Reptile abundance, but not species richness, increases with regrowth age and spatial extent in fragmented agricultural landscapes of eastern Australia

•Relative abundance of reptiles in fragmented agricultural landscapes increases with remnant forest extent.•Small-bodied and less-vagile reptiles increased with extent of old regrowth.•Fragmentation did not affect landscape-level richness or abundance.•Remnant and old (>30years age) regrowth fore...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological conservation 2015-04, Vol.184, p.174-181
Hauptverfasser: McAlpine, C.A., Bowen, M.E., Smith, G.C., Gramotnev, G., Smith, A.G., Lo Cascio, A., Goulding, W., Maron, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 181
container_issue
container_start_page 174
container_title Biological conservation
container_volume 184
creator McAlpine, C.A.
Bowen, M.E.
Smith, G.C.
Gramotnev, G.
Smith, A.G.
Lo Cascio, A.
Goulding, W.
Maron, M.
description •Relative abundance of reptiles in fragmented agricultural landscapes increases with remnant forest extent.•Small-bodied and less-vagile reptiles increased with extent of old regrowth.•Fragmentation did not affect landscape-level richness or abundance.•Remnant and old (>30years age) regrowth forest extent drive landscape-level reptile responses.•Allowing cleared forests to regenerate may be a cost-effective restoration strategy. The conversion of forested landscapes to agriculture commonly results in three main changes to landscape structure: forest loss, fragmentation, and the creation of novel habitats such as forest regrowth. Here we apply a landscape-level survey design to test how reptiles respond to patterns resulting from these three processes in the Brigalow Belt of eastern Australia, a region highly modified by recent agricultural expansion. We surveyed reptiles in 24 agricultural landscapes (each 2.5×2.5km) that contained mosaics of remnant and regrowth vegetation of various ages and extents. We found that none of the landscape attributes significantly influenced landscape-level species richness of reptiles. On the other hand, the total abundance of reptiles per unit of sampling effort increased with remnant forest extent. In addition, abundance of small-bodied and less-vagile reptiles was positively affected by the extent of old regrowth. Fragmentation did not have important effects on the landscape-level species richness and total abundance of reptiles. Our finding that forest extent is the primary landscape attribute that influences reptiles suggests that, despite expectations to the contrary, the taxon responds in a manner similar to more vagile taxa, such as birds. However, the fact that total abundance but not species richness was the measure that responded suggests different mechanisms are in play. Allowing regrowth forests to regenerate beyond 30years of age may be a cost-effective strategy for landscape-level conservation of reptiles in this region.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770308993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320715000312</els_id><sourcerecordid>1770308993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-17e91d02f9c0fb968c2bf77cf315114a90d31661af267f8e82ea085908a0fed13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFq3DAQhkVpodskb5CDjj3EmxkptuxLIYSmDQQKpT0LWR5ttHhtV5Kb9kXyvJ1ley6FAc1I__8h6RfiEmGLgM31ftvH2c_TVgHWW0AueCU22BpdqQ7Na7EBgKbSCsxb8S7nPY9GN_VGvHylpcSRpOvXaXCTpyvZr0VOc5F5IR8pyxT900Q5X8k4-UQu895zLE8y0S7Nz9y4HQOmgR2uRDdK-lVoKiyXIbndgXsaWMSgdSxrYsXI8uzdwqg5SGYWSpO8XXPh0-jOxZvgxkwXf9cz8f3-47e7z9Xjl08Pd7ePlddGlQoNdTiACp2H0HdN61UfjPFBY4144zoYNDYNuqAaE1pqFTlo6w5aB4EG1Gfi_Ym7pPnHSrnYQ8yeRr4ezWu2aAxoaLtO_4dUqxZV3R2pNyepT3POiYJdUjy49Nsi2GNidm9PidljYhaQC9j24WQjfvHPSMlm_n-OZIiJfLHDHP8N-AN7dqPO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732812591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reptile abundance, but not species richness, increases with regrowth age and spatial extent in fragmented agricultural landscapes of eastern Australia</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>McAlpine, C.A. ; Bowen, M.E. ; Smith, G.C. ; Gramotnev, G. ; Smith, A.G. ; Lo Cascio, A. ; Goulding, W. ; Maron, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, C.A. ; Bowen, M.E. ; Smith, G.C. ; Gramotnev, G. ; Smith, A.G. ; Lo Cascio, A. ; Goulding, W. ; Maron, M.</creatorcontrib><description>•Relative abundance of reptiles in fragmented agricultural landscapes increases with remnant forest extent.•Small-bodied and less-vagile reptiles increased with extent of old regrowth.•Fragmentation did not affect landscape-level richness or abundance.•Remnant and old (&gt;30years age) regrowth forest extent drive landscape-level reptile responses.•Allowing cleared forests to regenerate may be a cost-effective restoration strategy. The conversion of forested landscapes to agriculture commonly results in three main changes to landscape structure: forest loss, fragmentation, and the creation of novel habitats such as forest regrowth. Here we apply a landscape-level survey design to test how reptiles respond to patterns resulting from these three processes in the Brigalow Belt of eastern Australia, a region highly modified by recent agricultural expansion. We surveyed reptiles in 24 agricultural landscapes (each 2.5×2.5km) that contained mosaics of remnant and regrowth vegetation of various ages and extents. We found that none of the landscape attributes significantly influenced landscape-level species richness of reptiles. On the other hand, the total abundance of reptiles per unit of sampling effort increased with remnant forest extent. In addition, abundance of small-bodied and less-vagile reptiles was positively affected by the extent of old regrowth. Fragmentation did not have important effects on the landscape-level species richness and total abundance of reptiles. Our finding that forest extent is the primary landscape attribute that influences reptiles suggests that, despite expectations to the contrary, the taxon responds in a manner similar to more vagile taxa, such as birds. However, the fact that total abundance but not species richness was the measure that responded suggests different mechanisms are in play. Allowing regrowth forests to regenerate beyond 30years of age may be a cost-effective strategy for landscape-level conservation of reptiles in this region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Age ; Conservation ; Farmlands ; Forests ; Fragmentation ; Habitat loss ; Landscape mosaic ; Landscapes ; Movement ; Reptiles ; Secondary forest ; Vagility</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2015-04, Vol.184, p.174-181</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-17e91d02f9c0fb968c2bf77cf315114a90d31661af267f8e82ea085908a0fed13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-17e91d02f9c0fb968c2bf77cf315114a90d31661af267f8e82ea085908a0fed13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320715000312$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, G.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gramotnev, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Cascio, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulding, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maron, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Reptile abundance, but not species richness, increases with regrowth age and spatial extent in fragmented agricultural landscapes of eastern Australia</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>•Relative abundance of reptiles in fragmented agricultural landscapes increases with remnant forest extent.•Small-bodied and less-vagile reptiles increased with extent of old regrowth.•Fragmentation did not affect landscape-level richness or abundance.•Remnant and old (&gt;30years age) regrowth forest extent drive landscape-level reptile responses.•Allowing cleared forests to regenerate may be a cost-effective restoration strategy. The conversion of forested landscapes to agriculture commonly results in three main changes to landscape structure: forest loss, fragmentation, and the creation of novel habitats such as forest regrowth. Here we apply a landscape-level survey design to test how reptiles respond to patterns resulting from these three processes in the Brigalow Belt of eastern Australia, a region highly modified by recent agricultural expansion. We surveyed reptiles in 24 agricultural landscapes (each 2.5×2.5km) that contained mosaics of remnant and regrowth vegetation of various ages and extents. We found that none of the landscape attributes significantly influenced landscape-level species richness of reptiles. On the other hand, the total abundance of reptiles per unit of sampling effort increased with remnant forest extent. In addition, abundance of small-bodied and less-vagile reptiles was positively affected by the extent of old regrowth. Fragmentation did not have important effects on the landscape-level species richness and total abundance of reptiles. Our finding that forest extent is the primary landscape attribute that influences reptiles suggests that, despite expectations to the contrary, the taxon responds in a manner similar to more vagile taxa, such as birds. However, the fact that total abundance but not species richness was the measure that responded suggests different mechanisms are in play. Allowing regrowth forests to regenerate beyond 30years of age may be a cost-effective strategy for landscape-level conservation of reptiles in this region.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Farmlands</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>Landscape mosaic</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Secondary forest</subject><subject>Vagility</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFq3DAQhkVpodskb5CDjj3EmxkptuxLIYSmDQQKpT0LWR5ttHhtV5Kb9kXyvJ1ley6FAc1I__8h6RfiEmGLgM31ftvH2c_TVgHWW0AueCU22BpdqQ7Na7EBgKbSCsxb8S7nPY9GN_VGvHylpcSRpOvXaXCTpyvZr0VOc5F5IR8pyxT900Q5X8k4-UQu895zLE8y0S7Nz9y4HQOmgR2uRDdK-lVoKiyXIbndgXsaWMSgdSxrYsXI8uzdwqg5SGYWSpO8XXPh0-jOxZvgxkwXf9cz8f3-47e7z9Xjl08Pd7ePlddGlQoNdTiACp2H0HdN61UfjPFBY4144zoYNDYNuqAaE1pqFTlo6w5aB4EG1Gfi_Ym7pPnHSrnYQ8yeRr4ezWu2aAxoaLtO_4dUqxZV3R2pNyepT3POiYJdUjy49Nsi2GNidm9PidljYhaQC9j24WQjfvHPSMlm_n-OZIiJfLHDHP8N-AN7dqPO</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>McAlpine, C.A.</creator><creator>Bowen, M.E.</creator><creator>Smith, G.C.</creator><creator>Gramotnev, G.</creator><creator>Smith, A.G.</creator><creator>Lo Cascio, A.</creator><creator>Goulding, W.</creator><creator>Maron, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Reptile abundance, but not species richness, increases with regrowth age and spatial extent in fragmented agricultural landscapes of eastern Australia</title><author>McAlpine, C.A. ; Bowen, M.E. ; Smith, G.C. ; Gramotnev, G. ; Smith, A.G. ; Lo Cascio, A. ; Goulding, W. ; Maron, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-17e91d02f9c0fb968c2bf77cf315114a90d31661af267f8e82ea085908a0fed13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Farmlands</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>Landscape mosaic</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Secondary forest</topic><topic>Vagility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAlpine, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, G.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gramotnev, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Cascio, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulding, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maron, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAlpine, C.A.</au><au>Bowen, M.E.</au><au>Smith, G.C.</au><au>Gramotnev, G.</au><au>Smith, A.G.</au><au>Lo Cascio, A.</au><au>Goulding, W.</au><au>Maron, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reptile abundance, but not species richness, increases with regrowth age and spatial extent in fragmented agricultural landscapes of eastern Australia</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>184</volume><spage>174</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>174-181</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><abstract>•Relative abundance of reptiles in fragmented agricultural landscapes increases with remnant forest extent.•Small-bodied and less-vagile reptiles increased with extent of old regrowth.•Fragmentation did not affect landscape-level richness or abundance.•Remnant and old (&gt;30years age) regrowth forest extent drive landscape-level reptile responses.•Allowing cleared forests to regenerate may be a cost-effective restoration strategy. The conversion of forested landscapes to agriculture commonly results in three main changes to landscape structure: forest loss, fragmentation, and the creation of novel habitats such as forest regrowth. Here we apply a landscape-level survey design to test how reptiles respond to patterns resulting from these three processes in the Brigalow Belt of eastern Australia, a region highly modified by recent agricultural expansion. We surveyed reptiles in 24 agricultural landscapes (each 2.5×2.5km) that contained mosaics of remnant and regrowth vegetation of various ages and extents. We found that none of the landscape attributes significantly influenced landscape-level species richness of reptiles. On the other hand, the total abundance of reptiles per unit of sampling effort increased with remnant forest extent. In addition, abundance of small-bodied and less-vagile reptiles was positively affected by the extent of old regrowth. Fragmentation did not have important effects on the landscape-level species richness and total abundance of reptiles. Our finding that forest extent is the primary landscape attribute that influences reptiles suggests that, despite expectations to the contrary, the taxon responds in a manner similar to more vagile taxa, such as birds. However, the fact that total abundance but not species richness was the measure that responded suggests different mechanisms are in play. Allowing regrowth forests to regenerate beyond 30years of age may be a cost-effective strategy for landscape-level conservation of reptiles in this region.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3207
ispartof Biological conservation, 2015-04, Vol.184, p.174-181
issn 0006-3207
1873-2917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770308993
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Abundance
Age
Conservation
Farmlands
Forests
Fragmentation
Habitat loss
Landscape mosaic
Landscapes
Movement
Reptiles
Secondary forest
Vagility
title Reptile abundance, but not species richness, increases with regrowth age and spatial extent in fragmented agricultural landscapes of eastern Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A53%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reptile%20abundance,%20but%20not%20species%20richness,%20increases%20with%20regrowth%20age%20and%20spatial%20extent%20in%20fragmented%20agricultural%20landscapes%20of%20eastern%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=McAlpine,%20C.A.&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=184&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=174-181&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770308993%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732812591&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006320715000312&rfr_iscdi=true