Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators
•Individual specificity was observed according to source of conflicting stimuli.•Primary affectedness quantified test organism’s positional sensitivity to stimulus.•Secondary affectedness revealed fish status, tendency toward or away from stimulus.•Predators produced stronger effects than food as in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological modelling 2015-06, Vol.306, p.257-267 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 267 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 257 |
container_title | Ecological modelling |
container_volume | 306 |
creator | Kim, Hungsoo Nguyen, Tuyen Van Uehara, Takashi Heo, Muyoung Chon, Tae-Soo |
description | •Individual specificity was observed according to source of conflicting stimuli.•Primary affectedness quantified test organism’s positional sensitivity to stimulus.•Secondary affectedness revealed fish status, tendency toward or away from stimulus.•Predators produced stronger effects than food as initial stimulus.
Zebrafish behavior was monitored based on continuous movement tracking of individuals in response to two conflicting stimuli, food and predators. The shape parameters describing positional distribution along the x-axis (mean, standard deviation (SD) and skewness) were differentiated according to source and time order (i.e., food first or predator first) of stimuli. Behavioral states were expressed by primary (mean and SD of x-coordinates) and secondary (skewness of x-coordinates) affectedness, and were addressed by specificity of individual response to stimuli. Even after adjusting spatial location and movement range in primary affectedness, secondary affectedness still occurred owing to a residual effect of the stimulus according to asymmetry of the positional distribution (e.g., away from the predator). Predator (as initial or secondary stimulus) produced stronger affectedness than food given as initial stimulus. Even after removal of initial stimulus, it still influenced affectedness of test organisms in the subsequent phases, implying memory effect of initial stimulus. Quantification of stress based on expression of behavioral state changes is feasible and could provide insight for monitoring based on indicator organism behavior under stressful conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770270720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304380014004785</els_id><sourcerecordid>1770270720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-619ddb5bebe9840da3cdab5e2440b4e9c707a579d5ea5b4830a716b79a71b1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwG_CxSCSsnaROjlV5SpW49MTF8mMDrpK42Gkl_j2JgrjCaVa7MyPtR8g1g5QBW97tUjS-ab3FJuXA8mGbAlQnZMZKwRMBfHlKZpBBnmQlwDm5iHEHAIyXfEbUG-qgahc_6OJedc7TgMH5G9r6I7bY9dR1VFkbMEbXvdPYjxPtPTW-qxtn-mnr2kPjbmntvY1UdZbuA1rV-xAvyVmtmohXPzon28eH7fo52bw-vaxXm8TkBeuTJaus1YVGjVWZg1WZsUoXyPMcdI6VESBUISpboCp0XmagBFtqUQ2imc7mZDHV7oP_PGDsZeuiwaZRHfpDlEwMJIYODv-wZrwEkTE-WMVkNcHHGLCW--BaFb4kAznilzv5i1-O-MfDgH9IrqYkDj8fHQYZjcPOoHUBTS-td392fAMywZOa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732807312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kim, Hungsoo ; Nguyen, Tuyen Van ; Uehara, Takashi ; Heo, Muyoung ; Chon, Tae-Soo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hungsoo ; Nguyen, Tuyen Van ; Uehara, Takashi ; Heo, Muyoung ; Chon, Tae-Soo</creatorcontrib><description>•Individual specificity was observed according to source of conflicting stimuli.•Primary affectedness quantified test organism’s positional sensitivity to stimulus.•Secondary affectedness revealed fish status, tendency toward or away from stimulus.•Predators produced stronger effects than food as initial stimulus.
Zebrafish behavior was monitored based on continuous movement tracking of individuals in response to two conflicting stimuli, food and predators. The shape parameters describing positional distribution along the x-axis (mean, standard deviation (SD) and skewness) were differentiated according to source and time order (i.e., food first or predator first) of stimuli. Behavioral states were expressed by primary (mean and SD of x-coordinates) and secondary (skewness of x-coordinates) affectedness, and were addressed by specificity of individual response to stimuli. Even after adjusting spatial location and movement range in primary affectedness, secondary affectedness still occurred owing to a residual effect of the stimulus according to asymmetry of the positional distribution (e.g., away from the predator). Predator (as initial or secondary stimulus) produced stronger affectedness than food given as initial stimulus. Even after removal of initial stimulus, it still influenced affectedness of test organisms in the subsequent phases, implying memory effect of initial stimulus. Quantification of stress based on expression of behavioral state changes is feasible and could provide insight for monitoring based on indicator organism behavior under stressful conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Affectedness ; Danio rerio ; Foods ; Freshwater ; Mathematical models ; Memory ; Monitoring ; Movement ; Organisms ; Predators ; Shape parameter ; Skewness ; Stimuli ; Zebrafish</subject><ispartof>Ecological modelling, 2015-06, Vol.306, p.257-267</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-619ddb5bebe9840da3cdab5e2440b4e9c707a579d5ea5b4830a716b79a71b1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-619ddb5bebe9840da3cdab5e2440b4e9c707a579d5ea5b4830a716b79a71b1b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4173-0897 ; 0000-0002-3120-8627</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tuyen Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uehara, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Muyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chon, Tae-Soo</creatorcontrib><title>Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators</title><title>Ecological modelling</title><description>•Individual specificity was observed according to source of conflicting stimuli.•Primary affectedness quantified test organism’s positional sensitivity to stimulus.•Secondary affectedness revealed fish status, tendency toward or away from stimulus.•Predators produced stronger effects than food as initial stimulus.
Zebrafish behavior was monitored based on continuous movement tracking of individuals in response to two conflicting stimuli, food and predators. The shape parameters describing positional distribution along the x-axis (mean, standard deviation (SD) and skewness) were differentiated according to source and time order (i.e., food first or predator first) of stimuli. Behavioral states were expressed by primary (mean and SD of x-coordinates) and secondary (skewness of x-coordinates) affectedness, and were addressed by specificity of individual response to stimuli. Even after adjusting spatial location and movement range in primary affectedness, secondary affectedness still occurred owing to a residual effect of the stimulus according to asymmetry of the positional distribution (e.g., away from the predator). Predator (as initial or secondary stimulus) produced stronger affectedness than food given as initial stimulus. Even after removal of initial stimulus, it still influenced affectedness of test organisms in the subsequent phases, implying memory effect of initial stimulus. Quantification of stress based on expression of behavioral state changes is feasible and could provide insight for monitoring based on indicator organism behavior under stressful conditions.</description><subject>Affectedness</subject><subject>Danio rerio</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Shape parameter</subject><subject>Skewness</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Zebrafish</subject><issn>0304-3800</issn><issn>1872-7026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwG_CxSCSsnaROjlV5SpW49MTF8mMDrpK42Gkl_j2JgrjCaVa7MyPtR8g1g5QBW97tUjS-ab3FJuXA8mGbAlQnZMZKwRMBfHlKZpBBnmQlwDm5iHEHAIyXfEbUG-qgahc_6OJedc7TgMH5G9r6I7bY9dR1VFkbMEbXvdPYjxPtPTW-qxtn-mnr2kPjbmntvY1UdZbuA1rV-xAvyVmtmohXPzon28eH7fo52bw-vaxXm8TkBeuTJaus1YVGjVWZg1WZsUoXyPMcdI6VESBUISpboCp0XmagBFtqUQ2imc7mZDHV7oP_PGDsZeuiwaZRHfpDlEwMJIYODv-wZrwEkTE-WMVkNcHHGLCW--BaFb4kAznilzv5i1-O-MfDgH9IrqYkDj8fHQYZjcPOoHUBTS-td392fAMywZOa</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Kim, Hungsoo</creator><creator>Nguyen, Tuyen Van</creator><creator>Uehara, Takashi</creator><creator>Heo, Muyoung</creator><creator>Chon, Tae-Soo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4173-0897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-8627</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators</title><author>Kim, Hungsoo ; Nguyen, Tuyen Van ; Uehara, Takashi ; Heo, Muyoung ; Chon, Tae-Soo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-619ddb5bebe9840da3cdab5e2440b4e9c707a579d5ea5b4830a716b79a71b1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Affectedness</topic><topic>Danio rerio</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Shape parameter</topic><topic>Skewness</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Zebrafish</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tuyen Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uehara, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Muyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chon, Tae-Soo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological modelling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hungsoo</au><au>Nguyen, Tuyen Van</au><au>Uehara, Takashi</au><au>Heo, Muyoung</au><au>Chon, Tae-Soo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators</atitle><jtitle>Ecological modelling</jtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>306</volume><spage>257</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>257-267</pages><issn>0304-3800</issn><eissn>1872-7026</eissn><abstract>•Individual specificity was observed according to source of conflicting stimuli.•Primary affectedness quantified test organism’s positional sensitivity to stimulus.•Secondary affectedness revealed fish status, tendency toward or away from stimulus.•Predators produced stronger effects than food as initial stimulus.
Zebrafish behavior was monitored based on continuous movement tracking of individuals in response to two conflicting stimuli, food and predators. The shape parameters describing positional distribution along the x-axis (mean, standard deviation (SD) and skewness) were differentiated according to source and time order (i.e., food first or predator first) of stimuli. Behavioral states were expressed by primary (mean and SD of x-coordinates) and secondary (skewness of x-coordinates) affectedness, and were addressed by specificity of individual response to stimuli. Even after adjusting spatial location and movement range in primary affectedness, secondary affectedness still occurred owing to a residual effect of the stimulus according to asymmetry of the positional distribution (e.g., away from the predator). Predator (as initial or secondary stimulus) produced stronger affectedness than food given as initial stimulus. Even after removal of initial stimulus, it still influenced affectedness of test organisms in the subsequent phases, implying memory effect of initial stimulus. Quantification of stress based on expression of behavioral state changes is feasible and could provide insight for monitoring based on indicator organism behavior under stressful conditions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4173-0897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-8627</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-3800 |
ispartof | Ecological modelling, 2015-06, Vol.306, p.257-267 |
issn | 0304-3800 1872-7026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770270720 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Affectedness Danio rerio Foods Freshwater Mathematical models Memory Monitoring Movement Organisms Predators Shape parameter Skewness Stimuli Zebrafish |
title | Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A18%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zebrafish%20(Danio%20rerio)%20movement%20in%20addressing%20stress%20to%20conflicting%20stimuli,%20foods%20and%20predators&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20modelling&rft.au=Kim,%20Hungsoo&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=306&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=257-267&rft.issn=0304-3800&rft.eissn=1872-7026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770270720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732807312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0304380014004785&rfr_iscdi=true |