Scaling multiblast craters: General approach and application to volcanic craters

Most volcanic explosions leave a crater in the surface around the center of the explosions. Such craters differ from products of single events like meteorite impacts or those produced by military testing because they typically result from multiple, rather than single, explosions. Here we analyze the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2015-09, Vol.120 (9), p.6141-6158
Hauptverfasser: Sonder, I., Graettinger, A. H., Valentine, G. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6158
container_issue 9
container_start_page 6141
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 120
creator Sonder, I.
Graettinger, A. H.
Valentine, G. A.
description Most volcanic explosions leave a crater in the surface around the center of the explosions. Such craters differ from products of single events like meteorite impacts or those produced by military testing because they typically result from multiple, rather than single, explosions. Here we analyze the evolution of experimental craters that were created by several detonations of chemical explosives in layered aggregates. An empirical relationship for the scaled crater radius as a function of scaled explosion depth for single blasts in flat test beds is derived from experimental data, which differs from existing relations and has better applicability for deep blasts. A method to calculate an effective explosion depth for nonflat topography (e.g., for explosions below existing craters) is derived, showing how multiblast crater sizes differ from the single‐blast case: Sizes of natural caters (radii and volumes) are not characteristic of the number of explosions, nor therefore of the total acting energy, that formed a crater. Also, the crater size is not simply related to the largest explosion in a sequence but depends upon that explosion and the energy of that single blast and on the cumulative energy of all blasts that formed a crater. The two energies can be combined to form an effective number of explosions that is characteristic for the crater evolution. The multiblast crater size evolution has implications on the estimates of volcanic eruption energies, indicating that it is not correct to estimate explosion energy from crater size using previously published relationships that were derived for single‐blast cases. Key Points Volcanic eruption energy cannot be derived from single‐blast scaled crater size A length‐energy scale is given for single explosions in flat surface conditions Crater size‐energy scaling tools are provided for multiblast conditions
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2015JB012018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770271033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1911640428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4679-4e0f897560db587d92b2fb5baae8f08f93b80f3e09142a7bd274ef720c2af33d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRSMEEgi64wMisWFBwI8kdthRCgFUAeK9syaODQY3KXYC9O9xVUCIBbOZh86dudJE0SZGuxghskcQzs6GCIfMl6I1gvMiKWiWL__UmK5GA--fUQgeRjhdiy6vJVjTPMaT3namsuC7WDrolPP7caka5cDGMJ26FuRTDE09b6yR0Jm2ibs2fmuthMbIb9VGtKLBejX4yuvR7fHRzeFJMr4oTw8PxgmkOSuSVCHNC5blqK4yzuqCVERXWQWguEZcF7TiSFOFgksCrKoJS5VmBEkCmtKarkfbi73B2muvfCcmxktlLTSq7b3AjCHCMKI0oFt_0Oe2d01wJ3CBcZ6ilPB_KUYoxoTxNFA7C0q61nuntJg6MwE3ExiJ-R_E7z8EnC7wd2PV7F9WnJVXwyxcKYIqWaiM79THjwrci8gZZZm4Py_F3ejh5C4fZWJIPwFkapZN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1723112784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scaling multiblast craters: General approach and application to volcanic craters</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><creator>Sonder, I. ; Graettinger, A. H. ; Valentine, G. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sonder, I. ; Graettinger, A. H. ; Valentine, G. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Most volcanic explosions leave a crater in the surface around the center of the explosions. Such craters differ from products of single events like meteorite impacts or those produced by military testing because they typically result from multiple, rather than single, explosions. Here we analyze the evolution of experimental craters that were created by several detonations of chemical explosives in layered aggregates. An empirical relationship for the scaled crater radius as a function of scaled explosion depth for single blasts in flat test beds is derived from experimental data, which differs from existing relations and has better applicability for deep blasts. A method to calculate an effective explosion depth for nonflat topography (e.g., for explosions below existing craters) is derived, showing how multiblast crater sizes differ from the single‐blast case: Sizes of natural caters (radii and volumes) are not characteristic of the number of explosions, nor therefore of the total acting energy, that formed a crater. Also, the crater size is not simply related to the largest explosion in a sequence but depends upon that explosion and the energy of that single blast and on the cumulative energy of all blasts that formed a crater. The two energies can be combined to form an effective number of explosions that is characteristic for the crater evolution. The multiblast crater size evolution has implications on the estimates of volcanic eruption energies, indicating that it is not correct to estimate explosion energy from crater size using previously published relationships that were derived for single‐blast cases. Key Points Volcanic eruption energy cannot be derived from single‐blast scaled crater size A length‐energy scale is given for single explosions in flat surface conditions Crater size‐energy scaling tools are provided for multiblast conditions</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015JB012018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aggregates ; Banks (topography) ; Blasts ; crater evolution ; crater morphology analysis ; Craters ; Data processing ; Depth ; Empirical analysis ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; Energy use ; energy-length scale ; Estimates ; Evolution ; Experimental data ; Explosions ; explosive volcanic processes ; Explosives ; Geophysics ; Length ; maar-diatreme formation ; Mathematical analysis ; Meteorite craters ; Meteorite impacts ; Methods ; Military ; multiblast craters ; Products ; Scaling ; Sequencing ; Slope ; Testing ; Topography ; Topography (geology) ; Volcanic craters ; Volcanic eruption effects ; Volcanic eruptions ; Volcanoes</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2015-09, Vol.120 (9), p.6141-6158</ispartof><rights>2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4679-4e0f897560db587d92b2fb5baae8f08f93b80f3e09142a7bd274ef720c2af33d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4679-4e0f897560db587d92b2fb5baae8f08f93b80f3e09142a7bd274ef720c2af33d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7639-9204</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015JB012018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015JB012018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sonder, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graettinger, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentine, G. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Scaling multiblast craters: General approach and application to volcanic craters</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><description>Most volcanic explosions leave a crater in the surface around the center of the explosions. Such craters differ from products of single events like meteorite impacts or those produced by military testing because they typically result from multiple, rather than single, explosions. Here we analyze the evolution of experimental craters that were created by several detonations of chemical explosives in layered aggregates. An empirical relationship for the scaled crater radius as a function of scaled explosion depth for single blasts in flat test beds is derived from experimental data, which differs from existing relations and has better applicability for deep blasts. A method to calculate an effective explosion depth for nonflat topography (e.g., for explosions below existing craters) is derived, showing how multiblast crater sizes differ from the single‐blast case: Sizes of natural caters (radii and volumes) are not characteristic of the number of explosions, nor therefore of the total acting energy, that formed a crater. Also, the crater size is not simply related to the largest explosion in a sequence but depends upon that explosion and the energy of that single blast and on the cumulative energy of all blasts that formed a crater. The two energies can be combined to form an effective number of explosions that is characteristic for the crater evolution. The multiblast crater size evolution has implications on the estimates of volcanic eruption energies, indicating that it is not correct to estimate explosion energy from crater size using previously published relationships that were derived for single‐blast cases. Key Points Volcanic eruption energy cannot be derived from single‐blast scaled crater size A length‐energy scale is given for single explosions in flat surface conditions Crater size‐energy scaling tools are provided for multiblast conditions</description><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Banks (topography)</subject><subject>Blasts</subject><subject>crater evolution</subject><subject>crater morphology analysis</subject><subject>Craters</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Depth</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy use</subject><subject>energy-length scale</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Experimental data</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>explosive volcanic processes</subject><subject>Explosives</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Length</subject><subject>maar-diatreme formation</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Meteorite craters</subject><subject>Meteorite impacts</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Military</subject><subject>multiblast craters</subject><subject>Products</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Sequencing</subject><subject>Slope</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Topography (geology)</subject><subject>Volcanic craters</subject><subject>Volcanic eruption effects</subject><subject>Volcanic eruptions</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRSMEEgi64wMisWFBwI8kdthRCgFUAeK9syaODQY3KXYC9O9xVUCIBbOZh86dudJE0SZGuxghskcQzs6GCIfMl6I1gvMiKWiWL__UmK5GA--fUQgeRjhdiy6vJVjTPMaT3namsuC7WDrolPP7caka5cDGMJ26FuRTDE09b6yR0Jm2ibs2fmuthMbIb9VGtKLBejX4yuvR7fHRzeFJMr4oTw8PxgmkOSuSVCHNC5blqK4yzuqCVERXWQWguEZcF7TiSFOFgksCrKoJS5VmBEkCmtKarkfbi73B2muvfCcmxktlLTSq7b3AjCHCMKI0oFt_0Oe2d01wJ3CBcZ6ilPB_KUYoxoTxNFA7C0q61nuntJg6MwE3ExiJ-R_E7z8EnC7wd2PV7F9WnJVXwyxcKYIqWaiM79THjwrci8gZZZm4Py_F3ejh5C4fZWJIPwFkapZN</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Sonder, I.</creator><creator>Graettinger, A. H.</creator><creator>Valentine, G. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7639-9204</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Scaling multiblast craters: General approach and application to volcanic craters</title><author>Sonder, I. ; Graettinger, A. H. ; Valentine, G. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4679-4e0f897560db587d92b2fb5baae8f08f93b80f3e09142a7bd274ef720c2af33d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Banks (topography)</topic><topic>Blasts</topic><topic>crater evolution</topic><topic>crater morphology analysis</topic><topic>Craters</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Depth</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy use</topic><topic>energy-length scale</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Experimental data</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>explosive volcanic processes</topic><topic>Explosives</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Length</topic><topic>maar-diatreme formation</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Meteorite craters</topic><topic>Meteorite impacts</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Military</topic><topic>multiblast craters</topic><topic>Products</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Sequencing</topic><topic>Slope</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Topography (geology)</topic><topic>Volcanic craters</topic><topic>Volcanic eruption effects</topic><topic>Volcanic eruptions</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sonder, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graettinger, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentine, G. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sonder, I.</au><au>Graettinger, A. H.</au><au>Valentine, G. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scaling multiblast craters: General approach and application to volcanic craters</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>6141</spage><epage>6158</epage><pages>6141-6158</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>Most volcanic explosions leave a crater in the surface around the center of the explosions. Such craters differ from products of single events like meteorite impacts or those produced by military testing because they typically result from multiple, rather than single, explosions. Here we analyze the evolution of experimental craters that were created by several detonations of chemical explosives in layered aggregates. An empirical relationship for the scaled crater radius as a function of scaled explosion depth for single blasts in flat test beds is derived from experimental data, which differs from existing relations and has better applicability for deep blasts. A method to calculate an effective explosion depth for nonflat topography (e.g., for explosions below existing craters) is derived, showing how multiblast crater sizes differ from the single‐blast case: Sizes of natural caters (radii and volumes) are not characteristic of the number of explosions, nor therefore of the total acting energy, that formed a crater. Also, the crater size is not simply related to the largest explosion in a sequence but depends upon that explosion and the energy of that single blast and on the cumulative energy of all blasts that formed a crater. The two energies can be combined to form an effective number of explosions that is characteristic for the crater evolution. The multiblast crater size evolution has implications on the estimates of volcanic eruption energies, indicating that it is not correct to estimate explosion energy from crater size using previously published relationships that were derived for single‐blast cases. Key Points Volcanic eruption energy cannot be derived from single‐blast scaled crater size A length‐energy scale is given for single explosions in flat surface conditions Crater size‐energy scaling tools are provided for multiblast conditions</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2015JB012018</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7639-9204</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2015-09, Vol.120 (9), p.6141-6158
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770271033
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Wiley Online Library Free Content
subjects Aggregates
Banks (topography)
Blasts
crater evolution
crater morphology analysis
Craters
Data processing
Depth
Empirical analysis
Energy
Energy consumption
Energy use
energy-length scale
Estimates
Evolution
Experimental data
Explosions
explosive volcanic processes
Explosives
Geophysics
Length
maar-diatreme formation
Mathematical analysis
Meteorite craters
Meteorite impacts
Methods
Military
multiblast craters
Products
Scaling
Sequencing
Slope
Testing
Topography
Topography (geology)
Volcanic craters
Volcanic eruption effects
Volcanic eruptions
Volcanoes
title Scaling multiblast craters: General approach and application to volcanic craters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scaling%20multiblast%20craters:%20General%20approach%20and%20application%20to%20volcanic%20craters&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Sonder,%20I.&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=6141&rft.epage=6158&rft.pages=6141-6158&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015JB012018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1911640428%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1723112784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true