Launch and deployment of distributed small satellite systems

The rise in launch and use of small satellites in the past decade, a result of improved functionality through technology miniaturisation and alternative design philosophies, has spawned interest in the development of distributed systems or constellations of small satellites. However, whilst a variet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta astronautica 2015-09, Vol.114, p.65-78
Hauptverfasser: Crisp, N.H., Smith, K., Hollingsworth, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 78
container_issue
container_start_page 65
container_title Acta astronautica
container_volume 114
creator Crisp, N.H.
Smith, K.
Hollingsworth, P.
description The rise in launch and use of small satellites in the past decade, a result of improved functionality through technology miniaturisation and alternative design philosophies, has spawned interest in the development of distributed systems or constellations of small satellites. However, whilst a variety of missions based on constellations of small satellites have been proposed, issues relating to the launch and deployment of these distributed systems mean that few have actually been realised. A number of strategies have been proposed which enable multiple small satellites comprising a constellation to be launched together and efficiently separated on-orbit, thus reducing the total cost of launch. In this paper, two such strategies which have the potential to significantly increase the viability of small satellite constellations in Earth orbit are investigated. Deployment using natural Earth perturbations to indirectly achieve plane separations is analysed using a developed method and compared to deployment utilising the Earth–Moon Lagrange point L1 as a staging area prior to return to LEO. The analysis of three example missions indicates that these two strategies can facilitate the successful establishment of small satellite constellations in Earth orbit whilst also reducing propulsive requirements, system complexity, and/or cost. The study also found that the method of nodal precession is sensitive to the effects of orbital decay due to drag and can result in long deployment times, and the use of Lunar L1 is more suitable for constellation configurations where several satellites are present in each orbital plane. •Comparison of two deployment methods for small satellite constellations in LEO.•Development of a method of constellation deployment by indirect plane separation.•Significant Δν savings can be realised using method of indirect plane separation.•Staged return from Earth–Moon L1 enables fast and reduced Δν plane separation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.04.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770295755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S009457651500171X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1770295755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4b18862679282f2ab921180305a72262db26dc544f7d4f6cb85ab0b04ac694fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLAzEcxIMoWKufwRy97PpPmid4KeILCl70HLJJFlP2UZOs0G_vlopXPc1l5sfMIHRNoCZAxO22tq5Ym0saawqE18DqWU7QgiipKworOEULAM0qLgU_Rxc5bwFAUqUX6G5jp8F9YDt47MOuG_d9GAoeW-zjjIzNVILHubddh7MtoetiCTjvcwl9vkRnre1yuPrRJXp_fHi7f642r08v9-tN5dgKSsUaopSgQmqqaEttoykhau7FraRUUN9Q4R1nrJWetcI1itsGGmDWCc1av1qimyN3l8bPKeRi-pjd3MUOYZyyIVIC1Vxy_g8rE0oKDQerPFpdGnNOoTW7FHub9oaAOVxrtub3WnO41gAzs8zJ9TEZ5tFfMSSTXQyDCz6m4IrxY_yT8Q3xMIXF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1746876905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Launch and deployment of distributed small satellite systems</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Crisp, N.H. ; Smith, K. ; Hollingsworth, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crisp, N.H. ; Smith, K. ; Hollingsworth, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The rise in launch and use of small satellites in the past decade, a result of improved functionality through technology miniaturisation and alternative design philosophies, has spawned interest in the development of distributed systems or constellations of small satellites. However, whilst a variety of missions based on constellations of small satellites have been proposed, issues relating to the launch and deployment of these distributed systems mean that few have actually been realised. A number of strategies have been proposed which enable multiple small satellites comprising a constellation to be launched together and efficiently separated on-orbit, thus reducing the total cost of launch. In this paper, two such strategies which have the potential to significantly increase the viability of small satellite constellations in Earth orbit are investigated. Deployment using natural Earth perturbations to indirectly achieve plane separations is analysed using a developed method and compared to deployment utilising the Earth–Moon Lagrange point L1 as a staging area prior to return to LEO. The analysis of three example missions indicates that these two strategies can facilitate the successful establishment of small satellite constellations in Earth orbit whilst also reducing propulsive requirements, system complexity, and/or cost. The study also found that the method of nodal precession is sensitive to the effects of orbital decay due to drag and can result in long deployment times, and the use of Lunar L1 is more suitable for constellation configurations where several satellites are present in each orbital plane. •Comparison of two deployment methods for small satellite constellations in LEO.•Development of a method of constellation deployment by indirect plane separation.•Significant Δν savings can be realised using method of indirect plane separation.•Staged return from Earth–Moon L1 enables fast and reduced Δν plane separation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.04.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computer networks ; Constellation deployment ; Cost engineering ; CubeSat ; Earth orbits ; Earth–Moon Lagrange point L1 ; Launches ; Nanosatellite ; Nodal precession ; Orbitals ; Satellite constellations ; Small satellites ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>Acta astronautica, 2015-09, Vol.114, p.65-78</ispartof><rights>2015 IAA</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4b18862679282f2ab921180305a72262db26dc544f7d4f6cb85ab0b04ac694fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4b18862679282f2ab921180305a72262db26dc544f7d4f6cb85ab0b04ac694fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.04.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crisp, N.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Launch and deployment of distributed small satellite systems</title><title>Acta astronautica</title><description>The rise in launch and use of small satellites in the past decade, a result of improved functionality through technology miniaturisation and alternative design philosophies, has spawned interest in the development of distributed systems or constellations of small satellites. However, whilst a variety of missions based on constellations of small satellites have been proposed, issues relating to the launch and deployment of these distributed systems mean that few have actually been realised. A number of strategies have been proposed which enable multiple small satellites comprising a constellation to be launched together and efficiently separated on-orbit, thus reducing the total cost of launch. In this paper, two such strategies which have the potential to significantly increase the viability of small satellite constellations in Earth orbit are investigated. Deployment using natural Earth perturbations to indirectly achieve plane separations is analysed using a developed method and compared to deployment utilising the Earth–Moon Lagrange point L1 as a staging area prior to return to LEO. The analysis of three example missions indicates that these two strategies can facilitate the successful establishment of small satellite constellations in Earth orbit whilst also reducing propulsive requirements, system complexity, and/or cost. The study also found that the method of nodal precession is sensitive to the effects of orbital decay due to drag and can result in long deployment times, and the use of Lunar L1 is more suitable for constellation configurations where several satellites are present in each orbital plane. •Comparison of two deployment methods for small satellite constellations in LEO.•Development of a method of constellation deployment by indirect plane separation.•Significant Δν savings can be realised using method of indirect plane separation.•Staged return from Earth–Moon L1 enables fast and reduced Δν plane separation.</description><subject>Computer networks</subject><subject>Constellation deployment</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>CubeSat</subject><subject>Earth orbits</subject><subject>Earth–Moon Lagrange point L1</subject><subject>Launches</subject><subject>Nanosatellite</subject><subject>Nodal precession</subject><subject>Orbitals</subject><subject>Satellite constellations</subject><subject>Small satellites</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>0094-5765</issn><issn>1879-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtLAzEcxIMoWKufwRy97PpPmid4KeILCl70HLJJFlP2UZOs0G_vlopXPc1l5sfMIHRNoCZAxO22tq5Ym0saawqE18DqWU7QgiipKworOEULAM0qLgU_Rxc5bwFAUqUX6G5jp8F9YDt47MOuG_d9GAoeW-zjjIzNVILHubddh7MtoetiCTjvcwl9vkRnre1yuPrRJXp_fHi7f642r08v9-tN5dgKSsUaopSgQmqqaEttoykhau7FraRUUN9Q4R1nrJWetcI1itsGGmDWCc1av1qimyN3l8bPKeRi-pjd3MUOYZyyIVIC1Vxy_g8rE0oKDQerPFpdGnNOoTW7FHub9oaAOVxrtub3WnO41gAzs8zJ9TEZ5tFfMSSTXQyDCz6m4IrxY_yT8Q3xMIXF</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Crisp, N.H.</creator><creator>Smith, K.</creator><creator>Hollingsworth, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Launch and deployment of distributed small satellite systems</title><author>Crisp, N.H. ; Smith, K. ; Hollingsworth, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4b18862679282f2ab921180305a72262db26dc544f7d4f6cb85ab0b04ac694fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Computer networks</topic><topic>Constellation deployment</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>CubeSat</topic><topic>Earth orbits</topic><topic>Earth–Moon Lagrange point L1</topic><topic>Launches</topic><topic>Nanosatellite</topic><topic>Nodal precession</topic><topic>Orbitals</topic><topic>Satellite constellations</topic><topic>Small satellites</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crisp, N.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Acta astronautica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crisp, N.H.</au><au>Smith, K.</au><au>Hollingsworth, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Launch and deployment of distributed small satellite systems</atitle><jtitle>Acta astronautica</jtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>114</volume><spage>65</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>65-78</pages><issn>0094-5765</issn><eissn>1879-2030</eissn><abstract>The rise in launch and use of small satellites in the past decade, a result of improved functionality through technology miniaturisation and alternative design philosophies, has spawned interest in the development of distributed systems or constellations of small satellites. However, whilst a variety of missions based on constellations of small satellites have been proposed, issues relating to the launch and deployment of these distributed systems mean that few have actually been realised. A number of strategies have been proposed which enable multiple small satellites comprising a constellation to be launched together and efficiently separated on-orbit, thus reducing the total cost of launch. In this paper, two such strategies which have the potential to significantly increase the viability of small satellite constellations in Earth orbit are investigated. Deployment using natural Earth perturbations to indirectly achieve plane separations is analysed using a developed method and compared to deployment utilising the Earth–Moon Lagrange point L1 as a staging area prior to return to LEO. The analysis of three example missions indicates that these two strategies can facilitate the successful establishment of small satellite constellations in Earth orbit whilst also reducing propulsive requirements, system complexity, and/or cost. The study also found that the method of nodal precession is sensitive to the effects of orbital decay due to drag and can result in long deployment times, and the use of Lunar L1 is more suitable for constellation configurations where several satellites are present in each orbital plane. •Comparison of two deployment methods for small satellite constellations in LEO.•Development of a method of constellation deployment by indirect plane separation.•Significant Δν savings can be realised using method of indirect plane separation.•Staged return from Earth–Moon L1 enables fast and reduced Δν plane separation.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.04.015</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-5765
ispartof Acta astronautica, 2015-09, Vol.114, p.65-78
issn 0094-5765
1879-2030
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770295755
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Computer networks
Constellation deployment
Cost engineering
CubeSat
Earth orbits
Earth–Moon Lagrange point L1
Launches
Nanosatellite
Nodal precession
Orbitals
Satellite constellations
Small satellites
Strategy
title Launch and deployment of distributed small satellite systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T11%3A20%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Launch%20and%20deployment%20of%20distributed%20small%20satellite%20systems&rft.jtitle=Acta%20astronautica&rft.au=Crisp,%20N.H.&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=114&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=65-78&rft.issn=0094-5765&rft.eissn=1879-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.04.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770295755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1746876905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S009457651500171X&rfr_iscdi=true