Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators

•Individual specificity was observed according to source of conflicting stimuli.•Primary affectedness quantified test organism’s positional sensitivity to stimulus.•Secondary affectedness revealed fish status, tendency toward or away from stimulus.•Predators produced stronger effects than food as in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological modelling 2015-06, Vol.306, p.257-267
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Hungsoo, Nguyen, Tuyen Van, Uehara, Takashi, Heo, Muyoung, Chon, Tae-Soo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 267
container_issue
container_start_page 257
container_title Ecological modelling
container_volume 306
creator Kim, Hungsoo
Nguyen, Tuyen Van
Uehara, Takashi
Heo, Muyoung
Chon, Tae-Soo
description •Individual specificity was observed according to source of conflicting stimuli.•Primary affectedness quantified test organism’s positional sensitivity to stimulus.•Secondary affectedness revealed fish status, tendency toward or away from stimulus.•Predators produced stronger effects than food as initial stimulus. Zebrafish behavior was monitored based on continuous movement tracking of individuals in response to two conflicting stimuli, food and predators. The shape parameters describing positional distribution along the x-axis (mean, standard deviation (SD) and skewness) were differentiated according to source and time order (i.e., food first or predator first) of stimuli. Behavioral states were expressed by primary (mean and SD of x-coordinates) and secondary (skewness of x-coordinates) affectedness, and were addressed by specificity of individual response to stimuli. Even after adjusting spatial location and movement range in primary affectedness, secondary affectedness still occurred owing to a residual effect of the stimulus according to asymmetry of the positional distribution (e.g., away from the predator). Predator (as initial or secondary stimulus) produced stronger affectedness than food given as initial stimulus. Even after removal of initial stimulus, it still influenced affectedness of test organisms in the subsequent phases, implying memory effect of initial stimulus. Quantification of stress based on expression of behavioral state changes is feasible and could provide insight for monitoring based on indicator organism behavior under stressful conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770270720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304380014004785</els_id><sourcerecordid>1770270720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-619ddb5bebe9840da3cdab5e2440b4e9c707a579d5ea5b4830a716b79a71b1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwG_CxSCSsnaROjlV5SpW49MTF8mMDrpK42Gkl_j2JgrjCaVa7MyPtR8g1g5QBW97tUjS-ab3FJuXA8mGbAlQnZMZKwRMBfHlKZpBBnmQlwDm5iHEHAIyXfEbUG-qgahc_6OJedc7TgMH5G9r6I7bY9dR1VFkbMEbXvdPYjxPtPTW-qxtn-mnr2kPjbmntvY1UdZbuA1rV-xAvyVmtmohXPzon28eH7fo52bw-vaxXm8TkBeuTJaus1YVGjVWZg1WZsUoXyPMcdI6VESBUISpboCp0XmagBFtqUQ2imc7mZDHV7oP_PGDsZeuiwaZRHfpDlEwMJIYODv-wZrwEkTE-WMVkNcHHGLCW--BaFb4kAznilzv5i1-O-MfDgH9IrqYkDj8fHQYZjcPOoHUBTS-td392fAMywZOa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732807312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kim, Hungsoo ; Nguyen, Tuyen Van ; Uehara, Takashi ; Heo, Muyoung ; Chon, Tae-Soo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hungsoo ; Nguyen, Tuyen Van ; Uehara, Takashi ; Heo, Muyoung ; Chon, Tae-Soo</creatorcontrib><description>•Individual specificity was observed according to source of conflicting stimuli.•Primary affectedness quantified test organism’s positional sensitivity to stimulus.•Secondary affectedness revealed fish status, tendency toward or away from stimulus.•Predators produced stronger effects than food as initial stimulus. Zebrafish behavior was monitored based on continuous movement tracking of individuals in response to two conflicting stimuli, food and predators. The shape parameters describing positional distribution along the x-axis (mean, standard deviation (SD) and skewness) were differentiated according to source and time order (i.e., food first or predator first) of stimuli. Behavioral states were expressed by primary (mean and SD of x-coordinates) and secondary (skewness of x-coordinates) affectedness, and were addressed by specificity of individual response to stimuli. Even after adjusting spatial location and movement range in primary affectedness, secondary affectedness still occurred owing to a residual effect of the stimulus according to asymmetry of the positional distribution (e.g., away from the predator). Predator (as initial or secondary stimulus) produced stronger affectedness than food given as initial stimulus. Even after removal of initial stimulus, it still influenced affectedness of test organisms in the subsequent phases, implying memory effect of initial stimulus. Quantification of stress based on expression of behavioral state changes is feasible and could provide insight for monitoring based on indicator organism behavior under stressful conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Affectedness ; Danio rerio ; Foods ; Freshwater ; Mathematical models ; Memory ; Monitoring ; Movement ; Organisms ; Predators ; Shape parameter ; Skewness ; Stimuli ; Zebrafish</subject><ispartof>Ecological modelling, 2015-06, Vol.306, p.257-267</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-619ddb5bebe9840da3cdab5e2440b4e9c707a579d5ea5b4830a716b79a71b1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-619ddb5bebe9840da3cdab5e2440b4e9c707a579d5ea5b4830a716b79a71b1b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4173-0897 ; 0000-0002-3120-8627</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tuyen Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uehara, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Muyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chon, Tae-Soo</creatorcontrib><title>Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators</title><title>Ecological modelling</title><description>•Individual specificity was observed according to source of conflicting stimuli.•Primary affectedness quantified test organism’s positional sensitivity to stimulus.•Secondary affectedness revealed fish status, tendency toward or away from stimulus.•Predators produced stronger effects than food as initial stimulus. Zebrafish behavior was monitored based on continuous movement tracking of individuals in response to two conflicting stimuli, food and predators. The shape parameters describing positional distribution along the x-axis (mean, standard deviation (SD) and skewness) were differentiated according to source and time order (i.e., food first or predator first) of stimuli. Behavioral states were expressed by primary (mean and SD of x-coordinates) and secondary (skewness of x-coordinates) affectedness, and were addressed by specificity of individual response to stimuli. Even after adjusting spatial location and movement range in primary affectedness, secondary affectedness still occurred owing to a residual effect of the stimulus according to asymmetry of the positional distribution (e.g., away from the predator). Predator (as initial or secondary stimulus) produced stronger affectedness than food given as initial stimulus. Even after removal of initial stimulus, it still influenced affectedness of test organisms in the subsequent phases, implying memory effect of initial stimulus. Quantification of stress based on expression of behavioral state changes is feasible and could provide insight for monitoring based on indicator organism behavior under stressful conditions.</description><subject>Affectedness</subject><subject>Danio rerio</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Shape parameter</subject><subject>Skewness</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Zebrafish</subject><issn>0304-3800</issn><issn>1872-7026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwG_CxSCSsnaROjlV5SpW49MTF8mMDrpK42Gkl_j2JgrjCaVa7MyPtR8g1g5QBW97tUjS-ab3FJuXA8mGbAlQnZMZKwRMBfHlKZpBBnmQlwDm5iHEHAIyXfEbUG-qgahc_6OJedc7TgMH5G9r6I7bY9dR1VFkbMEbXvdPYjxPtPTW-qxtn-mnr2kPjbmntvY1UdZbuA1rV-xAvyVmtmohXPzon28eH7fo52bw-vaxXm8TkBeuTJaus1YVGjVWZg1WZsUoXyPMcdI6VESBUISpboCp0XmagBFtqUQ2imc7mZDHV7oP_PGDsZeuiwaZRHfpDlEwMJIYODv-wZrwEkTE-WMVkNcHHGLCW--BaFb4kAznilzv5i1-O-MfDgH9IrqYkDj8fHQYZjcPOoHUBTS-td392fAMywZOa</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Kim, Hungsoo</creator><creator>Nguyen, Tuyen Van</creator><creator>Uehara, Takashi</creator><creator>Heo, Muyoung</creator><creator>Chon, Tae-Soo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4173-0897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-8627</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators</title><author>Kim, Hungsoo ; Nguyen, Tuyen Van ; Uehara, Takashi ; Heo, Muyoung ; Chon, Tae-Soo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-619ddb5bebe9840da3cdab5e2440b4e9c707a579d5ea5b4830a716b79a71b1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Affectedness</topic><topic>Danio rerio</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Shape parameter</topic><topic>Skewness</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Zebrafish</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tuyen Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uehara, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Muyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chon, Tae-Soo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological modelling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hungsoo</au><au>Nguyen, Tuyen Van</au><au>Uehara, Takashi</au><au>Heo, Muyoung</au><au>Chon, Tae-Soo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators</atitle><jtitle>Ecological modelling</jtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>306</volume><spage>257</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>257-267</pages><issn>0304-3800</issn><eissn>1872-7026</eissn><abstract>•Individual specificity was observed according to source of conflicting stimuli.•Primary affectedness quantified test organism’s positional sensitivity to stimulus.•Secondary affectedness revealed fish status, tendency toward or away from stimulus.•Predators produced stronger effects than food as initial stimulus. Zebrafish behavior was monitored based on continuous movement tracking of individuals in response to two conflicting stimuli, food and predators. The shape parameters describing positional distribution along the x-axis (mean, standard deviation (SD) and skewness) were differentiated according to source and time order (i.e., food first or predator first) of stimuli. Behavioral states were expressed by primary (mean and SD of x-coordinates) and secondary (skewness of x-coordinates) affectedness, and were addressed by specificity of individual response to stimuli. Even after adjusting spatial location and movement range in primary affectedness, secondary affectedness still occurred owing to a residual effect of the stimulus according to asymmetry of the positional distribution (e.g., away from the predator). Predator (as initial or secondary stimulus) produced stronger affectedness than food given as initial stimulus. Even after removal of initial stimulus, it still influenced affectedness of test organisms in the subsequent phases, implying memory effect of initial stimulus. Quantification of stress based on expression of behavioral state changes is feasible and could provide insight for monitoring based on indicator organism behavior under stressful conditions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4173-0897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-8627</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-3800
ispartof Ecological modelling, 2015-06, Vol.306, p.257-267
issn 0304-3800
1872-7026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770270720
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Affectedness
Danio rerio
Foods
Freshwater
Mathematical models
Memory
Monitoring
Movement
Organisms
Predators
Shape parameter
Skewness
Stimuli
Zebrafish
title Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A18%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zebrafish%20(Danio%20rerio)%20movement%20in%20addressing%20stress%20to%20conflicting%20stimuli,%20foods%20and%20predators&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20modelling&rft.au=Kim,%20Hungsoo&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=306&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=257-267&rft.issn=0304-3800&rft.eissn=1872-7026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770270720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732807312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0304380014004785&rfr_iscdi=true