Aortic curvature as a predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak
Objective Hostile infrarenal neck characteristics are associated with complications such as type Ia endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Aortic neck angulation has been identified as one such characteristic, but its association with complications has not been uniform between studies. Neck an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2016-03, Vol.63 (3), p.596-602 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 602 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 596 |
container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Schuurmann, Richte C.L., MS Ouriel, Kenneth, MD Muhs, Bart E., MD, PhD Jordan, William D., MD Ouriel, Richard L., BS Boersen, Johannes T., MS de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M., MD, PhD |
description | Objective Hostile infrarenal neck characteristics are associated with complications such as type Ia endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Aortic neck angulation has been identified as one such characteristic, but its association with complications has not been uniform between studies. Neck angulation assumes triangular oversimplification of the aortic trajectory, which may explain conflicting findings. By contrast, aortic curvature is a measurement that includes the bending rate and tortuosity and may provide better predictive value for neck complications. Methods Data were retrieved from the Heli-FX (Aptus Endosystems, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) Aortic Securement System Global Registry (ANCHOR). One cohort included patients who presented with intraoperative endoleak type Ia at the completion angiogram as the indication for EndoAnchors (Aptus Endosystems), and a second cohort comprised those without intraoperative or late type Ia endoleak (controls). The aortic trajectory was divided into six segments with potentially different influence on the stent graft performance: suprarenal, juxtarenal, and infrarenal aortic neck (−30 to −10 mm, −10 to 10 mm, and 10-30 mm from the lowest renal artery, respectively), the entire aortic neck, aneurysm sac, and terminal aorta (20 mm above the bifurcation to the bifurcation). Maximum and average curvature were automatically calculated over the six segments by proprietary custom software. Aortic curvature was compared with other standard neck characteristics, including neck length, neck diameter, maximum aneurysm sac diameter, neck thrombus and calcium thickness and circumference, suprarenal angulation, infrarenal angulation, and the neck tortuosity index. Independent risk factors for intraoperative type Ia endoleak were identified using backwards stepwise logistic regression. For the variables in the final regression model, suitable cutoff values in relation to the prediction of acute type Ia endoleak were defined with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results The analysis included 64 patients with intraoperative type Ia endoleak and 79 controls. Logistic regression identified only aortic neck calcification and aortic curvature, expressed over the juxtarenal aortic neck, the aneurysm sac, and the terminal aorta, as independent predictors of intraoperative type Ia endoleak. Conclusions Together with aortic neck calcification, aortic curvature appears to be the best predictor of intraoperative t |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.110 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768564663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521415019448</els_id><sourcerecordid>1768564663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-a6aef3fddc4d47e6152dd1fcfa2519202f72b02ac62cd51d8d76e297ef34e8ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAURS0EaqelP4ANypJNgp_HH4mQkErVQqVKLIC15drPktNMHGxnpPn3eDQtCxas3uaeK71zCXkHtAMK8uPYjfvcMQqio30HQF-RDdBBtbKnw2uyoYpDKxjwc3KR80gpgOjVGTlnUg2SDXRDvlzHVIJt7Jr2pqwJG5Mb0ywJXbAlpib6JswlmbhgMiXssSmHBZt70-Ds4oTm6S15482U8er5XpJfd7c_b761D9-_3t9cP7SWCyitkQb91jtnueMKJQjmHHjrDRMwMMq8Yo-UGSuZdQJc75RENqgKcey9316SD6feJcXfK-aidyFbnCYzY1yzBiV7IbmU2xqFU9SmmHNCr5cUdiYdNFB9VKdHXdXpozpNe13VVeb9c_36uEP3l3hxVQOfTgGsT-4DJp1twNlWUwlt0S6G_9Z__oe2U5iDNdMTHjCPcU1ztadBZ6ap_nHc7jgdCAoD5_32D_eilFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768564663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aortic curvature as a predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Schuurmann, Richte C.L., MS ; Ouriel, Kenneth, MD ; Muhs, Bart E., MD, PhD ; Jordan, William D., MD ; Ouriel, Richard L., BS ; Boersen, Johannes T., MS ; de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Schuurmann, Richte C.L., MS ; Ouriel, Kenneth, MD ; Muhs, Bart E., MD, PhD ; Jordan, William D., MD ; Ouriel, Richard L., BS ; Boersen, Johannes T., MS ; de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Hostile infrarenal neck characteristics are associated with complications such as type Ia endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Aortic neck angulation has been identified as one such characteristic, but its association with complications has not been uniform between studies. Neck angulation assumes triangular oversimplification of the aortic trajectory, which may explain conflicting findings. By contrast, aortic curvature is a measurement that includes the bending rate and tortuosity and may provide better predictive value for neck complications. Methods Data were retrieved from the Heli-FX (Aptus Endosystems, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) Aortic Securement System Global Registry (ANCHOR). One cohort included patients who presented with intraoperative endoleak type Ia at the completion angiogram as the indication for EndoAnchors (Aptus Endosystems), and a second cohort comprised those without intraoperative or late type Ia endoleak (controls). The aortic trajectory was divided into six segments with potentially different influence on the stent graft performance: suprarenal, juxtarenal, and infrarenal aortic neck (−30 to −10 mm, −10 to 10 mm, and 10-30 mm from the lowest renal artery, respectively), the entire aortic neck, aneurysm sac, and terminal aorta (20 mm above the bifurcation to the bifurcation). Maximum and average curvature were automatically calculated over the six segments by proprietary custom software. Aortic curvature was compared with other standard neck characteristics, including neck length, neck diameter, maximum aneurysm sac diameter, neck thrombus and calcium thickness and circumference, suprarenal angulation, infrarenal angulation, and the neck tortuosity index. Independent risk factors for intraoperative type Ia endoleak were identified using backwards stepwise logistic regression. For the variables in the final regression model, suitable cutoff values in relation to the prediction of acute type Ia endoleak were defined with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results The analysis included 64 patients with intraoperative type Ia endoleak and 79 controls. Logistic regression identified only aortic neck calcification and aortic curvature, expressed over the juxtarenal aortic neck, the aneurysm sac, and the terminal aorta, as independent predictors of intraoperative type Ia endoleak. Conclusions Together with aortic neck calcification, aortic curvature appears to be the best predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak, as expressed within the juxtarenal aortic neck, the aneurysm sac, and the terminal aorta. Aortic neck angulation was not a predictor for acute failure. Aortic curvature may provide a better anatomic characteristic to define patients at risk for early complications after endovascular aneurysm repair.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26796290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alabama ; Aortic Aneurysm - complications ; Aortic Aneurysm - diagnosis ; Aortic Aneurysm - surgery ; Aortography - methods ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Case-Control Studies ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Connecticut ; Endoleak - diagnosis ; Endoleak - etiology ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Multivariate Analysis ; Netherlands ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prosthesis Design ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Registries ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Calcification - complications ; Vascular Calcification - diagnosis ; Vascular Calcification - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2016-03, Vol.63 (3), p.596-602</ispartof><rights>Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2016 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-a6aef3fddc4d47e6152dd1fcfa2519202f72b02ac62cd51d8d76e297ef34e8ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-a6aef3fddc4d47e6152dd1fcfa2519202f72b02ac62cd51d8d76e297ef34e8ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521415019448$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26796290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schuurmann, Richte C.L., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Kenneth, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhs, Bart E., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, William D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Richard L., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersen, Johannes T., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Aortic curvature as a predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective Hostile infrarenal neck characteristics are associated with complications such as type Ia endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Aortic neck angulation has been identified as one such characteristic, but its association with complications has not been uniform between studies. Neck angulation assumes triangular oversimplification of the aortic trajectory, which may explain conflicting findings. By contrast, aortic curvature is a measurement that includes the bending rate and tortuosity and may provide better predictive value for neck complications. Methods Data were retrieved from the Heli-FX (Aptus Endosystems, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) Aortic Securement System Global Registry (ANCHOR). One cohort included patients who presented with intraoperative endoleak type Ia at the completion angiogram as the indication for EndoAnchors (Aptus Endosystems), and a second cohort comprised those without intraoperative or late type Ia endoleak (controls). The aortic trajectory was divided into six segments with potentially different influence on the stent graft performance: suprarenal, juxtarenal, and infrarenal aortic neck (−30 to −10 mm, −10 to 10 mm, and 10-30 mm from the lowest renal artery, respectively), the entire aortic neck, aneurysm sac, and terminal aorta (20 mm above the bifurcation to the bifurcation). Maximum and average curvature were automatically calculated over the six segments by proprietary custom software. Aortic curvature was compared with other standard neck characteristics, including neck length, neck diameter, maximum aneurysm sac diameter, neck thrombus and calcium thickness and circumference, suprarenal angulation, infrarenal angulation, and the neck tortuosity index. Independent risk factors for intraoperative type Ia endoleak were identified using backwards stepwise logistic regression. For the variables in the final regression model, suitable cutoff values in relation to the prediction of acute type Ia endoleak were defined with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results The analysis included 64 patients with intraoperative type Ia endoleak and 79 controls. Logistic regression identified only aortic neck calcification and aortic curvature, expressed over the juxtarenal aortic neck, the aneurysm sac, and the terminal aorta, as independent predictors of intraoperative type Ia endoleak. Conclusions Together with aortic neck calcification, aortic curvature appears to be the best predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak, as expressed within the juxtarenal aortic neck, the aneurysm sac, and the terminal aorta. Aortic neck angulation was not a predictor for acute failure. Aortic curvature may provide a better anatomic characteristic to define patients at risk for early complications after endovascular aneurysm repair.</description><subject>Alabama</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm - complications</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm - surgery</subject><subject>Aortography - methods</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Connecticut</subject><subject>Endoleak - diagnosis</subject><subject>Endoleak - etiology</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Calcification - complications</subject><subject>Vascular Calcification - diagnosis</subject><subject>Vascular Calcification - surgery</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAURS0EaqelP4ANypJNgp_HH4mQkErVQqVKLIC15drPktNMHGxnpPn3eDQtCxas3uaeK71zCXkHtAMK8uPYjfvcMQqio30HQF-RDdBBtbKnw2uyoYpDKxjwc3KR80gpgOjVGTlnUg2SDXRDvlzHVIJt7Jr2pqwJG5Mb0ywJXbAlpib6JswlmbhgMiXssSmHBZt70-Ds4oTm6S15482U8er5XpJfd7c_b761D9-_3t9cP7SWCyitkQb91jtnueMKJQjmHHjrDRMwMMq8Yo-UGSuZdQJc75RENqgKcey9316SD6feJcXfK-aidyFbnCYzY1yzBiV7IbmU2xqFU9SmmHNCr5cUdiYdNFB9VKdHXdXpozpNe13VVeb9c_36uEP3l3hxVQOfTgGsT-4DJp1twNlWUwlt0S6G_9Z__oe2U5iDNdMTHjCPcU1ztadBZ6ap_nHc7jgdCAoD5_32D_eilFU</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Schuurmann, Richte C.L., MS</creator><creator>Ouriel, Kenneth, MD</creator><creator>Muhs, Bart E., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Jordan, William D., MD</creator><creator>Ouriel, Richard L., BS</creator><creator>Boersen, Johannes T., MS</creator><creator>de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Aortic curvature as a predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak</title><author>Schuurmann, Richte C.L., MS ; Ouriel, Kenneth, MD ; Muhs, Bart E., MD, PhD ; Jordan, William D., MD ; Ouriel, Richard L., BS ; Boersen, Johannes T., MS ; de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-a6aef3fddc4d47e6152dd1fcfa2519202f72b02ac62cd51d8d76e297ef34e8ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alabama</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm - complications</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm - surgery</topic><topic>Aortography - methods</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Connecticut</topic><topic>Endoleak - diagnosis</topic><topic>Endoleak - etiology</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Calcification - complications</topic><topic>Vascular Calcification - diagnosis</topic><topic>Vascular Calcification - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schuurmann, Richte C.L., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Kenneth, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhs, Bart E., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, William D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Richard L., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersen, Johannes T., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schuurmann, Richte C.L., MS</au><au>Ouriel, Kenneth, MD</au><au>Muhs, Bart E., MD, PhD</au><au>Jordan, William D., MD</au><au>Ouriel, Richard L., BS</au><au>Boersen, Johannes T., MS</au><au>de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aortic curvature as a predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>596</spage><epage>602</epage><pages>596-602</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Objective Hostile infrarenal neck characteristics are associated with complications such as type Ia endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Aortic neck angulation has been identified as one such characteristic, but its association with complications has not been uniform between studies. Neck angulation assumes triangular oversimplification of the aortic trajectory, which may explain conflicting findings. By contrast, aortic curvature is a measurement that includes the bending rate and tortuosity and may provide better predictive value for neck complications. Methods Data were retrieved from the Heli-FX (Aptus Endosystems, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) Aortic Securement System Global Registry (ANCHOR). One cohort included patients who presented with intraoperative endoleak type Ia at the completion angiogram as the indication for EndoAnchors (Aptus Endosystems), and a second cohort comprised those without intraoperative or late type Ia endoleak (controls). The aortic trajectory was divided into six segments with potentially different influence on the stent graft performance: suprarenal, juxtarenal, and infrarenal aortic neck (−30 to −10 mm, −10 to 10 mm, and 10-30 mm from the lowest renal artery, respectively), the entire aortic neck, aneurysm sac, and terminal aorta (20 mm above the bifurcation to the bifurcation). Maximum and average curvature were automatically calculated over the six segments by proprietary custom software. Aortic curvature was compared with other standard neck characteristics, including neck length, neck diameter, maximum aneurysm sac diameter, neck thrombus and calcium thickness and circumference, suprarenal angulation, infrarenal angulation, and the neck tortuosity index. Independent risk factors for intraoperative type Ia endoleak were identified using backwards stepwise logistic regression. For the variables in the final regression model, suitable cutoff values in relation to the prediction of acute type Ia endoleak were defined with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results The analysis included 64 patients with intraoperative type Ia endoleak and 79 controls. Logistic regression identified only aortic neck calcification and aortic curvature, expressed over the juxtarenal aortic neck, the aneurysm sac, and the terminal aorta, as independent predictors of intraoperative type Ia endoleak. Conclusions Together with aortic neck calcification, aortic curvature appears to be the best predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak, as expressed within the juxtarenal aortic neck, the aneurysm sac, and the terminal aorta. Aortic neck angulation was not a predictor for acute failure. Aortic curvature may provide a better anatomic characteristic to define patients at risk for early complications after endovascular aneurysm repair.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26796290</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.110</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2016-03, Vol.63 (3), p.596-602 |
issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768564663 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Alabama Aortic Aneurysm - complications Aortic Aneurysm - diagnosis Aortic Aneurysm - surgery Aortography - methods Blood Vessel Prosthesis Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation Case-Control Studies Chi-Square Distribution Connecticut Endoleak - diagnosis Endoleak - etiology Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation Humans Logistic Models Multivariate Analysis Netherlands Predictive Value of Tests Prosthesis Design Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Registries Risk Factors Stents Surgery Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome Vascular Calcification - complications Vascular Calcification - diagnosis Vascular Calcification - surgery |
title | Aortic curvature as a predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A10%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aortic%20curvature%20as%20a%20predictor%20of%20intraoperative%20type%20Ia%20endoleak&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Schuurmann,%20Richte%20C.L.,%20MS&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=596&rft.epage=602&rft.pages=596-602&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1768564663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768564663&rft_id=info:pmid/26796290&rft_els_id=S0741521415019448&rfr_iscdi=true |