The Ensemble Photometric Variability of ~25,000 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Using a sample of over 25,000 spectroscopically confirmed quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we show how quasar variability in the rest-frame optical/UV regime depends on rest-frame time lag, luminosity, rest wavelength, redshift, the presence of radio and X-ray emission, and the presence of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2004-02, Vol.601 (2), p.692-714
Hauptverfasser: Vanden Berk, Daniel E, Wilhite, Brian C, Kron, Richard G, Anderson, Scott F, Brunner, Robert J, Hall, Patrick B, Ivezić, Željko, Richards, Gordon T, Schneider, Donald P, York, Donald G, Brinkmann, Jonathan V, Lamb, Don Q, Nichol, Robert C, Schlegel, David J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 714
container_issue 2
container_start_page 692
container_title The Astrophysical journal
container_volume 601
creator Vanden Berk, Daniel E
Wilhite, Brian C
Kron, Richard G
Anderson, Scott F
Brunner, Robert J
Hall, Patrick B
Ivezić, Željko
Richards, Gordon T
Schneider, Donald P
York, Donald G
Brinkmann, Jonathan V
Lamb, Don Q
Nichol, Robert C
Schlegel, David J
description Using a sample of over 25,000 spectroscopically confirmed quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we show how quasar variability in the rest-frame optical/UV regime depends on rest-frame time lag, luminosity, rest wavelength, redshift, the presence of radio and X-ray emission, and the presence of broad absorption line systems. Imaging photometry is compared with three-band spectrophotometry obtained at later epochs spanning time lags up to about 2 yr. The large sample size and wide range of parameter values allow the dependence of variability to be isolated as a function of many independent parameters. The time dependence of variability (the structure function) is well fitted by a single power law with an index gamma = 0.246 plus or minus 0.008, on timescales from days to years. There is an anticorrelation of variability amplitude with rest wavelength-e.g. quasars are about twice as variable at 1000 Aa as at 6000 Aa-and quasars are systematically bluer when brighter at all redshifts. There is a strong anticorrelation of variability with quasar luminosity-variability amplitude decreases by a factor of about 4 when luminosity increases by a factor of 100. There is also a significant positive correlation of variability amplitude with redshift, indicating evolution of the quasar population or the variability mechanism. We parameterize all of these relationships. Quasars with ROSAT All-Sky Survey X-ray detections are significantly more variable (at optical/UV wavelengths) than those without, and radio-loud quasars are marginally more variable than their radio-quiet counterparts. We find no significant difference in the variability of quasars with and without broad absorption line troughs. Currently, no models of quasar variability address more than a few of these relationships. Models involving multiple discrete events or gravitational microlensing are unlikely by themselves to account for the data. So-called accretion disk instability models are promising, but more quantitative predictions are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/380563
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17695278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1875853348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-9b084146a46dca10c27411d77c3e07d4a33d044ea7e2a20d62ba99297cd1cfa63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAgCo6jPkPciIjV3Jo0SxnHCwyozHjZhTRNnWg7rUkrdOOz2zIuBNHV4cD3n8V_ANjH6BSjhJ_RBMWcboARjmkSMRqLTTBCCLGIU_G8DXZCeB1WIuUIPC2WFk5XwZZpYeHdsmqq0jbeGfiovdOpK1zTwSqHnyQ-6VPwvtVB-wDdCjZ9dF5UegUv3ItrdAHnbx2ct_7DdrtgK9dFsHvfcwweLqeLyXU0u726mZzPIkNjSSOZooRhxjXjmdEYGSIYxpkQhlokMqYpzRBjVgtLNEEZJ6mWkkhhMmxyzekYHK3v1r56b21oVOmCsUWhV7Zqg8KJiJOYUpb09PB_KriMifgBja9C8DZXtXel9p3CSA0Vq3XFPTxYQ1fVf5vj32aoXw3fUBxhRRSXRNVZTr8AVxOCyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17695278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Ensemble Photometric Variability of ~25,000 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><creator>Vanden Berk, Daniel E ; Wilhite, Brian C ; Kron, Richard G ; Anderson, Scott F ; Brunner, Robert J ; Hall, Patrick B ; Ivezić, Željko ; Richards, Gordon T ; Schneider, Donald P ; York, Donald G ; Brinkmann, Jonathan V ; Lamb, Don Q ; Nichol, Robert C ; Schlegel, David J</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanden Berk, Daniel E ; Wilhite, Brian C ; Kron, Richard G ; Anderson, Scott F ; Brunner, Robert J ; Hall, Patrick B ; Ivezić, Željko ; Richards, Gordon T ; Schneider, Donald P ; York, Donald G ; Brinkmann, Jonathan V ; Lamb, Don Q ; Nichol, Robert C ; Schlegel, David J</creatorcontrib><description>Using a sample of over 25,000 spectroscopically confirmed quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we show how quasar variability in the rest-frame optical/UV regime depends on rest-frame time lag, luminosity, rest wavelength, redshift, the presence of radio and X-ray emission, and the presence of broad absorption line systems. Imaging photometry is compared with three-band spectrophotometry obtained at later epochs spanning time lags up to about 2 yr. The large sample size and wide range of parameter values allow the dependence of variability to be isolated as a function of many independent parameters. The time dependence of variability (the structure function) is well fitted by a single power law with an index gamma = 0.246 plus or minus 0.008, on timescales from days to years. There is an anticorrelation of variability amplitude with rest wavelength-e.g. quasars are about twice as variable at 1000 Aa as at 6000 Aa-and quasars are systematically bluer when brighter at all redshifts. There is a strong anticorrelation of variability with quasar luminosity-variability amplitude decreases by a factor of about 4 when luminosity increases by a factor of 100. There is also a significant positive correlation of variability amplitude with redshift, indicating evolution of the quasar population or the variability mechanism. We parameterize all of these relationships. Quasars with ROSAT All-Sky Survey X-ray detections are significantly more variable (at optical/UV wavelengths) than those without, and radio-loud quasars are marginally more variable than their radio-quiet counterparts. We find no significant difference in the variability of quasars with and without broad absorption line troughs. Currently, no models of quasar variability address more than a few of these relationships. Models involving multiple discrete events or gravitational microlensing are unlikely by themselves to account for the data. So-called accretion disk instability models are promising, but more quantitative predictions are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/380563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2004-02, Vol.601 (2), p.692-714</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-9b084146a46dca10c27411d77c3e07d4a33d044ea7e2a20d62ba99297cd1cfa63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-9b084146a46dca10c27411d77c3e07d4a33d044ea7e2a20d62ba99297cd1cfa63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/380563/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27607,27903,27904,53909</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/601/2/692$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanden Berk, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilhite, Brian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kron, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Scott F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunner, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Patrick B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivezić, Željko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Gordon T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Donald P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Donald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinkmann, Jonathan V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Don Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichol, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlegel, David J</creatorcontrib><title>The Ensemble Photometric Variability of ~25,000 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><description>Using a sample of over 25,000 spectroscopically confirmed quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we show how quasar variability in the rest-frame optical/UV regime depends on rest-frame time lag, luminosity, rest wavelength, redshift, the presence of radio and X-ray emission, and the presence of broad absorption line systems. Imaging photometry is compared with three-band spectrophotometry obtained at later epochs spanning time lags up to about 2 yr. The large sample size and wide range of parameter values allow the dependence of variability to be isolated as a function of many independent parameters. The time dependence of variability (the structure function) is well fitted by a single power law with an index gamma = 0.246 plus or minus 0.008, on timescales from days to years. There is an anticorrelation of variability amplitude with rest wavelength-e.g. quasars are about twice as variable at 1000 Aa as at 6000 Aa-and quasars are systematically bluer when brighter at all redshifts. There is a strong anticorrelation of variability with quasar luminosity-variability amplitude decreases by a factor of about 4 when luminosity increases by a factor of 100. There is also a significant positive correlation of variability amplitude with redshift, indicating evolution of the quasar population or the variability mechanism. We parameterize all of these relationships. Quasars with ROSAT All-Sky Survey X-ray detections are significantly more variable (at optical/UV wavelengths) than those without, and radio-loud quasars are marginally more variable than their radio-quiet counterparts. We find no significant difference in the variability of quasars with and without broad absorption line troughs. Currently, no models of quasar variability address more than a few of these relationships. Models involving multiple discrete events or gravitational microlensing are unlikely by themselves to account for the data. So-called accretion disk instability models are promising, but more quantitative predictions are needed.</description><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAgCo6jPkPciIjV3Jo0SxnHCwyozHjZhTRNnWg7rUkrdOOz2zIuBNHV4cD3n8V_ANjH6BSjhJ_RBMWcboARjmkSMRqLTTBCCLGIU_G8DXZCeB1WIuUIPC2WFk5XwZZpYeHdsmqq0jbeGfiovdOpK1zTwSqHnyQ-6VPwvtVB-wDdCjZ9dF5UegUv3ItrdAHnbx2ct_7DdrtgK9dFsHvfcwweLqeLyXU0u726mZzPIkNjSSOZooRhxjXjmdEYGSIYxpkQhlokMqYpzRBjVgtLNEEZJ6mWkkhhMmxyzekYHK3v1r56b21oVOmCsUWhV7Zqg8KJiJOYUpb09PB_KriMifgBja9C8DZXtXel9p3CSA0Vq3XFPTxYQ1fVf5vj32aoXw3fUBxhRRSXRNVZTr8AVxOCyg</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Vanden Berk, Daniel E</creator><creator>Wilhite, Brian C</creator><creator>Kron, Richard G</creator><creator>Anderson, Scott F</creator><creator>Brunner, Robert J</creator><creator>Hall, Patrick B</creator><creator>Ivezić, Željko</creator><creator>Richards, Gordon T</creator><creator>Schneider, Donald P</creator><creator>York, Donald G</creator><creator>Brinkmann, Jonathan V</creator><creator>Lamb, Don Q</creator><creator>Nichol, Robert C</creator><creator>Schlegel, David J</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>The Ensemble Photometric Variability of ~25,000 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey</title><author>Vanden Berk, Daniel E ; Wilhite, Brian C ; Kron, Richard G ; Anderson, Scott F ; Brunner, Robert J ; Hall, Patrick B ; Ivezić, Željko ; Richards, Gordon T ; Schneider, Donald P ; York, Donald G ; Brinkmann, Jonathan V ; Lamb, Don Q ; Nichol, Robert C ; Schlegel, David J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-9b084146a46dca10c27411d77c3e07d4a33d044ea7e2a20d62ba99297cd1cfa63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanden Berk, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilhite, Brian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kron, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Scott F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunner, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Patrick B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivezić, Željko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Gordon T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Donald P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Donald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinkmann, Jonathan V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Don Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichol, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlegel, David J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanden Berk, Daniel E</au><au>Wilhite, Brian C</au><au>Kron, Richard G</au><au>Anderson, Scott F</au><au>Brunner, Robert J</au><au>Hall, Patrick B</au><au>Ivezić, Željko</au><au>Richards, Gordon T</au><au>Schneider, Donald P</au><au>York, Donald G</au><au>Brinkmann, Jonathan V</au><au>Lamb, Don Q</au><au>Nichol, Robert C</au><au>Schlegel, David J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Ensemble Photometric Variability of ~25,000 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>601</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>692</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>692-714</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><abstract>Using a sample of over 25,000 spectroscopically confirmed quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we show how quasar variability in the rest-frame optical/UV regime depends on rest-frame time lag, luminosity, rest wavelength, redshift, the presence of radio and X-ray emission, and the presence of broad absorption line systems. Imaging photometry is compared with three-band spectrophotometry obtained at later epochs spanning time lags up to about 2 yr. The large sample size and wide range of parameter values allow the dependence of variability to be isolated as a function of many independent parameters. The time dependence of variability (the structure function) is well fitted by a single power law with an index gamma = 0.246 plus or minus 0.008, on timescales from days to years. There is an anticorrelation of variability amplitude with rest wavelength-e.g. quasars are about twice as variable at 1000 Aa as at 6000 Aa-and quasars are systematically bluer when brighter at all redshifts. There is a strong anticorrelation of variability with quasar luminosity-variability amplitude decreases by a factor of about 4 when luminosity increases by a factor of 100. There is also a significant positive correlation of variability amplitude with redshift, indicating evolution of the quasar population or the variability mechanism. We parameterize all of these relationships. Quasars with ROSAT All-Sky Survey X-ray detections are significantly more variable (at optical/UV wavelengths) than those without, and radio-loud quasars are marginally more variable than their radio-quiet counterparts. We find no significant difference in the variability of quasars with and without broad absorption line troughs. Currently, no models of quasar variability address more than a few of these relationships. Models involving multiple discrete events or gravitational microlensing are unlikely by themselves to account for the data. So-called accretion disk instability models are promising, but more quantitative predictions are needed.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1086/380563</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0004-637X
ispartof The Astrophysical journal, 2004-02, Vol.601 (2), p.692-714
issn 0004-637X
1538-4357
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17695278
source IOP Publishing Free Content
title The Ensemble Photometric Variability of ~25,000 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A01%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Ensemble%20Photometric%20Variability%20of%20~25,000%20Quasars%20in%20the%20Sloan%20Digital%20Sky%20Survey&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Vanden%20Berk,%20Daniel%20E&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=601&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=692&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=692-714&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/380563&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_O3W%3E1875853348%3C/proquest_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17695278&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true