Indirect paleo-seagrass indicators (IPSIs): A review
Seagrass meadows are marine habitats with high ecological importance. Their detection in the fossil record will contribute to our understanding of the development of patterns of marine biodiversity through time and the response of coastal marine habitats to environmental change. Due to the low proba...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth-science reviews 2015-04, Vol.143, p.161-186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 186 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 161 |
container_title | Earth-science reviews |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | Reich, S. Di Martino, E. Todd, J.A. Wesselingh, F.P. Renema, W. |
description | Seagrass meadows are marine habitats with high ecological importance. Their detection in the fossil record will contribute to our understanding of the development of patterns of marine biodiversity through time and the response of coastal marine habitats to environmental change. Due to the low probability of fossilization of seagrass macrofossils, the reliable identification of seagrass meadows in the fossil record is often challenging. A wide range of indirect indicators has been applied to infer paleo-seagrass habitats in Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic deposits. The usefulness of those indicators is determined by various factors, such as their stratigraphic range, fossilization potential, habitat restriction, and others. Although they have sometimes been briefly summarized in the literature, a comprehensive review of indirect paleo-seagrass indicators, including an assessment of their value for recognition of this habitat, is not yet available. We summarize them here and explore their usefulness. We aim to assist future workers to identify facies and fossil assemblages associated with seagrass beds. Apart from a few truly diagnostic proxies, combinations of several indicators turn out to be most reliable when aiming to identify the presence of paleo-seagrass habitats. The presence/absence of many potentially seagrass-associated taxa cannot serve as a useful indicator due to a lack of habitat restriction, but statistical evaluations of abundance data are promising to discriminate seagrass beds from neighboring areas. However, such studies are available for only a few commonly seagrass-associated organism groups. Furthermore, the applicability of many indicators is confined by latitude, because their occurrence is restricted to (sub)tropical or at most warm temperate regions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770289789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012825215000185</els_id><sourcerecordid>1758245204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a432t-71fe74b7a8d897ec0500f09dbf065acc092353de3a8b852db22d523568212d323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1KxDAURoMoOI4-gwU346L15rZpUnfD4E9hQEFdhzRJpaXTjklH8e3NUHHhRlchl_N9uTmEnFNIKND8qk2scl43zr4nCJQlQBOA4oDMqOAY5wLFIZkBUIwFMjwmJ963EO5Q8BnJyt6EqB6jrersEHurXp3yPmrCXKtxcD5alI9Ppb-8jpZReKSxH6fkqFadt2ff55y83N48r-7j9cNduVquY5WlOMac1pZnFVfCiIJbDQyghsJUNeRMaQ0Fpiw1NlWiEgxNhWhYGIWVKZoU0zlZTL1bN7ztrB_lpvHadp3q7bDzknIOGKpF8Q-UCcwYQhbQi19oO-xcHz4iaZ5jluWMpoHiE6Xd4L2ztdy6ZqPcp6Qg9-JlK3_Ey714CVQG8SG5nJI2qAm6nAyQ7bWdREszNH92fAE9HY0N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1662446513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indirect paleo-seagrass indicators (IPSIs): A review</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Reich, S. ; Di Martino, E. ; Todd, J.A. ; Wesselingh, F.P. ; Renema, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reich, S. ; Di Martino, E. ; Todd, J.A. ; Wesselingh, F.P. ; Renema, W.</creatorcontrib><description>Seagrass meadows are marine habitats with high ecological importance. Their detection in the fossil record will contribute to our understanding of the development of patterns of marine biodiversity through time and the response of coastal marine habitats to environmental change. Due to the low probability of fossilization of seagrass macrofossils, the reliable identification of seagrass meadows in the fossil record is often challenging. A wide range of indirect indicators has been applied to infer paleo-seagrass habitats in Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic deposits. The usefulness of those indicators is determined by various factors, such as their stratigraphic range, fossilization potential, habitat restriction, and others. Although they have sometimes been briefly summarized in the literature, a comprehensive review of indirect paleo-seagrass indicators, including an assessment of their value for recognition of this habitat, is not yet available. We summarize them here and explore their usefulness. We aim to assist future workers to identify facies and fossil assemblages associated with seagrass beds. Apart from a few truly diagnostic proxies, combinations of several indicators turn out to be most reliable when aiming to identify the presence of paleo-seagrass habitats. The presence/absence of many potentially seagrass-associated taxa cannot serve as a useful indicator due to a lack of habitat restriction, but statistical evaluations of abundance data are promising to discriminate seagrass beds from neighboring areas. However, such studies are available for only a few commonly seagrass-associated organism groups. Furthermore, the applicability of many indicators is confined by latitude, because their occurrence is restricted to (sub)tropical or at most warm temperate regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-8252</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6828</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESREAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>(Paleo)ecology ; Aquatic plants ; Assessments ; Constrictions ; Deposition ; Faunal association ; Fossil record ; Fossils ; Habitats ; Indicators ; Marine ; Marine angiosperms ; Organisms ; Paleobotany ; Probability ; Proxy ; Seagrass meadow</subject><ispartof>Earth-science reviews, 2015-04, Vol.143, p.161-186</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Apr 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a432t-71fe74b7a8d897ec0500f09dbf065acc092353de3a8b852db22d523568212d323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a432t-71fe74b7a8d897ec0500f09dbf065acc092353de3a8b852db22d523568212d323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reich, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Martino, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesselingh, F.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renema, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Indirect paleo-seagrass indicators (IPSIs): A review</title><title>Earth-science reviews</title><description>Seagrass meadows are marine habitats with high ecological importance. Their detection in the fossil record will contribute to our understanding of the development of patterns of marine biodiversity through time and the response of coastal marine habitats to environmental change. Due to the low probability of fossilization of seagrass macrofossils, the reliable identification of seagrass meadows in the fossil record is often challenging. A wide range of indirect indicators has been applied to infer paleo-seagrass habitats in Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic deposits. The usefulness of those indicators is determined by various factors, such as their stratigraphic range, fossilization potential, habitat restriction, and others. Although they have sometimes been briefly summarized in the literature, a comprehensive review of indirect paleo-seagrass indicators, including an assessment of their value for recognition of this habitat, is not yet available. We summarize them here and explore their usefulness. We aim to assist future workers to identify facies and fossil assemblages associated with seagrass beds. Apart from a few truly diagnostic proxies, combinations of several indicators turn out to be most reliable when aiming to identify the presence of paleo-seagrass habitats. The presence/absence of many potentially seagrass-associated taxa cannot serve as a useful indicator due to a lack of habitat restriction, but statistical evaluations of abundance data are promising to discriminate seagrass beds from neighboring areas. However, such studies are available for only a few commonly seagrass-associated organism groups. Furthermore, the applicability of many indicators is confined by latitude, because their occurrence is restricted to (sub)tropical or at most warm temperate regions.</description><subject>(Paleo)ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Constrictions</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Faunal association</subject><subject>Fossil record</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine angiosperms</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>Paleobotany</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Proxy</subject><subject>Seagrass meadow</subject><issn>0012-8252</issn><issn>1872-6828</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1KxDAURoMoOI4-gwU346L15rZpUnfD4E9hQEFdhzRJpaXTjklH8e3NUHHhRlchl_N9uTmEnFNIKND8qk2scl43zr4nCJQlQBOA4oDMqOAY5wLFIZkBUIwFMjwmJ963EO5Q8BnJyt6EqB6jrersEHurXp3yPmrCXKtxcD5alI9Ppb-8jpZReKSxH6fkqFadt2ff55y83N48r-7j9cNduVquY5WlOMac1pZnFVfCiIJbDQyghsJUNeRMaQ0Fpiw1NlWiEgxNhWhYGIWVKZoU0zlZTL1bN7ztrB_lpvHadp3q7bDzknIOGKpF8Q-UCcwYQhbQi19oO-xcHz4iaZ5jluWMpoHiE6Xd4L2ztdy6ZqPcp6Qg9-JlK3_Ey714CVQG8SG5nJI2qAm6nAyQ7bWdREszNH92fAE9HY0N</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Reich, S.</creator><creator>Di Martino, E.</creator><creator>Todd, J.A.</creator><creator>Wesselingh, F.P.</creator><creator>Renema, W.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>H95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Indirect paleo-seagrass indicators (IPSIs): A review</title><author>Reich, S. ; Di Martino, E. ; Todd, J.A. ; Wesselingh, F.P. ; Renema, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a432t-71fe74b7a8d897ec0500f09dbf065acc092353de3a8b852db22d523568212d323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>(Paleo)ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Constrictions</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Faunal association</topic><topic>Fossil record</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine angiosperms</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>Paleobotany</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Proxy</topic><topic>Seagrass meadow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reich, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Martino, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesselingh, F.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renema, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Earth-science reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reich, S.</au><au>Di Martino, E.</au><au>Todd, J.A.</au><au>Wesselingh, F.P.</au><au>Renema, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indirect paleo-seagrass indicators (IPSIs): A review</atitle><jtitle>Earth-science reviews</jtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>143</volume><spage>161</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>161-186</pages><issn>0012-8252</issn><eissn>1872-6828</eissn><coden>ESREAV</coden><abstract>Seagrass meadows are marine habitats with high ecological importance. Their detection in the fossil record will contribute to our understanding of the development of patterns of marine biodiversity through time and the response of coastal marine habitats to environmental change. Due to the low probability of fossilization of seagrass macrofossils, the reliable identification of seagrass meadows in the fossil record is often challenging. A wide range of indirect indicators has been applied to infer paleo-seagrass habitats in Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic deposits. The usefulness of those indicators is determined by various factors, such as their stratigraphic range, fossilization potential, habitat restriction, and others. Although they have sometimes been briefly summarized in the literature, a comprehensive review of indirect paleo-seagrass indicators, including an assessment of their value for recognition of this habitat, is not yet available. We summarize them here and explore their usefulness. We aim to assist future workers to identify facies and fossil assemblages associated with seagrass beds. Apart from a few truly diagnostic proxies, combinations of several indicators turn out to be most reliable when aiming to identify the presence of paleo-seagrass habitats. The presence/absence of many potentially seagrass-associated taxa cannot serve as a useful indicator due to a lack of habitat restriction, but statistical evaluations of abundance data are promising to discriminate seagrass beds from neighboring areas. However, such studies are available for only a few commonly seagrass-associated organism groups. Furthermore, the applicability of many indicators is confined by latitude, because their occurrence is restricted to (sub)tropical or at most warm temperate regions.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.009</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-8252 |
ispartof | Earth-science reviews, 2015-04, Vol.143, p.161-186 |
issn | 0012-8252 1872-6828 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770289789 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | (Paleo)ecology Aquatic plants Assessments Constrictions Deposition Faunal association Fossil record Fossils Habitats Indicators Marine Marine angiosperms Organisms Paleobotany Probability Proxy Seagrass meadow |
title | Indirect paleo-seagrass indicators (IPSIs): A review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indirect%20paleo-seagrass%20indicators%20(IPSIs):%20A%20review&rft.jtitle=Earth-science%20reviews&rft.au=Reich,%20S.&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=143&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=161-186&rft.issn=0012-8252&rft.eissn=1872-6828&rft.coden=ESREAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1758245204%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1662446513&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0012825215000185&rfr_iscdi=true |