Inter-specific differences in the dynamics of water use and pulse-response of co-dominant canopy species in a dryland woodland

Differences in the magnitude and timing of rainfall pulse-response among plant species in dryland ecosystems may facilitate the maintenance of species diversity, but this hypothesis remains untested among species that appear to occupy the same ecological niche. Here, we examined the pulse-response o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of arid environments 2016-01, Vol.124, p.332-340
Hauptverfasser: Page, Gerald F.M., Merchant, Andrew, Grierson, Pauline F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 340
container_issue
container_start_page 332
container_title Journal of arid environments
container_volume 124
creator Page, Gerald F.M.
Merchant, Andrew
Grierson, Pauline F.
description Differences in the magnitude and timing of rainfall pulse-response among plant species in dryland ecosystems may facilitate the maintenance of species diversity, but this hypothesis remains untested among species that appear to occupy the same ecological niche. Here, we examined the pulse-response of co-dominant Acacia species forming the canopy of a dryland woodland. Trees received natural precipitation and supplemental irrigation equivalent to a ∼105 mm rainfall pulse over four days. The pulse-response was large and rapid irrespective of species or differences in minimum water potential during drought. Branch water potential increased from ∼−8 MPa to > −1 MPa at pre-dawn and foliage relative water content increased from 43.4% to 98.6% within five days of drought-break. Differences in midday water potential among species following the water pulse reflected differences in rates of stomatal conductance (gs) and likely as a consequence of differences in specific leaf area (SLA). We conclude there is no temporal partitioning of resources among the canopy species in the study woodland. Instead, water relations in these three closely related species were anisohydric and tightly coupled to soil water availability. •We captured the response of three species of Acacia to a simulated rainfall pulse.•Tree water relations were anisohydric and tightly coupled to soil water availability.•Branch water potential increased from ∼−8 MPa to > −1 MPa within 5 days.•Phyllode relative water content increased from 43.4% to 98.6% within 5 days.•There was no evidence of temporal resource partitioning among the canopy species.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.09.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770287311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140196315300501</els_id><sourcerecordid>1732813569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e68e8b356b4a7d97d7e6824cb10106b41b9786f527b2763efc8f5c7c569fdf443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1PAyEUJEYTa_UvGI5edoX9YrlpGj-amHjRxBth4RHZtLDCtk0v_nZZq2c9vZdhZvKYQeiSkpwS2lz3eS-D1eC2eUFonROeE1IdoRklvM54UbwdoxmhFckob8pTdBZjTwildV3O0OfSjRCyOICyxiqsrTEQwCmI2Do8vgPWeyfXVkXsDd7JxMabCFg6jYfNKkIWIA7eJSi9K59pv7ZOuhEr6fywx9_WBzeJddivJuXOez0t5-jEyGRy8TPn6PX-7mXxmD09PywXt0-ZKlk7ZtC00HZl3XSVZJozzRJSVKpLAZAE0o6ztjF1wbqCNSUY1ZpaMVU33GhTVeUcXR18h-A_NhBHsbZRwSrdAH4TBWWMFC0rKf0HtSxamm7hidocqCr4GAMYMQS7lmEvKBFTN6IXv92IqRtBuEjdJOHNQQjpz1sLQcSUUQpd2wBqFNrbvyy-ACpknRo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732813569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-specific differences in the dynamics of water use and pulse-response of co-dominant canopy species in a dryland woodland</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Page, Gerald F.M. ; Merchant, Andrew ; Grierson, Pauline F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Page, Gerald F.M. ; Merchant, Andrew ; Grierson, Pauline F.</creatorcontrib><description>Differences in the magnitude and timing of rainfall pulse-response among plant species in dryland ecosystems may facilitate the maintenance of species diversity, but this hypothesis remains untested among species that appear to occupy the same ecological niche. Here, we examined the pulse-response of co-dominant Acacia species forming the canopy of a dryland woodland. Trees received natural precipitation and supplemental irrigation equivalent to a ∼105 mm rainfall pulse over four days. The pulse-response was large and rapid irrespective of species or differences in minimum water potential during drought. Branch water potential increased from ∼−8 MPa to &gt; −1 MPa at pre-dawn and foliage relative water content increased from 43.4% to 98.6% within five days of drought-break. Differences in midday water potential among species following the water pulse reflected differences in rates of stomatal conductance (gs) and likely as a consequence of differences in specific leaf area (SLA). We conclude there is no temporal partitioning of resources among the canopy species in the study woodland. Instead, water relations in these three closely related species were anisohydric and tightly coupled to soil water availability. •We captured the response of three species of Acacia to a simulated rainfall pulse.•Tree water relations were anisohydric and tightly coupled to soil water availability.•Branch water potential increased from ∼−8 MPa to &gt; −1 MPa within 5 days.•Phyllode relative water content increased from 43.4% to 98.6% within 5 days.•There was no evidence of temporal resource partitioning among the canopy species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-1963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-922X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.09.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acacia ; Arid ; Biological diversity ; Canopies ; Carbon isotopes ; Droughts ; Maintenance ; Moisture content ; Niche ; Partitioning ; Rainfall ; Water potential ; Water use ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Journal of arid environments, 2016-01, Vol.124, p.332-340</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e68e8b356b4a7d97d7e6824cb10106b41b9786f527b2763efc8f5c7c569fdf443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e68e8b356b4a7d97d7e6824cb10106b41b9786f527b2763efc8f5c7c569fdf443</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3531-7123</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196315300501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Page, Gerald F.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merchant, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grierson, Pauline F.</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-specific differences in the dynamics of water use and pulse-response of co-dominant canopy species in a dryland woodland</title><title>Journal of arid environments</title><description>Differences in the magnitude and timing of rainfall pulse-response among plant species in dryland ecosystems may facilitate the maintenance of species diversity, but this hypothesis remains untested among species that appear to occupy the same ecological niche. Here, we examined the pulse-response of co-dominant Acacia species forming the canopy of a dryland woodland. Trees received natural precipitation and supplemental irrigation equivalent to a ∼105 mm rainfall pulse over four days. The pulse-response was large and rapid irrespective of species or differences in minimum water potential during drought. Branch water potential increased from ∼−8 MPa to &gt; −1 MPa at pre-dawn and foliage relative water content increased from 43.4% to 98.6% within five days of drought-break. Differences in midday water potential among species following the water pulse reflected differences in rates of stomatal conductance (gs) and likely as a consequence of differences in specific leaf area (SLA). We conclude there is no temporal partitioning of resources among the canopy species in the study woodland. Instead, water relations in these three closely related species were anisohydric and tightly coupled to soil water availability. •We captured the response of three species of Acacia to a simulated rainfall pulse.•Tree water relations were anisohydric and tightly coupled to soil water availability.•Branch water potential increased from ∼−8 MPa to &gt; −1 MPa within 5 days.•Phyllode relative water content increased from 43.4% to 98.6% within 5 days.•There was no evidence of temporal resource partitioning among the canopy species.</description><subject>Acacia</subject><subject>Arid</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Carbon isotopes</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Niche</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Water potential</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0140-1963</issn><issn>1095-922X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1PAyEUJEYTa_UvGI5edoX9YrlpGj-amHjRxBth4RHZtLDCtk0v_nZZq2c9vZdhZvKYQeiSkpwS2lz3eS-D1eC2eUFonROeE1IdoRklvM54UbwdoxmhFckob8pTdBZjTwildV3O0OfSjRCyOICyxiqsrTEQwCmI2Do8vgPWeyfXVkXsDd7JxMabCFg6jYfNKkIWIA7eJSi9K59pv7ZOuhEr6fywx9_WBzeJddivJuXOez0t5-jEyGRy8TPn6PX-7mXxmD09PywXt0-ZKlk7ZtC00HZl3XSVZJozzRJSVKpLAZAE0o6ztjF1wbqCNSUY1ZpaMVU33GhTVeUcXR18h-A_NhBHsbZRwSrdAH4TBWWMFC0rKf0HtSxamm7hidocqCr4GAMYMQS7lmEvKBFTN6IXv92IqRtBuEjdJOHNQQjpz1sLQcSUUQpd2wBqFNrbvyy-ACpknRo</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Page, Gerald F.M.</creator><creator>Merchant, Andrew</creator><creator>Grierson, Pauline F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-7123</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Inter-specific differences in the dynamics of water use and pulse-response of co-dominant canopy species in a dryland woodland</title><author>Page, Gerald F.M. ; Merchant, Andrew ; Grierson, Pauline F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e68e8b356b4a7d97d7e6824cb10106b41b9786f527b2763efc8f5c7c569fdf443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acacia</topic><topic>Arid</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Carbon isotopes</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Niche</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Water potential</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Page, Gerald F.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merchant, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grierson, Pauline F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of arid environments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Page, Gerald F.M.</au><au>Merchant, Andrew</au><au>Grierson, Pauline F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-specific differences in the dynamics of water use and pulse-response of co-dominant canopy species in a dryland woodland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of arid environments</jtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>124</volume><spage>332</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>332-340</pages><issn>0140-1963</issn><eissn>1095-922X</eissn><abstract>Differences in the magnitude and timing of rainfall pulse-response among plant species in dryland ecosystems may facilitate the maintenance of species diversity, but this hypothesis remains untested among species that appear to occupy the same ecological niche. Here, we examined the pulse-response of co-dominant Acacia species forming the canopy of a dryland woodland. Trees received natural precipitation and supplemental irrigation equivalent to a ∼105 mm rainfall pulse over four days. The pulse-response was large and rapid irrespective of species or differences in minimum water potential during drought. Branch water potential increased from ∼−8 MPa to &gt; −1 MPa at pre-dawn and foliage relative water content increased from 43.4% to 98.6% within five days of drought-break. Differences in midday water potential among species following the water pulse reflected differences in rates of stomatal conductance (gs) and likely as a consequence of differences in specific leaf area (SLA). We conclude there is no temporal partitioning of resources among the canopy species in the study woodland. Instead, water relations in these three closely related species were anisohydric and tightly coupled to soil water availability. •We captured the response of three species of Acacia to a simulated rainfall pulse.•Tree water relations were anisohydric and tightly coupled to soil water availability.•Branch water potential increased from ∼−8 MPa to &gt; −1 MPa within 5 days.•Phyllode relative water content increased from 43.4% to 98.6% within 5 days.•There was no evidence of temporal resource partitioning among the canopy species.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.09.004</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-7123</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-1963
ispartof Journal of arid environments, 2016-01, Vol.124, p.332-340
issn 0140-1963
1095-922X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770287311
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acacia
Arid
Biological diversity
Canopies
Carbon isotopes
Droughts
Maintenance
Moisture content
Niche
Partitioning
Rainfall
Water potential
Water use
Woodlands
title Inter-specific differences in the dynamics of water use and pulse-response of co-dominant canopy species in a dryland woodland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A42%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-specific%20differences%20in%20the%20dynamics%20of%20water%20use%20and%20pulse-response%20of%20co-dominant%20canopy%20species%20in%20a%20dryland%20woodland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20arid%20environments&rft.au=Page,%20Gerald%20F.M.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=124&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=332-340&rft.issn=0140-1963&rft.eissn=1095-922X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.09.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1732813569%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732813569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140196315300501&rfr_iscdi=true