The heterogeneity of concentrated prescribing behavior: Theory and evidence from antipsychotics

We present two new findings based on annual antipsychotic US prescribing data from IMS Health on 2867 psychiatrists who wrote 50 or more prescriptions in 2007. First, many of these psychiatrists have prescription patterns that are statistically significantly different than random draws from national...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of health economics 2015-03, Vol.40, p.26-39
Hauptverfasser: Berndt, Ernst R., Gibbons, Robert S., Kolotilin, Anton, Taub, Anna Levine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 39
container_issue
container_start_page 26
container_title Journal of health economics
container_volume 40
creator Berndt, Ernst R.
Gibbons, Robert S.
Kolotilin, Anton
Taub, Anna Levine
description We present two new findings based on annual antipsychotic US prescribing data from IMS Health on 2867 psychiatrists who wrote 50 or more prescriptions in 2007. First, many of these psychiatrists have prescription patterns that are statistically significantly different than random draws from national market shares for prescriptions by psychiatrists. For example, many have prescription patterns that are significantly more concentrated than such draws. Second, among psychiatrists who are the most concentrated, different prescribers often concentrate on distinct drugs. Motivated by these two findings, we then construct a model of physician learning-by-doing that fits these facts and generates two further predictions: both concentration (on one or a few drugs) and deviation (from the prescription patterns of others) should be smaller for high-volume physicians. We find empirical support for these predictions. Furthermore, our model outperforms an alternative theory concerning detailing by pharmaceutical representatives.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.11.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770309053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167629614001404</els_id><sourcerecordid>1770309053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-70f7395ead237b55a65635489c0819c71c735d81364d0c0e06ed308b861e8a083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0IQ9NKL3dHK-uqpJfQLAr2kZyFL41hm19pK3oX995XZpIdeootAPO9oZh5Cbhi0DJj8OLXTiG6HPrVbYF3LWAvAX5AN08o0THbyJdlUUDVya-QVeVPKBPUIbl6Tq60QSvCu2xB7PyIdccGcHnDGuJxpGqhPs8d5yW7BQA8Zi8-xj_MD7XF0p5jyJ1pzKZ-pmwPFUwxYA3TIaV9flngoZz-mJfrylrwa3K7gu8f7mvz-9vX-9kdz9-v7z9svd43vJCyNgkFxI9CFLVe9EE4KyUWnjQfNjFfMKy6CZlx2ATwgSAwcdK8lQ-1A82vy4VL3kNOfI5bF7mPxuNu5GdOxWKYUcDB1_udRKaXRRoOp6Pv_0Ckd81wHWSnFZO1npeSF8jmVknGwhxz3Lp8tA7vaspN9smVXW5YxW23V4M1j-WO_x_Av9qSnAp8vANbVnSJmW3xcVx1iRr_YkOJzf_wFwuOoTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1667163649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The heterogeneity of concentrated prescribing behavior: Theory and evidence from antipsychotics</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Berndt, Ernst R. ; Gibbons, Robert S. ; Kolotilin, Anton ; Taub, Anna Levine</creator><creatorcontrib>Berndt, Ernst R. ; Gibbons, Robert S. ; Kolotilin, Anton ; Taub, Anna Levine</creatorcontrib><description>We present two new findings based on annual antipsychotic US prescribing data from IMS Health on 2867 psychiatrists who wrote 50 or more prescriptions in 2007. First, many of these psychiatrists have prescription patterns that are statistically significantly different than random draws from national market shares for prescriptions by psychiatrists. For example, many have prescription patterns that are significantly more concentrated than such draws. Second, among psychiatrists who are the most concentrated, different prescribers often concentrate on distinct drugs. Motivated by these two findings, we then construct a model of physician learning-by-doing that fits these facts and generates two further predictions: both concentration (on one or a few drugs) and deviation (from the prescription patterns of others) should be smaller for high-volume physicians. We find empirical support for these predictions. Furthermore, our model outperforms an alternative theory concerning detailing by pharmaceutical representatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.11.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25575344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antipsychotic prescriptions ; Deviation ; Drugs ; Economics ; Female ; Health ; Health administration ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Male ; Market shares ; Markets ; Mathematical models ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Organizational learning ; Pharmaceutical concentration ; Physician learning ; Physicians ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Prescriptions ; Psychiatrists ; Psychiatry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychotropic drugs ; Schizophrenia - drug therapy ; Studies ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of health economics, 2015-03, Vol.40, p.26-39</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-70f7395ead237b55a65635489c0819c71c735d81364d0c0e06ed308b861e8a083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-70f7395ead237b55a65635489c0819c71c735d81364d0c0e06ed308b861e8a083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629614001404$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25575344$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berndt, Ernst R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolotilin, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taub, Anna Levine</creatorcontrib><title>The heterogeneity of concentrated prescribing behavior: Theory and evidence from antipsychotics</title><title>Journal of health economics</title><addtitle>J Health Econ</addtitle><description>We present two new findings based on annual antipsychotic US prescribing data from IMS Health on 2867 psychiatrists who wrote 50 or more prescriptions in 2007. First, many of these psychiatrists have prescription patterns that are statistically significantly different than random draws from national market shares for prescriptions by psychiatrists. For example, many have prescription patterns that are significantly more concentrated than such draws. Second, among psychiatrists who are the most concentrated, different prescribers often concentrate on distinct drugs. Motivated by these two findings, we then construct a model of physician learning-by-doing that fits these facts and generates two further predictions: both concentration (on one or a few drugs) and deviation (from the prescription patterns of others) should be smaller for high-volume physicians. We find empirical support for these predictions. Furthermore, our model outperforms an alternative theory concerning detailing by pharmaceutical representatives.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antipsychotic prescriptions</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Market shares</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical concentration</subject><subject>Physician learning</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Psychiatrists</subject><subject>Psychiatry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychotropic drugs</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0167-6296</issn><issn>1879-1646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0IQ9NKL3dHK-uqpJfQLAr2kZyFL41hm19pK3oX995XZpIdeootAPO9oZh5Cbhi0DJj8OLXTiG6HPrVbYF3LWAvAX5AN08o0THbyJdlUUDVya-QVeVPKBPUIbl6Tq60QSvCu2xB7PyIdccGcHnDGuJxpGqhPs8d5yW7BQA8Zi8-xj_MD7XF0p5jyJ1pzKZ-pmwPFUwxYA3TIaV9flngoZz-mJfrylrwa3K7gu8f7mvz-9vX-9kdz9-v7z9svd43vJCyNgkFxI9CFLVe9EE4KyUWnjQfNjFfMKy6CZlx2ATwgSAwcdK8lQ-1A82vy4VL3kNOfI5bF7mPxuNu5GdOxWKYUcDB1_udRKaXRRoOp6Pv_0Ckd81wHWSnFZO1npeSF8jmVknGwhxz3Lp8tA7vaspN9smVXW5YxW23V4M1j-WO_x_Av9qSnAp8vANbVnSJmW3xcVx1iRr_YkOJzf_wFwuOoTA</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Berndt, Ernst R.</creator><creator>Gibbons, Robert S.</creator><creator>Kolotilin, Anton</creator><creator>Taub, Anna Levine</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>The heterogeneity of concentrated prescribing behavior: Theory and evidence from antipsychotics</title><author>Berndt, Ernst R. ; Gibbons, Robert S. ; Kolotilin, Anton ; Taub, Anna Levine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-70f7395ead237b55a65635489c0819c71c735d81364d0c0e06ed308b861e8a083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antipsychotic prescriptions</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Market shares</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical concentration</topic><topic>Physician learning</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Psychiatrists</topic><topic>Psychiatry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychotropic drugs</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berndt, Ernst R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolotilin, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taub, Anna Levine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berndt, Ernst R.</au><au>Gibbons, Robert S.</au><au>Kolotilin, Anton</au><au>Taub, Anna Levine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The heterogeneity of concentrated prescribing behavior: Theory and evidence from antipsychotics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of health economics</jtitle><addtitle>J Health Econ</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>40</volume><spage>26</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>26-39</pages><issn>0167-6296</issn><eissn>1879-1646</eissn><abstract>We present two new findings based on annual antipsychotic US prescribing data from IMS Health on 2867 psychiatrists who wrote 50 or more prescriptions in 2007. First, many of these psychiatrists have prescription patterns that are statistically significantly different than random draws from national market shares for prescriptions by psychiatrists. For example, many have prescription patterns that are significantly more concentrated than such draws. Second, among psychiatrists who are the most concentrated, different prescribers often concentrate on distinct drugs. Motivated by these two findings, we then construct a model of physician learning-by-doing that fits these facts and generates two further predictions: both concentration (on one or a few drugs) and deviation (from the prescription patterns of others) should be smaller for high-volume physicians. We find empirical support for these predictions. Furthermore, our model outperforms an alternative theory concerning detailing by pharmaceutical representatives.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25575344</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.11.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6296
ispartof Journal of health economics, 2015-03, Vol.40, p.26-39
issn 0167-6296
1879-1646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770309053
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use
Antipsychotic prescriptions
Deviation
Drugs
Economics
Female
Health
Health administration
Heterogeneity
Humans
Male
Market shares
Markets
Mathematical models
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Organizational learning
Pharmaceutical concentration
Physician learning
Physicians
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Prescriptions
Psychiatrists
Psychiatry - statistics & numerical data
Psychotropic drugs
Schizophrenia - drug therapy
Studies
United States
title The heterogeneity of concentrated prescribing behavior: Theory and evidence from antipsychotics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T20%3A08%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20heterogeneity%20of%20concentrated%20prescribing%20behavior:%20Theory%20and%20evidence%20from%20antipsychotics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20health%20economics&rft.au=Berndt,%20Ernst%20R.&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=40&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=26-39&rft.issn=0167-6296&rft.eissn=1879-1646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770309053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1667163649&rft_id=info:pmid/25575344&rft_els_id=S0167629614001404&rfr_iscdi=true