper shear connection, which hinders making the overall UHPC deck thinner and lighter. In addition, the shear strength of stud shear connectors embedded in UHPC slab has not been verified to be the same as that in a conventional concrete deck. This study investigates a stud shear connector embedded in a UHPC deck through 15 push-out tests. The ultimate strength of the stud and relative slips are measured. The test parameters were chosen to prove the feasibility of a thinner slab. The stud aspect ratio, overall height-to-diameter, and cover thickness on top of the stud head requirement are also examined to verify the existing geometrical constraints specified in the AASHTO LRFD and Eurocode-4 design codes for UHPC decks. It was shown that the aspect ratio can be reduced from 4 to 3.1 without loss of shear strength of the stud, and the cover could be reduced from 50mm to 25mm without causing a splitting crack at the UHPC slab. However, the required ductility demand, 6mm, was not realized in all cases. Therefore, the stud shear connectors in a UHPC deck should be designed according to the elastic criterion. •Stud shear connectors provide sufficient shear strength for UHPC deck.•Aspect ratio of stud can be as low as 3.1 without a loss of strength for UHPC deck.•Cover thickness over the stud can be as low as 25mm without causing a splitting crack.•Stud shear connectors do not satisfy ductility demands for UHPC deck.•Stud shear connectors in a UHPC deck should be used as per elastic design concept.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3530-5544</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3068-0591</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-974X
ispartof Journal of constructional steel research, 2015-05, Vol.108, p.23-30
issn 0143-974X
1873-5983
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770310198
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Bridge slab deck
Composite beam
Concretes
Connectors
Decks
Headed stud
Shear
Shear connector
Shear strength
Slabs
Studs
Ultimate tensile strength
Ultrahigh-performance concrete
title Headed stud shear connector for thin ultrahigh-performance concrete bridge deck
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T02%3A46%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Headed%20stud%20shear%20connector%20for%20thin%20ultrahigh-performance%20concrete%20bridge%20deck&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20constructional%20steel%20research&rft.au=Kim,%20Jee-Sang&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=108&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=23-30&rft.issn=0143-974X&rft.eissn=1873-5983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770310198%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770310198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0143974X15000346&rfr_iscdi=true