The development of the Australian environmental offsets policy: from theory to practice
Environmental offsetting involves compensating for the residual adverse impacts of an action on the environment by generating an equivalent benefit elsewhere. As the prevalence of environmental offsetting grows, so does the challenge of translating no-net-loss goals to workable policy. From 2011–201...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental conservation 2015-12, Vol.42 (4), p.306-314 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 314 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 306 |
container_title | Environmental conservation |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | MILLER, KATHERINE L. TREZISE, JAMES A. KRAUS, STEFAN DRIPPS, KIMBERLEY EVANS, MEGAN C. GIBBONS, PHILIP POSSINGHAM, HUGH P. MARON, MARTINE |
description | Environmental offsetting involves compensating for the residual adverse impacts of an action on the environment by generating an equivalent benefit elsewhere. As the prevalence of environmental offsetting grows, so does the challenge of translating no-net-loss goals to workable policy. From 2011–2012, the Australian Government developed an Environmental Offsets Policy and an accompanying metric (the Offsets Assessment Guide) to support decision making about offset requirements under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Through extensive stakeholder consultation and in collaboration with academic researchers, the Guide was developed with the aim of accounting appropriately for ecological equivalence in a transparent and flexible manner. This paper outlines the Australian Government's environmental offset policy development process, and describes the approach adopted for evaluating the suitability of proposed offsets in meeting the policy goals. The Guide explicitly estimates the extent to which an offset will improve the target biota and/or avert future losses, the degree of confidence that the offset will be implemented successfully, and the time it will take to deliver a conservation benefit. Since implementation of the Environmental Offsets Policy and the Guide, there has been a shift in focus from estimating offset requirements based on simplistic area ratios, toward directly evaluating the components of an offset action that determine its environmental performance. Achieving a balance between scientific robustness and policy workability is an ongoing challenge. The Environmental Offsets Policy and Guide represent an important step towards consistency and transparency in environmental offset decision-making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S037689291400040X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770287863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S037689291400040X</cupid><jstor_id>26320630</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26320630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-a106cc620b3d3004d59c49b17a6f70656987321876756fa8ee74dd66104307af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctKxDAUhoMoOF4ewIVYcOOmepK0ubgbBm8w4MIZdFcybaId2qYmmYF5e1NGRBTBVSDf9-f84SB0guESA-ZXT0A5E5JInAFABi87aIQzJtOMCr6LRgNOB76PDrxfRoflXIzQ8-xNJ5Ve68b2re5CYk0S4tV45YNTTa26RHfr2tluoKqJ3HgdfNLbpi4314lxth0S1m2SYJPeqTLUpT5Ce0Y1Xh9_nodofnszm9yn08e7h8l4mpaZlCFVGFhZMgILWtHYu8plBAvMFTM8VmRScEqw4IznzCihNc-qijEMGQWuDD1EF9t3e2ffV9qHoq19qZtGddqufIE5ByK4YPQfKs0lASlwVM9_qEu7cl38SLSIoMAA8mjhrVU6673Tpuhd3Sq3KTAUw1aKX1uJmdNtZumDdV8BwigBRiHysy03yhbq1dW-mD8RwHEgFkzAYNDPqapduLp61d_K_Tn3AzwZn9E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1728306005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The development of the Australian environmental offsets policy: from theory to practice</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>MILLER, KATHERINE L. ; TREZISE, JAMES A. ; KRAUS, STEFAN ; DRIPPS, KIMBERLEY ; EVANS, MEGAN C. ; GIBBONS, PHILIP ; POSSINGHAM, HUGH P. ; MARON, MARTINE</creator><creatorcontrib>MILLER, KATHERINE L. ; TREZISE, JAMES A. ; KRAUS, STEFAN ; DRIPPS, KIMBERLEY ; EVANS, MEGAN C. ; GIBBONS, PHILIP ; POSSINGHAM, HUGH P. ; MARON, MARTINE</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental offsetting involves compensating for the residual adverse impacts of an action on the environment by generating an equivalent benefit elsewhere. As the prevalence of environmental offsetting grows, so does the challenge of translating no-net-loss goals to workable policy. From 2011–2012, the Australian Government developed an Environmental Offsets Policy and an accompanying metric (the Offsets Assessment Guide) to support decision making about offset requirements under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Through extensive stakeholder consultation and in collaboration with academic researchers, the Guide was developed with the aim of accounting appropriately for ecological equivalence in a transparent and flexible manner. This paper outlines the Australian Government's environmental offset policy development process, and describes the approach adopted for evaluating the suitability of proposed offsets in meeting the policy goals. The Guide explicitly estimates the extent to which an offset will improve the target biota and/or avert future losses, the degree of confidence that the offset will be implemented successfully, and the time it will take to deliver a conservation benefit. Since implementation of the Environmental Offsets Policy and the Guide, there has been a shift in focus from estimating offset requirements based on simplistic area ratios, toward directly evaluating the components of an offset action that determine its environmental performance. Achieving a balance between scientific robustness and policy workability is an ongoing challenge. The Environmental Offsets Policy and Guide represent an important step towards consistency and transparency in environmental offset decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8929</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S037689291400040X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVCNA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Australia ; biodiversity ; Biota ; Conservation ; Decision making ; development policy ; environmental markets ; environmental offsets ; Environmental performance ; Environmental policy ; Environmental protection ; Equivalence ; Estimating ; Governments ; mitigation hierarchy ; no net loss ; Offsets ; Policies ; researchers ; stakeholders ; threatened species</subject><ispartof>Environmental conservation, 2015-12, Vol.42 (4), p.306-314</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2015</rights><rights>Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-a106cc620b3d3004d59c49b17a6f70656987321876756fa8ee74dd66104307af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-a106cc620b3d3004d59c49b17a6f70656987321876756fa8ee74dd66104307af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26320630$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S037689291400040X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27903,27904,55606,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MILLER, KATHERINE L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TREZISE, JAMES A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRAUS, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRIPPS, KIMBERLEY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EVANS, MEGAN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIBBONS, PHILIP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POSSINGHAM, HUGH P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARON, MARTINE</creatorcontrib><title>The development of the Australian environmental offsets policy: from theory to practice</title><title>Environmental conservation</title><addtitle>Envir. Conserv</addtitle><description>Environmental offsetting involves compensating for the residual adverse impacts of an action on the environment by generating an equivalent benefit elsewhere. As the prevalence of environmental offsetting grows, so does the challenge of translating no-net-loss goals to workable policy. From 2011–2012, the Australian Government developed an Environmental Offsets Policy and an accompanying metric (the Offsets Assessment Guide) to support decision making about offset requirements under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Through extensive stakeholder consultation and in collaboration with academic researchers, the Guide was developed with the aim of accounting appropriately for ecological equivalence in a transparent and flexible manner. This paper outlines the Australian Government's environmental offset policy development process, and describes the approach adopted for evaluating the suitability of proposed offsets in meeting the policy goals. The Guide explicitly estimates the extent to which an offset will improve the target biota and/or avert future losses, the degree of confidence that the offset will be implemented successfully, and the time it will take to deliver a conservation benefit. Since implementation of the Environmental Offsets Policy and the Guide, there has been a shift in focus from estimating offset requirements based on simplistic area ratios, toward directly evaluating the components of an offset action that determine its environmental performance. Achieving a balance between scientific robustness and policy workability is an ongoing challenge. The Environmental Offsets Policy and Guide represent an important step towards consistency and transparency in environmental offset decision-making.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>development policy</subject><subject>environmental markets</subject><subject>environmental offsets</subject><subject>Environmental performance</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Estimating</subject><subject>Governments</subject><subject>mitigation hierarchy</subject><subject>no net loss</subject><subject>Offsets</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>researchers</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><subject>threatened species</subject><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctKxDAUhoMoOF4ewIVYcOOmepK0ubgbBm8w4MIZdFcybaId2qYmmYF5e1NGRBTBVSDf9-f84SB0guESA-ZXT0A5E5JInAFABi87aIQzJtOMCr6LRgNOB76PDrxfRoflXIzQ8-xNJ5Ve68b2re5CYk0S4tV45YNTTa26RHfr2tluoKqJ3HgdfNLbpi4314lxth0S1m2SYJPeqTLUpT5Ce0Y1Xh9_nodofnszm9yn08e7h8l4mpaZlCFVGFhZMgILWtHYu8plBAvMFTM8VmRScEqw4IznzCihNc-qijEMGQWuDD1EF9t3e2ffV9qHoq19qZtGddqufIE5ByK4YPQfKs0lASlwVM9_qEu7cl38SLSIoMAA8mjhrVU6673Tpuhd3Sq3KTAUw1aKX1uJmdNtZumDdV8BwigBRiHysy03yhbq1dW-mD8RwHEgFkzAYNDPqapduLp61d_K_Tn3AzwZn9E</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>MILLER, KATHERINE L.</creator><creator>TREZISE, JAMES A.</creator><creator>KRAUS, STEFAN</creator><creator>DRIPPS, KIMBERLEY</creator><creator>EVANS, MEGAN C.</creator><creator>GIBBONS, PHILIP</creator><creator>POSSINGHAM, HUGH P.</creator><creator>MARON, MARTINE</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>The development of the Australian environmental offsets policy: from theory to practice</title><author>MILLER, KATHERINE L. ; TREZISE, JAMES A. ; KRAUS, STEFAN ; DRIPPS, KIMBERLEY ; EVANS, MEGAN C. ; GIBBONS, PHILIP ; POSSINGHAM, HUGH P. ; MARON, MARTINE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-a106cc620b3d3004d59c49b17a6f70656987321876756fa8ee74dd66104307af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>development policy</topic><topic>environmental markets</topic><topic>environmental offsets</topic><topic>Environmental performance</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Estimating</topic><topic>Governments</topic><topic>mitigation hierarchy</topic><topic>no net loss</topic><topic>Offsets</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>researchers</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><topic>threatened species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MILLER, KATHERINE L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TREZISE, JAMES A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRAUS, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRIPPS, KIMBERLEY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EVANS, MEGAN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIBBONS, PHILIP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POSSINGHAM, HUGH P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARON, MARTINE</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MILLER, KATHERINE L.</au><au>TREZISE, JAMES A.</au><au>KRAUS, STEFAN</au><au>DRIPPS, KIMBERLEY</au><au>EVANS, MEGAN C.</au><au>GIBBONS, PHILIP</au><au>POSSINGHAM, HUGH P.</au><au>MARON, MARTINE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The development of the Australian environmental offsets policy: from theory to practice</atitle><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle><addtitle>Envir. Conserv</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>306-314</pages><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><eissn>1469-4387</eissn><coden>EVCNA4</coden><abstract>Environmental offsetting involves compensating for the residual adverse impacts of an action on the environment by generating an equivalent benefit elsewhere. As the prevalence of environmental offsetting grows, so does the challenge of translating no-net-loss goals to workable policy. From 2011–2012, the Australian Government developed an Environmental Offsets Policy and an accompanying metric (the Offsets Assessment Guide) to support decision making about offset requirements under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Through extensive stakeholder consultation and in collaboration with academic researchers, the Guide was developed with the aim of accounting appropriately for ecological equivalence in a transparent and flexible manner. This paper outlines the Australian Government's environmental offset policy development process, and describes the approach adopted for evaluating the suitability of proposed offsets in meeting the policy goals. The Guide explicitly estimates the extent to which an offset will improve the target biota and/or avert future losses, the degree of confidence that the offset will be implemented successfully, and the time it will take to deliver a conservation benefit. Since implementation of the Environmental Offsets Policy and the Guide, there has been a shift in focus from estimating offset requirements based on simplistic area ratios, toward directly evaluating the components of an offset action that determine its environmental performance. Achieving a balance between scientific robustness and policy workability is an ongoing challenge. The Environmental Offsets Policy and Guide represent an important step towards consistency and transparency in environmental offset decision-making.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S037689291400040X</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-8929 |
ispartof | Environmental conservation, 2015-12, Vol.42 (4), p.306-314 |
issn | 0376-8929 1469-4387 1469-4387 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770287863 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Australia biodiversity Biota Conservation Decision making development policy environmental markets environmental offsets Environmental performance Environmental policy Environmental protection Equivalence Estimating Governments mitigation hierarchy no net loss Offsets Policies researchers stakeholders threatened species |
title | The development of the Australian environmental offsets policy: from theory to practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A26%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20development%20of%20the%20Australian%20environmental%20offsets%20policy:%20from%20theory%20to%20practice&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20conservation&rft.au=MILLER,%20KATHERINE%20L.&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=306-314&rft.issn=0376-8929&rft.eissn=1469-4387&rft.coden=EVCNA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S037689291400040X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26320630%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1728306005&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S037689291400040X&rft_jstor_id=26320630&rfr_iscdi=true |